Content
Activity
11/18/2025
-
updated by
Ivana Šugić on 11/18/2025 07:58 PM - Status changed from merged to in test
- Assignee set to Ivana Šugić
-
updated by
GitHub on 11/18/2025 05:48 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 11/18/2025 05:47 PM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Mir Bhatia)
-
updated by
Klaus Zanders on 11/18/2025 03:41 PM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Klaus Zanders)
-
updated by
Marcello Rocha Pereira on 11/18/2025 03:40 PM -
Comment added
Also, after talking with Oliver, we will help build a "glue" service that will do the entire upload, rename, maintenance...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 11/18/2025 03:28 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 11/18/2025 03:28 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 11/18/2025 03:28 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Tobias Dillmann on 11/18/2025 03:18 PM - Status changed from needs review to in review
-
updated by
GitHub on 11/18/2025 03:15 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#21053 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
created by
Marcello Rocha Pereira on 11/18/2025 03:04 PM -
Comment added
Dominic Bräunlein Oliver Günther This service will orchestrate our storages services and provide you with a single point...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 11/18/2025 02:18 PM - Status changed from review approved to merged
-
updated by
GitHub on 11/18/2025 02:18 PM - Comment added
-
created by
Eric Schubert on 11/18/2025 02:02 PM -
updated by
Eric Schubert on 11/18/2025 02:01 PM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Eric Schubert)
-
created by
Marcello Rocha Pereira on 11/18/2025 01:51 PM -
updated by
Henriette Darge on 11/18/2025 01:49 PM - Status changed from in review to review approved
- Assignee deleted (
Henriette Darge)
-
updated by
GitHub on 11/18/2025 01:47 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 11/18/2025 01:25 PM - Status changed from review approved to merged
-
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 11/18/2025 01:00 PM - Assignee set to Tobias Dillmann
-
updated by
Marcello Rocha Pereira on 11/18/2025 12:17 PM -
Comment added
Agreed.
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 11/18/2025 12:15 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#20986 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Marcello Rocha Pereira on 11/18/2025 10:59 AM -
Comment added
Wieland Lindenthal So far we are discussing how to handle it for a bunch of different reasons, like re-generating the fi...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 11/18/2025 10:45 AM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#21005 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 11/18/2025 10:11 AM - Status changed from new to decided
- % Complete set to 100%
- Decision set to We will try 3, but it's okay for 17.0 to require correct config (1)
-
updated by
GitHub on 11/18/2025 10:06 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 11/18/2025 09:57 AM - Status changed from needs review to in review
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 11/18/2025 09:52 AM - Status changed from needs review to review approved
- Assignee deleted (
Henriette Darge)
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 11/18/2025 09:17 AM -
Comment added
Marcello Rocha Pereira Yauheni Suhakou I randomly stumbled upon this work package. In the description isn't there some f...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 11/18/2025 08:34 AM - Assignee set to Henriette Darge
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 11/18/2025 08:04 AM - The changes were retracted.
-
updated by
GitHub on 11/18/2025 07:56 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 11/18/2025 07:48 AM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Oliver Günther)
-
updated by
GitHub on 11/18/2025 07:48 AM - Comment added
11/17/2025
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 11/17/2025 07:25 PM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee changed from Oliver Günther to Henriette Darge
-
updated by
Alexander Coles on 11/17/2025 05:44 PM -
Comment added
Although I made a start on this, it's far from finished: since I wasn't sure exactly how this work fits in with the Proj...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 11/17/2025 02:38 PM - Version set to 17.0.0
-
updated by
Attila Dombi on 11/17/2025 12:58 PM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Attila Dombi)
-
updated by
GitHub on 11/17/2025 12:53 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Eric Schubert on 11/17/2025 12:50 PM - Status changed from new to in development
- Assignee set to Eric Schubert
- Developers set to Eric Schubert
-
updated by
Yauheni Suhakou on 11/17/2025 12:07 PM - Status changed from new to in development
- Assignee set to Yauheni Suhakou
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 11/17/2025 10:07 AM -
Comment added
FYI Mir Bhatia Klaus Zanders
- Status changed from new to decided
- % Complete set to 100%
- Decision set to Restricted to single-select project attributes of type user
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Marcello Rocha Pereira on 11/17/2025 09:49 AM - Description changed (Details)
-
created by
Marcello Rocha Pereira on 11/17/2025 09:19 AM -
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 11/17/2025 08:52 AM -
Comment added
Updated automatically by changing values within child work package #69098
- Scheduling mode set to Automatic
-
Comment added
-
created by
Mir Bhatia on 11/17/2025 08:52 AM -
updated by
Oliver Günther on 11/17/2025 06:55 AM - Status changed from review failed to in development
-
updated by
GitHub on 11/17/2025 06:55 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 11/17/2025 06:54 AM - Status changed from specified to in development
- Developers changed from OP Dev Dream Team to Oliver Günther
-
updated by
Alexander Coles on 11/17/2025 03:46 AM -
Comment added
Hi Christophe Bliard , I've reassigned this to you as Henriette Darge mentioned that you will most likely be taking this...
