Content
Activity
02/27/2025
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 02/27/2025 11:04 PM -
Comment added
Good question. There are actually two separate things we need to decide:
How do we extend existing roles?
How do we ...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 02/27/2025 06:34 PM -
Comment added
Hi Bruno Pagno.
Your suggestions seems rather logical to me! We'll see what the rest of the team thinks. Thanks for brin...
-
Comment added
-
created by
Bruno Pagno on 02/27/2025 05:45 PM -
Comment added
My suggestion is to assign permissions to view/write/edit comments with restricted visibility to all users who have the ...
-
Comment added
-
created by
Andrey Dermeyko on 02/27/2025 04:23 PM -
Comment added
I assigned Wieland Lindenthal due to his role on the Project Overview page.
Please correct me if I'm wrong
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Markus K. on 02/27/2025 02:49 PM -
Comment added
Parimal Satyal Looking at the figma design, this would be a good simple approach surely covering the most use cases 👍
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 02/27/2025 01:12 PM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Bruno Pagno)
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 02/27/2025 11:36 AM -
Comment added
Thanks, Bruno Pagno.
Update from today's meetings:
The "Visibilty" approach was generally preferred by our stream team...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Alexander Stock on 02/27/2025 10:39 AM - Votes changed from 2 to 3
-
updated by
Andreas H. on 02/27/2025 10:25 AM -
Comment added
+1
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Andreas H. on 02/27/2025 10:08 AM -
Comment added
+1 A native implementation of this feature is quite important to us, especially the browser notification part. It was al...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 02/27/2025 09:23 AM -
Comment added
After some exploration we went back to option 1.
It is the simplest path to enabling the feature (comments with restrict...
- Status changed from new to decided
- Decision set to Option 1 as it is the simplest path to enable the comments with restricted visibility feature
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/27/2025 08:41 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 02/27/2025 08:05 AM -
Comment added
Using same naming as non restricted comments for the permissions
- Assignee changed from Kabiru Mwenja to Bruno Pagno
- File image.png added as attachment
-
Comment added
02/26/2025
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/26/2025 04:36 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/26/2025 04:35 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 02/26/2025 04:31 PM - Status changed from closed to rejected
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 02/26/2025 04:27 PM -
Comment added
We decided not to continue with separate Comments table, thus this work package makes no sense anymore
- Status changed from in development to closed
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 02/26/2025 04:27 PM - Assignee changed from Bruno Pagno to Kabiru Mwenja
-
created by
Kabiru Mwenja on 02/26/2025 04:26 PM -
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 02/26/2025 04:26 PM -
Comment added
We decided not to continue with separate Comments table, thus this work package makes no sense anymore
- Status changed from new to closed
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 02/26/2025 04:26 PM -
Comment added
We decided not to continue with separate Comments table, thus this work package makes no sense anymore
- Status changed from new to closed
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 02/26/2025 04:26 PM -
Comment added
We decided not to continue with separate Comments table, thus this work package makes no sense anymore
- Status changed from new to closed
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 02/26/2025 04:25 PM -
Comment added
We decided not to continue with separate Comments table, thus this work package makes no sense anymore
- Status changed from new to closed
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 02/26/2025 04:25 PM - Subject changed from POC: Introduce work package restricted comments as part of journal notes to Exclude work package restricted comments from journal aggregation
- Status changed from in development to new
- Assignee deleted (
Kabiru Mwenja)
-
updated by
Jan Keppler on 02/26/2025 04:17 PM -
Comment added
+1
- Votes changed from 1 to 2
-
Comment added
-
created by
Kabiru Mwenja on 02/26/2025 02:39 PM -
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 02/26/2025 02:01 PM -
Comment added
Parimal Satyal fair enough. My assumption was that we were expecting the open point to be clarified to push forward. Tha...
- Status changed from needs clarification to confirmed
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 02/26/2025 11:53 AM -
Comment added
Hi Bruno Pagno,
Good catch. It was in the "OLD" page; I've created a new page for this feature: https://www.figma.com/de...
- Mockups set to https://www.figma.com/design/hC75Mf34GcQ2LFdm2pQu0l/Reminders?node-id=401-7270
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 02/26/2025 11:51 AM -
Comment added
Hi Bruno Pagno,
This bug won't depend on the open point, and the expected behaviour is up to date. Is there anything els...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 02/26/2025 10:17 AM -
Comment added
To be honest both options look good to me, but I don't have a clear preference.
My main consideration would be the trade...
-
Comment added
02/25/2025
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 02/25/2025 06:30 PM -
Comment added
Hi team,
I've added a new page called "Project settings" in the Figma mockups.
There are three versions we can consider...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/25/2025 06:15 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18053 deployed to qa.openproject-stage.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/25/2025 05:27 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/25/2025 04:23 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 02/25/2025 03:06 PM -
Comment added
Bruno Pagno marking as test failed then.
btw, i made my text bold in the previous comment because i wasn't sure it woul...
- Status changed from in test to test failed
- Assignee changed from Cécile Guiot to Bruno Pagno
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 02/25/2025 03:03 PM -
Comment added
Good finding. I overlooked the newest at the top sorting. I think its worth fixing.
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 02/25/2025 02:24 PM -
Comment added
Bruno Pagno when the sort order is newest at the bottom, the 1st activity is linked with the comment box
but when it's ...
- File grafik.png added as attachment
- File grafik.png added as attachment
- File grafik.png added as attachment
- File grafik.png added as attachment
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 02/25/2025 11:27 AM - Status changed from merged to in test
- Assignee set to Cécile Guiot
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 02/25/2025 10:58 AM -
Comment added
Fixed ✅
Tested on:
Core build
5adbb7629aa459bb73aaca37bb014b9d81f0e710
Product version
de29850da25ca2e304c449a28b1c2e76d...
