Content
Activity
03/21/2025
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/21/2025 03:03 PM -
Comment added
Agree Parimal Satyal - the "small version" is enabled via the RVC feature flag so you can already see this on https://qa...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 03/21/2025 02:41 PM -
Comment added
Kabiru Mwenja how does this task work? Do we need to kickoff documentation somehow or create a placeholder for it?
This ...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/21/2025 02:40 PM - Assignee set to Kabiru Mwenja
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 03/21/2025 02:38 PM -
Comment added
Hi Kabiru Mwenja. This is also one of those things that we should perhaps test in real life, but I also prefer the small...
-
Comment added
-
Implementation STC-204: Define Quoting criteria for work package comments with restricted visibilityupdated by
GitHub on 03/21/2025 02:15 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18388 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/21/2025 02:15 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18360 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
Implementation STC-204: Define Quoting criteria for work package comments with restricted visibilityupdated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/21/2025 01:53 PM - Status changed from needs review to closed
- % Complete set to 100%
-
Implementation STC-204: Define Quoting criteria for work package comments with restricted visibilityupdated by
GitHub on 03/21/2025 01:51 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/21/2025 01:49 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/21/2025 11:57 AM - Description changed (Details)
- Status changed from specified to in development
- Assignee set to Kabiru Mwenja
- Developers set to Kabiru Mwenja
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/21/2025 11:51 AM - Status changed from needs review to closed
- Assignee deleted (
Bruno Pagno) - % Complete set to 100%
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/21/2025 11:45 AM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18332 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/21/2025 11:45 AM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18302 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/21/2025 11:45 AM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18262 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/21/2025 11:45 AM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18262 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/21/2025 11:45 AM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18262 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/21/2025 11:45 AM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18217 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/21/2025 11:45 AM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18144 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/21/2025 11:45 AM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18144 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/21/2025 11:45 AM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18144 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/21/2025 11:45 AM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18144 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/21/2025 11:45 AM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18131 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/21/2025 11:45 AM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18095 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/21/2025 11:45 AM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18095 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/21/2025 11:45 AM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18091 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/21/2025 11:45 AM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18091 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/21/2025 11:45 AM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18091 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/21/2025 11:45 AM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18091 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/21/2025 11:45 AM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18091 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/21/2025 11:22 AM - Status changed from new to needs clarification
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 03/21/2025 11:19 AM - Status changed from needs clarification to decided
- Decision set to Change the attachments container from the work package to the journal (comment) so that they are seen as inline
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/21/2025 11:17 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/21/2025 11:17 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/21/2025 11:17 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/21/2025 11:17 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/21/2025 11:17 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/21/2025 10:07 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
Marc Alcobé on 03/21/2025 09:53 AM -
Comment added
Hi Bruno Pagno and Wieland Lindenthal,
I'm sorry to hear that. From a mobile perspective, I must insist on this one agai...
-
Comment added
-
Implementation STC-204: Define Quoting criteria for work package comments with restricted visibilityupdated by
GitHub on 03/21/2025 09:43 AM - Comment added
-
Implementation STC-204: Define Quoting criteria for work package comments with restricted visibilityupdated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/21/2025 09:38 AM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Kabiru Mwenja)
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 03/21/2025 09:26 AM - Description changed (Details)
- Status changed from in specification to specified
- Version set to 15.5.0
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 03/21/2025 09:26 AM - Description changed (Details)
- Status changed from specified to in development
- Assignee set to Bruno Pagno
- Version set to 15.5.0
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 03/21/2025 09:25 AM -
Comment added
This is a duplicate of STC-277. We decided to make it a feature instead of an implementation chunk.
- Status changed from in specification to rejected
- % Complete set to 100%
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 03/21/2025 09:20 AM - Version set to 15.5.0
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 03/21/2025 09:18 AM - Version changed from 15.5.0 to Wish List
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 03/21/2025 09:18 AM - Version changed from 15.5.0 to Wish List
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 03/21/2025 09:15 AM -
Comment added
We have limited capacity for 15.5 and will not make it. Marc Alcobé
Wieland Lindenthal we need to replan this one.
- Version changed from 15.5.0 to Wish List
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 03/21/2025 09:14 AM -
Comment added
We have limited capacity for 15.5, so I'm putting this one to wish list. We need to replan this Wieland Lindenthal
- Version changed from 15.5.0 to Wish List
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Niels Lindenthal on 03/21/2025 09:07 AM -
Comment added
Rince wind wrote:
Just throwing this out there, IMO this would be the right place to use AI to autofill correct custom ...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/21/2025 08:35 AM - Description changed (Details)
-
updated by
Rince wind on 03/21/2025 08:33 AM -
Comment added
Just throwing this out there, IMO this would be the right place to use AI to autofill correct custom field values etc.