- Status changed from in development to on hold
- Assignee changed from Alexander Coles to Christophe Bliard
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 11/17/2025 03:32 AM - Comment added
11/16/2025
-
updated by
GitHub on 11/16/2025 01:02 AM - Comment added
11/14/2025
-
updated by
GitHub on 11/14/2025 05:01 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 11/14/2025 01:36 PM -
Comment added
Correct. We're moving this to a new tab.
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 11/14/2025 01:10 PM - Description changed (Details)
- Status changed from in specification to specified
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 11/14/2025 01:07 PM - Status changed from in review to review failed
- Assignee changed from Henriette Darge to Oliver Günther
-
created by
Henriette Darge on 11/14/2025 12:02 PM -
updated by
Henriette Darge on 11/14/2025 11:57 AM -
Comment added
Automatisch durch die Änderungen in Unteraufgabe #69073 aktualisiert
- Subject changed from Change representation of project template selector on project create form to Improve project create form by moving template selection to a separate page
- Description changed (Details)
- Scheduling mode set to Automatic
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 11/14/2025 10:36 AM - Assignee changed from Henriette Darge to Oliver Günther
-
created by
Oliver Günther on 11/14/2025 10:33 AM -
Comment added
FYI Marcello Rocha Pereira Parimal Satyal Jens Ulferts this is the open point regarding which user is used for performin...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 11/14/2025 10:09 AM - Status changed from needs review to in review
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 11/14/2025 10:07 AM - Type changed from Implementation to Feature
- Version set to Product Backlog
- Module set to Modules and project features / Project creation
-
updated by
Alexander Coles on 11/14/2025 09:43 AM -
Comment added
I've created #69068 to track implementing support for icons for project/workspace templates (not sure if it should be a ...
- Description changed (Details)
-
Comment added
-
Open Point #69035: How to enforce required custom fields that are not part of the initiation requestupdated by
Oliver Günther on 11/14/2025 09:40 AM - Status changed from new to decided
- % Complete set to 100%
- Decision set to This cannot happen, as all required custom fields will need to appear in the wizard
-
created by
Alexander Coles on 11/14/2025 09:38 AM -
updated by
Oliver Günther on 11/14/2025 09:08 AM - Status changed from new to decided
- % Complete set to 100%
- Decision set to Groups can also be selected (as they are allowed before)
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 11/14/2025 09:08 AM -
Comment added
Klaus Zanders Parimal Satyal I think this can be closed as the decision was "move it to a new tab", correct?
- Status changed from new to decided
- % Complete set to 100%
- Decision set to Role assignment will be shown on a separate tab
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 11/14/2025 08:41 AM - Assignee set to Henriette Darge
-
updated by
GitHub on 11/14/2025 08:15 AM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#21026 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Attila Dombi on 11/14/2025 07:43 AM - Status changed from new to in development
- Developers set to Attila Dombi
-
updated by
GitHub on 11/14/2025 07:35 AM - Comment added
11/13/2025
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 11/13/2025 08:35 PM -
Comment added
Setting to needs review, even though the first bit is not yet addressed, as we need the template changes for that.
- Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Oliver Günther)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 11/13/2025 08:25 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 11/13/2025 05:09 PM - Comment added
-
created by
Oliver Günther on 11/13/2025 03:14 PM -
updated by
Oliver Günther on 11/13/2025 03:14 PM - Subject changed from Multi-step project creation wizard to create and process PM²/PMflex project initiation requests
to Multi-step project creation wizard to create and process PM²/PMflex artifacts
- Subject changed from Multi-step project creation wizard to create and process PM²/PMflex project initiation requests
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 11/13/2025 01:29 PM - Parent changed from Multi-step project creation wizard to create and process PM²/PMflex artifacts to Templates define their own settings for the project wizard
-
created by
Mir Bhatia on 11/13/2025 01:22 PM -
created by
Mir Bhatia on 11/13/2025 01:22 PM -
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 11/13/2025 01:21 PM -
Comment added
Updated automatically by changing values within child work package #69038
- Scheduling mode set to Automatic
-
Comment added
-
created by
Mir Bhatia on 11/13/2025 01:21 PM -
updated by
Jan Sandbrink on 11/13/2025 01:16 PM - Description changed (Details)
-
updated by
GitHub on 11/13/2025 01:15 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#21008 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 11/13/2025 12:49 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 11/13/2025 12:49 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 11/13/2025 11:58 AM - Subject changed from Configuration of project custom fields to appear in the create wizard to Configuration of project attributes to appear in the create wizard
- Description changed (Details)
- File Bildschirmfoto_2025-11-13_um_13.03.51.png added as attachment
-
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 11/13/2025 10:54 AM -
Comment added
Hi Henriette Darge , Alexander Coles ,
the enforcement on filling out required custom fields on project creation curren...
- Description changed (Details)
-
Comment added
-
Open Point #69035: How to enforce required custom fields that are not part of the initiation requestcreated by
Jens Ulferts on 11/13/2025 10:52 AM -
created by
Jens Ulferts on 11/13/2025 10:45 AM -
Comment added
Updated automatically by changing values within child work package #69035
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 11/13/2025 10:27 AM - Description changed (Details)
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 11/13/2025 10:18 AM - Status changed from new to decided
- % Complete set to 100%
- Decision set to All users and groups, as before
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 11/13/2025 10:16 AM - Status changed from new to decided
- % Complete set to 100%
- Decision set to We will unset the custom field if the member role is removed
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 11/13/2025 10:14 AM - Status changed from new to decided
- % Complete set to 100%
- Decision set to We go with option 3, and make sure to inform admins really well about that implication
-
updated by
Niels Lindenthal on 11/13/2025 09:44 AM -
Comment added
Hi Jens Ulferts,
Thanks for the input. I agree.
I moved this out of 17.0 so we have a bit more time to define all this. ...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 11/13/2025 09:28 AM -
Comment added
Hi Niels Lindenthal , the requirements themselves look good. What I wonder about though is the potential of this leading...
- Status changed from new to in specification
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 11/13/2025 09:19 AM - Status changed from in specification to in development
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 11/13/2025 07:58 AM - Description changed (Details)
-
updated by
Niels Lindenthal on 11/13/2025 07:29 AM - Version changed from 17.0.0 to 17.1.0
-
updated by
Niels Lindenthal on 11/13/2025 04:48 AM -
Comment added
Hi Oliver Günther and Jens Ulferts,
Can you please have a look at this requirement? I think it would allow us more flexi...
- Project changed from OpenProject to Project Inititation Requests
- Subject changed from Allow notifying project roles in custom actions to Custom actions: Notify people involved in a workflow with pre-defined work package comments
- Description changed (Details)
- Priority changed from Medium to High
- Version changed from Wish List to 17.0.0
- Parent changed from Notifiying placeholder users via custom action doesn't work to Multi-step project creation wizard to create and process PM²/PMflex artifacts
- Requires doc change changed from No to Yes
- Enterprise plan set to Enterprise (ENT) / Professional (PRO)
- Module set to Administration / Custom actions
- Votes deleted (
1)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Niels Lindenthal on 11/13/2025 04:39 AM -
Comment added
Hi Oliver Günther and Jens Ulferts,
More general remark regarding notifications:
I had a call with Aylin from Accenture ...
