Content
Activity
02/04/2025
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 02/04/2025 05:44 PM -
Comment added
Hi Christophe Bliard,
These are all the scenarios I identified and have now written for the Single date mode. Shall we d...
- Description changed (Details)
- Assignee changed from Parimal Satyal to Christophe Bliard
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Behrokh Satarnejad on 02/04/2025 03:12 PM - Status changed from specified to in development
- Accountable set to Behrokh Satarnejad
-
updated by
Behrokh Satarnejad on 02/04/2025 03:11 PM - Status changed from review failed to in development
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 02/04/2025 01:42 PM -
Comment added
Hi Niels Lindenthal,
Also verified with Marc Alcobé, we ended up not using the term "descendants" in favour of "children...
- Description changed (Details)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 02/04/2025 11:43 AM - Status changed from needs review to review failed
- Assignee changed from Henriette Darge to Behrokh Satarnejad
-
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 02/04/2025 11:20 AM - Assignee set to Henriette Darge
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/04/2025 10:38 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
Behrokh Satarnejad on 02/04/2025 10:30 AM - Status changed from confirmed to in development
- Assignee set to Behrokh Satarnejad
- Accountable set to Behrokh Satarnejad
-
updated by
Behrokh Satarnejad on 02/04/2025 10:27 AM - Version set to 15.4.0
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 02/04/2025 09:50 AM - Subject changed from The arrows for lag filed in add-relation modal is visible in firefox to The arrows for lag field in add-relation modal is visible in firefox
-
updated by
Behrokh Satarnejad on 02/04/2025 09:43 AM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Behrokh Satarnejad)
-
updated by
Behrokh Satarnejad on 02/04/2025 09:33 AM - Status changed from review failed to in development
- Assignee set to Behrokh Satarnejad
-
updated by
Niels Lindenthal on 02/04/2025 09:23 AM -
Comment added
Hi Parimal Satyal,
What I meant to say: "Please check that this is consistent with the wording we use for the new decend...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 02/04/2025 09:18 AM -
Comment added
Hi Christophe Bliard. I like it!
Niels Lindenthal Sorry, could you clarify: do you mean we could use the term "descende...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Niels Lindenthal on 02/04/2025 09:07 AM -
Comment added
Hi Parimal Satyal,
I think that we use the term "decendants" with the new filter in the cost reports. Can you please che...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 02/04/2025 08:44 AM -
Comment added
Hi there,
Update the tooltip text for the totals to:
"{n}h (total value derived from a sum of this and all children)...
-
Comment added
02/03/2025
-
updated by
Tobias Nowakow on 02/03/2025 09:38 PM -
Comment added
Seems to be a workaround not a solution
Parimal Satyal wrote:
Hello,
Would the possibility of having negative lag solve...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Tobias Nowakow on 02/03/2025 09:36 PM -
Comment added
+1
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 02/03/2025 07:10 PM - The changes were retracted.
-
created by
Parimal Satyal on 02/03/2025 07:10 PM -
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 02/03/2025 05:22 PM -
Comment added
Hi Niels,
Good catch! Here are suggestions to improve the tooltips for both cases (since the total is not just children...
- Description changed (Details)
- Status changed from new to confirmed
- Bug found in version set to 15.2.x
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 02/03/2025 05:15 PM -
Comment added
Hi Behrokh Satarnejad,
I agree that it should scroll to the newly added relation in both cases. I'd initially added this...
- Description changed (Details)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Behrokh Satarnejad on 02/03/2025 05:10 PM -
Comment added
Hi Parimal Satyal ,
While working on this bug, I figured out that we have different implementation for add an existing W...
-
Comment added
-
created by
Parimal Satyal on 02/03/2025 04:51 PM -
Comment added
Extracted from .
-
Comment added
-
created by
Niels Lindenthal on 02/03/2025 04:32 PM -
Comment added
Hi Parimal Satyal,
Can you please have a look at the tooltips? For me it seems like they are not really explaining the c...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 02/03/2025 04:28 PM -
Comment added
Updated expected behaviour. Thanks to Behrokh Satarnejad for bringing this exception to the previously-fixed autoscroll ...
- Description changed (Details)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Attila Dombi on 02/03/2025 01:40 PM - Status changed from needs review to review failed
- Assignee deleted (
Attila Dombi)
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 02/03/2025 01:36 PM -
Comment added
Fixed ✅
Tested on:
Core build
99db98b3d352a243f67b0b18c7749fb041b7a29c
Product version
53ab774ec0aa9b1790e402c05c7d49902...
- Status changed from merged to tested
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 02/03/2025 01:34 PM -
Comment added
Not really 🤔 I wonder though if it's something worth changing, if users are already used to the icon (which itself surel...
