Content
Activity
11/11/2013
-
created by
Robin Wagner on 11/11/2013 07:44 PM -
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 11/11/2013 06:58 PM -
Comment added
In order to evaluate the problem I created a branch which should be a first step towards fixing the bug (no stacktraces ...
- Status changed from new to confirmed
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Martin Czuchra on 11/11/2013 06:50 PM -
Comment added
Can be reviewed in PR 639
- Status changed from specified to needs review
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Martin Czuchra on 11/11/2013 06:50 PM -
Comment added
Can be reviewed in PR 639
- Status changed from specified to needs review
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 11/11/2013 06:36 PM -
Comment added
There used to be such a link. It was implemented to support accessibility.
The reason the link no longer exists should b...
-
Comment added
-
created by
Jens Ulferts on 11/11/2013 06:31 PM -
created by
Robin Wagner on 11/11/2013 06:27 PM -
updated by
Jan Sandbrink on 11/11/2013 04:50 PM - Description set (Details)
-
updated by
Jonas Heinrich (Finn) on 11/11/2013 04:49 PM - Description changed (Details)
- Status changed from merged to closed
-
updated by
Jonas Heinrich (Finn) on 11/11/2013 04:47 PM - Status changed from merged to closed
-
created by
Jan Sandbrink on 11/11/2013 04:42 PM -
updated by
Hagen Schink on 11/11/2013 04:28 PM - Status changed from merged to closed
-
updated by
Sebastian Schuster on 11/11/2013 04:05 PM - Story Points changed from 2 to 8
-
updated by
Nils Kenneweg on 11/11/2013 03:51 PM - Status changed from confirmed to in development
-
updated by
Jan Sandbrink on 11/11/2013 03:15 PM - Description set (Details)
-
updated by
Nils Kenneweg on 11/11/2013 03:08 PM - Status changed from in development to needs review
-
created by
Jan Sandbrink on 11/11/2013 03:08 PM -
updated by
Hagen Schink on 11/11/2013 02:20 PM -
Comment added
Gets solved in conjunction with #2591
- Status changed from on hold to in development
- Assignee set to Till Breuer
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Sebastian Schuster on 11/11/2013 01:26 PM -
Comment added
Fixed on preview.
- Status changed from merged to closed
- Assignee deleted (
Nils Kenneweg)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Hagen Schink on 11/11/2013 12:33 PM - Story Points changed from 0 to 1
-
updated by
Hagen Schink on 11/11/2013 12:32 PM - Story Points changed from 0 to 0
-
updated by
Robin Wagner on 11/11/2013 11:51 AM - Status changed from merged to closed
-
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 11/11/2013 11:42 AM - Version deleted ()
-
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 11/11/2013 11:42 AM - Version deleted ()
-
created by
Michael Frister on 11/11/2013 11:41 AM -
updated by
Nils Kenneweg on 11/11/2013 11:36 AM - Status changed from in development to needs review
-
updated by
Sebastian Schuster on 11/11/2013 11:33 AM - Type set to Bug
- Project set to OpenProject
- Subject set to MyProjectOverviews contain bad characters
- Description set (Details)
- Status set to in development
- Assignee set to Sebastian Schuster
- Priority set to Medium
- Version deleted ()
- Author set to Sebastian Schuster
- % Complete set to 0%
- Story Points changed from 0 to 2
- Scheduling mode set to Automatic
- Working days set to include non-working days
-
Bug OP-64: Translation missing in Fehlermeldung bei Erzeugung eines Zirkelbezugs durch Elternticketsupdated by
Jens Ulferts on 11/11/2013 11:30 AM - Version deleted ()
-
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 11/11/2013 11:30 AM - Version deleted ()
-
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 11/11/2013 11:29 AM - Version deleted ()
-
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 11/11/2013 11:26 AM -
Comment added
No, it’s not.
- Status changed from specified to rejected
- Assignee deleted (
Hagen Schink) - Version deleted ()
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Hagen Schink on 11/11/2013 11:26 AM -
Comment added
I agree, this is a duplicate.
- Status changed from confirmed to rejected
- Assignee deleted (
Hagen Schink) - Version deleted (
Product Backlog)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 11/11/2013 11:24 AM -
Comment added
This is probably the same as OP-833. Hagen, can you please double check and reject this if it is so.
- Description changed (Details)
- Assignee set to Hagen Schink
- Version set to Product Backlog
- Story Points changed from 0 to 0
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 11/11/2013 11:20 AM -
Comment added
As OP-737 is closed, this here can be rejected.
- Status changed from confirmed to rejected
- Version deleted ()
- Story Points changed from 0 to 0
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Sebastian Schuster on 11/11/2013 11:16 AM - Status changed from needs review to merged
-
updated by
Martin Czuchra on 11/11/2013 11:16 AM -
Comment added
I don’t think we need a test here.
- Status changed from needs review to merged
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Sebastian Schuster on 11/11/2013 11:15 AM - Status changed from needs review to merged
- Assignee deleted (
Till Breuer)
-
updated by
Alexander Bach on 11/11/2013 10:53 AM - Type set to Bug
- Project set to OpenProject
- Subject set to Not all issue statuses can be assigned after an error while creating the issue
- Description set (Details)
- Status set to new
- Priority set to Medium
- Version deleted ()
- Author set to Alexander Bach
- % Complete set to 0%
- Scheduling mode set to Automatic
- Working days set to include non-working days
- Bug found in version set to (deleted option)
-
updated by
Nils Kenneweg on 11/11/2013 10:48 AM - The changes were retracted.
