Content
Activity
01/30/2025
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/30/2025 05:15 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#17604 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/30/2025 05:15 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#17604 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/30/2025 05:15 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#17604 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/30/2025 05:15 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#17604 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 01/30/2025 04:44 PM - Status changed from review approved to merged
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 01/30/2025 04:44 PM - Status changed from review approved to merged
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 01/30/2025 04:44 PM - Status changed from review approved to merged
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 01/30/2025 04:44 PM - Status changed from review approved to merged
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/30/2025 04:44 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/30/2025 04:44 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/30/2025 04:44 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/30/2025 04:44 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 01/30/2025 04:35 PM - Status changed from needs review to review approved
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 01/30/2025 04:35 PM - Status changed from needs review to review approved
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/30/2025 04:30 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 01/30/2025 03:22 PM -
Comment added
Excellent questions, Christophe Bliard.
Correct, only when there are two or more predecessors. Ergo, no closest label ...
- Description changed (Details)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 01/30/2025 02:27 PM - Version set to 15.4.0
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 01/30/2025 01:55 PM -
Comment added
Hi Parimal Satyal,
If I read correctly the "closest" badge is shown only if there are at least 2 predecessors, correct? ...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 01/30/2025 01:51 PM - Status changed from confirmed to in development
- Assignee set to Henriette Darge
- Accountable set to Henriette Darge
-
updated by
Behrokh Satarnejad on 01/30/2025 01:27 PM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Behrokh Satarnejad)
-
updated by
Behrokh Satarnejad on 01/30/2025 01:27 PM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Behrokh Satarnejad)
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 01/30/2025 12:15 PM -
Comment added
It might be an option to use the flatpickr range with two inputs at least for the mobile version, see https://flatpickr....
- Status changed from new to in specification
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 01/30/2025 12:14 PM - Description changed (Details)
-
updated by
Behrokh Satarnejad on 01/30/2025 11:17 AM - Status changed from review failed to in development
- Assignee set to Behrokh Satarnejad
-
updated by
Behrokh Satarnejad on 01/30/2025 11:17 AM - Status changed from review failed to in development
- Assignee set to Behrokh Satarnejad
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 01/30/2025 10:46 AM - Status changed from in review to review approved
- Assignee deleted (
Christophe Bliard)
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 01/30/2025 10:45 AM - Status changed from in review to review failed
- Assignee deleted (
Christophe Bliard)
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 01/30/2025 10:45 AM - Status changed from in review to review approved
- Assignee deleted (
Christophe Bliard)
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 01/30/2025 10:44 AM - Status changed from in review to review failed
- Assignee deleted (
Christophe Bliard)
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 01/30/2025 10:16 AM -
Comment added
Updated the description according to the decsision made here. Further, I am moving this to 15.4 as the Datepicker will o...
- Subject changed from Highlight closest relation in the datepicker to Highlight closest predecessor in the relations tab
- Description changed (Details)
- Version changed from 15.3.0 to 15.4.0
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 01/30/2025 09:29 AM - Status changed from needs review to in review
- Assignee set to Christophe Bliard
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 01/30/2025 09:28 AM - Status changed from needs review to in review
- Assignee set to Christophe Bliard
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 01/30/2025 09:28 AM - Status changed from needs review to in review
- Assignee set to Christophe Bliard
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 01/30/2025 09:28 AM - Status changed from needs review to in review
- Assignee set to Christophe Bliard
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 01/30/2025 09:25 AM - Accountable set to Christophe Bliard
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 01/30/2025 09:24 AM - Description changed (Details)
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 01/30/2025 08:53 AM - Description set (Details)
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/30/2025 08:23 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
Behrokh Satarnejad on 01/30/2025 08:22 AM - Status changed from specified to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Behrokh Satarnejad) - Accountable set to Behrokh Satarnejad
01/29/2025
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 01/29/2025 05:47 PM - Description changed (Details)
-
updated by
Behrokh Satarnejad on 01/29/2025 04:39 PM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Behrokh Satarnejad)
-
updated by
Behrokh Satarnejad on 01/29/2025 04:39 PM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Behrokh Satarnejad)
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/29/2025 04:38 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/29/2025 04:38 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Behrokh Satarnejad on 01/29/2025 04:34 PM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Behrokh Satarnejad)
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 01/29/2025 04:21 PM -
Comment added
Update: this work package now only contains scenarios relevant to the date picker.
All other scenarios have been moved ...
