Content
View differences
Updated by Mir Bhatia 7 days ago
### Feedback:
With semantic identifiers on I find that referencing work packages is more awkward to me than it used to be (which kind of defeats the purpose). Before, I had to type in 5 numbers which admittedly I had to copy (mentally) from somewhere. What I would have expected is that I can now use the smaller numbers like 269 whenever I want to
* create a relation to a work package
* create a reference in some text
* log time
* search for a work package via the global search bar
But instead, I have to write more now, e.g. Agile-269. While it is easier to remember 3 chars than 5, we should work on finding work packages by their numbers only.
**Context of user:**
* [ ] Non-user
* [x] Uses Community Edition
* [ ] Tests OpenProject Enterprise
* [ ] Existing customer
* [ ] Enterprise Cloud
* [ ] Enterprise on-prem
* [ ] BIM Cloud
* [ ] BIM on-prem
**Link to Odoo (if applicable)**
* ...
With semantic identifiers on I find that referencing work packages is more awkward to me than it used to be (which kind of defeats the purpose). Before, I had to type in 5 numbers which admittedly I had to copy (mentally) from somewhere. What I would have expected is that I can now use the smaller numbers like 269 whenever I want to
* create a relation to a work package
* create a reference in some text
* log time
* search for a work package via the global search bar
But instead, I have to write more now, e.g. Agile-269. While it is easier to remember 3 chars than 5, we should work on finding work packages by their numbers only.
**Context of user:**
* [ ] Non-user
* [x] Uses Community Edition
* [ ] Tests OpenProject Enterprise
* [ ] Existing customer
* [ ] Enterprise Cloud
* [ ] Enterprise on-prem
* [ ] BIM Cloud
* [ ] BIM on-prem
**Link to Odoo (if applicable)**
* ...