- Enterprise plan set to Community (COM)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Niels Lindenthal on 11/13/2025 04:32 AM -
Comment added
Hi Oliver Günther,
My understanding is that each artifact will have an own type with own attributes and workflows. So in...
-
Comment added
11/12/2025
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 11/12/2025 04:12 PM -
Comment added
Thanks Oliver Günther.
I've updated the mockups based on these updated specs.
Initially, I tried the multi-step process...
- Mockups set to https://www.figma.com/design/tlD4wYMNV8S1DeQlGzku0s/Project-creation?node-id=2272-49573
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 11/12/2025 04:11 PM - Mockups set to https://www.figma.com/design/tlD4wYMNV8S1DeQlGzku0s/Project-creation?node-id=2272-49573
-
updated by
GitHub on 11/12/2025 03:37 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 11/12/2025 02:58 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 11/12/2025 01:54 PM -
Comment added
Hi Alexander Coles
Marc provided some Mockups for moving the template selector to a first page before collecting data l...
- Description changed (Details)
- File Bildschirmfoto_2025-11-12_um_14.54.03.png added as attachment
-
Comment added
-
created by
Marcello Rocha Pereira on 11/12/2025 01:37 PM -
updated by
Marcello Rocha Pereira on 11/12/2025 01:36 PM - Description set (Details)
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 11/12/2025 01:32 PM - Subject changed from Configuration of project custom fields to appear in the create wizard or not to Configuration of project custom fields to appear in the create wizard
-
updated by
GitHub on 11/12/2025 12:58 PM - Comment added
-
created by
Jan Sandbrink on 11/12/2025 12:53 PM -
updated by
Oliver Günther on 11/12/2025 12:48 PM -
Comment added
Yes this is still possible, but since every project can define their "artifact" work package type, it would not be a sin...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Niels Lindenthal on 11/12/2025 12:42 PM -
Comment added
Hi Oliver Günther,
There is work package list in the portfolio project showing all work packages "Project initiation ...
- Description changed (Details)
- Status changed from in specification to specified
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Niels Lindenthal on 11/12/2025 12:42 PM - Module set to Modules and project features / Project creation
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 11/12/2025 12:41 PM - Assignee deleted (
Mir Bhatia)
- Assignee deleted (
-
updated by
Niels Lindenthal on 11/12/2025 12:39 PM -
Comment added
Hi Oliver Günther,
OK for me. I moved it to 17.1. Let's focus on the other stuff first.
- Priority changed from High to Medium
- Version changed from 17.0.0 to 17.1.0
- Requires doc change changed from No to Yes
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 11/12/2025 12:37 PM - The changes were retracted.
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 11/12/2025 12:37 PM -
Comment added
Rejecting in favor of
- Status changed from needs clarification to rejected
- % Complete set to 100%
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 11/12/2025 12:35 PM -
Comment added
FYI Niels Lindenthal Jens Ulferts I updated the description with the results of the discussion and added warnings to wha...
- Description changed (Details)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 11/12/2025 12:30 PM -
Comment added
Merged into
- Status changed from new to rejected
- % Complete set to 100%
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 11/12/2025 12:29 PM -
Comment added
FYI Marc Alcobé Niels Lindenthal Jens Ulferts we didn't really talk about the remaining global setting to notify on proj...
- Subject changed from Send out notification on completion of project wizard to Send out notification on creation of a project
- Description changed (Details)
- Status changed from in development to needs clarification
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 11/12/2025 12:28 PM -
Comment added
FYI Mir Bhatia Parimal Satyal I added the specification from the meeting earlier. Mir and I already aligned briefly, so ...
- Description changed (Details)
- Status changed from new to in development
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Dominic Bräunlein on 11/12/2025 09:28 AM - Description changed (Details)
-
updated by
Niels Lindenthal on 11/12/2025 05:53 AM -
Comment added
Hi Jens Ulferts, this approach sounds good to me.
-
Comment added
Also available in: Atom