Content
Activity
03/06/2025
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 03/06/2025 06:34 PM -
Comment added
Hi team,
I've updated the Figma with three options on how to fix this:
https://www.figma.com/design/w0YoqQ5v0JGNT5NS5NZ...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 03/06/2025 06:11 PM -
Comment added
Warning: This looks to get very big and I don't see a short way around it.
From a product perspective restricted comment...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 03/06/2025 06:06 PM -
Comment added
Hi Wieland Lindenthal,
Oh I agree. I'm in favour of showing it less. Do you mean then we limit it to users who have the ...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/06/2025 04:51 PM - Subject changed from How should we treat attachments for work packages with restricted visibility to How should we treat attachments for work packages comments with restricted visibility
-
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 03/06/2025 04:16 PM -
Comment added
I also think that it will be quite hard to find a solution to have attachments restricted in their visibility based on ...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 03/06/2025 04:01 PM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Bruno Pagno) - Version set to 15.5.0
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/06/2025 04:00 PM -
Comment added
Oliver Günther wrote:
Assignment of the attachment is not possible in all cases. With S3, we defer uploading to S3, onl...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/06/2025 03:56 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/06/2025 03:45 PM -
Comment added
Repost from Element for context
\*_Surfacing this here for tech discussion_: When a user creates a comment with restric...
- Involved people changed from Wieland Lindenthal, Parimal Satyal, Kabiru Mwenja, Bruno Pagno to Wieland Lindenthal, Parimal Satyal, Kabiru Mwenja, Jens Ulferts, Oliver Günther, Bruno Pagno
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 03/06/2025 03:43 PM -
Comment added
Assignment of the attachment is not possible in all cases. With S3, we defer uploading to S3, only to receive a completi...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/06/2025 03:33 PM - Subject changed from How should we treat restricted comments attachments to How should we treat attachments for work packages with restricted visibility
-
updated by
Markus K. on 03/06/2025 02:05 PM -
Comment added
Here's a file to test. The link in the activity stream doesn't open in a new tab.
- File Bug__59942_-_OpenProject_Community.pdf added as attachment
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 03/06/2025 01:59 PM -
Comment added
Parimal Satyal Kabiru Mwenja Bruno Pagno
I am a bit worried to annoy people by our Enterprise hints. I understand that ...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/06/2025 12:34 PM - Assignee set to Kabiru Mwenja
-
created by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/06/2025 12:24 PM -
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/06/2025 10:45 AM -
Comment added
Yes Jens Ulferts - it is still behind a feature flag- moving it and reinstating to "tested".
- Status changed from closed to tested
- Version changed from 15.4.0 to 15.5.0
-
Comment added
-
created by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/06/2025 10:43 AM -
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 03/06/2025 10:36 AM -
Comment added
Hi Kabiru Mwenja , this is as of now still behind a feature flag. So I assume it needs to be moved again?
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 03/06/2025 10:23 AM -
Comment added
I learned today that on Desktop we still have the automatic expansion if the content is bigger than 4 lines. The input g...
- File image.png added as attachment
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 03/06/2025 09:49 AM -
Comment added
Decisions from today's bi-weekly:
Change design of the fixed comment box so that it has a new line with cancel and sub...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/06/2025 09:02 AM - Description changed (Details)
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 03/06/2025 08:10 AM -
Comment added
This might be related to STC-234
-
Comment added
-
created by
Niels Lindenthal on 03/06/2025 05:59 AM -
Comment added
Hi Parimal Satyal,
Can you please create mockups for both cases (mobile and desktop)?
For desktop I was wondering if we ...
-
Comment added
03/05/2025
-
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 03/05/2025 05:55 PM -
Comment added
Wieland Lindenthal moving this out of 15.4 as the feature freeze is today. Moving to 15.5 but I suggest to evaluate whet...
- Version changed from 15.4.0 to 15.5.0
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 03/05/2025 05:54 PM -
Comment added
Wieland Lindenthal moving this out of 15.4 as the feature freeze is today. Moving to 15.5 but I suggest to evaluate whet...
- Version changed from 15.4.0 to 15.5.0
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 03/05/2025 05:53 PM -
Comment added
Wieland Lindenthal moving this out of 15.4 as the feature freeze is today. Moving to 15.5 but I suggest to evaluate whet...
- Version changed from 15.4.0 to 15.5.0
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 03/05/2025 04:07 PM - Status changed from merged to closed
- % Complete set to 100%
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 03/05/2025 04:06 PM -
Comment added
Bruno Pagno if this doesn't need any testing, feel free to close the WP.
