Content
Activity
03/17/2025
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/17/2025 04:44 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 03/17/2025 02:43 PM -
Comment added
Thanks for the writeup, Bruno Pagno .
To me, the goal is by now rather clear, but of course there are a lot of uncertain...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/17/2025 02:36 PM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Kabiru Mwenja)
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/17/2025 02:36 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 03/17/2025 01:33 PM -
Comment added
Wieland Lindenthal we did some experimentation on using a view (not a materialized view) and it seems performatic enough...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 03/17/2025 01:25 PM -
Comment added
Kabiru Mwenja Bruno Pagno Jens Ulferts I guess there are quite some uncertainties still around using a materialized view...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 03/17/2025 11:55 AM -
Comment added
Marking this as test failed for two reasons:
"Custom fields", the second word should be lower-case (this is OP style i...
- Status changed from merged to test failed
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 03/17/2025 11:47 AM -
Comment added
Kabiru Mwenja agreed. I think this is refactor is a reasonable amount of work as well, so it is healthier to do separate...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/17/2025 11:45 AM -
Comment added
Thanks for compiling this Bruno Pagno ! My first thought is that we should handle this extraction initially as a separat...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/17/2025 11:15 AM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18240 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
created by
Bruno Pagno on 03/17/2025 10:52 AM -
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 03/17/2025 10:47 AM - Status changed from review approved to merged
- Assignee deleted (
Bruno Pagno)
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/17/2025 10:47 AM - Comment added
03/14/2025
-
updated by
Marc Alcobé on 03/14/2025 03:04 PM -
Comment added
Hi Parimal Satyal and Wieland Lindenthal,
For sure not "Vaciar lista" that doesn't sound native. Also, there is a proble...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 03/14/2025 02:23 PM -
Comment added
Parimal Satyal if that helps you, i don't think 'Vider tout' makes sense either, even in context i'm not sure i would un...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 03/14/2025 01:56 PM -
Comment added
If we go for "Vaciar todo", we could also do "Vider tout" in French, but it somehow sounds too informal to my ears, in a...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 03/14/2025 01:53 PM -
Comment added
Spanish "Vaciar todo" (Marc Alcobé)?
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 03/14/2025 01:51 PM -
Comment added
Yes, we could do that. But we should probably use the equivalent of list in both DE and FR too, since we use 'Inbox' onl...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 03/14/2025 10:21 AM -
Comment added
to be fair: Jens is in favour of extracting comments from the journal. then associating the inline attachment with the c...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 03/14/2025 10:11 AM -
Comment added
Parimal Satyal in the same vein as what Wieland suggested, we could do 'Vider la liste' or something like that? 'Vider l...
-
Comment added
-
created by
Cécile Guiot on 03/14/2025 09:58 AM -
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 03/14/2025 09:45 AM -
Comment added
Thanks, Wieland Lindenthal. Important distinction.
Cécile Guiot Can you think of a shorter, snappier label to replace '...
- Description changed (Details)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 03/14/2025 09:19 AM -
Comment added
Parimal Satyal When reading the German translation "Alles löschen" I thought with a bit of panic: "Wait, we don't delete...
-
Comment added
03/13/2025
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/13/2025 08:21 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 03/13/2025 03:43 PM - Status changed from tested to closed
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/13/2025 03:34 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/13/2025 03:08 PM - Status changed from new to rejected
- Assignee deleted (
Parimal Satyal) - % Complete set to 100%
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/13/2025 02:18 PM - Status changed from in development to review approved
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 03/13/2025 01:23 PM - Subject changed from Reminder: Shorter date and time fields in the set reminder dialog to Reminder: Shorter date and time fields in the "Set reminder" dialog
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 03/13/2025 01:23 PM - Subject changed from Implement redesign of restricted checkbox placement in desktop and mobile
to Implement redesign of "restricted visibility" checkbox placement in desktop and mobile
- Subject changed from Implement redesign of restricted checkbox placement in desktop and mobile
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 03/13/2025 01:22 PM - Subject changed from Adjust activity tab comment dismiss strategy to include cancel button and Esc keyboard action
to Adjust Activity tab comment dismiss strategy to include cancel button and Esc keyboard action
- Subject changed from Adjust activity tab comment dismiss strategy to include cancel button and Esc keyboard action
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 03/13/2025 01:20 PM - Subject changed from Activity tab scrolling when adding new comments
to Activity tab scrolling top (leaving a lot of white space underneath) when adding new comments
- Subject changed from Activity tab scrolling when adding new comments
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 03/13/2025 12:44 PM - Description changed (Details)
- Status changed from needs review to in development
- Assignee set to Bruno Pagno
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 03/13/2025 10:52 AM - File image.png added as attachment
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 03/13/2025 10:51 AM - Description changed (Details)
- Status changed from new to in specification
- File Untitled.png added as attachment
- File
image.pngremoved as attachment
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 03/13/2025 10:33 AM -
Comment added
Also, blatantly backtracking on a "decided" state here, because I had misunderstood the path forward.
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 03/13/2025 10:31 AM -
Comment added
After discussing with Wieland Lindenthal the topic again
Attachments know if they are inline (AKA part of the rich tex...