- File Screenshot_2025-02-03_at_13.34.21.png added as attachment
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 02/03/2025 11:21 AM - Assignee set to Jens Ulferts
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 02/03/2025 11:10 AM -
Comment added
Working as expected ✅
Tested on:
Core build
df0bf3f5a5c668c74d0812d985ee216e6def3aae
Product version
53ab774ec0aa9b1790e...
- Status changed from in test to tested
- Assignee deleted (
Cécile Guiot)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 02/03/2025 11:06 AM -
Comment added
Added a bit of additional context about when dates are normally shown. Of course, if a date is currently not shown for a...
- Description changed (Details)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Marc Alcobé on 02/03/2025 10:34 AM -
Comment added
Hi Parimal Satyal,
I think it is not a good representation of what manual scheduling does to be honest. Pin a date is no...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 02/03/2025 10:31 AM -
Comment added
Hi Marc Alcobé,
I was thinking of using the existing pin icon for manual since users are already used to it (especially ...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 02/03/2025 10:29 AM - Votes changed from 62 to 63
-
updated by
Alexander Coles on 02/03/2025 10:27 AM - Status changed from specified to in development
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 02/03/2025 10:26 AM - Status changed from merged to in test
- Assignee set to Cécile Guiot
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 02/03/2025 10:26 AM - Status changed from merged to in test
- Assignee set to Cécile Guiot
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 02/03/2025 10:24 AM - Description changed (Details)
- Designer set to Parimal Satyal
-
updated by
Marc Alcobé on 02/03/2025 10:17 AM -
Comment added
Hey Parimal Satyal,
I agree with Christophe, the ⚡️ looks good for automatic. I think the problem is how to represent ma...
- File manual_.png added as attachment
- File manual_.png added as attachment
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/03/2025 09:51 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
Сергей Баранов on 02/03/2025 05:44 AM -
Comment added
+1
-
Comment added
02/01/2025
-
updated by
Alexander Coles on 02/01/2025 07:24 PM - The changes were retracted.
01/31/2025
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 01/31/2025 03:41 PM -
Comment added
⚡ icon for automatic scheduling is 👌
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 01/31/2025 03:37 PM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Henriette Darge)
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/31/2025 03:29 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 01/31/2025 03:23 PM -
Comment added
Fixed ✅
Tested on:
Core build
c9b26adaddbeba79bbdeacc1978a894abb6324cd
Product version
53ab774ec0aa9b1790e402c05c7d49902...
- Status changed from in test to tested
- Assignee deleted (
Cécile Guiot)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 01/31/2025 03:21 PM -
Comment added
Behrokh Satarnejad thanks! it did the trick indeed :))
- Assignee changed from Behrokh Satarnejad to Cécile Guiot
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 01/31/2025 03:13 PM - Version set to 15.3.0
-
updated by
Behrokh Satarnejad on 01/31/2025 03:12 PM -
Comment added
Hi Cécile Guiot
You should change the manual scheduling in the WP which is a relation.
Cheers,
Behri
- File Screen_Recording_2025-01-31_at_15.11.39.mov added as attachment
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 01/31/2025 03:06 PM -
Comment added
hi Behrokh Satarnejad , maybe i'm misunderstanding something, but i don't see the pin icon at all when i select manual s...
- Assignee changed from Cécile Guiot to Behrokh Satarnejad
- File no_pin_on_manual_scheduling.gif added as attachment
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 01/31/2025 03:05 PM -
Comment added
Hi team,
I think this is worth looking into for release with automatic scheduling. We'll have a LOT more pins once the ...
- Description changed (Details)
- Status changed from new to needs clarification
- Assignee set to Parimal Satyal
- File Single-date-datepicker_withIcons.png added as attachment
- File Single-date-datepicker_withIcons.png added as attachment
- Involved people changed from Parimal Satyal, Oliver Günther to Henriette Darge, Parimal Satyal, Christophe Bliard
-
Comment added
-
created by
Cécile Guiot on 01/31/2025 03:02 PM -
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 01/31/2025 01:01 PM - Status changed from merged to in test
- Assignee set to Cécile Guiot
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/31/2025 12:15 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#17787 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 01/31/2025 11:44 AM - Status changed from in review to merged
- Assignee deleted (
Christophe Bliard)
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/31/2025 11:44 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
Behrokh Satarnejad on 01/31/2025 11:25 AM - Subject changed from 500 is thrown when user saves wrongly filled relations form to The arrows for lag filed in add-relation modal is visible in firefox
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 01/31/2025 11:24 AM - Status changed from needs review to in review
-
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 01/31/2025 11:23 AM - Assignee set to Christophe Bliard
-
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 01/31/2025 11:22 AM - Assignee set to Attila Dombi
-
updated by
Behrokh Satarnejad on 01/31/2025 11:16 AM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Behrokh Satarnejad)
-
updated by
Behrokh Satarnejad on 01/31/2025 11:06 AM - Status changed from confirmed to in development
- Assignee set to Behrokh Satarnejad
- Accountable set to Behrokh Satarnejad
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/31/2025 11:00 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 01/31/2025 10:39 AM -
Comment added
Fixed ✅
Tested on:
Core build
90c4e94636683116b60e6d14fddef49b2ece60c9
Product version
53ab774ec0aa9b1790e402c05c7d49902...
