Content
Activity
04/18/2025
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 04/18/2025 05:35 PM -
Comment added
Hi Parimal Satyal,
From the notifications page, the relations tab has a hierarchy breadcrumb at the top.
This breadcrum...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/18/2025 03:59 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 04/18/2025 02:40 PM - Description changed (Details)
- Status changed from specified to in development
- Assignee set to Christophe Bliard
- Developers set to Christophe Bliard
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 04/18/2025 02:29 PM - Status changed from in development to on hold
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/18/2025 12:15 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18680 deployed to qa.openproject-stage.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/18/2025 11:48 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 04/18/2025 11:47 AM - Status changed from needs review to merged
- Assignee deleted (
Christophe Bliard)
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/18/2025 11:47 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 04/18/2025 08:43 AM -
Comment added
Hi Parimal Satyal,
Yes, agreed. I'm still looking for a good way to formulate it in a sentence, but that's the result I ...
-
Comment added
04/17/2025
-
updated by
Alexander Stock on 04/17/2025 04:06 PM -
Comment added
Also mentioned in support ticket 26373 by a customer who uses a 15.5 SaaS environment. Further insights probably can be ...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 04/17/2025 02:49 PM -
Comment added
Hi Christophe Bliard,
Added a bit more detail. Could you confirm this aligns with your understanding too?
Cheers
Parimal
- Description changed (Details)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 04/17/2025 02:08 PM - Status changed from review failed to needs review
- Assignee set to Christophe Bliard
-
Feature SPAR-257: Make it possible to include or exclude working days when defining lag per relationupdated by
Christophe Bliard on 04/17/2025 01:40 PM - Version changed from 16.0.0 to 16.1.0
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 04/17/2025 01:39 PM - Status changed from in specification to specified
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/17/2025 01:18 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 04/17/2025 12:23 PM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Christophe Bliard)
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/17/2025 12:23 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 04/17/2025 12:09 PM - Description changed (Details)
- Status changed from needs clarification to in development
- Assignee set to Christophe Bliard
- Version set to 15.5.1
- Developers set to Christophe Bliard
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 04/17/2025 11:50 AM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Christophe Bliard) - Version changed from 15.5.1 to 16.0.0
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/17/2025 11:50 AM - Comment added
-
created by
Jens Ulferts on 04/17/2025 09:16 AM -
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 04/17/2025 09:09 AM - Description changed (Details)
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 04/17/2025 08:27 AM - Status changed from needs review to review failed
04/16/2025
-
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 04/16/2025 05:28 PM -
Comment added
Here you go, Christophe Bliard . The one I created is admittedly artificial. I would imagine that once such a hierarchy ...
- Description changed (Details)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 04/16/2025 03:03 PM -
Comment added
Thanks Jens Ulferts,
If you have time for it, could you isolate a reproduction case?
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 04/16/2025 02:21 PM -
Comment added
Christophe Bliard I found a couple of related incidents so it seems to occur more often than I initially thought. Not 15...
- Description changed (Details)
-
Comment added
-
created by
Jens Ulferts on 04/16/2025 12:16 PM -
Comment added
Christophe Bliard, this error seems to have existed for some time. I stumbled over it when taking a look at . AppSignal...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 04/16/2025 11:18 AM -
Comment added
After discussion with Niels Lindenthal,
We'll do it in two steps:
Implement negative lag first
Add SPAR-257 afterwar...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 04/16/2025 11:14 AM - Status changed from review failed to needs review
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/16/2025 09:25 AM - Comment added
04/15/2025
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 04/15/2025 09:28 PM -
Comment added
Dominic Bräunlein also have a look at DEB-797 There a now inactive assignee/accountable can also block further updates. ...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 04/15/2025 04:44 PM -
Comment added
Hi Christophe Bliard,
We discussed it this morning in the Front-end/Dev weekly. You can read the notes/outcomes for othe...