- Status changed from decided to needs clarification
- Decision deleted (
Explore associating attachments to comments instead of work packages)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 03/13/2025 10:26 AM -
Comment added
Hi Bruno Pagno , Kabiru Mwenja , Wieland Lindenthal , with the idea considered in here, of being able to attach files to...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 03/13/2025 09:25 AM -
Comment added
Hey Bruno Pagno it may look a bit "picky" on the details, however, that is what I do ;-) .... So, I have trouble with ...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 03/13/2025 09:10 AM - Status changed from needs clarification to decided
- % Complete set to 100%
- Decision set to Explore associating attachments to comments instead of work packages
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 03/13/2025 07:47 AM - Version deleted (
15.4.0)
- Version deleted (
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 03/13/2025 07:15 AM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Bruno Pagno)
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/13/2025 06:59 AM - Comment added
03/12/2025
-
updated by
Niels Lindenthal on 03/12/2025 05:41 PM - Roadmap changed from (deleted option) to (deleted option)
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/12/2025 05:27 PM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Kabiru Mwenja)
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/12/2025 05:27 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/12/2025 05:27 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/12/2025 05:24 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/12/2025 05:24 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/12/2025 02:39 PM - Version set to 15.5.0
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/12/2025 02:38 PM - Status changed from new to in development
- Assignee set to Kabiru Mwenja
- Version set to 15.5.0
- Developers set to Kabiru Mwenja
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/12/2025 02:36 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/12/2025 02:13 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/12/2025 02:13 PM - Status changed from needs review to closed
- % Complete set to 100%
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/12/2025 02:07 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/12/2025 02:07 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/12/2025 02:07 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/12/2025 02:07 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/12/2025 11:55 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 03/12/2025 09:24 AM - Status changed from review approved to closed
- % Complete set to 100%
-
created by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/12/2025 09:24 AM -
created by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/12/2025 09:18 AM -
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/12/2025 09:17 AM -
Comment added
fyi Bruno Pagno - I realized we forgot to include the work packages (notes) API in the specification
-
Comment added
03/11/2025
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/11/2025 10:02 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/11/2025 09:58 PM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Kabiru Mwenja) - Version set to 15.5.0
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/11/2025 09:57 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/11/2025 09:57 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/11/2025 09:57 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/11/2025 09:56 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/11/2025 09:55 PM - Comment added
-
created by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/11/2025 07:22 PM -
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 03/11/2025 06:37 PM -
Comment added
Updated specs based on decisions taken today in our weekly and in .
- Acceptance criteria changed (Details)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 03/11/2025 06:34 PM - Parent set to Internal comments in the work package activity tab
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 03/11/2025 06:32 PM -
Comment added
Decisions from this morning:
Work on the unified Work packages entry, with a new 'Activity' tab
The other three tabs...
- Status changed from needs clarification to decided
- % Complete set to 100%
- Decision changed from Try the approach with a new 'Work packages' entry in the Project settings.
to Settings will be in a new tab called 'Activity' in the new consolidated 'Work packages' page in Project settings.
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/11/2025 05:35 PM - Version set to 15.5.0
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/11/2025 05:33 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/11/2025 05:33 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/11/2025 05:33 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/11/2025 05:33 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/11/2025 05:02 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/11/2025 03:07 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 03/11/2025 03:01 PM - Project changed from OpenProject to Stream Communicator
- Status changed from specified to in development
- Assignee changed from Parimal Satyal to Bruno Pagno
- Version set to 15.5.0
- Developers set to Bruno Pagno
- Mockups set to https://www.figma.com/design/w0YoqQ5v0JGNT5NS5NZJZq/Comments-with-restricted-visibility?node-id=164-7460&p=f&t=7JaYXWWgumu1xiRF-0
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 03/11/2025 03:00 PM -
Comment added
Corinna Günther it does not matter, I don't think there's a right or wrong way. The text is inserted and you can type an...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 03/11/2025 02:44 PM -
Comment added
This open point depends on how we implement semantic colours: . Will update here once we make progress there.
- Status changed from new to needs clarification
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Corinna Günther on 03/11/2025 02:43 PM -
Comment added
Am I supposed to add my text above or below the quoted text? The curser automatically starts in front of the @, so I ass...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/11/2025 02:00 PM - Status changed from needs review to review approved
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 03/11/2025 01:49 PM - Description changed (Details)
- Status changed from new to in development
- Assignee set to Bruno Pagno
- Developers set to Bruno Pagno
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 03/11/2025 01:48 PM - Status changed from in development to new
- Assignee deleted (
Bruno Pagno)
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 03/11/2025 12:52 PM -
Comment added
Some updates after our meeting with Kabiru Mwenja and Wieland Lindenthal this afternoon:
Two decisions:
In both desktop ...
- File Mobile.png added as attachment
- File Desktop.png added as attachment
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 03/11/2025 11:05 AM -
Comment added
Just for documentation, we decided to explore changing the context of attachments inserted through the editor to comment...
-
Comment added
-
created by
Bruno Pagno on 03/11/2025 11:03 AM -
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/11/2025 09:58 AM -
Comment added
As discussed in meeting- preference is to reduce the viewport height taken by the "Restricted Visibility" checkbox and c...
- File Screenshot_2025-03-11_at_11.54.20_AM.png added as attachment
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/11/2025 08:39 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/11/2025 08:39 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/11/2025 08:39 AM - Comment added
Also available in: Atom