Content
Activity
01/28/2025
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 01/28/2025 07:55 PM -
Comment added
Yes Edit Notes allows you to edit everyone's notes.
I find the naming "Moderate comments" confusing, as if you were to a...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 01/28/2025 06:33 PM -
Comment added
Hi Bruno Pagno,
The current naming scheme is admittedly confusing (thus this feature to change it).
From what I understa...
-
Comment added
-
created by
Parimal Satyal on 01/28/2025 06:18 PM -
created by
Parimal Satyal on 01/28/2025 06:18 PM -
Comment added
Hi team,
Thoughts? Wieland Lindenthal Kabiru Mwenja Bruno Pagno
Cheers
Parimal
-
Comment added
-
created by
Parimal Satyal on 01/28/2025 06:17 PM -
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 01/28/2025 06:15 PM -
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 01/28/2025 05:39 PM -
Comment added
Parimal Satyal I am a bit confused about the wording of the "Moderate comments" on the description.
Do we want to rename...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 01/28/2025 05:22 PM -
Comment added
Kabiru Mwenja you are absolutely correct. I'll review the PR and update it.
-
Comment added
-
Bug STC-141: [Regression] Missing "Commit Message" Comments in Work Packages after upgrade to 15.0.1updated by
GitHub on 01/28/2025 05:15 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#17594 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
Bug STC-141: [Regression] Missing "Commit Message" Comments in Work Packages after upgrade to 15.0.1updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 01/28/2025 04:31 PM - Status changed from review approved to merged
- Assignee deleted (
Kabiru Mwenja)
-
Bug STC-141: [Regression] Missing "Commit Message" Comments in Work Packages after upgrade to 15.0.1updated by
GitHub on 01/28/2025 04:31 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 01/28/2025 04:05 PM -
Comment added
Hi Bruno Pagno - I think we're missing the following ACs
Add the following guideline text to "Moderate comments":
"Cau...
- Status changed from needs review to review failed
-
Comment added
-
created by
Kabiru Mwenja on 01/28/2025 03:12 PM -
created by
Kabiru Mwenja on 01/28/2025 03:09 PM -
created by
Kabiru Mwenja on 01/28/2025 03:08 PM -
created by
Kabiru Mwenja on 01/28/2025 03:05 PM -
created by
Kabiru Mwenja on 01/28/2025 03:01 PM -
created by
Kabiru Mwenja on 01/28/2025 02:58 PM -
Implementation STC-204: Define Quoting criteria for work package comments with restricted visibilitycreated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 01/28/2025 02:54 PM -
created by
Kabiru Mwenja on 01/28/2025 02:51 PM -
created by
Kabiru Mwenja on 01/28/2025 02:51 PM -
created by
Kabiru Mwenja on 01/28/2025 02:45 PM -
created by
Kabiru Mwenja on 01/28/2025 02:44 PM -
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 01/28/2025 02:39 PM - Description changed (Details)
- Version set to 15.4.0
- Requires doc change changed from No to Yes
-
created by
Bruno Pagno on 01/28/2025 02:38 PM -
updated by
Gábor Alexovics on 01/28/2025 01:55 PM -
Comment added
Hi,
I don't know if these issues are within the scope of this epic, but, I tried to create WPs by email using the curren...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 01/28/2025 01:10 PM -
Comment added
Kabiru Mwenja i will take a look, it doesn't hurt :)
- Status changed from merged to in test
- Assignee set to Cécile Guiot
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 01/28/2025 11:59 AM -
Comment added
We've updated the specs and out of scope after a stream meeting:
Specs related to the mobile implemenation will be add...
-
Comment added
-
Bug STC-141: [Regression] Missing "Commit Message" Comments in Work Packages after upgrade to 15.0.1updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 01/28/2025 11:47 AM - Assignee changed from Jonas Jabari to Kabiru Mwenja
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/28/2025 11:45 AM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#17282 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 01/28/2025 11:18 AM -
Comment added
Hi Cécile Guiot - follow up from daily. Do you reckon it's worth doing smoke tests on the activity tab? The feature flag...
- Type changed from Implementation to Code maintenance
- Status changed from in review to merged
- Assignee deleted (
Kabiru Mwenja) - Version set to 15.3.0
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/28/2025 11:17 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 01/28/2025 10:12 AM - Status changed from needs review to review failed
- Assignee deleted (
Henriette Darge)
01/27/2025
-
created by
Niels Lindenthal on 01/27/2025 08:02 PM -
Comment added
Hi Wieland Lindenthal and Parimal Satyal,
Can we make the comment field wider? I think we are loosing too much space lef...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 01/27/2025 05:55 PM - Status changed from in review to needs review
- Assignee changed from Kabiru Mwenja to Henriette Darge
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 01/27/2025 05:44 PM - Status changed from needs review to in review
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 01/27/2025 05:24 PM -
Comment added
@Jonas Jabari I'm afraid there's a flicker on set anchor UX bug introduce by this fix - you can reproduce this by clicki...