If there is anything we should check, then plea...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/05/2025 10:44 AM -
Comment added
Thanks for the breakdown Parimal and for impressively quick turnaround on design options: I would go for the middle grou...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 03/05/2025 09:09 AM -
Comment added
Catching up with the thread. I think the three options Parimal included look pretty good. A is probably the best in term...
-
Comment added
-
created by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/05/2025 07:53 AM -
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/05/2025 07:41 AM - Description changed (Details)
-
updated by
Stefan Weiberg on 03/05/2025 07:33 AM -
Comment added
+1
-
Comment added
03/04/2025
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 03/04/2025 06:44 PM -
Comment added
Hi team,
In the description, I've included three options A, B and C.
A uses different boders and fills; B uses differe...
- Description changed (Details)
- File RestrictedComments_colourOptions.png added as attachment
- File RestrictedComments_colourOptions.png added as attachment
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/04/2025 06:14 PM -
Comment added
For reference: GH uses the border color pattern to highlight 1) your own comments or pull request descriptions 2) Merged...
-
Comment added
-
created by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/04/2025 05:23 PM -
Comment added
Hi Parimal Satyal ,
I'm creating this OPEN POINT to track the design decision.
I'm already seeing inconsistencies in da...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Niels Lindenthal on 03/04/2025 04:31 PM - Ordered by changed from Niels Lindenthal to ZenDiS
- PD (max) set to 20
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 03/04/2025 04:31 PM - Status changed from tested to closed
- % Complete set to 100%
-
updated by
Niels Lindenthal on 03/04/2025 04:31 PM - PD (max) set to 20
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 03/04/2025 04:31 PM - Status changed from tested to closed
- % Complete set to 100%
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 03/04/2025 04:30 PM - Status changed from tested to closed
- % Complete set to 100%
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 03/04/2025 03:38 PM - Status changed from review approved to closed
- Assignee deleted (
Bruno Pagno) - % Complete set to 100%
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/04/2025 03:38 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 03/04/2025 01:44 PM -
Comment added
Decisions:
Grant this new permission to all roles also having the "Manage members" permission
Feature flag feature
...
- Description changed (Details)
- Status changed from needs clarification to decided
- % Complete set to 100%
- Decision set to Grant this new permission to all roles also having the "Manage members" permission
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/04/2025 12:45 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18125 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Andrey Dermeyko on 03/04/2025 12:43 PM -
Comment added
Niels Lindenthal maybe it is your stream "Time and Costs"?
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 03/04/2025 12:27 PM - Status changed from needs review to merged
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/04/2025 12:27 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/04/2025 12:00 PM - Comment added
-
created by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/04/2025 11:47 AM -
updated by
Samantha Machon on 03/04/2025 09:53 AM -
Comment added
+1 from on-premises customer
- Votes changed from 2 to 3
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 03/04/2025 09:50 AM -
Comment added
Thoughts from this morning:
Given work on parallel work package (add later), perhaps a separate entry in the Project s...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 03/04/2025 08:53 AM - Status changed from new to needs review
- Version set to 15.4.0
- Accountable set to Bruno Pagno
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/04/2025 08:52 AM - Comment added
03/03/2025
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/03/2025 07:45 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18075 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 03/03/2025 07:24 PM -
Comment added
Hi Wieland Lindenthal. Discussed this with Marc. There'll be two elements to this:
A teaser in the Activity tab (visib...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/03/2025 07:11 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/03/2025 04:33 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 03/03/2025 02:53 PM - The changes were retracted.
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 03/03/2025 02:51 PM -
Comment added
Kabiru Mwenja Bruno Pagno Parimal Satyal Niels just chose the feature to be part of the Enterprise (ENT) / Professional ...
- Subject changed from Corporate Enterprise upsale banners for “Comments with restricted visibility” to Enterprise/Professional upsale banners for “Comments with restricted visibility”
- Description changed (Details)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/03/2025 02:15 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18115 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 03/03/2025 01:39 PM -
Comment added
Fixed ✅ (also fixed in the WP split view for me Bruno Pagno )
Tested on:
Windows 11Pro
Firefox 135.0
Core build
eebdf384...
