Content
Activity
03/26/2025
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/26/2025 04:55 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/26/2025 04:25 PM - Status changed from new to in development
- Developers set to Kabiru Mwenja
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 03/26/2025 01:47 PM - Status changed from new to confirmed
- Module set to Modules and project features / Notification center
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 03/26/2025 12:44 PM -
Comment added
Hi Markus,
we discussed this internally and came up with the decision that file attachment links will continue to open i...
- Status changed from new to rejected
- % Complete set to 100%
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/26/2025 10:54 AM - Subject changed from Not able to save WP reminder if date/time aren't manually changed to Not able to save WP reminder if date/time aren't manually changed on Safari Browser
- Bug found in version set to 15.4.x
-
created by
Vanessa Spielau on 03/26/2025 10:48 AM -
updated by
Marc Alcobé on 03/26/2025 10:06 AM -
Comment added
Hi Wieland Lindenthal,
Thanks for the clarification. Then it is similar to the reminder notifications, we can display th...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/26/2025 08:13 AM - Status changed from specified to in development
- Assignee changed from Wieland Lindenthal to Kabiru Mwenja
- Developers set to Kabiru Mwenja
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 03/26/2025 08:05 AM - The changes were retracted.
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/26/2025 08:00 AM - Description changed (Details)
- Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Kabiru Mwenja)
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 03/26/2025 08:00 AM - Assignee deleted (
Parimal Satyal)
- Assignee deleted (
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/26/2025 08:00 AM - Comment added
03/25/2025
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 03/25/2025 06:07 PM -
Comment added
Niels Lindenthal Did you reply to the correct work package here? It is not clear with what we shall go ahead.
Niels Lind...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Niels Lindenthal on 03/25/2025 06:05 PM -
Comment added
Hi Wieland Lindenthal,
please go ahead.
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 03/25/2025 05:56 PM -
Comment added
Team, I've added another small bit to the permissions/visibility bit. Also something that came up whislt writing the blo...
- Acceptance criteria changed (Details)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 03/25/2025 05:55 PM -
Comment added
Marc Alcobé Most of what you can do on the Activity tab you can already do with the current API: You can add normal comm...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 03/25/2025 05:43 PM -
Comment added
Niels Lindenthal FYI: Ideally the Communicator team would get some time this year to do this. I simply moved it out of ...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 03/25/2025 05:12 PM -
Comment added
Bruno Pagno Kabiru Mwenja I moved a couple of "rejected" child IMPLMEMENTATION work packages from the original FEATURE ...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 03/25/2025 05:07 PM - Status changed from rejected to in specification
- Parent changed from Introduce internal comments to Extract Comments from Journals
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 03/25/2025 05:07 PM - Status changed from rejected to in specification
- Parent changed from Introduce internal comments to Extract Comments from Journals
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 03/25/2025 04:04 PM -
Comment added
Moved translation considerations to the bottom of the specs and cleaned up Figma mockups so we only the most updated des...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Marc Alcobé on 03/25/2025 03:25 PM -
Comment added
Hi Wieland Lindenthal,
The comments with restricted visibility also need an API? I thought as being part of the activity...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 03/25/2025 01:57 PM -
Comment added
Updated automatically by changing values within child work package STC-289
- Scheduling mode set to Automatic
-
Comment added
-
created by
Wieland Lindenthal on 03/25/2025 01:57 PM -
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 03/25/2025 01:54 PM -
Comment added
The original contributors are hard to get hold off. Apparently they moved on.
- Description changed (Details)
- Status changed from new to rejected
- % Complete set to 100%
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 03/25/2025 01:35 PM -
Comment added
I set this BUG to rejected. I think that the expectation statement is not up to date anymore with what we believe the pr...