- Subject changed from Scenarios for date picker behaviour with automatic scheduling to Scenarios: Primerised date picker
- Description changed (Details)
-
Comment added
-
created by
Parimal Satyal on 01/29/2025 04:20 PM -
Comment added
Update: this work package was split from . It contains scenarios that did not concern the behaviour of the date picker d...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/29/2025 04:17 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 01/29/2025 04:15 PM - Description changed (Details)
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 01/29/2025 04:07 PM - Description changed (Details)
-
created by
Parimal Satyal on 01/29/2025 03:59 PM -
Comment added
Hi Henriette Darge,
Based on our discussion earlier today and after further thoughts on ways to optimise the datepicker ...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Behrokh Satarnejad on 01/29/2025 03:52 PM - Status changed from confirmed to in development
- Assignee set to Behrokh Satarnejad
- Accountable set to Behrokh Satarnejad
-
updated by
Behrokh Satarnejad on 01/29/2025 03:51 PM - Status changed from confirmed to in development
- Assignee set to Behrokh Satarnejad
- Accountable set to Behrokh Satarnejad
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 01/29/2025 03:48 PM - Assignee set to Alexander Coles
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 01/29/2025 03:03 PM -
Comment added
Thanks, confirmed, all green now! ✅
We might come up with other scenarios whilst testing but for the moment, this docume...
- Description changed (Details)
- Status changed from in progress to scheduled
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Behrokh Satarnejad on 01/29/2025 03:00 PM - Status changed from review failed to in development
- Assignee set to Behrokh Satarnejad
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 01/29/2025 02:57 PM -
Comment added
Hi Parimal Satyal,
Scenarios 30 and 31 were so close, I renamed them 30a and 30b.
Only 3 more to confirm and we're good....
- Description changed (Details)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Behrokh Satarnejad on 01/29/2025 02:25 PM -
Comment added
There is a WP for showing ghost relations in mobile app.
- Status changed from new to in specification
-
Comment added
-
created by
Parimal Satyal on 01/29/2025 02:10 PM -
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 01/29/2025 02:06 PM -
Comment added
After our conversation, we've decided:
For any work package that has the same start and end dates, we will show it as ...
- Description changed (Details)
-
Comment added
-
created by
Behrokh Satarnejad on 01/29/2025 01:24 PM -
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 01/29/2025 12:36 PM -
Comment added
Hi Christophe Bliard,
Thanks for the review. The following is for 27b onwards (it remains in order there). I've also sp...
- Description changed (Details)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 01/29/2025 11:35 AM -
Comment added
Hi Parimal Satyal,
Another question: if a work package of a ghost relation in children or predecessor/ successor has no ...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 01/29/2025 10:29 AM - Description changed (Details)
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 01/29/2025 10:19 AM -
Comment added
Fixed ✅
Tested on:
Core build
5665d3d33839d83a56f5277b205ff516d0ed6ff0
Product version
53ab774ec0aa9b1790e402c05c7d49902...
- Status changed from merged to tested
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 01/29/2025 10:16 AM - Description changed (Details)
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 01/29/2025 08:28 AM -
Comment added
Hi Parimal Satyal,
I finished reviewing them.
The ones in 🟡 needs to be changed. Then pass them to 🔵 so I can review th...
- Description changed (Details)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 01/29/2025 07:12 AM - Description changed (Details)
01/28/2025
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/28/2025 04:15 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#17746 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 01/28/2025 04:04 PM - Description changed (Details)
-
updated by
Tobias Dillmann on 01/28/2025 03:51 PM - Status changed from review approved to merged
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 01/28/2025 03:39 PM -
Comment added
Reorganized links to sub-features to make it more obvious that this work package has been split into smaller sub-feature...
- Description changed (Details)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/28/2025 03:36 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 01/28/2025 03:28 PM - Parent changed from Add automatic scheduling mode to New scheduling mode: automatic (start as soon as possible)
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 01/28/2025 02:42 PM -
Comment added
Hello,
Would the possibility of having negative lag solve this? For example, if lag were -1 (assuming 0 is the day after...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 01/28/2025 02:26 PM -
Comment added
Hi Parimal Satyal,
I noticed something regarding dates when it's a milestone. It is currently rendered like this, with t...
-
Comment added
-
created by
Christophe Bliard on 01/28/2025 12:14 PM -
updated by
Tobias Dillmann on 01/28/2025 11:11 AM - Status changed from in review to review approved
- Assignee deleted (
Tobias Dillmann)
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 01/28/2025 11:07 AM -
Comment added
Hi Christophe Bliard
that might be.. hard to tell as I never managed to reproduce what caused these errors. Once the ot...
-
Comment added
-
created by
Behrokh Satarnejad on 01/28/2025 11:07 AM -
Comment added
Extracted from specifications of ghost relations.
-
Comment added
-
created by
Behrokh Satarnejad on 01/28/2025 10:49 AM -
Comment added
Extracted from specifications of ghost relations as we discussed with Parimal Satyal in frontend-design meeting.
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Samantha Machon on 01/28/2025 09:56 AM -
Comment added
+1 from customer
- Votes changed from 7 to 10
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Behrokh Satarnejad on 01/28/2025 09:42 AM -
Comment added
Thanks Parimal Satyal for clarifying which icon should be used.
It has been implemented differently, I'll fix it.
