Content
Activity
03/31/2025
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/31/2025 10:45 AM -
Comment added
Hi Jens Ulferts - FYI we will discuss in tomorrows meeting whether to remove the feature flag and have this released in ...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/31/2025 10:42 AM -
Comment added
Version updated to 16.0.0 due to dependency on Enterprise Tokens that are planned for 16.0.0.
- Version changed from 15.5.0 to 16.0.0
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/31/2025 10:42 AM - Version changed from 15.5.0 to 16.0.0
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/31/2025 10:42 AM - Version changed from 15.5.0 to 16.0.0
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/31/2025 10:42 AM - Version changed from 15.5.0 to 16.0.0
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/31/2025 10:42 AM - Version changed from 15.5.0 to 16.0.0
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/31/2025 10:42 AM - Version changed from 15.5.0 to 16.0.0
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/31/2025 10:42 AM - Version changed from 15.5.0 to 16.0.0
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/31/2025 10:41 AM - Version changed from 15.5.0 to 16.0.0
-
Implementation STC-204: Define Quoting criteria for work package comments with restricted visibilityupdated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/31/2025 10:41 AM - Version changed from 15.5.0 to 16.0.0
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/31/2025 10:41 AM - Version changed from 15.5.0 to 16.0.0
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/31/2025 10:41 AM - Version changed from 15.5.0 to 16.0.0
03/28/2025
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/28/2025 10:24 AM -
Comment added
Version updated to 16.0.0 due to dependency on Enterprise Tokens that are planned for 16.0.0 - The current functionality...
- Version changed from 15.5.0 to 16.0.0
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 03/28/2025 10:05 AM -
Comment added
Hi Markus,
indeed there was a misunderstanding (apologies about that!) and file links in the Activity tab should behave ...
- Status changed from rejected to confirmed
- Bug found in version set to 15.4.x
-
Comment added
03/27/2025
-
updated by
Markus K. on 03/27/2025 02:05 PM -
Comment added
Hi Cécile Guiot,
I'm trying to understand the decision but I'm unsure if we misunderstood something. Perhaps I confused ...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/27/2025 10:30 AM -
Comment added
Parimal Satyal wrote:
Team, I've added another small bit to the permissions/visibility bit. Also something that came up...
-
Comment added
-
created by
Wieland Lindenthal on 03/27/2025 09:18 AM -
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/27/2025 07:20 AM - Status changed from new to in development
- Assignee set to Kabiru Mwenja
- Developers set to Kabiru Mwenja
03/26/2025
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/26/2025 04:55 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/26/2025 04:25 PM - Status changed from new to in development
- Developers set to Kabiru Mwenja
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 03/26/2025 01:47 PM - Status changed from new to confirmed
- Module set to Modules and project features / Notification center
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 03/26/2025 12:44 PM -
Comment added
Hi Markus,
we discussed this internally and came up with the decision that file attachment links will continue to open i...
- Status changed from new to rejected
- % Complete set to 100%
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/26/2025 10:54 AM - Subject changed from Not able to save WP reminder if date/time aren't manually changed to Not able to save WP reminder if date/time aren't manually changed on Safari Browser
- Bug found in version set to 15.4.x
-
created by
Vanessa Spielau on 03/26/2025 10:48 AM -
updated by
Marc Alcobé on 03/26/2025 10:06 AM -
Comment added
Hi Wieland Lindenthal,
Thanks for the clarification. Then it is similar to the reminder notifications, we can display th...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/26/2025 08:13 AM - Status changed from specified to in development
- Assignee changed from Wieland Lindenthal to Kabiru Mwenja
- Developers set to Kabiru Mwenja
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 03/26/2025 08:05 AM - The changes were retracted.
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/26/2025 08:00 AM - Description changed (Details)
- Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Kabiru Mwenja)
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 03/26/2025 08:00 AM - Assignee deleted (
Parimal Satyal)
- Assignee deleted (
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/26/2025 08:00 AM - Comment added
03/25/2025
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 03/25/2025 06:07 PM -
Comment added
Niels Lindenthal Did you reply to the correct work package here? It is not clear with what we shall go ahead.
Niels Lind...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Niels Lindenthal on 03/25/2025 06:05 PM -
Comment added
Hi Wieland Lindenthal,
please go ahead.
