Content
Activity
03/04/2025
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 03/04/2025 06:44 PM -
Comment added
Hi team,
In the description, I've included three options A, B and C.
A uses different boders and fills; B uses differe...
- Description changed (Details)
- File RestrictedComments_colourOptions.png added as attachment
- File RestrictedComments_colourOptions.png added as attachment
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/04/2025 06:14 PM -
Comment added
For reference: GH uses the border color pattern to highlight 1) your own comments or pull request descriptions 2) Merged...
-
Comment added
-
created by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/04/2025 05:23 PM -
Comment added
Hi Parimal Satyal ,
I'm creating this OPEN POINT to track the design decision.
I'm already seeing inconsistencies in da...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Niels Lindenthal on 03/04/2025 04:31 PM - Ordered by changed from Niels Lindenthal to ZenDiS
- PD (max) set to 20
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 03/04/2025 04:31 PM - Status changed from tested to closed
- % Complete set to 100%
-
updated by
Niels Lindenthal on 03/04/2025 04:31 PM - PD (max) set to 20
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 03/04/2025 04:31 PM - Status changed from tested to closed
- % Complete set to 100%
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 03/04/2025 04:30 PM - Status changed from tested to closed
- % Complete set to 100%
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 03/04/2025 03:38 PM - Status changed from review approved to closed
- Assignee deleted (
Bruno Pagno) - % Complete set to 100%
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/04/2025 03:38 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 03/04/2025 01:44 PM -
Comment added
Decisions:
Grant this new permission to all roles also having the "Manage members" permission
Feature flag feature
...
- Description changed (Details)
- Status changed from needs clarification to decided
- % Complete set to 100%
- Decision set to Grant this new permission to all roles also having the "Manage members" permission
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/04/2025 12:45 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18125 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Andrey Dermeyko on 03/04/2025 12:43 PM -
Comment added
Niels Lindenthal maybe it is your stream "Time and Costs"?
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 03/04/2025 12:27 PM - Status changed from needs review to merged
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/04/2025 12:27 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/04/2025 12:00 PM - Comment added
-
created by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/04/2025 11:47 AM -
updated by
Samantha Machon on 03/04/2025 09:53 AM -
Comment added
+1 from on-premises customer
- Votes changed from 2 to 3
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 03/04/2025 09:50 AM -
Comment added
Thoughts from this morning:
Given work on parallel work package (add later), perhaps a separate entry in the Project s...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 03/04/2025 08:53 AM - Status changed from new to needs review
- Version set to 15.4.0
- Accountable set to Bruno Pagno
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/04/2025 08:52 AM - Comment added
03/03/2025
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/03/2025 07:45 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18075 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 03/03/2025 07:24 PM -
Comment added
Hi Wieland Lindenthal. Discussed this with Marc. There'll be two elements to this:
A teaser in the Activity tab (visib...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/03/2025 07:11 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/03/2025 04:33 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 03/03/2025 02:53 PM - The changes were retracted.
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 03/03/2025 02:51 PM -
Comment added
Kabiru Mwenja Bruno Pagno Parimal Satyal Niels just chose the feature to be part of the Enterprise (ENT) / Professional ...
- Subject changed from Corporate Enterprise upsale banners for “Comments with restricted visibility” to Enterprise/Professional upsale banners for “Comments with restricted visibility”
- Description changed (Details)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/03/2025 02:15 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18115 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 03/03/2025 01:39 PM -
Comment added
Fixed ✅ (also fixed in the WP split view for me Bruno Pagno )
Tested on:
Windows 11Pro
Firefox 135.0
Core build
eebdf384...
- Status changed from merged to tested
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/03/2025 01:24 PM - Comment added
-
created by
Bruno Pagno on 03/03/2025 01:24 PM -
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 03/03/2025 01:15 PM -
Comment added
Cécile Guiot it's merged in case you want to double check
- Status changed from review approved to merged
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/03/2025 01:15 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/03/2025 11:24 AM - Status changed from needs review to review approved
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/03/2025 10:30 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
Niels Lindenthal on 03/03/2025 09:52 AM - Enterprise plan set to Enterprise / Professional
-
updated by
Niels Lindenthal on 03/03/2025 09:46 AM - Enterprise plan set to Community
-
updated by
Niels Lindenthal on 03/03/2025 09:22 AM - Enterprise plan set to Enterprise / Professional
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/03/2025 09:18 AM - Version deleted (
15.4.0)
- Version deleted (
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/03/2025 09:18 AM - Version changed from 15.4.0 to 15.5.0
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/03/2025 09:13 AM - Status changed from needs review to review approved
- Assignee set to Bruno Pagno
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/03/2025 09:13 AM -
Comment added
Agreed - however, I'd make a note to inform the contributors and close out their PR once we merge to dev.