- Status changed from in test to closed
- Assignee deleted (
Cécile Guiot)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/25/2025 10:45 AM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18067 deployed to qa.openproject-stage.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 02/25/2025 10:21 AM - Description changed (Details)
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 02/25/2025 09:36 AM - Description changed (Details)
- Decision set to Try the approach with a new 'Work packages' entry in the Project settings.
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 02/25/2025 09:24 AM - Status changed from merged to in test
- Assignee set to Cécile Guiot
-
created by
Bruno Pagno on 02/25/2025 09:00 AM -
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 02/25/2025 08:13 AM - Status changed from review approved to merged
- Assignee deleted (
Kabiru Mwenja)
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/25/2025 08:12 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 02/25/2025 08:03 AM - Status changed from confirmed to review approved
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/25/2025 07:35 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 02/25/2025 07:09 AM - Version set to 15.3.1
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/25/2025 07:09 AM - Comment added
-
created by
Kabiru Mwenja on 02/25/2025 06:58 AM -
Comment added
Hi Jens Ulferts Markus Kahl - unfortunately we have the same issue on reminders. Raising a fix for next patch release.
-
Comment added
02/24/2025
-
updated by
Marc Alcobé on 02/24/2025 05:36 PM -
Comment added
Hi Niels Lindenthal and Wieland Lindenthal,
That would be great as we are planning to work on this in the next release 1...
-
Comment added
-
created by
Bruno Pagno on 02/24/2025 05:08 PM -
created by
Bruno Pagno on 02/24/2025 05:07 PM -
created by
Bruno Pagno on 02/24/2025 05:06 PM -
Comment added
I was able to do a proof of concept quick implementation of rendering comments on the timeline, and it seems quite feasi...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 02/24/2025 04:33 PM -
Comment added
Working as expected ✅
Tested on:
Windows11Pro
Firefox 135.0
Core build
101d88801ef6498e33be4ea43fe49f95cc462ab2
Product ...
- Status changed from merged to tested
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/24/2025 04:32 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/24/2025 03:55 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 02/24/2025 12:16 PM -
Comment added
Fixed ✅
Tested on:
Core build
cf643f93b16c2f7cc4dd820b968b0e617bf369af
Product version
de29850da25ca2e304c449a28b1c2e76d...
- Status changed from in test to closed
- Assignee deleted (
Cécile Guiot)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 02/24/2025 12:02 PM - Description changed (Details)
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 02/24/2025 11:02 AM - Status changed from merged to in test
- Assignee set to Cécile Guiot
-
created by
Kabiru Mwenja on 02/24/2025 10:56 AM -
updated by
GitHub on 02/24/2025 10:45 AM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18053 deployed to qa.openproject-stage.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 02/24/2025 10:19 AM - Status changed from review approved to merged
- Assignee deleted (
Kabiru Mwenja)
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/24/2025 10:19 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 02/24/2025 09:55 AM - Status changed from in development to review approved
- Version set to 15.3.1
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/24/2025 09:50 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/24/2025 09:35 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 02/24/2025 09:20 AM -
Comment added
Hi Jens Ulferts , happpy to take it up! Thanks for the report 👍
- Status changed from confirmed to in development
- Assignee set to Kabiru Mwenja
- Accountable set to Kabiru Mwenja
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 02/24/2025 09:19 AM - Status changed from needs review to closed
-
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 02/24/2025 09:10 AM -
Comment added
Hi Kabiru Mwenja ,
I believe you were the person who worked on this topic. Please see to it getting processed. In my op...
- Project changed from OpenProject to Stream Communicator
- Priority changed from Medium to High
- Version deleted (
15.3.1)
-
Comment added
02/23/2025
-
updated by
Niels Lindenthal on 02/23/2025 06:47 PM -
Comment added
Hi Wieland Lindenthal,
OK for you? We need it for the apps
- Priority changed from High to Medium
- Version changed from Wish List to 15.5.0
-
Comment added
02/21/2025
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/21/2025 06:45 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18044 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/21/2025 06:07 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/21/2025 05:41 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/21/2025 05:40 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/21/2025 02:45 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#17952 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/21/2025 02:13 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/21/2025 02:02 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 02/21/2025 12:25 PM -
Comment added
Hi Parimal Satyal - any update on a decision here? We can also talk about in next communicator weekly.
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 02/21/2025 12:19 PM - Priority changed from Medium to Low
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 02/21/2025 12:18 PM - Status changed from confirmed to needs clarification
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 02/21/2025 12:16 PM -
Comment added
Parimal Satyal hey, do we have a figma link for this? I don't see it in the work package.
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 02/21/2025 11:56 AM - Description changed (Details)
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 02/21/2025 10:44 AM -
Comment added
We agreed to explore option 3. Unless we see any big blockers, we will consider that the decision for the path forward
- Description changed (Details)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 02/21/2025 09:56 AM -
Comment added
Fixed ✅
Tested on:
iPhone 14
iOS 18.1.1
Core build
f90f90a36d9b15dac20c3c6040384e6471500559
Product version
de29850da25c...
- Status changed from merged to closed
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 02/21/2025 09:46 AM - Status changed from review failed to needs review
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/21/2025 09:46 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
Bruno Pagno on 02/21/2025 09:36 AM - Description changed (Details)
-
updated by
Kabiru Mwenja on 02/21/2025 07:42 AM - Description changed (Details)
Also available in: Atom