Content
Activity
01/24/2025
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 01/24/2025 03:13 PM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Version set to 15.3.0
-
updated by
Eric Schubert on 01/24/2025 02:56 PM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Eric Schubert) - Version set to 15.2.1
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/24/2025 02:56 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Eric Schubert on 01/24/2025 02:46 PM - Status changed from confirmed to in development
-
updated by
Dominic Bräunlein on 01/24/2025 02:31 PM -
Comment added
Sure, that is what I came up with:
This action will irreversibly remove the item and all its sub-items.
Any assigned va...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Eric Schubert on 01/24/2025 02:10 PM -
Comment added
Dominic Bräunlein
can you please review the used text? And if you already want to customize it further directly to the ...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/24/2025 01:17 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Eric Schubert on 01/24/2025 01:09 PM - Status changed from specified to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Alexander Coles)
-
updated by
Dominic Bräunlein on 01/24/2025 11:16 AM - Project changed from OpenProject to Stream Storage Integrations
- Assignee set to Eric Schubert
- Accountable set to Eric Schubert
- Developers set to OP Dev Titan Team
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/24/2025 09:52 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 01/24/2025 09:30 AM - Version set to Product Backlog
-
updated by
Dominic Bräunlein on 01/24/2025 08:38 AM - Assignee deleted (
Dominic Bräunlein) - Accountable deleted (
Cécile Guiot)
- Assignee deleted (
-
updated by
Dominic Bräunlein on 01/24/2025 07:32 AM -
Comment added
Moving this out of the EPIC. This FEATURE can be implemented independently.
- Parent deleted (
Activate and deactivate file storages, project attributes, custom fields and types for multiple projects)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Dominic Bräunlein on 01/24/2025 07:28 AM -
Comment added
No need for a multi-step dialog. The solution includes only one step now and it works.
- Status changed from on hold to rejected
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Dominic Bräunlein on 01/24/2025 07:27 AM - Description changed (Details)
- Status changed from on hold to closed
-
updated by
Dominic Bräunlein on 01/24/2025 07:26 AM - The changes were retracted.
-
updated by
Niels Lindenthal on 01/24/2025 07:24 AM -
Comment added
Ping Dominic Bräunlein
-
Comment added
01/23/2025
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/23/2025 05:45 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#17662 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 01/23/2025 05:14 PM - Status changed from needs review to merged
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/23/2025 05:14 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Eric Schubert on 01/23/2025 03:27 PM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Eric Schubert)
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/23/2025 03:27 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Eric Schubert on 01/23/2025 01:24 PM - Status changed from new to in specification
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 01/23/2025 11:23 AM - Status changed from new to decided
01/22/2025
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 01/22/2025 05:09 PM -
Comment added
Kabiru Mwenja yes i saw your notes and this is why i asked where that page is because i never heard that concept, but no...
-
Comment added
-
created by
Eric Schubert on 01/22/2025 05:00 PM -
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 01/22/2025 04:38 PM -
Comment added
Cécile Guiot had put in some some QA notes in the description: 🙃
---
🧥 QA Note
Smoke Test Multi-project activation page...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 01/22/2025 04:37 PM -
Comment added
Kabiru Mwenja what is the 'multi-project activation' page? i never heard of it 😵
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/22/2025 12:45 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#16765 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 01/22/2025 12:04 PM - Status changed from review approved to merged
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/22/2025 12:04 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Eric Schubert on 01/22/2025 11:50 AM - Description changed (Details)
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 01/22/2025 11:07 AM - Status changed from needs review to review approved
- Assignee deleted (
Christophe Bliard)
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/22/2025 10:25 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/22/2025 10:25 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 01/22/2025 10:04 AM - Description changed (Details)
- Assignee set to Bruno Pagno
-
updated by
Eric Schubert on 01/22/2025 10:01 AM - Status changed from new to in development
- Assignee set to Eric Schubert
- Accountable set to Eric Schubert
01/21/2025
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 01/21/2025 05:08 PM -
Comment added
Would it be possible to redo the query without re-designing queries?
Marcello Rocha Pereira not that I know of.
But th...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Marcello Rocha Pereira on 01/21/2025 04:51 PM -
Comment added
Bruno Pagno we have this duplicating behaviour in a bunch of queries (relations for example joins like 5 times the same ...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Eric Schubert on 01/21/2025 03:06 PM -
Comment added
The decision process boils down to this decision matrix:
Autocompletion on text input
Suggestion hover on '/'
drag...
- Description changed (Details)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 01/21/2025 02:51 PM - Description changed (Details)
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/21/2025 02:15 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#17644 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Eric Schubert on 01/21/2025 01:46 PM - Status changed from needs review to closed
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/21/2025 01:46 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Rince wind on 01/21/2025 12:11 PM -
Comment added
Are there any thoughts on how this feature behaves while enabling automatically generated subjects? What is to become wi...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Eric Schubert on 01/21/2025 11:34 AM - Status changed from needs review to closed
- Assignee deleted (
Eric Schubert)
-
updated by
Stefan Weiberg on 01/21/2025 11:23 AM -
Comment added
Would it be possible to have a group by option based on the level of hierarchy? As an example I have Application > Mo...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Eric Schubert on 01/21/2025 10:52 AM -
Comment added
I got it from the discussion with Marc some weeks ago, there is was said, that when a user is defining a text pattern, b...
- Description changed (Details)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 01/21/2025 09:20 AM -
Comment added
Working as expected ✅
Tested on:
Windows 11Pro
Firefox 134.0.1
Core build
1b0268fde80d23fd77cde23d4166bae87631c661
Produ...
- Status changed from in test to tested
- Assignee deleted (
Cécile Guiot)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 01/21/2025 07:46 AM -
Comment added
What does "Bad, because user acceptance is low" for Option 3 mean?
- Description changed (Details)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Niels Lindenthal on 01/21/2025 06:14 AM -
Comment added
Hi Dominic Bräunlein,
Let‘s remove the open features and close this epic. We will follow up on them independently. Let‘s...
-
Comment added
01/20/2025
-
updated by
Eric Schubert on 01/20/2025 04:55 PM - Description changed (Details)
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 01/20/2025 03:27 PM -
Comment added
I added some notes about using Block Note under "more information"
- Description changed (Details)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Dominic Bräunlein on 01/20/2025 01:42 PM -
Comment added
Eric Schubert As decided, I move this feature out of 15.3 and add it to wish list
- Version changed from 15.3.0 to Wish List
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Jan Sandbrink on 01/20/2025 01:41 PM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Jan Sandbrink)
-
updated by
Dominic Bräunlein on 01/20/2025 11:45 AM - Version changed from 15.2.0 to 15.3.0
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 01/20/2025 10:22 AM -
Comment added
I think we can argue wether building accessibility ourselves is really neutral. I would consider is as "bad" 🙈
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/20/2025 10:19 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 01/20/2025 10:15 AM -
Comment added
Jan Sandbrink let's put it back in development :)
- Status changed from in test to in development
- Assignee changed from Cécile Guiot to Jan Sandbrink
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Jan Sandbrink on 01/20/2025 10:10 AM -
Comment added
Cécile Guiot FYI: We are currently fixing an issue that we found during WP creation. Should I move the ticket back to de...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 01/20/2025 09:36 AM - Description changed (Details)
Also available in: Atom