- Status changed from merged to tested
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/03/2025 01:24 PM - Comment added
-
created by
Bruno Pagno on 03/03/2025 01:24 PM -
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 03/03/2025 01:15 PM -
Comment added
Cécile Guiot it's merged in case you want to double check
- Status changed from review approved to merged
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/03/2025 01:15 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/03/2025 11:24 AM - Status changed from needs review to review approved
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/03/2025 10:30 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
Niels Lindenthal on 03/03/2025 09:52 AM - Enterprise plan set to Enterprise / Professional
-
updated by
Niels Lindenthal on 03/03/2025 09:46 AM - Enterprise plan set to Community
-
updated by
Niels Lindenthal on 03/03/2025 09:22 AM - Enterprise plan set to Enterprise / Professional
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/03/2025 09:18 AM - Version deleted (
15.4.0)
- Version deleted (
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/03/2025 09:18 AM - Version changed from 15.4.0 to 15.5.0
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/03/2025 09:13 AM - Status changed from needs review to review approved
- Assignee set to Bruno Pagno
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/03/2025 09:13 AM -
Comment added
Agreed - however, I'd make a note to inform the contributors and close out their PR once we merge to dev.
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 03/03/2025 08:59 AM - Status changed from new to in development
- Assignee set to Bruno Pagno
- Accountable set to Bruno Pagno
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 03/03/2025 08:36 AM - Status changed from new to needs clarification
02/28/2025
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 02/28/2025 04:31 PM -
Comment added
I think we can close this one.
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 02/28/2025 03:44 PM -
Comment added
Bruno Pagno all good, i think your assessment is as good as mine. Besides, it's really a detail, so i think we can survi...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 02/28/2025 03:37 PM -
Comment added
Cécile Guiot FYI, I spent some time today fiddling with CSS and I believe fixing this behaviour on the non-split-view is...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/28/2025 03:35 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/28/2025 03:35 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 02/28/2025 03:30 PM - Status changed from test failed to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Bruno Pagno)
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 02/28/2025 02:30 PM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Bruno Pagno)
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/28/2025 01:08 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 02/28/2025 12:43 PM -
Comment added
Conversation with Wieland Lindenthal
This can wait until after 15.4 as we gather more feedback there
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 02/28/2025 12:39 PM -
Comment added
Conversation with Wieland Lindenthal
"Every attachment has an ID and users can access it if they have access to it, th...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 02/28/2025 11:25 AM - Version set to 15.4.0
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 02/28/2025 10:59 AM -
Comment added
New proposal for extending current permissions when we release the feature:
users that have the manage_work_package_re...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 02/28/2025 10:27 AM -
Comment added
I have looked into seeders. The change is quite simple, so I will go with:
- Anonymous and Non-Members get nothing
- Me...
-
Comment added
-
created by
Kabiru Mwenja on 02/28/2025 10:08 AM -
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 02/28/2025 09:49 AM - Status changed from new to in development
- Assignee set to Kabiru Mwenja
- Accountable set to Kabiru Mwenja
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 02/28/2025 09:48 AM -
Comment added
Duplicate
- Status changed from in development to closed
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 02/28/2025 09:48 AM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee changed from Kabiru Mwenja to Bruno Pagno
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 02/28/2025 09:47 AM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee changed from Kabiru Mwenja to Bruno Pagno
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 02/28/2025 09:27 AM -
Comment added
Just not to leave unsaid, another alternative would be not to allow attachments on restricted comments. But I believe th...
- Involved people changed from Wieland Lindenthal, Parimal Satyal, Bruno Pagno to Wieland Lindenthal, Parimal Satyal, Kabiru Mwenja, Bruno Pagno
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 02/28/2025 09:01 AM - Status changed from needs review to in development
- Assignee set to Bruno Pagno
- Accountable changed from Kabiru Mwenja to Bruno Pagno
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 02/28/2025 08:56 AM -
Comment added
How do we extend existing roles?
Not sure if you're asking about the mechanics, but explaing for the sake of being exp...
-
Comment added
-
created by
Kabiru Mwenja on 02/28/2025 08:18 AM -
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 02/28/2025 08:16 AM - Status changed from new to closed
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 02/28/2025 08:15 AM - Status changed from new to closed
-
created by
Kabiru Mwenja on 02/28/2025 08:02 AM -
updated by
Andreas H. on 02/28/2025 07:24 AM -
Comment added
Ups, wrong workpackage, sorry :) Maybe this comment can be deleted?
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 02/28/2025 07:00 AM - Status changed from new to in development
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 02/28/2025 06:58 AM - Status changed from new to in development
- Assignee set to Kabiru Mwenja
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 02/28/2025 06:58 AM - Assignee deleted (
Kabiru Mwenja)
- Assignee deleted (
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 02/28/2025 06:58 AM - Status changed from closed to rejected
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 02/28/2025 06:58 AM - Status changed from closed to rejected
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 02/28/2025 06:57 AM - Status changed from closed to rejected
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 02/28/2025 06:57 AM - Status changed from closed to rejected
Also available in: Atom