-
updated by
Nils Kenneweg on 11/11/2013 10:32 AM -
Comment added
PR: https://github.com/opf/openproject/pull/634
- Status changed from in development to needs review
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Hagen Schink on 11/11/2013 10:28 AM - Status changed from in development to on hold
-
updated by
Nils Kenneweg on 11/11/2013 10:27 AM - Status changed from on hold to in development
- Assignee changed from Martin Czuchra to Nils Kenneweg
-
updated by
Nils Kenneweg on 11/11/2013 10:19 AM - Status changed from confirmed to in development
-
updated by
Nils Kenneweg on 11/11/2013 10:19 AM - Description changed (Details)
- Status changed from confirmed to in development
-
updated by
Nils Kenneweg on 11/11/2013 10:16 AM - Status changed from confirmed to rejected
-
updated by
Nils Kenneweg on 11/11/2013 10:16 AM - Status changed from confirmed to rejected
-
updated by
Till Breuer on 11/11/2013 10:14 AM - Status changed from needs review to merged
-
updated by
Christian Ratz on 11/11/2013 09:43 AM -
Comment added
My fault the user was an global admin, everything is working as expected.
- Status changed from on hold to closed
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Sebastian Schuster on 11/11/2013 09:40 AM -
Comment added
Niels, can you take a look at the proper specification here? I propose rejecting this bug.
- Assignee set to Niels Lindenthal
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Till Breuer on 11/11/2013 09:31 AM -
Comment added
Reviewing
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Till Breuer on 11/11/2013 09:21 AM -
Comment added
PR: https://github.com/opf/openproject/pull/633
- Status changed from in development to needs review
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Nils Kenneweg on 11/11/2013 09:17 AM -
Comment added
As far as the timelines are concerned I was always assuming that a parent element has either a start and end date or no ...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 11/11/2013 09:17 AM - Version deleted ()
-
updated by
Robin Wagner on 11/11/2013 09:16 AM -
Comment added
Hi Johannes,
I did select the option to display the work package types in the roadmap. The error must be caused by somet...
- Description changed (Details)
- Status changed from on hold to confirmed
- Assignee changed from Robin Wagner to Johannes Wollert
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Hagen Schink on 11/11/2013 09:13 AM -
Comment added
Find fix in PR 632
- Status changed from on hold to needs review
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Robin Wagner on 11/11/2013 09:01 AM -
Comment added
Hi Johannes,
that’s a good point.
I noticed the difference in highlighting but given that both mouse hovering and naviga...
- Status changed from on hold to closed
- Assignee deleted (
Johannes Wollert)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Christian Ratz on 11/11/2013 08:56 AM -
Comment added
Not needed anymore since the migrations run directly from the plugin path.
- Status changed from new to closed
- Assignee deleted (
Christian Ratz)
-
Comment added
11/08/2013
-
updated by
Philipp Tessenow on 11/08/2013 06:11 PM -
Comment added
+1
- Status changed from merged to closed
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Hagen Schink on 11/08/2013 06:10 PM -
Comment added
The custom values of the following tickets appear to be changed after saving the without changing anything.
Ticket
Cu...
- Status changed from merged to on hold
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Hagen Schink on 11/08/2013 05:55 PM -
Comment added
per pro. Johannes
- Status changed from merged to closed
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Hagen Schink on 11/08/2013 05:55 PM -
Comment added
per pro. Johannes
- Status changed from merged to closed
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Hagen Schink on 11/08/2013 05:55 PM -
Comment added
per pro. Johannes
- Status changed from merged to closed
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Philipp Tessenow on 11/08/2013 05:53 PM -
Comment added
works on preview
- Status changed from merged to closed
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Philipp Tessenow on 11/08/2013 05:53 PM - Status changed from specified to closed
-
updated by
Christian Ratz on 11/08/2013 05:51 PM -
Comment added
Still not working, I see users without the permission ‘view_work_packages’
- Status changed from merged to on hold
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Michael Frister on 11/08/2013 05:38 PM - Status changed from merged to closed
-
updated by
Philipp Tessenow on 11/08/2013 05:37 PM -
Comment added
found a work_package with custom value set. seems to work.
- Status changed from merged to closed
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Hagen Schink on 11/08/2013 05:36 PM -
Comment added
Improved description
- Description changed (Details)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Philipp Tessenow on 11/08/2013 05:28 PM -
Comment added
found a planning element with watchers on preview
- Status changed from merged to closed
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Johannes Wollert on 11/08/2013 05:27 PM -
Comment added
This might actually be specified behavior. Types can be configured to have their work packages included in road maps (ad...
- Status changed from confirmed to on hold
- Assignee set to Robin Wagner
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Hagen Schink on 11/08/2013 05:22 PM -
Comment added
Sorry, didn’t apply my own reproduction steps.
- Type set to Bug
- Project set to OpenProject
- Subject set to [Work Package Tracking] Cannot change query result page of custom query
- Description set (Details)
- Status set to rejected
- Priority set to Medium
- Author set to Hagen Schink
- % Complete set to 0%
- Scheduling mode set to Automatic
- Working days set to include non-working days
- File actual.PNG added as attachment
- File expected.PNG added as attachment
- Bug found in version set to (deleted option)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Philipp Tessenow on 11/08/2013 05:20 PM -
Comment added
works for me!
