Content
Activity
01/09/2025
-
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 01/09/2025 05:07 PM -
Comment added
Marc Alcobé , I finished the list of scenarios to detail the behaviour of the backend for scheduling. As always there ar...
- Description changed (Details)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Malte Ney on 01/09/2025 12:02 PM -
Comment added
Dear Openproject team,
Implementing the feature would help me a lot in the project management office.
Can you add a vot...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Niels Lindenthal on 01/09/2025 10:54 AM -
Comment added
Thanks Jens Ulferts, I moved it to Q1 2025.
- Roadmap changed from (deleted option) to (deleted option)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Niels Lindenthal on 01/09/2025 10:24 AM - Requires doc change changed from No to Yes
- List set to cProject
-
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 01/09/2025 10:18 AM -
Comment added
Hi Niels Lindenthal ,
this epic has a number of finished bug tickets but cannot be viewed as completed yet as the perfor...
- Status changed from new to on hold
-
Comment added
-
created by
Jens Ulferts on 01/09/2025 10:04 AM -
Comment added
Oliver Günther I added this ticket as that would not only improve UX but should also fix the performance issues reported...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Tobias Dillmann on 01/09/2025 09:37 AM - Status changed from review failed to in development
- Assignee set to Tobias Dillmann
-
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 01/09/2025 08:34 AM - Status changed from in development to merged
-
updated by
Niels Lindenthal on 01/09/2025 06:32 AM -
Comment added
Hi Jens Ulferts,
Can you please check the status of this work package?
Thanks
Niels
-
Comment added
01/08/2025
-
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 01/08/2025 05:26 PM - Status changed from needs review to review failed
- Assignee deleted (
Jens Ulferts)
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/08/2025 03:15 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#17358 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Ivan Kuchin on 01/08/2025 02:34 PM - Status changed from in review to merged
- Assignee deleted (
Tobias Dillmann)
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/08/2025 02:34 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 01/08/2025 11:20 AM - Assignee set to Jens Ulferts
-
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 01/08/2025 11:03 AM - Type changed from Bug to Feature
- Project changed from OpenProject to Stream Project Portfolio Management
- Description changed (Details)
- Status changed from confirmed to specified
- Bug found in version deleted (
15.0.x)
-
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 01/08/2025 08:34 AM - Description changed (Details)
- Parent changed from Project life cyle with phases and gates - Step 1: customization and configuration
to Project life cycle with phases and gates - Step 2: work package assignments and journalization
-
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 01/08/2025 08:30 AM -
Comment added
Hey Rince wind , there is feature out there to have a lifecycle attribute for work packages. I am not sure if that is en...
-
Comment added
01/07/2025
-
updated by
Rince wind on 01/07/2025 06:05 PM -
Comment added
Out of curiosity, since the gate/stage seems to have a lot of overlaps with what a version is and how the new attribute ...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/07/2025 03:45 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#17502 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 01/07/2025 03:06 PM -
Comment added
Marc Alcobé , I set the status to merged for now. As discussed, we will revisit the UX in the wake of automatic scheduli...
- Status changed from review approved to merged
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/07/2025 03:05 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 01/07/2025 03:04 PM -
Comment added
The status is actually a mix between "in specification", "in development" and "needs review". In any case, we are defini...
- Status changed from in specification to in development
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 01/07/2025 02:50 PM -
Comment added
Marc Alcobé and I had a chat today on how to proceed with the automatic scheduling. We:
Agreed that the scheduling fun...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 01/07/2025 02:43 PM -
Comment added
Hi Niels Lindenthal ,
the status is correct. I am working on the specification which I expect to take some time.
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Tobias Dillmann on 01/07/2025 01:56 PM - Status changed from needs review to in review
-
updated by
Tobias Dillmann on 01/07/2025 01:55 PM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Tobias Dillmann)
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/07/2025 01:55 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Niels Lindenthal on 01/07/2025 11:30 AM -
Comment added
Hi Jens Ulferts,
You just said that you started working on this but it is still "in specification". Can you please check...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Niels Lindenthal on 01/07/2025 11:29 AM -
Comment added
Hi Harald Herz and Jörg Mollowitz,
Jens Ulferts and his team started with some parts of step 2. We just realized that th...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Markus Kahl on 01/07/2025 11:21 AM - Assignee set to Tobias Dillmann
-
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 01/07/2025 10:17 AM - Description changed (Details)
-
updated by
Behrokh Satarnejad on 01/07/2025 09:13 AM - Status changed from in review to review approved
- Assignee deleted (
Behrokh Satarnejad)
01/06/2025
-
updated by
Ivan Kuchin on 01/06/2025 05:52 PM - Status changed from specified to in development
- Assignee set to Ivan Kuchin
- Accountable set to Ivan Kuchin
-
updated by
Behrokh Satarnejad on 01/06/2025 03:30 PM - Status changed from needs review to in review
-
updated by
Ivan Kuchin on 01/06/2025 02:48 PM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Ivan Kuchin)
-
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 01/06/2025 10:51 AM - Status changed from new to needs review
- Assignee set to Behrokh Satarnejad
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/06/2025 10:51 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 01/06/2025 10:28 AM -
Comment added
Works for me Marc Alcobé ,
so we accept the behaviour for now, we will then have to ensure that a faulty life cycle does...
- Status changed from needs clarification to rejected
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Marc Alcobé on 01/06/2025 10:27 AM -
Comment added
Hi Jens Ulferts,
Thanks for the feedback on the proposal, I agree with the concerns.
The biggest UX problem I'm seeing ...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 01/06/2025 10:20 AM -
Comment added
Hi Marc Alcobé ,
as of now, I am not convinced by the approach for a couple of reasons:
The design is optimized for in...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 01/06/2025 08:40 AM - Assignee deleted (
Cécile Guiot)
- Assignee deleted (
01/03/2025
-
updated by
Tobias Nowakow on 01/03/2025 08:34 PM -
Comment added
Closely related to OP-11991.
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Tobias Nowakow on 01/03/2025 08:20 PM -
Comment added
This is probably closely related to OP-11991, but the sticky state.
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Tobias Nowakow on 01/03/2025 08:16 PM -
Comment added
+1
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Tobias Nowakow on 01/03/2025 08:15 PM -
Comment added
+1
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/03/2025 11:11 AM - Comment added
Also available in: Atom