Content
Activity
04/30/2025
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 04/30/2025 04:40 PM -
Comment added
Updated the expected behaviour as discussed.
I've removed the bit about changing sort order, since the current sort orde...
- Description changed (Details)
- Status changed from needs clarification to confirmed
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 04/30/2025 02:59 PM -
Comment added
Parimal Satyal could you please finish these specs?
- Description changed (Details)
- Status changed from confirmed to needs clarification
- Assignee set to Parimal Satyal
- Version set to 16.0.0
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 04/30/2025 02:47 PM - The changes were retracted.
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/30/2025 01:45 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18767 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
created by
Wieland Lindenthal on 04/30/2025 01:24 PM -
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 04/30/2025 01:00 PM - Status changed from needs review to merged
- Assignee deleted (
Bruno Pagno)
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/30/2025 12:59 PM - Comment added
-
created by
Kabiru Mwenja on 04/30/2025 12:29 PM -
created by
Wieland Lindenthal on 04/30/2025 12:12 PM -
Comment added
FYI Bruno Pagno Kabiru Mwenja, this is probably not the most critical BUG. However, I think you should be aware of it.
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 04/30/2025 12:11 PM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee changed from Kabiru Mwenja to Bruno Pagno
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/30/2025 12:10 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 04/30/2025 11:53 AM -
Comment added
Thank you Wieland, that is indeed the correct state.
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 04/30/2025 11:45 AM -
Comment added
Hey Kabiru Mwenja Bruno Pagno, this EPIC was in the state of "in development" and I checked to see what is missing. Appa...
- Status changed from in development to merged
- Assignee deleted (
Parimal Satyal) - Version set to 16.0.0
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 04/30/2025 10:30 AM - Subject changed from Shorten the label of 'Mark all as read' in Notification center and trigger browser confirmation dialog
to Trigger browser confirmation dialog when clicking on 'Mark all as read' - Description changed (Details)
- Subject changed from Shorten the label of 'Mark all as read' in Notification center and trigger browser confirmation dialog
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/30/2025 09:54 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 04/30/2025 09:16 AM - Status changed from confirmed to in development
- Developers set to Kabiru Mwenja
04/29/2025
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/29/2025 03:15 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18740 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 04/29/2025 02:52 PM - Status changed from review approved to merged
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/29/2025 02:52 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/29/2025 02:28 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/29/2025 02:15 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18733 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 04/29/2025 01:43 PM -
Comment added
Parimal Satyal I merged the PR for the sake of updating the feature. Whenever we have the new video we can open a new bu...
- Status changed from review approved to merged
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/29/2025 01:43 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 04/29/2025 01:21 PM - Status changed from needs review to review approved
- Assignee deleted (
Kabiru Mwenja)
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/29/2025 01:15 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18756 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 04/29/2025 12:46 PM - Status changed from needs review to merged
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/29/2025 12:41 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/29/2025 12:40 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 04/29/2025 10:57 AM -
Comment added
Oh gosh, you're right. Thanks for noticing, I hadn't. I'll get back to Alexander.
Cheers
Parimal
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 04/29/2025 10:47 AM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Bruno Pagno)
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 04/29/2025 10:40 AM -
Comment added
Parimal Satyal there's a small issue with the video, that the label transforms from "internal comment" to "restrict visi...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 04/29/2025 09:55 AM - The changes were retracted.
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 04/29/2025 09:52 AM - Version changed from 16.1.0 to 16.2.0
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 04/29/2025 09:45 AM - Version changed from 16.1.0 to Wish List
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/29/2025 09:45 AM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18738 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 04/29/2025 09:44 AM - Status changed from in specification to specified
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 04/29/2025 09:44 AM - Version set to 16.0.0
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 04/29/2025 09:17 AM - Subject changed from Add restricted comments to work packages API to Add internal comments to work packages API
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 04/29/2025 08:57 AM - Status changed from review approved to merged
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/29/2025 08:57 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 04/29/2025 08:33 AM - Status changed from needs review to review approved
04/28/2025
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/28/2025 05:14 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 04/28/2025 05:13 PM - Status changed from new to in development
- Assignee set to Bruno Pagno
- Developers set to Bruno Pagno
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 04/28/2025 04:00 PM -
Comment added
Hi team,
We have the video now for the full-scale banner. Don't know if it's possible to integrate it directly to this ...