- Status changed from merged to tested
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 01/31/2025 10:23 AM - The changes were retracted.
-
updated by
Behrokh Satarnejad on 01/31/2025 10:20 AM - Description changed (Details)
-
updated by
Behrokh Satarnejad on 01/31/2025 10:17 AM -
Comment added
I'm losing the WP, since it will be fixed in
SPAR-139
- Status changed from confirmed to closed
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Behrokh Satarnejad on 01/31/2025 09:40 AM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Behrokh Satarnejad)
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 01/31/2025 09:39 AM - Assignee deleted (
Christophe Bliard) - Accountable set to Christophe Bliard
- Assignee deleted (
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 01/31/2025 09:39 AM - Assignee deleted (
Christophe Bliard)
- Assignee deleted (
-
updated by
Behrokh Satarnejad on 01/31/2025 09:10 AM - Status changed from confirmed to in development
- Assignee set to Behrokh Satarnejad
- Accountable set to Behrokh Satarnejad
-
updated by
Behrokh Satarnejad on 01/31/2025 08:37 AM - Description changed (Details)
-
updated by
Behrokh Satarnejad on 01/31/2025 08:37 AM -
Comment added
Updating description since part of it is fixed in another WP:
SPAR-139
- Description changed (Details)
-
Comment added
01/30/2025
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/30/2025 05:15 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#17604 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/30/2025 05:15 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#17604 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/30/2025 05:15 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#17604 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/30/2025 05:15 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#17604 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 01/30/2025 04:44 PM - Status changed from review approved to merged
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 01/30/2025 04:44 PM - Status changed from review approved to merged
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 01/30/2025 04:44 PM - Status changed from review approved to merged
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 01/30/2025 04:44 PM - Status changed from review approved to merged
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/30/2025 04:44 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/30/2025 04:44 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/30/2025 04:44 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/30/2025 04:44 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 01/30/2025 04:35 PM - Status changed from needs review to review approved
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 01/30/2025 04:35 PM - Status changed from needs review to review approved
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/30/2025 04:30 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 01/30/2025 03:22 PM -
Comment added
Excellent questions, Christophe Bliard.
Correct, only when there are two or more predecessors. Ergo, no closest label ...
- Description changed (Details)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 01/30/2025 02:27 PM - Version set to 15.4.0
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 01/30/2025 01:55 PM -
Comment added
Hi Parimal Satyal,
If I read correctly the "closest" badge is shown only if there are at least 2 predecessors, correct? ...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 01/30/2025 01:51 PM - Status changed from confirmed to in development
- Assignee set to Henriette Darge
- Accountable set to Henriette Darge
-
updated by
Behrokh Satarnejad on 01/30/2025 01:27 PM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Behrokh Satarnejad)
-
updated by
Behrokh Satarnejad on 01/30/2025 01:27 PM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Behrokh Satarnejad)
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 01/30/2025 12:15 PM -
Comment added
It might be an option to use the flatpickr range with two inputs at least for the mobile version, see https://flatpickr....
- Status changed from new to in specification
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 01/30/2025 12:14 PM - Description changed (Details)
-
updated by
Behrokh Satarnejad on 01/30/2025 11:17 AM - Status changed from review failed to in development
- Assignee set to Behrokh Satarnejad
-
updated by
Behrokh Satarnejad on 01/30/2025 11:17 AM - Status changed from review failed to in development
- Assignee set to Behrokh Satarnejad
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 01/30/2025 10:46 AM - Status changed from in review to review approved
- Assignee deleted (
Christophe Bliard)
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 01/30/2025 10:45 AM - Status changed from in review to review failed
- Assignee deleted (
Christophe Bliard)
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 01/30/2025 10:45 AM - Status changed from in review to review approved
- Assignee deleted (
Christophe Bliard)
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 01/30/2025 10:44 AM - Status changed from in review to review failed
- Assignee deleted (
Christophe Bliard)
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 01/30/2025 10:16 AM -
Comment added
Updated the description according to the decsision made here. Further, I am moving this to 15.4 as the Datepicker will o...