- Status changed from merged to closed
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Michael Frister on 11/08/2013 05:19 PM - Status changed from merged to closed
-
updated by
Sebastian Schuster on 11/08/2013 05:15 PM - Status changed from merged to closed
-
updated by
Sebastian Schuster on 11/08/2013 05:09 PM - Status changed from merged to closed
-
updated by
Philipp Tessenow on 11/08/2013 05:06 PM -
Comment added
works with ?key= url parameter (so not only basic auth)
- Description changed (Details)
- Status changed from merged to closed
- Assignee deleted (
Markus Kahl)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Christian Ratz on 11/08/2013 05:00 PM - Status changed from needs review to closed
- Assignee deleted (
Till Breuer)
-
updated by
Sebastian Schuster on 11/08/2013 04:59 PM - Status changed from merged to closed
- Assignee deleted (
Nils Kenneweg)
-
updated by
Sebastian Schuster on 11/08/2013 04:55 PM - Status changed from merged to closed
-
updated by
Till Breuer on 11/08/2013 04:53 PM - Status changed from new to in development
- Assignee set to Till Breuer
- Version deleted ()
- Story Points changed from 0 to 2
- Bug found in version set to (deleted option)
-
updated by
Johannes Wollert on 11/08/2013 04:40 PM -
Comment added
Martin, could you please give more information on what you’d expect, or what exactly you find to be inconsistent?
Is it ...
- Assignee set to Martin Czuchra
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Johannes Wollert on 11/08/2013 04:31 PM -
Comment added
https://github.com/opf/openproject/pull/630
- Status changed from in development to needs review
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Sebastian Schuster on 11/08/2013 04:15 PM - Status changed from closed to rejected
-
updated by
Till Breuer on 11/08/2013 04:15 PM -
Comment added
PR: https://github.com/opf/openproject/pull/629
- Status changed from in development to needs review
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Sebastian Schuster on 11/08/2013 04:10 PM - Status changed from needs review to merged
-
updated by
Michael Frister on 11/08/2013 04:07 PM - Status changed from needs review to merged
-
updated by
Sebastian Schuster on 11/08/2013 03:31 PM -
Comment added
Developed, essentially by Hagen.
- Status changed from in development to merged
- Assignee deleted (
Sebastian Schuster) - Priority changed from Medium to High
- Story Points changed from 0 to 5
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Sebastian Schuster on 11/08/2013 03:30 PM - Status changed from needs review to merged
- Assignee deleted (
Hagen Schink) - Priority changed from Medium to High
- Story Points changed from 2 to 5
-
updated by
Johannes Wollert on 11/08/2013 03:06 PM - Status changed from confirmed to in development
- Assignee set to Johannes Wollert
- Version deleted ()
-
updated by
Johannes Wollert on 11/08/2013 02:48 PM -
Comment added
For anyone looking into this: I’ve pushed a supposedly working implementation of this to the feature/highlighted_backgro...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Johannes Wollert on 11/08/2013 02:39 PM -
Comment added
Are you sure, that’s what you’d expect? Because then you’ll have to specify precedence of either the box having the focu...
- Status changed from in development to on hold
- File Screen_shot_2013-11-08_at_14.34.03.png added as attachment
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Christian Ratz on 11/08/2013 02:35 PM - Status changed from on hold to merged
-
updated by
Johannes Wollert on 11/08/2013 02:28 PM - Status changed from confirmed to in development
- Assignee set to Johannes Wollert
- Version deleted ()
-
created by
Johannes Wollert on 11/08/2013 02:20 PM -
updated by
Till Breuer on 11/08/2013 02:19 PM -
Comment added
Integration test for child page creation added.
PR: https://github.com/opf/openproject/pull/620
- Status changed from in development to needs review
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Johannes Wollert on 11/08/2013 01:59 PM -
Comment added
Is this still breaking for you? Seems to work fine on OSX 10.6 with Firefox v25.0, so might have been a bug in your FF o...
- Status changed from in development to on hold
- Assignee changed from Johannes Wollert to Philipp Tessenow
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Christian Ratz on 11/08/2013 01:49 PM - Status changed from needs review to merged
-
updated by
Johannes Wollert on 11/08/2013 01:47 PM - Status changed from confirmed to in development
- Assignee set to Johannes Wollert
- Version deleted ()
-
updated by
Johannes Wollert on 11/08/2013 01:37 PM -
Comment added
https://github.com/opf/openproject/pull/627
- Status changed from confirmed to needs review
- Assignee changed from Martin Czuchra to Johannes Wollert
- Version deleted ()
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Christian Ratz on 11/08/2013 01:25 PM - Status changed from needs review to merged
- Assignee deleted (
Hagen Schink)
-
updated by
Christian Ratz on 11/08/2013 01:25 PM - Status changed from needs review to merged
- Assignee deleted (
Hagen Schink)
-
updated by
Hagen Schink on 11/08/2013 12:45 PM - Status changed from rejected to closed
- Version deleted ()
- Story Points changed from 0 to 0
-
updated by
Hagen Schink on 11/08/2013 12:45 PM - Story Points changed from 0 to 0
-
updated by
Johannes Wollert on 11/08/2013 12:31 PM -
Comment added
I guess this got fixed by the last deployment, can’t it reproduce anymore.
- Status changed from confirmed to rejected
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Johannes Wollert on 11/08/2013 12:16 PM -
Comment added
Like we discussed, the ticket goes back for now because of (a) missing test(s). The pull request looks good, tho!
- Status changed from needs review to in development
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Till Breuer on 11/08/2013 11:32 AM - Status changed from on hold to in development
-
updated by
Johannes Wollert on 11/08/2013 11:22 AM -
Comment added
https://github.com/opf/openproject/pull/625
- Status changed from in development to needs review
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Till Breuer on 11/08/2013 10:55 AM -
Comment added
This is a screenshot showing a similar update as https://preview.openproject.org/work_packages/2699 performed locally.