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 03/03/2025 08:59 AM - Status changed from new to in development
- Assignee set to Bruno Pagno
- Accountable set to Bruno Pagno
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 03/03/2025 08:36 AM - Status changed from new to needs clarification
02/28/2025
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 02/28/2025 04:31 PM -
Comment added
I think we can close this one.
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 02/28/2025 03:44 PM -
Comment added
Bruno Pagno all good, i think your assessment is as good as mine. Besides, it's really a detail, so i think we can survi...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 02/28/2025 03:37 PM -
Comment added
Cécile Guiot FYI, I spent some time today fiddling with CSS and I believe fixing this behaviour on the non-split-view is...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/28/2025 03:35 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/28/2025 03:35 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 02/28/2025 03:30 PM - Status changed from test failed to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Bruno Pagno)
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 02/28/2025 02:30 PM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Bruno Pagno)
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/28/2025 01:08 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 02/28/2025 12:43 PM -
Comment added
Conversation with Wieland Lindenthal
This can wait until after 15.4 as we gather more feedback there
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 02/28/2025 12:39 PM -
Comment added
Conversation with Wieland Lindenthal
"Every attachment has an ID and users can access it if they have access to it, th...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 02/28/2025 11:25 AM - Version set to 15.4.0
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 02/28/2025 10:59 AM -
Comment added
New proposal for extending current permissions when we release the feature:
users that have the manage_work_package_re...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 02/28/2025 10:27 AM -
Comment added
I have looked into seeders. The change is quite simple, so I will go with:
- Anonymous and Non-Members get nothing
- Me...
-
Comment added
-
created by
Kabiru Mwenja on 02/28/2025 10:08 AM -
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 02/28/2025 09:49 AM - Status changed from new to in development
- Assignee set to Kabiru Mwenja
- Accountable set to Kabiru Mwenja
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 02/28/2025 09:48 AM -
Comment added
Duplicate
- Status changed from in development to closed
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 02/28/2025 09:48 AM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee changed from Kabiru Mwenja to Bruno Pagno
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 02/28/2025 09:47 AM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee changed from Kabiru Mwenja to Bruno Pagno
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 02/28/2025 09:27 AM -
Comment added
Just not to leave unsaid, another alternative would be not to allow attachments on restricted comments. But I believe th...
- Involved people changed from Wieland Lindenthal, Parimal Satyal, Bruno Pagno to Wieland Lindenthal, Parimal Satyal, Kabiru Mwenja, Bruno Pagno
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 02/28/2025 09:01 AM - Status changed from needs review to in development
- Assignee set to Bruno Pagno
- Accountable changed from Kabiru Mwenja to Bruno Pagno
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 02/28/2025 08:56 AM -
Comment added
How do we extend existing roles?
Not sure if you're asking about the mechanics, but explaing for the sake of being exp...
-
Comment added
-
created by
Kabiru Mwenja on 02/28/2025 08:18 AM -
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 02/28/2025 08:16 AM - Status changed from new to closed
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 02/28/2025 08:15 AM - Status changed from new to closed
-
created by
Kabiru Mwenja on 02/28/2025 08:02 AM -
updated by
Andreas H. on 02/28/2025 07:24 AM -
Comment added
Ups, wrong workpackage, sorry :) Maybe this comment can be deleted?
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 02/28/2025 07:00 AM - Status changed from new to in development
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 02/28/2025 06:58 AM - Status changed from new to in development
- Assignee set to Kabiru Mwenja
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 02/28/2025 06:58 AM - Assignee deleted (
Kabiru Mwenja)
- Assignee deleted (
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 02/28/2025 06:58 AM - Status changed from closed to rejected
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 02/28/2025 06:58 AM - Status changed from closed to rejected
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 02/28/2025 06:57 AM - Status changed from closed to rejected
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 02/28/2025 06:57 AM - Status changed from closed to rejected
02/27/2025
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 02/27/2025 11:04 PM -
Comment added
Good question. There are actually two separate things we need to decide:
How do we extend existing roles?