- Description changed (Details)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 04/28/2025 03:41 PM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Bruno Pagno)
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/28/2025 03:03 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 04/28/2025 10:14 AM - Description changed (Details)
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 04/28/2025 09:56 AM -
Comment added
Marking as decided, since there's already a decision
- Status changed from new to decided
- % Complete set to 100%
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 04/28/2025 09:55 AM -
Comment added
There's a pull request open removing the feature flag, so we can consider this one resolved
- Status changed from new to resolved
- % Complete set to 100%
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 04/28/2025 09:53 AM -
Comment added
Kabiru Mwenja is this a stale one or something we can follow up?
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 04/28/2025 09:51 AM -
Comment added
Parimal Satyal Wieland Lindenthal this looks like a stale Open Point, but I'm not sure what's the context being discusse...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 04/28/2025 09:47 AM -
Comment added
Closing this one for being stale. We can reopen the discussion when threaded comments discussion come back
- Status changed from needs clarification to rejected
- % Complete set to 100%
- Involved people changed from Wieland Lindenthal, Parimal Satyal, (missing value or lacking permissions to access), Oliver Günther
to Wieland Lindenthal, Parimal Satyal, Oliver Günther, Bruno Pagno
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 04/28/2025 09:44 AM - Status changed from needs review to review approved
- Assignee deleted (
Bruno Pagno)
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 04/28/2025 09:34 AM -
Comment added
Hi Bruno Pagno, Kabiru Mwenja:
This feature can be rejected if we decide to implement the quick-set options first (since...
- Status changed from specified to on hold
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 04/28/2025 09:33 AM - Description changed (Details)
04/25/2025
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 04/25/2025 08:53 PM - Assignee set to Kabiru Mwenja
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 04/25/2025 08:52 PM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee changed from Kabiru Mwenja to Bruno Pagno
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/25/2025 08:52 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/25/2025 08:30 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/25/2025 07:45 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18737 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
created by
Kabiru Mwenja on 04/25/2025 07:13 PM -
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 04/25/2025 07:11 PM - Description changed (Details)
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 04/25/2025 07:06 PM - Status changed from needs review to merged
- Assignee deleted (
Bruno Pagno)
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 04/25/2025 07:06 PM - Status changed from test failed to merged
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/25/2025 07:04 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 04/25/2025 04:24 PM - Status changed from confirmed to in development
- Developers set to Bruno Pagno
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/25/2025 04:02 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 04/25/2025 04:00 PM - Subject changed from After clicking on "Make public" once, subsequent "cancel" actions do not level the "Internal comment" in checked state
to After clicking on "Make public" once, subsequent "cancel" actions do not retain the "Internal comment" checked state - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee changed from Kabiru Mwenja to Bruno Pagno
- Subject changed from After clicking on "Make public" once, subsequent "cancel" actions do not level the "Internal comment" in checked state
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/25/2025 03:59 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 04/25/2025 03:54 PM - Subject changed from Once the user chooses the make the comment public and then checks the internal comment checkbox, the checked state is not retained if the uncheck again and choose "cancel" in the confirmation dialog
to After clicking on "Make public" once, subsequent "cancel" actions do not level the "Internal comment" in checked state - Description changed (Details)
- File internal-comment-state-bug.gif added as attachment
- File
Kapture_2025-04-25_at_14.23.03.gifremoved as attachment
- Subject changed from Once the user chooses the make the comment public and then checks the internal comment checkbox, the checked state is not retained if the uncheck again and choose "cancel" in the confirmation dialog
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/25/2025 03:22 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Ivana Šugić on 04/25/2025 03:16 PM -
Comment added
Hi Kabiru Mwenja, no objections from me, feel free to assign to me whatever needs testing once you're done.