-...
- File Failed_error_reproduction.png added as attachment
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Hagen Schink on 11/08/2013 10:30 AM - Status changed from in development to needs review
-
updated by
Hagen Schink on 11/08/2013 10:30 AM - Status changed from in development to needs review
-
updated by
Johannes Wollert on 11/08/2013 10:30 AM - Status changed from new to in development
-
updated by
Johannes Wollert on 11/08/2013 10:25 AM - Story Points changed from 0 to 5
-
updated by
Till Breuer on 11/08/2013 10:20 AM -
Comment added
Couldn’t be reproduced - extended the specs in
https://github.com/opf/openproject/tree/bugfix/2718_newlines_change_track...
- Status changed from in development to on hold
- Assignee set to Till Breuer
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Johannes Wollert on 11/08/2013 10:16 AM - Assignee deleted (
Johannes Wollert)
- Assignee deleted (
-
updated by
Johannes Wollert on 11/08/2013 10:16 AM - Assignee deleted (
Johannes Wollert)
- Assignee deleted (
-
updated by
Johannes Wollert on 11/08/2013 10:02 AM -
Comment added
Resetting this ticket, because of changed acceptance criteria.
- Status changed from merged to in development
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Michael Frister on 11/08/2013 09:41 AM - Description changed (Details)
- Status changed from needs review to merged
-
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 11/08/2013 09:30 AM -
Comment added
PR
- Status changed from confirmed to needs review
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 11/08/2013 09:24 AM - Status changed from new to confirmed
- Version deleted ()
- Story Points changed from 0 to 1
-
updated by
Christian Ratz on 11/08/2013 09:13 AM -
Comment added
Change looks good, except that the order is wrong.
As I interpret the description the menuitems “Status Reporting” and “...
- Status changed from needs review to on hold
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Hagen Schink on 11/08/2013 08:30 AM - Story Points changed from 0 to 3
-
updated by
Hagen Schink on 11/08/2013 08:30 AM - Status changed from confirmed to in development
- Assignee set to Hagen Schink
- Version deleted ()
- Story Points changed from 0 to 1
-
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 11/08/2013 08:11 AM -
Comment added
PR issued
- Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Jens Ulferts)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Hagen Schink on 11/08/2013 07:37 AM -
Comment added
Hello Christian,
good point! I’m going to fix that.
Hagen
- Status changed from on hold to in development
-
Comment added
11/07/2013
-
updated by
Sebastian Schuster on 11/07/2013 06:35 PM - Type set to Bug
- Project set to OpenProject
- Subject set to Missing initial journals for custom values
- Description set (Details)
- Status set to in development
- Assignee set to Sebastian Schuster
- Priority set to Medium
- Version deleted ()
- Author set to Sebastian Schuster
- % Complete set to 0%
- Scheduling mode set to Automatic
- Working days set to include non-working days
-
updated by
Christian Ratz on 11/07/2013 04:41 PM -
Comment added
It works, I can assign another priority but I would love to see a test.
And there was no journal entry for this change, ...
- Status changed from needs review to on hold
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Till Breuer on 11/07/2013 04:30 PM - Status changed from confirmed to in development
- Version deleted ()
-
updated by
Christian Ratz on 11/07/2013 04:18 PM -
Comment added
Fixed in PR622
- Status changed from confirmed to needs review
- Version deleted ()
- Story Points changed from 0 to 1
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Robin Wagner on 11/07/2013 04:16 PM -
Comment added
You’re right.
If the version is shared, it is possible to move a work package from one project to another one without lo...
- Status changed from on hold to closed
- Assignee deleted (
Robin Wagner) - Priority changed from High to Medium
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Sebastian Schuster on 11/07/2013 04:06 PM -
Comment added
Implemented in PR621, please review.
- Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Sebastian Schuster) - Story Points changed from 0 to 3
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Till Breuer on 11/07/2013 04:04 PM -
Comment added
PR: https://github.com/opf/openproject/pull/620
- Status changed from in development to needs review
- Story Points changed from 0 to 8
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 11/07/2013 03:47 PM - Status changed from needs review to merged
-
updated by
Hagen Schink on 11/07/2013 03:35 PM -
Comment added
PR 619
- Status changed from in development to needs review
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Till Breuer on 11/07/2013 03:20 PM - Type set to Bug
- Project set to OpenProject
- Subject set to Newlines in workpackage descriptions aren't normalized for change tracking
- Description set (Details)
- Status set to confirmed
- Priority set to High
- Version deleted ()
- Author set to Till Breuer
- % Complete set to 0%
- Story Points changed from 0 to 3
- Scheduling mode set to Automatic
- Working days set to include non-working days
- Bug found in version set to (deleted option)
-
updated by
Hagen Schink on 11/07/2013 03:11 PM - Description set (Details)
- Status changed from new to in development
- Assignee set to Hagen Schink
- Version deleted ()
- Story Points changed from 0 to 2
- Bug found in version set to (deleted option)
-
updated by
Sebastian Schuster on 11/07/2013 03:07 PM - Type set to Bug
- Project set to OpenProject
- Subject set to Multiple journal entries when adding multiple attachments in one change
- Description set (Details)
- Status set to in development
- Assignee set to Sebastian Schuster
- Priority set to Medium
- Version deleted ()
- Author set to Sebastian Schuster
- % Complete set to 0%
- Scheduling mode set to Automatic
- Working days set to include non-working days
-
created by
Robin Wagner on 11/07/2013 03:03 PM -
created by
Hagen Schink on 11/07/2013 02:58 PM -
updated by
Sebastian Schuster on 11/07/2013 02:53 PM -
Comment added
We should first finalize the specification - it is not that clear this is really a bug.