- Status changed from confirmed to rejected
- % Complete set to 100%
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 03/25/2025 01:31 PM -
Comment added
Hey Niels Lindenthal, I propose to consider this EPIC for one of the next releases. We have 3 features in OpenProject th...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 03/25/2025 01:13 PM - Parent set to Add API for recent Communicator features (Emoji, Reminders, Internal Comments)
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 03/25/2025 01:13 PM - Parent changed from Introduce internal comments to Add API for recent Communicator features (Emoji, Reminders, Internal Comments)
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 03/25/2025 01:12 PM - Parent set to Add API for recent Communicator features (Emoji, Reminders, Internal Comments)
-
created by
Wieland Lindenthal on 03/25/2025 01:08 PM -
Comment added
Automatisch durch die Änderungen in Unteraufgabe STC-51 aktualisiert
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 03/25/2025 12:48 PM - Status changed from rejected to in specification
- Parent changed from Introduce internal comments to Extract Comments from Journals
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 03/25/2025 12:46 PM -
Comment added
If we do the extraction from comments from journals, I guess this IMPLEMENTATION chunk still makes sense.
- Status changed from rejected to in specification
- Parent changed from Introduce internal comments to Extract Comments from Journals
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 03/25/2025 12:44 PM -
Comment added
Automatisch durch die Änderungen in Unteraufgabe STC-253 aktualisiert
- Scheduling mode set to Automatic
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 03/25/2025 12:44 PM - Status changed from rejected to in specification
- Parent changed from Introduce internal comments to Extract Comments from Journals
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/25/2025 12:01 PM - Status changed from new to closed
- % Complete set to 100%
-
created by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/25/2025 12:00 PM -
updated by
GitHub on 03/25/2025 11:26 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/25/2025 11:25 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/25/2025 11:24 AM - Comment added
-
created by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/25/2025 11:08 AM -
updated by
Ivana Šugić on 03/25/2025 11:05 AM -
Comment added
Marking this as tested as all acceptance criteria have been verified. ✅
Tested on:
Ubuntu 24.04.2 LTS
Chrome 133.0.6943...
- Status changed from merged to tested
- % Complete set to 100%
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 03/25/2025 10:29 AM - Description changed (Details)
- File Edited_comment.png added as attachment
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 03/25/2025 09:35 AM - Status changed from needs clarification to decided
- % Complete set to 100%
- Decision set to Yes, acceptable for 15.5.
03/24/2025
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 03/24/2025 10:16 PM -
Comment added
Parimal Satyal Ok, makes sense. I got offrailed as Bruno Pagno apparently did look somewhere else for specs.
-
Comment added
-
created by
Parimal Satyal on 03/24/2025 05:57 PM -
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 03/24/2025 05:53 PM -
Comment added
Hi Wieland Lindenthal. Sure, normally I use the Mockups custom field for this, but I think it might be too low and some ...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 03/24/2025 05:48 PM -
Comment added
Parimal Satyal FYI: I have added the link to the Figma design for Enterprise Professional banner from above to the FEATU...
- Description changed (Details)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 03/24/2025 04:32 PM -
Comment added
Hi Wieland Lindenthal,
I agree. It's definitely something to keep in mind if/when we introduce other private elements, o...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 03/24/2025 04:16 PM -
Comment added
Hi Markus,
thanks for your report.
The project in which you entered the bug is sort of correct, but best is if you file ...
- Description changed (Details)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 03/24/2025 01:26 PM - The changes were retracted.
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 03/24/2025 01:00 PM -
Comment added
Parimal Satyal That one is tricky.
TLDR: For 15.5 I can live with leaking the "last updated at" info.
I wonder how we go...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 03/24/2025 11:40 AM - Description changed (Details)
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 03/24/2025 11:32 AM - Description changed (Details)
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 03/24/2025 11:05 AM -
Comment added
Thanks, Kabiru Mwenja. This is indeed more elegant, let's go with the smaller version.
- Status changed from needs clarification to decided
- % Complete set to 100%
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 03/24/2025 11:03 AM - Status changed from needs clarification to decided
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 03/24/2025 11:02 AM -
created by
Parimal Satyal on 03/24/2025 10:45 AM -
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/24/2025 10:18 AM - Status changed from needs clarification to resolved
- % Complete set to 100%
- Decision set to For 15.5: An @mention will turn into plain text if 'Restrict visibility' checked and the user in question doesn't have the necessary permissions. Unchecking it will not restore the @mention.