- File flicker-on-set-anchor.gif added as attachment
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 01/27/2025 03:58 PM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Bruno Pagno)
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/27/2025 03:58 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/27/2025 03:57 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/27/2025 03:08 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/27/2025 03:04 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 01/27/2025 12:57 PM - Description changed (Details)
-
updated by
Jonas Jabari on 01/27/2025 12:41 PM -
Comment added
From my end, there is nothing left to do :)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 01/27/2025 12:04 PM - Status changed from confirmed to in development
- Assignee set to Bruno Pagno
- Accountable set to Bruno Pagno
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 01/27/2025 11:55 AM - Status changed from needs review to in review
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 01/27/2025 11:13 AM -
Comment added
I suppose we now have some data on how many people switched the order to 'Newest on top'? I'm quite curious 😅
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 01/27/2025 10:50 AM -
Comment added
Hi @Jonas Jabari Kabiru Mwenja
Is there anything left to do here? If yes, we have to change the version, otherwise we c...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 01/27/2025 10:47 AM -
Comment added
Moving to 15.3.0 as 15.2 is released
- Version changed from 15.2.0 to 15.3.0
-
Comment added
01/25/2025
-
updated by
Jonas Jabari on 01/25/2025 06:34 PM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee changed from Jonas Jabari to Kabiru Mwenja
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/25/2025 06:33 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Jonas Jabari on 01/25/2025 05:17 PM - Description changed (Details)
- Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee changed from Jonas Jabari to Kabiru Mwenja
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/25/2025 05:14 PM - Comment added
-
created by
Kabiru Mwenja on 01/25/2025 07:50 AM -
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 01/25/2025 07:12 AM - Subject changed from Amend work package comment href from `#activity-<journal-sequence>` to `#comment-<journal-id>`
to Amend work package comment href from `#activity-<journal-sequence>` to `#comment-<journal-id>` with backwards compatibility for old links - File
Screenshot_2025-01-24_at_12.24.38_PM.pngremoved as attachment
- Subject changed from Amend work package comment href from `#activity-<journal-sequence>` to `#comment-<journal-id>`
01/24/2025
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 01/24/2025 05:42 PM - Subject changed from Amend work package comment "copy link" id from `#activity-<journal-sequence>` to `#comment-<journal-id>`
to Amend work package comment href from `#activity-<journal-sequence>` to `#comment-<journal-id>`
- Subject changed from Amend work package comment "copy link" id from `#activity-<journal-sequence>` to `#comment-<journal-id>`
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 01/24/2025 05:39 PM -
Comment added
Kabiru Mwenja** Yes** to moving the href to the date.
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 01/24/2025 05:21 PM -
Comment added
Good shout Parimal Satyal - the date/time field as a permalink would work IMO. To clarify, we currently don't have a "co...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 01/24/2025 05:15 PM -
Comment added
Hi Kabiru Mwenja,
Interesting question. I'm of the opinion that we could perhaps turn the date/time field into a (perma)...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/24/2025 05:10 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 01/24/2025 04:41 PM -
Comment added
Wieland Lindenthal Parimal Satyal - as we hide the comment anchors, we need to consider the "only changes" filter as it ...
- Subject changed from Introduce comment "copy link" drawn from the comment id replacing sequenced activity numbers
to Amend work package comment "copy link" id from `#activity-<journal-sequence>` to `#comment-<journal-id>` - File Screenshot_2025-01-24_at_6.38.23_PM.png added as attachment
- File Screenshot_2025-01-24_at_6.43.05_PM.png added as attachment
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Dominic Bräunlein on 01/24/2025 11:39 AM - Status changed from in test to test failed
- Assignee changed from Cécile Guiot to Kabiru Mwenja
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 01/24/2025 11:19 AM -
Comment added
Hi Wieland, absolutely agree. "Comments with restricted visibility" is indeed clearer and less clunky. Changing the sour...