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 03/25/2025 05:56 PM -
Comment added
Team, I've added another small bit to the permissions/visibility bit. Also something that came up whislt writing the blo...
- Acceptance criteria changed (Details)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 03/25/2025 05:55 PM -
Comment added
Marc Alcobé Most of what you can do on the Activity tab you can already do with the current API: You can add normal comm...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 03/25/2025 05:43 PM -
Comment added
Niels Lindenthal FYI: Ideally the Communicator team would get some time this year to do this. I simply moved it out of ...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 03/25/2025 05:12 PM -
Comment added
Bruno Pagno Kabiru Mwenja I moved a couple of "rejected" child IMPLMEMENTATION work packages from the original FEATURE ...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 03/25/2025 05:07 PM - Status changed from rejected to in specification
- Parent changed from Introduce internal comments to Extract Comments from Journals
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 03/25/2025 05:07 PM - Status changed from rejected to in specification
- Parent changed from Introduce internal comments to Extract Comments from Journals
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 03/25/2025 04:04 PM -
Comment added
Moved translation considerations to the bottom of the specs and cleaned up Figma mockups so we only the most updated des...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Marc Alcobé on 03/25/2025 03:25 PM -
Comment added
Hi Wieland Lindenthal,
The comments with restricted visibility also need an API? I thought as being part of the activity...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 03/25/2025 01:57 PM -
Comment added
Updated automatically by changing values within child work package STC-289
- Scheduling mode set to Automatic
-
Comment added
-
created by
Wieland Lindenthal on 03/25/2025 01:57 PM -
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 03/25/2025 01:54 PM -
Comment added
The original contributors are hard to get hold off. Apparently they moved on.
- Description changed (Details)
- Status changed from new to rejected
- % Complete set to 100%
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 03/25/2025 01:35 PM -
Comment added
I set this BUG to rejected. I think that the expectation statement is not up to date anymore with what we believe the pr...
- Status changed from confirmed to rejected
- % Complete set to 100%
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 03/25/2025 01:31 PM -
Comment added
Hey Niels Lindenthal, I propose to consider this EPIC for one of the next releases. We have 3 features in OpenProject th...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 03/25/2025 01:13 PM - Parent set to Add API for recent Communicator features (Emoji, Reminders, Internal Comments)
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 03/25/2025 01:13 PM - Parent changed from Introduce internal comments to Add API for recent Communicator features (Emoji, Reminders, Internal Comments)
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 03/25/2025 01:12 PM - Parent set to Add API for recent Communicator features (Emoji, Reminders, Internal Comments)
-
created by
Wieland Lindenthal on 03/25/2025 01:08 PM -
Comment added
Automatisch durch die Änderungen in Unteraufgabe STC-51 aktualisiert
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 03/25/2025 12:48 PM - Status changed from rejected to in specification
- Parent changed from Introduce internal comments to Extract Comments from Journals
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 03/25/2025 12:46 PM -
Comment added
If we do the extraction from comments from journals, I guess this IMPLEMENTATION chunk still makes sense.
- Status changed from rejected to in specification
- Parent changed from Introduce internal comments to Extract Comments from Journals
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 03/25/2025 12:44 PM -
Comment added
Automatisch durch die Änderungen in Unteraufgabe STC-253 aktualisiert
- Scheduling mode set to Automatic
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 03/25/2025 12:44 PM - Status changed from rejected to in specification
- Parent changed from Introduce internal comments to Extract Comments from Journals
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/25/2025 12:01 PM - Status changed from new to closed
- % Complete set to 100%
-
created by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/25/2025 12:00 PM -
updated by
GitHub on 03/25/2025 11:26 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/25/2025 11:25 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/25/2025 11:24 AM - Comment added
-
created by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/25/2025 11:08 AM -
updated by
Ivana Šugić on 03/25/2025 11:05 AM -
Comment added
Marking this as tested as all acceptance criteria have been verified. ✅
Tested on:
Ubuntu 24.04.2 LTS
Chrome 133.0.6943...
- Status changed from merged to tested
- % Complete set to 100%
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 03/25/2025 10:29 AM - Description changed (Details)
- File Edited_comment.png added as attachment
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 03/25/2025 09:35 AM - Status changed from needs clarification to decided
- % Complete set to 100%
- Decision set to Yes, acceptable for 15.5.
Also available in: Atom