- Status changed from needs review to on hold
- Assignee deleted (
Hagen Schink)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Sebastian Schuster on 11/07/2013 02:37 PM - Story Points changed from 0 to 5
-
updated by
Hagen Schink on 11/07/2013 01:45 PM -
Comment added
PR 618
- Status changed from in development to needs review
- Story Points changed from 0 to 2
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Martin Czuchra on 11/07/2013 01:37 PM -
Comment added
Implemented according to expected behavior.
- Status changed from needs review to merged
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Sebastian Schuster on 11/07/2013 12:41 PM -
Comment added
Implemented in PR617, please review.
- Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Sebastian Schuster)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Sebastian Schuster on 11/07/2013 12:33 PM - Status changed from new to specified
-
updated by
Sebastian Schuster on 11/07/2013 12:33 PM - Status changed from new to specified
-
updated by
Sebastian Schuster on 11/07/2013 12:33 PM - Status changed from new to specified
-
updated by
Sebastian Schuster on 11/07/2013 12:33 PM - Status changed from new to specified
-
updated by
Sebastian Schuster on 11/07/2013 12:33 PM - Status changed from new to specified
-
updated by
Martin Czuchra on 11/07/2013 12:20 PM -
Comment added
According to our discussions, what really is the problem here is that the sortation needs to be changed. I believe there...
- Priority changed from Medium to High
- Story Points changed from 0 to 8
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Martin Czuchra on 11/07/2013 11:57 AM -
Comment added
I am leaving this one out of the sprint 15 because we really have more important stuff to do.
- Assignee deleted (
Martin Czuchra) - Priority changed from Medium to Low
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Nils Kenneweg on 11/07/2013 11:56 AM -
Comment added
In fact the behaviour is not related to filter criteria but to the fact that the project has work packages which have no...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Martin Czuchra on 11/07/2013 11:55 AM - Assignee set to Nils Kenneweg
- Version deleted ()
-
updated by
Martin Czuchra on 11/07/2013 11:54 AM -
Comment added
It might be included after all!
- Description changed (Details)
- Assignee set to Nils Kenneweg
- Version deleted ()
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Martin Czuchra on 11/07/2013 11:52 AM - Assignee set to Nils Kenneweg
- Version deleted ()
- Story Points changed from 0 to 3
-
updated by
Martin Czuchra on 11/07/2013 11:52 AM - Assignee changed from Martin Czuchra to Nils Kenneweg
- Version deleted ()
- Story Points changed from 0 to 3
-
updated by
Hagen Schink on 11/07/2013 11:45 AM - Status changed from confirmed to in development
- Assignee set to Hagen Schink
- Version deleted ()
-
updated by
Hagen Schink on 11/07/2013 11:41 AM -
Comment added
PR 616
- Status changed from in development to needs review
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 11/07/2013 11:41 AM - Status changed from needs review to closed
-
created by
Jens Ulferts on 11/07/2013 11:34 AM -
updated by
Christian Ratz on 11/07/2013 11:32 AM -
Comment added
It works like charm, if the version is shared ;)
PLZ confirm
- Status changed from in development to on hold
- Assignee changed from Christian Ratz to Robin Wagner
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 11/07/2013 11:13 AM - Status changed from on hold to merged
- Assignee deleted (
Hagen Schink)
-
updated by
Niels Lindenthal on 11/07/2013 11:07 AM - Version deleted ()
-
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 11/07/2013 11:04 AM - Status changed from needs review to on hold
-
updated by
Hagen Schink on 11/07/2013 10:57 AM - Description changed (Details)
- Status changed from confirmed to in development
- Assignee set to Hagen Schink
- Version deleted ()
-
updated by
Hagen Schink on 11/07/2013 10:55 AM - Status changed from needs review to merged
-
updated by
Hagen Schink on 11/07/2013 10:43 AM -
Comment added
PR 615
- Status changed from in development to needs review
- Story Points changed from 0 to 1
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Nils Kenneweg on 11/07/2013 10:12 AM -
Comment added
PR: https://github.com/opf/openproject/pull/614
- Status changed from in development to needs review
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Christian Ratz on 11/07/2013 09:43 AM - Status changed from confirmed to in development
- Assignee set to Christian Ratz
- Version deleted ()
-
updated by
Robin Wagner on 11/07/2013 09:41 AM - Description changed (Details)
-
updated by
Martin Czuchra on 11/07/2013 09:36 AM -
Comment added
Moving this back to normal priority, it won’t be included in the upcoming deployment.
