Content
Activity
03/19/2025
-
updated by
Niels Lindenthal on 03/19/2025 05:49 PM - Requested by set to ZenDiS
-
updated by
Marc Alcobé on 03/19/2025 05:05 PM -
Comment added
Hi Parimal Satyal and Niels Lindenthal,
I've added the latest version of quick filters for Custom fields in this Figma f...
- Mockups set to https://www.figma.com/design/oTMDTvcwrx35qExTkkSKBn/Custom-fields?node-id=1474-23518
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 03/19/2025 12:36 PM -
Comment added
Hi Kabiru Mwenja,
Could you try these new colours in the PR? We're using browns with the approach you recommended (defa...
- Description changed (Details)
- Assignee changed from Parimal Satyal to Kabiru Mwenja
- File Colour_modes_WIP_-_Brown__border_muted_.png added as attachment
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 03/19/2025 10:58 AM - Status changed from in development to specified
- Assignee deleted (
Bruno Pagno)
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 03/19/2025 10:57 AM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Bruno Pagno)
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/19/2025 10:57 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/19/2025 10:33 AM - Status changed from resolved to needs clarification
- Assignee changed from Kabiru Mwenja to Parimal Satyal
- Involved people changed from Henriette Darge, Parimal Satyal, Bruno Pagno to Henriette Darge, Parimal Satyal, Kabiru Mwenja, Bruno Pagno
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 03/19/2025 10:31 AM -
Comment added
Thanks Kabiru Mwenja. Based on our meeting this morning, we need to continue exploring colours. I was also able to test ...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 03/19/2025 09:54 AM -
Comment added
Hi Niels Lindenthal,
This is split from that (please see last comment on OP-16769).
As discussed in our last daily, I wr...
- Description changed (Details)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/19/2025 09:22 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 03/19/2025 09:06 AM - Status changed from test failed to in development
- Assignee set to Bruno Pagno
03/18/2025
-
updated by
Niels Lindenthal on 03/18/2025 08:44 PM -
Comment added
Hi Parimal Satyal,
What is the difference between this one and
##62183?
Did you create mockups?
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/18/2025 07:16 PM - Comment added
-
created by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/18/2025 07:15 PM -
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/18/2025 07:08 PM - Status changed from new to decided
- % Complete set to 100%
-
updated by
System on 03/18/2025 07:08 PM - Duplicate work package updated: The status was automatically updated by the duplicated work package Open Point STC-264: closed Acitivity tab comment editor shrinks before restricted visibility checkbox can be clicked
- Status changed from new to decided
- % Complete set to 100%
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/18/2025 07:05 PM -
Comment added
Hi Parimal Satyal - sure thing, please review the PR linked above activity#comment-972219
Pull Preview: https://pr-1836...
- Status changed from needs clarification to resolved
- % Complete set to 100%
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 03/18/2025 06:52 PM - Status changed from closed to in specification
-
updated by
System on 03/18/2025 06:48 PM - Duplicate work package updated: The status was automatically updated by the duplicated work package Feature OP-16769: Relocate administration of custom fields for work packages
- Status changed from in specification to closed
- % Complete set to 100%
-
created by
Parimal Satyal on 03/18/2025 06:29 PM -
Comment added
Hi Marc Alcobé,
This is the we spoke about with Niels Lindenthal the other day; it could be the first place we try and ...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/18/2025 05:55 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 03/18/2025 05:31 PM -
Comment added
Hi Kabiru Mwenja,
Parsing through the two CSS files + testing colour combinations ended up taking a very long time indee...
- Description changed (Details)
- Assignee changed from Parimal Satyal to Kabiru Mwenja
- File Colour_modes_WIP.png added as attachment
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 03/18/2025 05:24 PM -
Comment added
Update: We're going with the following approach.
The checkbox is labelled "Restrict visibility" in both desktop and mo...
- File Comment_box_design_-_desktop.png added as attachment
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 03/18/2025 12:49 PM -
Comment added
Kabiru Mwenja Bruno Pagno The feedback I got on not showing inline attachments of comments in the Files tab is mostly po...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/18/2025 11:53 AM - Comment added
-
Implementation STC-204: Define Quoting criteria for work package comments with restricted visibilityupdated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/18/2025 11:42 AM - Status changed from new to in development
- Assignee set to Kabiru Mwenja
- Version set to 15.5.0
- Developers set to Kabiru Mwenja
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/18/2025 11:35 AM - Status changed from needs review to closed
- % Complete set to 100%
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/18/2025 11:35 AM - Status changed from needs review to closed
- Assignee deleted (
Bruno Pagno) - % Complete set to 100%
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/18/2025 11:35 AM - Status changed from needs review to closed
- % Complete set to 100%
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/18/2025 10:54 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/18/2025 10:43 AM -
Comment added
Discussions from meeting with Bruno Pagno Wieland Lindenthal - most reachable option remains changing the Attachments c...
- File image.png added as attachment
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/18/2025 09:23 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/18/2025 09:23 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/18/2025 09:23 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 03/18/2025 08:51 AM -
Comment added
Jens Ulferts Kabiru Mwenja Bruno Pagno Having the Event model and the Comment extraction seperated in separate steps, ca...
-
Comment added
03/17/2025
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/17/2025 04:44 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 03/17/2025 02:43 PM -
Comment added
Thanks for the writeup, Bruno Pagno .