- Subject changed from Highlight closest relation in the datepicker to Highlight closest predecessor in the relations tab
- Description changed (Details)
- Version changed from 15.3.0 to 15.4.0
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 01/30/2025 09:29 AM - Status changed from needs review to in review
- Assignee set to Christophe Bliard
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 01/30/2025 09:28 AM - Status changed from needs review to in review
- Assignee set to Christophe Bliard
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 01/30/2025 09:28 AM - Status changed from needs review to in review
- Assignee set to Christophe Bliard
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 01/30/2025 09:28 AM - Status changed from needs review to in review
- Assignee set to Christophe Bliard
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 01/30/2025 09:25 AM - Accountable set to Christophe Bliard
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 01/30/2025 09:24 AM - Description changed (Details)
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 01/30/2025 08:53 AM - Description set (Details)
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/30/2025 08:23 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
Behrokh Satarnejad on 01/30/2025 08:22 AM - Status changed from specified to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Behrokh Satarnejad) - Accountable set to Behrokh Satarnejad
01/29/2025
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 01/29/2025 05:47 PM - Description changed (Details)
-
updated by
Behrokh Satarnejad on 01/29/2025 04:39 PM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Behrokh Satarnejad)
-
updated by
Behrokh Satarnejad on 01/29/2025 04:39 PM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Behrokh Satarnejad)
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/29/2025 04:38 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/29/2025 04:38 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Behrokh Satarnejad on 01/29/2025 04:34 PM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Behrokh Satarnejad)
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 01/29/2025 04:21 PM -
Comment added
Update: this work package now only contains scenarios relevant to the date picker.
All other scenarios have been moved ...
- Subject changed from Scenarios for date picker behaviour with automatic scheduling to Scenarios: Primerised date picker
- Description changed (Details)
-
Comment added
-
created by
Parimal Satyal on 01/29/2025 04:20 PM -
Comment added
Update: this work package was split from . It contains scenarios that did not concern the behaviour of the date picker d...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/29/2025 04:17 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 01/29/2025 04:15 PM - Description changed (Details)
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 01/29/2025 04:07 PM - Description changed (Details)
-
created by
Parimal Satyal on 01/29/2025 03:59 PM -
Comment added
Hi Henriette Darge,
Based on our discussion earlier today and after further thoughts on ways to optimise the datepicker ...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Behrokh Satarnejad on 01/29/2025 03:52 PM - Status changed from confirmed to in development
- Assignee set to Behrokh Satarnejad
- Accountable set to Behrokh Satarnejad
-
updated by
Behrokh Satarnejad on 01/29/2025 03:51 PM - Status changed from confirmed to in development
- Assignee set to Behrokh Satarnejad
- Accountable set to Behrokh Satarnejad
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 01/29/2025 03:48 PM - Assignee set to Alexander Coles
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 01/29/2025 03:03 PM -
Comment added
Thanks, confirmed, all green now! ✅
We might come up with other scenarios whilst testing but for the moment, this docume...
- Description changed (Details)
- Status changed from in progress to scheduled
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Behrokh Satarnejad on 01/29/2025 03:00 PM - Status changed from review failed to in development
- Assignee set to Behrokh Satarnejad
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 01/29/2025 02:57 PM -
Comment added
Hi Parimal Satyal,
Scenarios 30 and 31 were so close, I renamed them 30a and 30b.
Only 3 more to confirm and we're good....
- Description changed (Details)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Behrokh Satarnejad on 01/29/2025 02:25 PM -
Comment added
There is a WP for showing ghost relations in mobile app.
- Status changed from new to in specification
-
Comment added
-
created by
Parimal Satyal on 01/29/2025 02:10 PM -
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 01/29/2025 02:06 PM -
Comment added
After our conversation, we've decided:
For any work package that has the same start and end dates, we will show it as ...
- Description changed (Details)
-
Comment added
-
created by
Behrokh Satarnejad on 01/29/2025 01:24 PM -
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 01/29/2025 12:36 PM -
Comment added
Hi Christophe Bliard,
Thanks for the review. The following is for 27b onwards (it remains in order there). I've also sp...
- Description changed (Details)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 01/29/2025 11:35 AM -
Comment added
Hi Parimal Satyal,
Another question: if a work package of a ghost relation in children or predecessor/ successor has no ...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 01/29/2025 10:29 AM - Description changed (Details)
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 01/29/2025 10:19 AM -
Comment added
Fixed ✅
Tested on:
Core build
5665d3d33839d83a56f5277b205ff516d0ed6ff0
Product version
53ab774ec0aa9b1790e402c05c7d49902...
- Status changed from merged to tested
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 01/29/2025 10:16 AM - Description changed (Details)
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 01/29/2025 08:28 AM -
Comment added
Hi Parimal Satyal,
I finished reviewing them.
The ones in 🟡 needs to be changed. Then pass them to 🔵 so I can review th...
- Description changed (Details)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 01/29/2025 07:12 AM - Description changed (Details)
Also available in: Atom