-
Comment added
03/20/2025
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/20/2025 05:01 PM -
Comment added
Parimal Satyal wrote:
Thanks, Kabiru Mwenja. Let's go ahead and used display-brown-borderColor-emphasis for the border,...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 03/20/2025 03:01 PM - Status changed from new to resolved
- % Complete set to 100%
-
updated by
Markus K. on 03/20/2025 02:21 PM -
Comment added
Cécile Guiot Due to little shirt-size and a very similar small fix was done in the latest release () I want to ask you f...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 03/20/2025 01:44 PM - Description changed (Details)
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 03/20/2025 01:37 PM -
Comment added
Yes. It looks good to me. I added in the relations the open point for extracting comments as there's some extra info the...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 03/20/2025 01:35 PM -
Comment added
As we created a code maintenance, I assume we can consider this open point closed and continue discussions directly on t...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 03/20/2025 01:26 PM -
Comment added
Kabiru Mwenja Bruno Pagno May I ask you to check the description and correct and extend it?
-
Comment added
-
created by
Wieland Lindenthal on 03/20/2025 01:22 PM -
Comment added
Unfortunately the size of this CODE MAINTENANCE is too big for version 15.5. And we need to ship STC-1 in 15.5. So we ne...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 03/20/2025 11:49 AM -
Comment added
Hi team, as promised, here's a quick update on the Enterprise banners after a chat with Marc and Niels:
The the team i...
- Mockups set to https://www.figma.com/design/w0YoqQ5v0JGNT5NS5NZJZq/Comments-with-restricted-visibility?node-id=395-12018
-
Comment added
-
Implementation STC-204: Define Quoting criteria for work package comments with restricted visibilityupdated by
GitHub on 03/20/2025 11:17 AM - Comment added
-
created by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/20/2025 10:21 AM -
created by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/20/2025 10:20 AM -
created by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/20/2025 10:19 AM -
created by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/20/2025 10:18 AM -
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 03/20/2025 10:17 AM - Subject changed from Introduce inline attachments for work package comments to Don't show work package comment inline attachments in Files tab
- Description changed (Details)
- Status changed from in specification to specified
-
created by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/20/2025 10:16 AM -
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 03/20/2025 10:11 AM -
Comment added
Thanks, Kabiru Mwenja. Let's go ahead and used display-brown-borderColor-emphasis for the border, as discussed earlier t...
- Description changed (Details)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/20/2025 09:26 AM -
Comment added
Arising Feature:
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/20/2025 09:25 AM -
Comment added
Discussions from meeting with Bruno Pagno Wieland Lindenthal - most reachable option remains changing the Attachments co...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/20/2025 09:23 AM -
Comment added
Hi Wieland Lindenthal , please review the specs of this feature arising from the attachments conversation in STC-258
wit...
- Description changed (Details)
- Status changed from new to in specification
- Assignee set to Wieland Lindenthal
- Version set to 15.5.0
-
Comment added
-
created by
Bruno Pagno on 03/20/2025 09:12 AM -
updated by
GitHub on 03/20/2025 08:45 AM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18370 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 03/20/2025 08:16 AM - Status changed from needs review to merged
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/20/2025 08:16 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/20/2025 07:40 AM -
Comment added
Sure Parimal Satyal - colors updated in the preview. 👍
- Assignee changed from Kabiru Mwenja to Parimal Satyal
-
Comment added
03/19/2025
-
updated by
Niels Lindenthal on 03/19/2025 05:49 PM - Requested by set to ZenDiS
-
updated by
Marc Alcobé on 03/19/2025 05:05 PM -
Comment added
Hi Parimal Satyal and Niels Lindenthal,
I've added the latest version of quick filters for Custom fields in this Figma f...
- Mockups set to https://www.figma.com/design/oTMDTvcwrx35qExTkkSKBn/Custom-fields?node-id=1474-23518
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 03/19/2025 12:36 PM -
Comment added
Hi Kabiru Mwenja,
Could you try these new colours in the PR? We're using browns with the approach you recommended (defa...
- Description changed (Details)
- Assignee changed from Parimal Satyal to Kabiru Mwenja
- File Colour_modes_WIP_-_Brown__border_muted_.png added as attachment
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 03/19/2025 10:58 AM - Status changed from in development to specified
- Assignee deleted (
Bruno Pagno)
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 03/19/2025 10:57 AM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Bruno Pagno)
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/19/2025 10:57 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/19/2025 10:33 AM - Status changed from resolved to needs clarification
- Assignee changed from Kabiru Mwenja to Parimal Satyal
- Involved people changed from Henriette Darge, Parimal Satyal, Bruno Pagno to Henriette Darge, Parimal Satyal, Kabiru Mwenja, Bruno Pagno
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 03/19/2025 10:31 AM -
Comment added
Thanks Kabiru Mwenja. Based on our meeting this morning, we need to continue exploring colours. I was also able to test ...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 03/19/2025 09:54 AM -
Comment added
Hi Niels Lindenthal,
This is split from that (please see last comment on OP-16769).
As discussed in our last daily, I wr...