-
Comment added
-
created by
Parimal Satyal on 04/15/2025 04:28 PM -
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 04/15/2025 04:23 PM - Version changed from 15.5.0 to 16.0.0
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 04/15/2025 04:23 PM - Version changed from 15.5.0 to 15.5.1
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 04/15/2025 04:22 PM - Version changed from 15.5.0 to 15.5.1
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 04/15/2025 04:22 PM - Version changed from 15.5.0 to 15.5.1
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 04/15/2025 04:22 PM - Version changed from 15.5.0 to 15.5.1
-
created by
Parimal Satyal on 04/15/2025 04:10 PM -
Comment added
As discussed with Henriette Darge.
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 04/15/2025 01:06 PM - Version changed from 15.5.0 to 15.5.1
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 04/15/2025 12:23 PM -
Comment added
I agree that there are multiple ways of dealing with it. I'd simply go by separating:
Deal with the a situation that a...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 04/15/2025 11:52 AM -
Comment added
Hey,
It's not just about displaying feedback information in the modal. This problem of having a work package uneditable ...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 04/15/2025 11:41 AM -
Comment added
Hey, I believe there are multiple layers to the problem.
One thing is that we run into such a situation of having empt...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 04/15/2025 11:05 AM -
Comment added
Approved ✅
Tested on:
Windows 11Pro
Firefox 137.0
Core build
f7f4ae29f2d1fd9f4df41897b92ede447de9abf4
Product version
a1...
- Status changed from in test to closed
- Assignee deleted (
Cécile Guiot) - % Complete set to 100%
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 04/15/2025 11:01 AM - Subject changed from User with a particular set of permissions sees error when updating WP progress to User with a particular set of permissions sees error when updating WP dates
- Status changed from confirmed to in development
- Assignee set to Christophe Bliard
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 04/15/2025 10:32 AM - Status changed from in review to review failed
- Assignee deleted (
Christophe Bliard)
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/15/2025 10:15 AM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18638 deployed to qa.openproject-stage.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 04/15/2025 09:58 AM - Status changed from tested to closed
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 04/15/2025 09:57 AM - Status changed from tested to closed
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 04/15/2025 09:57 AM - Status changed from tested to closed
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 04/15/2025 09:57 AM - Status changed from tested to closed
-
Bug SPAR-246: On mobile, adding a Finish date after adding a start date deletes the Start date inputupdated by
Cécile Guiot on 04/15/2025 09:57 AM - Status changed from tested to closed
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 04/15/2025 09:57 AM - Status changed from tested to closed
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 04/15/2025 09:57 AM - Status changed from tested to closed
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 04/15/2025 09:57 AM - Status changed from tested to closed
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 04/15/2025 09:57 AM - Status changed from tested to closed
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 04/15/2025 09:57 AM - Status changed from tested to closed
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 04/15/2025 09:56 AM - Status changed from tested to closed
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 04/15/2025 09:56 AM - Status changed from tested to closed
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 04/15/2025 09:56 AM - Status changed from tested to closed
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 04/15/2025 09:56 AM - Status changed from tested to closed
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 04/15/2025 09:56 AM - Status changed from tested to closed
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 04/15/2025 09:56 AM - Status changed from tested to closed
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 04/15/2025 09:56 AM - Status changed from tested to closed
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 04/15/2025 09:56 AM - Status changed from tested to closed
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 04/15/2025 09:56 AM - Status changed from tested to closed
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 04/15/2025 09:56 AM - Status changed from tested to closed
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 04/15/2025 09:56 AM - Status changed from tested to closed
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 04/15/2025 09:54 AM - Status changed from merged to in test
- Assignee set to Cécile Guiot
-
updated by
Behrokh Satarnejad on 04/15/2025 09:34 AM - Status changed from review approved to merged
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/15/2025 09:34 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 04/15/2025 09:24 AM - Status changed from in development to review approved
- Assignee deleted (
Behrokh Satarnejad)
-
updated by
Behrokh Satarnejad on 04/15/2025 08:38 AM - Description changed (Details)
04/14/2025
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 04/14/2025 08:47 PM -
Comment added
Hi Christophe Bliard,
As we discussed last week, I think we might need to allow users to be able to choose whether lag s...
-
Comment added
-
Feature SPAR-257: Make it possible to include or exclude working days when defining lag per relationcreated by
Parimal Satyal on 04/14/2025 08:44 PM -
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 04/14/2025 08:35 PM -
Comment added
Hi Christophe Bliard,
Interesting, thanks for the gif of the behaviour from 15.0.