- Involved people set to Wieland Lindenthal, Parimal Satyal, Bruno Pagno
03/22/2025
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/22/2025 09:59 AM - Comment added
03/21/2025
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/21/2025 03:03 PM -
Comment added
Agree Parimal Satyal - the "small version" is enabled via the RVC feature flag so you can already see this on https://qa...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 03/21/2025 02:41 PM -
Comment added
Kabiru Mwenja how does this task work? Do we need to kickoff documentation somehow or create a placeholder for it?
This ...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/21/2025 02:40 PM - Assignee set to Kabiru Mwenja
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 03/21/2025 02:38 PM -
Comment added
Hi Kabiru Mwenja. This is also one of those things that we should perhaps test in real life, but I also prefer the small...
-
Comment added
-
Implementation STC-204: Define Quoting criteria for work package comments with restricted visibilityupdated by
GitHub on 03/21/2025 02:15 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18388 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/21/2025 02:15 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18360 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
Implementation STC-204: Define Quoting criteria for work package comments with restricted visibilityupdated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/21/2025 01:53 PM - Status changed from needs review to closed
- % Complete set to 100%
-
Implementation STC-204: Define Quoting criteria for work package comments with restricted visibilityupdated by
GitHub on 03/21/2025 01:51 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/21/2025 01:49 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/21/2025 11:57 AM - Description changed (Details)
- Status changed from specified to in development
- Assignee set to Kabiru Mwenja
- Developers set to Kabiru Mwenja
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/21/2025 11:51 AM - Status changed from needs review to closed
- Assignee deleted (
Bruno Pagno) - % Complete set to 100%
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/21/2025 11:45 AM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18332 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/21/2025 11:45 AM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18302 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/21/2025 11:45 AM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18262 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/21/2025 11:45 AM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18262 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/21/2025 11:45 AM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18262 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/21/2025 11:45 AM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18217 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/21/2025 11:45 AM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18144 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/21/2025 11:45 AM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18144 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/21/2025 11:45 AM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18144 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/21/2025 11:45 AM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18144 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/21/2025 11:45 AM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18131 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/21/2025 11:45 AM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18095 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/21/2025 11:45 AM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18095 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/21/2025 11:45 AM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18091 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/21/2025 11:45 AM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18091 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/21/2025 11:45 AM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18091 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/21/2025 11:45 AM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18091 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/21/2025 11:45 AM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18091 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/21/2025 11:22 AM - Status changed from new to needs clarification
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 03/21/2025 11:19 AM - Status changed from needs clarification to decided
- Decision set to Change the attachments container from the work package to the journal (comment) so that they are seen as inline
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/21/2025 11:17 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/21/2025 11:17 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/21/2025 11:17 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/21/2025 11:17 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/21/2025 11:17 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/21/2025 10:07 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
Marc Alcobé on 03/21/2025 09:53 AM -
Comment added
Hi Bruno Pagno and Wieland Lindenthal,
I'm sorry to hear that. From a mobile perspective, I must insist on this one agai...
-
Comment added
-
Implementation STC-204: Define Quoting criteria for work package comments with restricted visibilityupdated by
GitHub on 03/21/2025 09:43 AM - Comment added
-
Implementation STC-204: Define Quoting criteria for work package comments with restricted visibilityupdated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/21/2025 09:38 AM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Kabiru Mwenja)
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 03/21/2025 09:26 AM - Description changed (Details)
- Status changed from in specification to specified
- Version set to 15.5.0
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 03/21/2025 09:26 AM - Description changed (Details)
- Status changed from specified to in development
- Assignee set to Bruno Pagno
- Version set to 15.5.0
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 03/21/2025 09:25 AM -
Comment added
This is a duplicate of STC-277. We decided to make it a feature instead of an implementation chunk.
- Status changed from in specification to rejected
- % Complete set to 100%
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 03/21/2025 09:20 AM - Version set to 15.5.0
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 03/21/2025 09:18 AM - Version changed from 15.5.0 to Wish List
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 03/21/2025 09:18 AM - Version changed from 15.5.0 to Wish List
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 03/21/2025 09:15 AM -
Comment added
We have limited capacity for 15.5 and will not make it. Marc Alcobé
Wieland Lindenthal we need to replan this one.