- Priority changed from High to Medium
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Hagen Schink on 11/07/2013 09:34 AM - Status changed from confirmed to in development
- Assignee set to Hagen Schink
- Version deleted ()
-
updated by
Hagen Schink on 11/07/2013 09:33 AM - Assignee set to Till Breuer
-
updated by
Nils Kenneweg on 11/07/2013 09:29 AM - Status changed from confirmed to in development
11/06/2013
-
updated by
Sebastian Schuster on 11/06/2013 06:30 PM - Status changed from confirmed to in development
- Assignee set to Sebastian Schuster
- Version deleted ()
-
updated by
Sebastian Schuster on 11/06/2013 05:15 PM - Status changed from needs review to merged
- Assignee deleted (
Hagen Schink)
-
updated by
Sebastian Schuster on 11/06/2013 05:08 PM - Status changed from needs review to merged
- Assignee deleted (
Till Breuer)
-
updated by
Markus Kahl on 11/06/2013 04:54 PM - Type set to Bug
- Project set to OpenProject
- Subject set to [API v2] API key auth does not work for custom_field actions
- Description set (Details)
- Status set to needs review
- Assignee set to Markus Kahl
- Priority set to Medium
- Version deleted ()
- Author set to Markus Kahl
- % Complete set to 0%
- Story Points changed from 0 to 1
- Scheduling mode set to Automatic
- Working days set to include non-working days
-
updated by
Christian Ratz on 11/06/2013 04:54 PM -
Comment added
Works for me. Merged
- Status changed from needs review to merged
- Assignee deleted (
Nils Kenneweg)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Martin Czuchra on 11/06/2013 04:44 PM -
Comment added
Because of the high priority of this bug, I am moving it into the sprint. Nils, could you have a look at this in the mor...
- Assignee set to Nils Kenneweg
- Version deleted ()
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Martin Czuchra on 11/06/2013 04:43 PM -
Comment added
This one should be easy to fix when sorting out the permissions-not-being-in-the-api-anymore problems.
- Priority changed from High to Immediate
- Version deleted ()
- Story Points changed from 0 to 2
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Hagen Schink on 11/06/2013 04:25 PM -
Comment added
PR 604
- Status changed from confirmed to needs review
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Hagen Schink on 11/06/2013 04:20 PM - Status changed from needs review to merged
-
updated by
Sebastian Schuster on 11/06/2013 04:18 PM - Status changed from needs review to merged
- Assignee deleted (
Till Breuer) - Version deleted ()
-
updated by
Hagen Schink on 11/06/2013 04:14 PM - Description set (Details)
- Status changed from new to confirmed
- Version deleted ()
- Story Points changed from 0 to 1
- Bug found in version set to (deleted option)
-
updated by
Sebastian Schuster on 11/06/2013 03:58 PM -
Comment added
Implemented in PR610, please review.
- Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Sebastian Schuster)
-
Comment added
-
created by
Hagen Schink on 11/06/2013 03:58 PM -
updated by
Hagen Schink on 11/06/2013 03:56 PM - Status changed from needs review to merged
-
updated by
Sebastian Schuster on 11/06/2013 03:52 PM - Status changed from on hold to in development
-
updated by
Philipp Tessenow on 11/06/2013 02:43 PM -
Comment added
+1
- Status changed from needs review to merged
- Version deleted ()
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Michael Frister on 11/06/2013 02:39 PM -
Comment added
Works pretty well except for one issue: j and k are swapped compared to vim :)
I fixed this here: https://github.com/opf...
- Status changed from merged to needs review
-
Comment added
-
created by
Robin Wagner on 11/06/2013 01:55 PM -
updated by
Sebastian Schuster on 11/06/2013 01:48 PM -
Comment added
Implemented in PR608, please review.
- Status changed from new to needs review
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Michael Frister on 11/06/2013 01:48 PM - Assignee deleted (
Michael Frister)
- Assignee deleted (
-
updated by
Till Breuer on 11/06/2013 01:47 PM - Version deleted ()
-
updated by
Sebastian Schuster on 11/06/2013 01:44 PM -
Comment added
For issues, this was fixed successfully, so I am goin to close this. However, watchers on planning elements are still lo...
- Status changed from merged to closed
- Assignee deleted (
Till Breuer)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Robin Wagner on 11/06/2013 01:27 PM - Type set to Bug
- Project set to OpenProject
- Subject set to [Roadmap] Related work package list not complete
- Description set (Details)
- Status set to confirmed
- Priority set to Medium
- Version deleted ()
- Author set to Robin Wagner
- % Complete set to 0%
- Scheduling mode set to Automatic
- Working days set to include non-working days
- File Bug_Roadmap1.png added as attachment
- File Bug_Roadmap2.png added as attachment
- Bug found in version set to (deleted option)
-
updated by
Markus Kahl on 11/06/2013 12:03 PM - Status changed from new to needs review
-
updated by
Till Breuer on 11/06/2013 11:38 AM - Status changed from confirmed to in development
- Version deleted ()
-
updated by
Till Breuer on 11/06/2013 11:28 AM -
Comment added
PR: https://github.com/opf/openproject/pull/606
- Status changed from in development to needs review
- Version deleted ()
-
Comment added
-
created by
Robin Wagner on 11/06/2013 11:13 AM -
updated by
Hagen Schink on 11/06/2013 10:07 AM -
Comment added
PR 605
- Status changed from in development to needs review
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Robin Wagner on 11/06/2013 10:02 AM -
Comment added
The ticket can be tested in the QA when OP-826 is fixed.
- Status changed from on hold to merged
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 11/06/2013 09:56 AM - Assignee set to Jens Ulferts
-
updated by
Hagen Schink on 11/06/2013 09:24 AM - Description changed (Details)
- Status changed from new to in development
- Assignee changed from Sebastian Schuster to Hagen Schink
-
updated by
Sebastian Schuster on 11/06/2013 09:05 AM - Status changed from in development to on hold
-
updated by
Sebastian Schuster on 11/06/2013 09:05 AM - Description changed (Details)
- Assignee set to Sebastian Schuster
11/05/2013
-
updated by
Till Breuer on 11/05/2013 09:44 PM -
Comment added
Hi,
That’s because the PR that was merged didn’t comprise the latest changes to the branch. Here is a new PR:
https://gi...