Thanks for ...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 04/25/2025 02:29 PM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Bruno Pagno)
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/25/2025 02:28 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/25/2025 02:10 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 04/25/2025 01:37 PM -
Comment added
Hi Ivana Šugić , I found a bug while testing the feature in QA Edge, I'd like to fix it first and then hand back to you...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 04/25/2025 01:26 PM -
Comment added
Updated automatically by changing values within child work package STC-315
- Status changed from merged to test failed
- Scheduling mode set to Automatic
-
Comment added
-
created by
Kabiru Mwenja on 04/25/2025 01:26 PM -
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 04/25/2025 01:19 PM - Status changed from specified to in development
- Developers set to Kabiru Mwenja
-
created by
Kabiru Mwenja on 04/25/2025 01:18 PM -
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 04/25/2025 01:17 PM - Version set to 16.0.0
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 04/25/2025 11:45 AM - Assignee set to Bruno Pagno
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 04/25/2025 11:44 AM - Assignee set to Kabiru Mwenja
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 04/25/2025 11:43 AM - Assignee set to Kabiru Mwenja
- Version set to 16.0.0
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 04/25/2025 11:37 AM - Type changed from Implementation to Feature
- Version set to 16.2.0
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 04/25/2025 11:23 AM - Status changed from review approved to merged
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/25/2025 11:06 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 04/25/2025 11:02 AM - Status changed from needs review to review approved
- Assignee deleted (
Bruno Pagno)
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 04/25/2025 10:18 AM - Description changed (Details)
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 04/25/2025 09:51 AM - Status changed from specified to in development
- Developers set to Bruno Pagno
-
updated by
Ivana Šugić on 04/25/2025 09:26 AM -
Comment added
This feature has been tested ✅
Tested on:
Core build
34a8aeb63ba44f775526ffe5178da65d2f4cb512
Product version
4c0a4dabe...
- Status changed from in test to tested
- % Complete set to 100%
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/25/2025 09:15 AM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18726 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/25/2025 09:15 AM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18695 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
created by
Ivana Šugić on 04/25/2025 08:54 AM
04/24/2025
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 04/24/2025 06:12 PM - Status changed from in development to closed
- Assignee deleted (
Kabiru Mwenja) - % Complete set to 100%
-
updated by
Ivana Šugić on 04/24/2025 06:00 PM - Status changed from merged to in test
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/24/2025 05:52 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/24/2025 05:46 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/24/2025 05:30 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/24/2025 05:24 PM - Comment added
-
created by
Kabiru Mwenja on 04/24/2025 05:18 PM -
updated by
GitHub on 04/24/2025 02:45 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18669 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 04/24/2025 02:15 PM - Status changed from in development to merged
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 04/24/2025 02:15 PM - Status changed from in development to closed
- Assignee deleted (
Bruno Pagno) - % Complete set to 100%
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/24/2025 02:09 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/24/2025 01:11 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 04/24/2025 12:48 PM - Version changed from 16.1.0 to Wish List
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 04/24/2025 12:01 PM -
Comment added
Hi team,
We've had a chat with Oliver and Marc and the text is now finalised. This is now specified.
I'm updating the L...
- Description changed (Details)
- Status changed from on hold to specified
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/24/2025 11:22 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 04/24/2025 10:48 AM - Version set to 16.0.0
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 04/24/2025 10:48 AM - Version set to 16.0.0
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/24/2025 10:39 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 04/24/2025 09:40 AM - Version changed from Wish List to 16.2.0
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 04/24/2025 09:35 AM - Version changed from 16.1.0 to 16.2.0
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 04/24/2025 09:32 AM - Version changed from Wish List to 16.1.0
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 04/24/2025 09:29 AM - Version changed from Wish List to 16.1.0
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 04/24/2025 09:28 AM - Version changed from 16.0.0 to 16.1.0
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 04/24/2025 09:27 AM - Decision set to Investigate if CKEditor/BlockNote.js can handle copy paste of binary image and reupload/republish. If this is not possible we need to reassess
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 04/24/2025 09:25 AM - Module set to Administration / Incoming emails
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 04/24/2025 09:21 AM - Version changed from Wish List to 16.1.0
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 04/24/2025 09:18 AM - Version set to 16.1.0
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 04/24/2025 09:17 AM - Status changed from new to decided
- % Complete set to 100%
- Decision set to Because even those who have the permission to write internal comments will most likely write 'normal' comments more often, we will not offer this option (at least not yet).
Also available in: Atom