- Description changed (Details)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/19/2025 09:22 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 03/19/2025 09:06 AM - Status changed from test failed to in development
- Assignee set to Bruno Pagno
03/18/2025
-
updated by
Niels Lindenthal on 03/18/2025 08:44 PM -
Comment added
Hi Parimal Satyal,
What is the difference between this one and
##62183?
Did you create mockups?
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/18/2025 07:16 PM - Comment added
-
created by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/18/2025 07:15 PM -
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/18/2025 07:08 PM - Status changed from new to decided
- % Complete set to 100%
-
updated by
System on 03/18/2025 07:08 PM - Duplicate work package updated: The status was automatically updated by the duplicated work package Open Point STC-264: closed Acitivity tab comment editor shrinks before restricted visibility checkbox can be clicked
- Status changed from new to decided
- % Complete set to 100%
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/18/2025 07:05 PM -
Comment added
Hi Parimal Satyal - sure thing, please review the PR linked above activity#comment-972219
Pull Preview: https://pr-1836...
- Status changed from needs clarification to resolved
- % Complete set to 100%
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 03/18/2025 06:52 PM - Status changed from closed to in specification
-
updated by
System on 03/18/2025 06:48 PM - Duplicate work package updated: The status was automatically updated by the duplicated work package Feature OP-16769: Relocate administration of custom fields for work packages
- Status changed from in specification to closed
- % Complete set to 100%
-
created by
Parimal Satyal on 03/18/2025 06:29 PM -
Comment added
Hi Marc Alcobé,
This is the we spoke about with Niels Lindenthal the other day; it could be the first place we try and ...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/18/2025 05:55 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 03/18/2025 05:31 PM -
Comment added
Hi Kabiru Mwenja,
Parsing through the two CSS files + testing colour combinations ended up taking a very long time indee...
- Description changed (Details)
- Assignee changed from Parimal Satyal to Kabiru Mwenja
- File Colour_modes_WIP.png added as attachment
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 03/18/2025 05:24 PM -
Comment added
Update: We're going with the following approach.
The checkbox is labelled "Restrict visibility" in both desktop and mo...
- File Comment_box_design_-_desktop.png added as attachment
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 03/18/2025 12:49 PM -
Comment added
Kabiru Mwenja Bruno Pagno The feedback I got on not showing inline attachments of comments in the Files tab is mostly po...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/18/2025 11:53 AM - Comment added
-
Implementation STC-204: Define Quoting criteria for work package comments with restricted visibilityupdated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/18/2025 11:42 AM - Status changed from new to in development
- Assignee set to Kabiru Mwenja
- Version set to 15.5.0
- Developers set to Kabiru Mwenja
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/18/2025 11:35 AM - Status changed from needs review to closed
- % Complete set to 100%
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/18/2025 11:35 AM - Status changed from needs review to closed
- Assignee deleted (
Bruno Pagno) - % Complete set to 100%
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/18/2025 11:35 AM - Status changed from needs review to closed
- % Complete set to 100%
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/18/2025 10:54 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/18/2025 10:43 AM -
Comment added
Discussions from meeting with Bruno Pagno Wieland Lindenthal - most reachable option remains changing the Attachments c...
- File image.png added as attachment
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/18/2025 09:23 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/18/2025 09:23 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/18/2025 09:23 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 03/18/2025 08:51 AM -
Comment added
Jens Ulferts Kabiru Mwenja Bruno Pagno Having the Event model and the Comment extraction seperated in separate steps, ca...
-
Comment added
03/17/2025
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/17/2025 04:44 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 03/17/2025 02:43 PM -
Comment added
Thanks for the writeup, Bruno Pagno .
To me, the goal is by now rather clear, but of course there are a lot of uncertain...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/17/2025 02:36 PM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Kabiru Mwenja)
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/17/2025 02:36 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 03/17/2025 01:33 PM -
Comment added
Wieland Lindenthal we did some experimentation on using a view (not a materialized view) and it seems performatic enough...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 03/17/2025 01:25 PM -
Comment added
Kabiru Mwenja Bruno Pagno Jens Ulferts I guess there are quite some uncertainties still around using a materialized view...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 03/17/2025 11:55 AM -
Comment added
Marking this as test failed for two reasons:
"Custom fields", the second word should be lower-case (this is OP style i...
- Status changed from merged to test failed
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 03/17/2025 11:47 AM -
Comment added
Kabiru Mwenja agreed. I think this is refactor is a reasonable amount of work as well, so it is healthier to do separate...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/17/2025 11:45 AM -
Comment added
Thanks for compiling this Bruno Pagno ! My first thought is that we should handle this extraction initially as a separat...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/17/2025 11:15 AM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18240 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
created by
Bruno Pagno on 03/17/2025 10:52 AM -
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 03/17/2025 10:47 AM - Status changed from review approved to merged
- Assignee deleted (
Bruno Pagno)
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/17/2025 10:47 AM - Comment added
Also available in: Atom