- Status changed from on hold to needs review
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Robin Wagner on 11/05/2013 07:18 PM - Priority changed from Medium to High
- File Bug_Wiki2.png added as attachment
- File
Bug_Wiki2.pngremoved as attachment
-
updated by
Robin Wagner on 11/05/2013 06:52 PM -
Comment added
Hi Till,
as discussed, the problem lies in using some special characters in a wiki page title (especially %).
I created ...
-
Comment added
-
created by
Robin Wagner on 11/05/2013 06:48 PM -
updated by
Till Breuer on 11/05/2013 06:27 PM -
Comment added
Robin, could you please instruct me for error reproduction? Couldn’t reproduce the error.
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Sebastian Schuster on 11/05/2013 05:49 PM - Version deleted ()
-
updated by
Sebastian Schuster on 11/05/2013 05:47 PM - Type set to Bug
- Project set to OpenProject
- Subject set to Lost planning elements watchers
- Description set (Details)
- Status set to new
- Priority set to High
- Version deleted ()
- Author set to Sebastian Schuster
- % Complete set to 0%
- Story Points changed from 0 to 3
- Scheduling mode set to Automatic
- Working days set to include non-working days
-
updated by
Sebastian Schuster on 11/05/2013 05:45 PM - Type set to Bug
- Project set to OpenProject
- Subject set to CustomValues still associated to issues
- Description set (Details)
- Status set to new
- Priority set to High
- Version deleted ()
- Author set to Sebastian Schuster
- % Complete set to 0%
- Story Points changed from 0 to 2
- Scheduling mode set to Automatic
- Working days set to include non-working days
-
updated by
Hagen Schink on 11/05/2013 05:42 PM - Status changed from merged to closed
-
updated by
Robin Wagner on 11/05/2013 04:56 PM -
Comment added
Error still exists.
- Status changed from merged to on hold
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Jonas Heinrich (Finn) on 11/05/2013 04:55 PM -
Comment added
Hi Till,
I’m sorry but the behavior still is not matching to the specification:
public
non-member with sufficient righ...
- Status changed from merged to on hold
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Christian Ratz on 11/05/2013 04:54 PM - Status changed from merged to closed
-
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 11/05/2013 04:49 PM - Status changed from merged to closed
- Assignee deleted (
Johannes Wollert)
-
updated by
Hagen Schink on 11/05/2013 04:44 PM - Status changed from merged to closed
-
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 11/05/2013 04:34 PM - Status changed from merged to closed
-
updated by
Robin Wagner on 11/05/2013 04:30 PM - Status changed from on hold to closed
- Assignee deleted (
Till Breuer)
-
updated by
Robin Wagner on 11/05/2013 04:26 PM - Status changed from merged to closed
-
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 11/05/2013 04:24 PM - Status changed from merged to closed
-
updated by
Martin Czuchra on 11/05/2013 04:04 PM -
Comment added
I’m removing the high priority then, and wait for others to comment.
- Priority changed from High to Medium
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Robin Wagner on 11/05/2013 03:39 PM - Priority changed from Medium to High
-
created by
Jonas Heinrich (Finn) on 11/05/2013 03:39 PM -
updated by
Till Breuer on 11/05/2013 03:39 PM - Status changed from confirmed to in development
- Assignee set to Till Breuer
-
updated by
Robin Wagner on 11/05/2013 03:38 PM - Description changed (Details)
- Priority changed from Medium to High
-
updated by
Robin Wagner on 11/05/2013 03:38 PM - Priority changed from Medium to High
-
updated by
Michael Frister on 11/05/2013 03:33 PM - Status changed from needs review to merged
-
updated by
Sebastian Schuster on 11/05/2013 03:13 PM - Status changed from new to in development
- Assignee set to Sebastian Schuster
-
updated by
Hagen Schink on 11/05/2013 02:44 PM -
Comment added
PR 602
- Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee changed from Hagen Schink to Michael Frister
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Michael Frister on 11/05/2013 01:53 PM - % Complete changed from 33% to 50%
-
updated by
Michael Frister on 11/05/2013 01:53 PM -
Comment added
Martin regarding whether we still use ie8_mode:
nö.
We already have the HTML5 doctype.
- Status changed from new to closed
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Jonas Heinrich (Finn) on 11/05/2013 01:14 PM - Subject changed from [Forum] no notifications on Forum-Activity to [Forums] no notifications on Forum-Activity
- Bug found in version set to (deleted option)
-
updated by
Jonas Heinrich (Finn) on 11/05/2013 01:14 PM - Subject changed from [Forum] Moving topics between boards doesn't work to [Forums] Moving topics between boards doesn't work
-
updated by
Jonas Heinrich (Finn) on 11/05/2013 01:03 PM -
Comment added
This is the same as #284. That’s why I’m rejecting this work package.
- Status changed from new to rejected
- Version deleted ()
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Martin Czuchra on 11/05/2013 11:55 AM -
Comment added
This one is relevant for upcoming deployments.
- Priority changed from Medium to High
-
Comment added
-
created by
Robin Wagner on 11/05/2013 11:51 AM -
updated by
Jonas Heinrich (Finn) on 11/05/2013 11:49 AM -
Comment added
Also when I add a comment I do not see a Preview button. Maybe that is related to this issue.