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 01/28/2025 09:32 AM - Project changed from OpenProject to Stream Planning and Reporting
-
updated by
Tobias Dillmann on 01/28/2025 09:24 AM - Status changed from in development to in review
- Assignee changed from Behrokh Satarnejad to Tobias Dillmann
-
updated by
Behrokh Satarnejad on 01/28/2025 09:22 AM -
Comment added
Hi Tobias Dillmann Thanks for a good catch.
I fixed this issue in a PR and referenced this WP there too. Could you pleas...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/28/2025 09:12 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
Behrokh Satarnejad on 01/28/2025 08:43 AM - Status changed from test failed to in development
- Assignee set to Behrokh Satarnejad
01/27/2025
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 01/27/2025 06:20 PM -
Comment added
Hi Parimal Satyal,
I finished reviewing the ones you reviewed too.
Cheers
- Description changed (Details)
- Version set to 15.4.0
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Tobias Dillmann on 01/27/2025 11:52 AM -
Comment added
Behrokh Satarnejad this fix seems to have caused SPPM-131 . Removing the overflow: hidden from the container fixes the l...
- Status changed from merged to test failed
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 01/27/2025 11:00 AM -
Comment added
Hi Behrokh Satarnejad,
The pin icon is if the related work package is manually scheduled. For all others, we'll use the ...
-
Comment added
01/26/2025
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/26/2025 11:43 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
Behrokh Satarnejad on 01/26/2025 11:41 AM - Status changed from confirmed to in development
- Assignee set to Behrokh Satarnejad
- Accountable set to Behrokh Satarnejad
-
updated by
Behrokh Satarnejad on 01/26/2025 05:13 AM -
Comment added
Thanks Parimal Satyal
We will show dates for (visible and ghost) children. Is there any icon for showing children dates...
-
Comment added
01/24/2025
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 01/24/2025 04:11 PM -
Comment added
Hi Behrokh Satarnejad,
Yes, the dates will be shown when available for:
Predecessors
Successors
Children
Updated...
- Description changed (Details)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/24/2025 03:45 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#17645 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
created by
Henriette Darge on 01/24/2025 03:14 PM -
updated by
Henriette Darge on 01/24/2025 03:13 PM - Status changed from needs review to merged
- Assignee deleted (
Henriette Darge)
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/24/2025 03:13 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Behrokh Satarnejad on 01/24/2025 02:11 PM - Assignee changed from Behrokh Satarnejad to Henriette Darge
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 01/24/2025 12:06 PM -
Comment added
Hi Henriette Darge,
The error looks a lot like the one I see when reproducing the bug that Cécile reported: . It's when ...
- Status changed from new to needs clarification
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 01/24/2025 12:04 PM -
Comment added
Moving to next version as it won't be properly finished and QAed for 15.3.0.
- Version changed from 15.3.0 to 15.4.0
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 01/24/2025 12:04 PM -
Comment added
Moving to next version as it won't be properly finished and QAed for 15.3.0.
- Version changed from 15.3.0 to 15.4.0
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 01/24/2025 12:04 PM -
Comment added
Moving to next version as it won't be properly finished and QAed for 15.3.0.
- Version changed from 15.3.0 to 15.4.0
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Samantha Machon on 01/24/2025 11:39 AM -
Comment added
+1 from trial user
- Votes changed from 61 to 62
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 01/24/2025 11:21 AM - Status changed from needs review to in review
- Assignee set to Christophe Bliard
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 01/24/2025 10:26 AM -
Comment added
All issues found have been entered as separate WPs.
Marking this as tested ✅
Tested on:
Windows 11Pro
Firefox 134.0.1
Co...
- Status changed from in test to tested
- Assignee deleted (
Cécile Guiot)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 01/24/2025 10:23 AM - Description changed (Details)
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 01/24/2025 10:22 AM - Description changed (Details)
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 01/24/2025 10:21 AM - Description changed (Details)
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 01/24/2025 10:19 AM - Version changed from 15.3.0 to Product Backlog
-
updated by
Alexander Stock on 01/24/2025 09:35 AM -
Comment added
+1 from customer
- Votes set to 2
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 01/24/2025 09:29 AM - Assignee changed from Henriette Darge to Behrokh Satarnejad
-
updated by
Behrokh Satarnejad on 01/24/2025 09:12 AM -
Comment added
Christophe Bliard wrote:
And for children relations, should we show dates as well? Because they can be involved in sche...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 01/24/2025 09:06 AM - Subject changed from Requried custom fields prevent a WorkPackage from being added as a child to Required custom fields prevent a WorkPackage from being added as a child
-
updated by
Niels Lindenthal on 01/24/2025 07:24 AM - Roadmap changed from (deleted option) to (deleted option)
-
updated by
Niels Lindenthal on 01/24/2025 07:23 AM - Roadmap changed from (deleted option) to (deleted option)
Also available in: Atom