- Version changed from 15.5.0 to Wish List
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 03/21/2025 09:14 AM -
Comment added
We have limited capacity for 15.5, so I'm putting this one to wish list. We need to replan this Wieland Lindenthal
- Version changed from 15.5.0 to Wish List
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Niels Lindenthal on 03/21/2025 09:07 AM -
Comment added
Rince wind wrote:
Just throwing this out there, IMO this would be the right place to use AI to autofill correct custom ...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/21/2025 08:35 AM - Description changed (Details)
-
updated by
Rince wind on 03/21/2025 08:33 AM -
Comment added
Just throwing this out there, IMO this would be the right place to use AI to autofill correct custom field values etc.
-
Comment added
03/20/2025
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/20/2025 05:01 PM -
Comment added
Parimal Satyal wrote:
Thanks, Kabiru Mwenja. Let's go ahead and used display-brown-borderColor-emphasis for the border,...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 03/20/2025 03:01 PM - Status changed from new to resolved
- % Complete set to 100%
-
updated by
Markus K. on 03/20/2025 02:21 PM -
Comment added
Cécile Guiot Due to little shirt-size and a very similar small fix was done in the latest release () I want to ask you f...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 03/20/2025 01:44 PM - Description changed (Details)
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 03/20/2025 01:37 PM -
Comment added
Yes. It looks good to me. I added in the relations the open point for extracting comments as there's some extra info the...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 03/20/2025 01:35 PM -
Comment added
As we created a code maintenance, I assume we can consider this open point closed and continue discussions directly on t...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 03/20/2025 01:26 PM -
Comment added
Kabiru Mwenja Bruno Pagno May I ask you to check the description and correct and extend it?
-
Comment added
-
created by
Wieland Lindenthal on 03/20/2025 01:22 PM -
Comment added
Unfortunately the size of this CODE MAINTENANCE is too big for version 15.5. And we need to ship STC-1 in 15.5. So we ne...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 03/20/2025 11:49 AM -
Comment added
Hi team, as promised, here's a quick update on the Enterprise banners after a chat with Marc and Niels:
The the team i...
- Mockups set to https://www.figma.com/design/w0YoqQ5v0JGNT5NS5NZJZq/Comments-with-restricted-visibility?node-id=395-12018
-
Comment added
-
Implementation STC-204: Define Quoting criteria for work package comments with restricted visibilityupdated by
GitHub on 03/20/2025 11:17 AM - Comment added
-
created by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/20/2025 10:21 AM -
created by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/20/2025 10:20 AM -
created by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/20/2025 10:19 AM -
created by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/20/2025 10:18 AM -
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 03/20/2025 10:17 AM - Subject changed from Introduce inline attachments for work package comments to Don't show work package comment inline attachments in Files tab
- Description changed (Details)
- Status changed from in specification to specified
-
created by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/20/2025 10:16 AM -
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 03/20/2025 10:11 AM -
Comment added
Thanks, Kabiru Mwenja. Let's go ahead and used display-brown-borderColor-emphasis for the border, as discussed earlier t...
- Description changed (Details)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/20/2025 09:26 AM -
Comment added
Arising Feature:
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/20/2025 09:25 AM -
Comment added
Discussions from meeting with Bruno Pagno Wieland Lindenthal - most reachable option remains changing the Attachments co...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/20/2025 09:23 AM -
Comment added
Hi Wieland Lindenthal , please review the specs of this feature arising from the attachments conversation in STC-258
wit...
- Description changed (Details)
- Status changed from new to in specification
- Assignee set to Wieland Lindenthal
- Version set to 15.5.0
-
Comment added
-
created by
Bruno Pagno on 03/20/2025 09:12 AM -
updated by
GitHub on 03/20/2025 08:45 AM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18370 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 03/20/2025 08:16 AM - Status changed from needs review to merged
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/20/2025 08:16 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/20/2025 07:40 AM -
Comment added
Sure Parimal Satyal - colors updated in the preview. 👍
- Assignee changed from Kabiru Mwenja to Parimal Satyal
-
Comment added
Also available in: Atom