-
Comment added
-
created by
Robin Wagner on 11/05/2013 11:29 AM -
updated by
Sebastian Schuster on 11/05/2013 11:14 AM - Status changed from needs review to merged
-
updated by
Jonas Heinrich (Finn) on 11/05/2013 10:23 AM -
Comment added
I got the same behavior when filtering for (none).
- Type set to Bug
- Project set to OpenProject
- Subject set to [Timelines] Filtering work packages for responsibles does not work
- Description set (Details)
- Status set to confirmed
- Priority set to Medium
- Version deleted ()
- Author set to Jonas Heinrich (Finn)
- % Complete set to 0%
- Scheduling mode set to Automatic
- Working days set to include non-working days
- Bug found in version set to (deleted option)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Christian Ratz on 11/05/2013 10:16 AM -
Comment added
Fixed, only the project tree was broken.
- Status changed from confirmed to needs review
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Jonas Heinrich (Finn) on 11/05/2013 10:15 AM - Type set to Bug
- Project set to OpenProject
- Subject set to [Work Package Tracking] No error for parallel editing
- Description set (Details)
- Status set to confirmed
- Priority set to High
- Version deleted ()
- Author set to Jonas Heinrich (Finn)
- % Complete set to 0%
- Scheduling mode set to Automatic
- Working days set to include non-working days
-
updated by
Christian Ratz on 11/05/2013 10:11 AM -
Comment added
fixed in PR600
- Status changed from new to needs review
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Sebastian Schuster on 11/05/2013 10:04 AM -
Comment added
I just QAed this on preview and I get the desired error message after changing my
password to an old one from before the...
- Status changed from merged to closed
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Sebastian Schuster on 11/05/2013 09:42 AM - Version set to Product Backlog
-
created by
Robin Wagner on 11/05/2013 09:37 AM -
updated by
Hagen Schink on 11/05/2013 09:29 AM -
Comment added
Hi Sebastian,
I guess this ticket is relevant for your team?
Hagen
- Assignee changed from Hagen Schink to Sebastian Schuster
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Michael Frister on 11/05/2013 09:27 AM -
Comment added
Hagen: Shouldn’t we move this into the current sprint?
- Assignee changed from Michael Frister to Hagen Schink
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Michael Frister on 11/05/2013 09:24 AM -
Comment added
Do we still use the ie8_mode plugin?
I think you can close this issue anyway, my only concern with the HTML5 doctype was...
- Assignee changed from Michael Frister to Martin Czuchra
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Sebastian Schuster on 11/05/2013 09:22 AM -
Comment added
Work package summary link is back again.
- Status changed from merged to closed
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Sebastian Schuster on 11/05/2013 09:10 AM -
Comment added
I am closing this ticket since it is most likely a duplicate of OP-650.
However, we should still keep the PR as it hints...
- Status changed from merged to closed
-
Comment added
-
created by
Robin Wagner on 11/05/2013 09:07 AM -
updated by
Sebastian Schuster on 11/05/2013 09:03 AM -
Comment added
Closing this as it cannot be QAed.
- Status changed from merged to closed
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Hagen Schink on 11/05/2013 08:27 AM - Project changed from OpenProject Foundation to OpenProject
- Version deleted ()
-
updated by
Hagen Schink on 11/05/2013 07:54 AM -
Comment added
Hi Martin,
this is not a timeline issue at all. The tag comes from a time when we haven’t specified modules by this but ...
- Subject changed from [Timelines] Certain project members should have the right to copy an existing project to [Copy Project] Certain project members should have the right to copy an existing project
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Hagen Schink on 11/05/2013 07:54 AM - Subject changed from [Timelines] New copy project form to [Copy Project] New copy project form
-
updated by
Hagen Schink on 11/05/2013 07:54 AM - Subject changed from [Timelines] Copy button in project settings to [Copy Project] Copy button in project settings
-
updated by
Hagen Schink on 11/05/2013 07:54 AM - Subject changed from [Timelines] Copy custom queries into new project to [Copy Project] Copy custom queries into new project
-
updated by
Hagen Schink on 11/05/2013 07:54 AM - Subject changed from [Timelines] Copy forums into new project to [Copy Project] Copy forums into new project
-
updated by
Hagen Schink on 11/05/2013 07:54 AM - Subject changed from [Timelines] Copy groups into new project to [Copy Project] Copy groups into new project
-
updated by
Hagen Schink on 11/05/2013 07:54 AM - Subject changed from [Timelines] Copy members into new project to [Copy Project] Copy members into new project
-
updated by
Hagen Schink on 11/05/2013 07:54 AM - Subject changed from [Timelines] Copy timeline reportings into new project to [Copy Project] Copy timeline reportings into new project
-
updated by
Hagen Schink on 11/05/2013 07:54 AM - Subject changed from [Timelines] Copy wiki pages to new project to [Copy Project] Copy wiki pages to new project
-
updated by
Hagen Schink on 11/05/2013 07:54 AM - Subject changed from [Timelines] Copy work packages to new project to [Copy Project] Copy work packages to new project
-
updated by
Hagen Schink on 11/05/2013 07:54 AM - Subject changed from [Timelines] Copy work package categories to new project to [Copy Project] Copy work package categories to new project
-
updated by
Hagen Schink on 11/05/2013 07:54 AM - Subject changed from [Timelines] Copy timeline reports to new project to [Copy Project] Copy timeline reports to new project
-
updated by
Hagen Schink on 11/05/2013 07:49 AM - Status changed from needs review to merged
-
updated by
Hagen Schink on 11/05/2013 07:42 AM - Assignee deleted (
Hagen Schink)
- Assignee deleted (
Also available in: Atom