- Description changed (Details)
-
Comment added
-
created by
Kabiru Mwenja on 01/24/2025 10:46 AM -
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 01/24/2025 10:33 AM -
Comment added
Cécile Guiot - I think this will fail QA for "fast networks" - might need to have another look a bit later as it's not s...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 01/24/2025 10:24 AM - File Screenshot_2025-01-24_at_12.24.38_PM.png added as attachment
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 01/24/2025 09:52 AM - Status changed from merged to in test
- Assignee set to Cécile Guiot
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 01/24/2025 09:43 AM - Assignee deleted (
Kabiru Mwenja)
- Assignee deleted (
-
updated by
Marc Alcobé on 01/24/2025 09:34 AM - Description changed (Details)
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 01/24/2025 09:30 AM -
Comment added
Parimal Satyal Niels Lindenthal Remark: The current English term "Restricted visibility comments", sounds wrong to me (o...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 01/24/2025 09:25 AM - Status changed from in development to closed
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 01/24/2025 09:19 AM - The changes were retracted.
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 01/24/2025 09:19 AM - The changes were retracted.
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 01/24/2025 09:19 AM - The changes were retracted.
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 01/24/2025 09:19 AM - Parent deleted (
Work package Activity tab update: Timeline UI, instant updates, Emoji reactions)
- Parent deleted (
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 01/24/2025 09:19 AM - Parent deleted (
Work package Activity tab update: Timeline UI, instant updates, Emoji reactions)
- Parent deleted (
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 01/24/2025 09:19 AM - Description changed (Details)
- Priority changed from Medium to Low
- Parent deleted (
Work package Activity tab update: Timeline UI, instant updates, Emoji reactions)
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 01/24/2025 09:19 AM - The changes were retracted.
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 01/24/2025 09:17 AM - Subject changed from Extend API to cover Emoji reactions (getting, form, setting, deleting) and extend documentation
to Extend API V3 to cover Emoji reactions on work package comments (getting, form, setting, deleting) and extend documentation - Description changed (Details)
- Parent deleted (
Work package Activity tab update: Timeline UI, instant updates, Emoji reactions)
- Subject changed from Extend API to cover Emoji reactions (getting, form, setting, deleting) and extend documentation
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 01/24/2025 09:17 AM -
Comment added
That was done.
- Status changed from new to closed
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 01/24/2025 09:13 AM -
Comment added
I believe, we don't have a need for that feature anymore. Rejecting it.
- Subject changed from When "empty state" and new messages composed or arrives remove empty state to Activity tab: When new messages are submitted or arrive then remove empty state
- Description changed (Details)
- Status changed from new to rejected
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/24/2025 08:15 AM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#17696 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 01/24/2025 07:38 AM - Description changed (Details)
- Status changed from needs review to merged
- File link to double-send-slow-network.mp4 (nextcloud.openproject.org) added
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/24/2025 07:37 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
Niels Lindenthal on 01/24/2025 07:25 AM -
Comment added
Wieland Lindenthal can you please remove the unfinished features from this epic and close it?
-
Comment added
01/23/2025
-
created by
Kabiru Mwenja on 01/23/2025 06:52 PM -
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 01/23/2025 06:38 PM - Subject changed from Activity tab (Notification center goes into mobile layout even on a desktop when the browser on moderate wide desktop
to Notification center: Activity tab goes into mobile layout even when the browser window is smaller desktop wide
- Subject changed from Activity tab (Notification center goes into mobile layout even on a desktop when the browser on moderate wide desktop
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 01/23/2025 06:28 PM -
Comment added
Marc Alcobé, Wieland Lindenthal: Could you add Spanish and German translations respectively? Thank you.
Cheers
Parimal
- Description changed (Details)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 01/23/2025 06:15 PM -
Comment added
Hi Niels Lindenthal,
I've changed it in the description and in the mockups. It looks like my work package with a table o...
- Description changed (Details)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 01/23/2025 03:57 PM -
Comment added
Bumping the target version to the coming minor release. However, @Jonas Jabari if the fix of this is small/simple we cou...
- Subject changed from Activity panel (Notification center goes into mobile layout even on a desktop when the browser on desktop
to Activity tab (Notification center goes into mobile layout even on a desktop when the browser on moderate wide desktop - Version changed from 15.2.0 to 15.3.0
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Alexander Stock on 01/23/2025 03:22 PM -
Comment added
+1 from customer
- Votes changed from 3 to 4
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Niels Lindenthal on 01/23/2025 02:02 PM -
Comment added
Hi Parimal Satyal,
can you please update the description -> "restricted visibility"?
Thanks
Niels
- Description changed (Details)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Niels Lindenthal on 01/23/2025 02:00 PM -
Comment added
The decision has been made here
- Status changed from needs clarification to resolved
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 01/23/2025 12:18 PM - Description set (Details)
-
updated by
Jonas Jabari on 01/23/2025 12:15 PM -
Comment added
Thanks Wieland Lindenthal for jumping in on the clarification, just adding my clarification on top:
Issue 1: Page scro...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 01/23/2025 12:07 PM -
Comment added
Cécile Guiot I improved the subject and description to be more clear on what it fixes.