How do we ...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 02/27/2025 06:34 PM -
Comment added
Hi Bruno Pagno.
Your suggestions seems rather logical to me! We'll see what the rest of the team thinks. Thanks for brin...
-
Comment added
-
created by
Bruno Pagno on 02/27/2025 05:45 PM -
Comment added
My suggestion is to assign permissions to view/write/edit comments with restricted visibility to all users who have the ...
-
Comment added
-
created by
Andrey Dermeyko on 02/27/2025 04:23 PM -
Comment added
I assigned Wieland Lindenthal due to his role on the Project Overview page.
Please correct me if I'm wrong
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Markus K. on 02/27/2025 02:49 PM -
Comment added
Parimal Satyal Looking at the figma design, this would be a good simple approach surely covering the most use cases 👍
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 02/27/2025 01:12 PM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Bruno Pagno)
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 02/27/2025 11:36 AM -
Comment added
Thanks, Bruno Pagno.
Update from today's meetings:
The "Visibilty" approach was generally preferred by our stream team...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Alexander Stock on 02/27/2025 10:39 AM - Votes changed from 2 to 3
-
updated by
Andreas H. on 02/27/2025 10:25 AM -
Comment added
+1
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Andreas H. on 02/27/2025 10:08 AM -
Comment added
+1 A native implementation of this feature is quite important to us, especially the browser notification part. It was al...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 02/27/2025 09:23 AM -
Comment added
After some exploration we went back to option 1.
It is the simplest path to enabling the feature (comments with restrict...
- Status changed from new to decided
- Decision set to Option 1 as it is the simplest path to enable the comments with restricted visibility feature
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/27/2025 08:41 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 02/27/2025 08:05 AM -
Comment added
Using same naming as non restricted comments for the permissions
- Assignee changed from Kabiru Mwenja to Bruno Pagno
- File image.png added as attachment
-
Comment added
02/26/2025
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/26/2025 04:36 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/26/2025 04:35 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 02/26/2025 04:31 PM - Status changed from closed to rejected
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 02/26/2025 04:27 PM -
Comment added
We decided not to continue with separate Comments table, thus this work package makes no sense anymore
- Status changed from in development to closed
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 02/26/2025 04:27 PM - Assignee changed from Bruno Pagno to Kabiru Mwenja
-
created by
Kabiru Mwenja on 02/26/2025 04:26 PM -
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 02/26/2025 04:26 PM -
Comment added
We decided not to continue with separate Comments table, thus this work package makes no sense anymore
- Status changed from new to closed
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 02/26/2025 04:26 PM -
Comment added
We decided not to continue with separate Comments table, thus this work package makes no sense anymore
- Status changed from new to closed
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 02/26/2025 04:26 PM -
Comment added
We decided not to continue with separate Comments table, thus this work package makes no sense anymore
- Status changed from new to closed
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 02/26/2025 04:25 PM -
Comment added
We decided not to continue with separate Comments table, thus this work package makes no sense anymore
- Status changed from new to closed
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 02/26/2025 04:25 PM - Subject changed from POC: Introduce work package restricted comments as part of journal notes to Exclude work package restricted comments from journal aggregation
- Status changed from in development to new
- Assignee deleted (
Kabiru Mwenja)
-
updated by
Jan Keppler on 02/26/2025 04:17 PM -
Comment added
+1
- Votes changed from 1 to 2
-
Comment added
-
created by
Kabiru Mwenja on 02/26/2025 02:39 PM -
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 02/26/2025 02:01 PM -
Comment added
Parimal Satyal fair enough. My assumption was that we were expecting the open point to be clarified to push forward. Tha...
- Status changed from needs clarification to confirmed
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 02/26/2025 11:53 AM -
Comment added
Hi Bruno Pagno,
Good catch. It was in the "OLD" page; I've created a new page for this feature: https://www.figma.com/de...
- Mockups set to https://www.figma.com/design/hC75Mf34GcQ2LFdm2pQu0l/Reminders?node-id=401-7270
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 02/26/2025 11:51 AM -
Comment added
Hi Bruno Pagno,
This bug won't depend on the open point, and the expected behaviour is up to date. Is there anything els...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 02/26/2025 10:17 AM -
Comment added
To be honest both options look good to me, but I don't have a clear preference.
My main consideration would be the trade...
-
Comment added
Also available in: Atom