To me, the goal is by now rather clear, but of course there are a lot of uncertain...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/17/2025 02:36 PM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Kabiru Mwenja)
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/17/2025 02:36 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 03/17/2025 01:33 PM -
Comment added
Wieland Lindenthal we did some experimentation on using a view (not a materialized view) and it seems performatic enough...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 03/17/2025 01:25 PM -
Comment added
Kabiru Mwenja Bruno Pagno Jens Ulferts I guess there are quite some uncertainties still around using a materialized view...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 03/17/2025 11:55 AM -
Comment added
Marking this as test failed for two reasons:
"Custom fields", the second word should be lower-case (this is OP style i...
- Status changed from merged to test failed
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 03/17/2025 11:47 AM -
Comment added
Kabiru Mwenja agreed. I think this is refactor is a reasonable amount of work as well, so it is healthier to do separate...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/17/2025 11:45 AM -
Comment added
Thanks for compiling this Bruno Pagno ! My first thought is that we should handle this extraction initially as a separat...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/17/2025 11:15 AM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18240 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
created by
Bruno Pagno on 03/17/2025 10:52 AM -
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 03/17/2025 10:47 AM - Status changed from review approved to merged
- Assignee deleted (
Bruno Pagno)
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/17/2025 10:47 AM - Comment added
03/14/2025
-
updated by
Marc Alcobé on 03/14/2025 03:04 PM -
Comment added
Hi Parimal Satyal and Wieland Lindenthal,
For sure not "Vaciar lista" that doesn't sound native. Also, there is a proble...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 03/14/2025 02:23 PM -
Comment added
Parimal Satyal if that helps you, i don't think 'Vider tout' makes sense either, even in context i'm not sure i would un...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 03/14/2025 01:56 PM -
Comment added
If we go for "Vaciar todo", we could also do "Vider tout" in French, but it somehow sounds too informal to my ears, in a...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 03/14/2025 01:53 PM -
Comment added
Spanish "Vaciar todo" (Marc Alcobé)?
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 03/14/2025 01:51 PM -
Comment added
Yes, we could do that. But we should probably use the equivalent of list in both DE and FR too, since we use 'Inbox' onl...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 03/14/2025 10:21 AM -
Comment added
to be fair: Jens is in favour of extracting comments from the journal. then associating the inline attachment with the c...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 03/14/2025 10:11 AM -
Comment added
Parimal Satyal in the same vein as what Wieland suggested, we could do 'Vider la liste' or something like that? 'Vider l...
-
Comment added
-
created by
Cécile Guiot on 03/14/2025 09:58 AM -
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 03/14/2025 09:45 AM -
Comment added
Thanks, Wieland Lindenthal. Important distinction.
Cécile Guiot Can you think of a shorter, snappier label to replace '...
- Description changed (Details)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 03/14/2025 09:19 AM -
Comment added
Parimal Satyal When reading the German translation "Alles löschen" I thought with a bit of panic: "Wait, we don't delete...
-
Comment added
03/13/2025
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/13/2025 08:21 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 03/13/2025 03:43 PM - Status changed from tested to closed
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/13/2025 03:34 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/13/2025 03:08 PM - Status changed from new to rejected
- Assignee deleted (
Parimal Satyal) - % Complete set to 100%
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/13/2025 02:18 PM - Status changed from in development to review approved
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 03/13/2025 01:23 PM - Subject changed from Reminder: Shorter date and time fields in the set reminder dialog to Reminder: Shorter date and time fields in the "Set reminder" dialog
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 03/13/2025 01:23 PM - Subject changed from Implement redesign of restricted checkbox placement in desktop and mobile
to Implement redesign of "restricted visibility" checkbox placement in desktop and mobile
- Subject changed from Implement redesign of restricted checkbox placement in desktop and mobile
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 03/13/2025 01:22 PM - Subject changed from Adjust activity tab comment dismiss strategy to include cancel button and Esc keyboard action
to Adjust Activity tab comment dismiss strategy to include cancel button and Esc keyboard action
- Subject changed from Adjust activity tab comment dismiss strategy to include cancel button and Esc keyboard action
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 03/13/2025 01:20 PM - Subject changed from Activity tab scrolling when adding new comments
to Activity tab scrolling top (leaving a lot of white space underneath) when adding new comments
- Subject changed from Activity tab scrolling when adding new comments
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 03/13/2025 12:44 PM - Description changed (Details)
- Status changed from needs review to in development
- Assignee set to Bruno Pagno
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 03/13/2025 10:52 AM - File image.png added as attachment
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 03/13/2025 10:51 AM - Description changed (Details)
- Status changed from new to in specification
- File Untitled.png added as attachment
- File
image.pngremoved as attachment
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 03/13/2025 10:33 AM -
Comment added
Also, blatantly backtracking on a "decided" state here, because I had misunderstood the path forward.
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 03/13/2025 10:31 AM -
Comment added
After discussing with Wieland Lindenthal the topic again
Attachments know if they are inline (AKA part of the rich tex...
- Status changed from decided to needs clarification
- Decision deleted (
Explore associating attachments to comments instead of work packages)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 03/13/2025 10:26 AM -
Comment added
Hi Bruno Pagno , Kabiru Mwenja , Wieland Lindenthal , with the idea considered in here, of being able to attach files to...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 03/13/2025 09:25 AM -
Comment added
Hey Bruno Pagno it may look a bit "picky" on the details, however, that is what I do ;-) .... So, I have trouble with ...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 03/13/2025 09:10 AM - Status changed from needs clarification to decided
- % Complete set to 100%
- Decision set to Explore associating attachments to comments instead of work packages
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 03/13/2025 07:47 AM - Version deleted (
15.4.0)
- Version deleted (
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 03/13/2025 07:15 AM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Bruno Pagno)
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/13/2025 06:59 AM - Comment added
Also available in: Atom