And yes, this fix does not resolv...
- Subject changed from On narrow screens (including mobile) the view always scrolls to the activity to On narrow screens (including mobile) the view always scrolls to the end of the Activity tab
- Description changed (Details)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 01/23/2025 12:07 PM - Description changed (Details)
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 01/23/2025 12:05 PM -
Comment added
@Jonas Jabari nevermind, Wieland Lindenthal explained to me what is included in this fix 😊 (thanks for that Wieland!)
Fi...
- Status changed from in test to tested
- Assignee deleted (
Cécile Guiot)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 01/23/2025 11:29 AM -
Comment added
@Jonas Jabari i still see the issue even after the fix but i think it's normal? when you open a WP the URL is .../activi...
- File activity_scroll_narrow_screens.gif added as attachment
-
Comment added
-
created by
Wieland Lindenthal on 01/23/2025 10:59 AM -
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 01/23/2025 10:40 AM - Description changed (Details)
- File ScreenRecording_01-10-2025_13-22-57_1.gif added as attachment
-
updated by
Niels Lindenthal on 01/23/2025 10:38 AM - Version set to 15.3.0
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 01/23/2025 10:26 AM -
Comment added
Together with Kabiru Mwenja and Bruno Pagno we discussed that back and forth. A migration can become big for the rollout...
- Status changed from new to rejected
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 01/23/2025 10:25 AM - Status changed from merged to in test
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 01/23/2025 10:18 AM -
Comment added
Updated automatically by changing values within child work package STC-194
- Description changed (Details)
- Working days set to working days only
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 01/23/2025 10:15 AM - Assignee changed from Cécile Guiot to Wieland Lindenthal
- Bug found in version set to 15.1.x
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 01/23/2025 09:01 AM - Description changed (Details)
- Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Kabiru Mwenja)
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/23/2025 08:59 AM - Comment added
-
created by
Niels Lindenthal on 01/23/2025 07:02 AM -
Comment added
Hi Wieland Lindenthal,
Did you intentionally make the time field mandatory? My preference would be to make it optional.
...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Niels Lindenthal on 01/23/2025 07:00 AM -
Comment added
Hi Wieland Lindenthal,
Can you please prioritize this for the next release? It is a quite annoying bug.
Thanks
Niels
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/23/2025 05:22 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 01/23/2025 05:15 AM - Status changed from confirmed to in development
- Assignee set to Kabiru Mwenja
- Version set to 15.3.0
01/22/2025
-
updated by
Niels Lindenthal on 01/22/2025 07:15 PM - Subject changed from Internal/confidential/private/restricted comments for work packages that are visible not for all project roles
to Work package comments with restricted visibility
- Subject changed from Internal/confidential/private/restricted comments for work packages that are visible not for all project roles
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 01/22/2025 05:29 PM -
Comment added
Mockups updated after our discussion today.
Cheers
Parimal
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 01/22/2025 04:22 PM -
Comment added
Thanks Wieland Lindenthal all good from my end, initial scope achieved 👍
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 01/22/2025 03:47 PM - Version set to 15.3.0
-
updated by
Jonas Jabari on 01/22/2025 02:59 PM - Status changed from confirmed to in development
-
updated by
Jonas Jabari on 01/22/2025 02:59 PM - Status changed from review approved to merged
- Assignee changed from Jonas Jabari to Cécile Guiot
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 01/22/2025 01:40 PM -
Comment added
Hey Kabiru Mwenja am I right with closing the EPIC? I moved the last remaining FEATURES out as they were not part of the...
- Status changed from in development to closed
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 01/22/2025 01:39 PM -
Comment added
I remove this FEATURE from the EPIC as it was not part of the initial scope. It will live stand alone for now.
- Version set to Wish List
- Parent deleted (
Set reminders for work packages to automatically generate date alert notifications)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 01/22/2025 01:37 PM -
Comment added
I remove this FEATURE from the EPIC as it was not part of the initial scope.
- Description changed (Details)
- Parent deleted (
Set reminders for work packages to automatically generate date alert notifications)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/22/2025 12:15 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#17617 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/22/2025 11:38 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 01/22/2025 10:09 AM - Subject changed from Duplicate journal version error on work package activity form submit to Duplicate work package comments when clicking submit multiple times
- Description changed (Details)
- Status changed from new to confirmed
- Priority changed from Medium to Low
- File Screenshot_2025-01-22_at_12.06.12_PM.png added as attachment
Also available in: Atom