I think this is a larger topic of ho...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 04/14/2025 06:12 PM - Status changed from needs review to in review
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 04/14/2025 05:22 PM -
Comment added
Fixed ✅
Tested on:
Core build
9ae744e052af4cbee699694039fb433028587380
Product version
4a9d35446618862b4c4f412829f9e9836...
- Status changed from in test to tested
- Assignee deleted (
Cécile Guiot) - % Complete set to 100%
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 04/14/2025 05:10 PM -
Comment added
Fixed ✅
Tested on:
Core build
9ae744e052af4cbee699694039fb433028587380
Product version
4a9d35446618862b4c4f412829f9e9836...
- Status changed from in test to tested
- Assignee deleted (
Cécile Guiot) - % Complete set to 100%
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 04/14/2025 04:54 PM -
Comment added
Hi Cécile Guiot,
Discussed this with Henriette Darge. Yes, we'll extract the discussion about how to distinguish between...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 04/14/2025 04:52 PM -
Comment added
We talked about this today in our UX/UI open door and decided to:
Enfore symmetry.
Relations with read-only permissi...
- Description changed (Details)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 04/14/2025 04:25 PM -
Comment added
I consider this bug fixed, but i'll wait for a resolution on the milestone visual to approve.
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 04/14/2025 04:21 PM -
Comment added
Fixed ✅
Tested on:
iPhone 14
iOS 18.3.1
Core build
9ae744e052af4cbee699694039fb433028587380
Product version
4a9d35446618...
- Status changed from in test to tested
- Assignee deleted (
Cécile Guiot)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 04/14/2025 04:19 PM -
Comment added
Fixed ✅
Tested on:
Core build
9ae744e052af4cbee699694039fb433028587380
Product version
4a9d35446618862b4c4f412829f9e9836...
- Status changed from merged to tested
- % Complete set to 100%
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 04/14/2025 04:18 PM - Status changed from merged to in test
- Assignee set to Cécile Guiot
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 04/14/2025 04:18 PM -
Comment added
Fixed ✅
Tested on:
Core build
9ae744e052af4cbee699694039fb433028587380
Product version
4a9d35446618862b4c4f412829f9e9836...
- Status changed from merged to tested
- % Complete set to 100%
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 04/14/2025 04:18 PM -
Comment added
Parimal Satyal i also do not see any visual difference between a milestone and WP that has a singe date.
On the below sc...
- Status changed from merged to in test
- Assignee set to Cécile Guiot
- File image.png added as attachment
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 04/14/2025 04:17 PM -
Comment added
Fixed ✅
Tested on:
Core build
9ae744e052af4cbee699694039fb433028587380
Product version
4a9d35446618862b4c4f412829f9e9836...
- Status changed from in test to tested
- Assignee deleted (
Cécile Guiot) - % Complete set to 100%
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/14/2025 04:13 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 04/14/2025 03:00 PM -
Comment added
I am confused.. What is this "visual pattern" of Milestones you are refering to? Look at this example:
These three loo...
- File Bildschirmfoto_2025-04-14_um_15.00.51.png added as attachment
- File Bildschirmfoto_2025-04-14_um_15.02.51.png added as attachment
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 04/14/2025 02:52 PM -
Comment added
Henriette Darge Indeed.
The Milestone is different; I just mean we can use the same visual pattern to display it.
Sing...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/14/2025 02:45 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18613 deployed to qa.openproject-stage.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/14/2025 02:45 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18612 deployed to qa.openproject-stage.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/14/2025 02:45 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18594 deployed to qa.openproject-stage.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/14/2025 02:45 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18594 deployed to qa.openproject-stage.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 04/14/2025 02:31 PM -
Comment added
As such, I don't think we need a gradient on them. I would display them the same as a milestone.
But a milestone does ...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/14/2025 02:15 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18631 deployed to qa.openproject-stage.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 04/14/2025 01:57 PM -
Comment added
Henriette Darge wrote:
Yes, that would be interesting! But do we have a visual code like this for the calendar yet? If...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 04/14/2025 01:51 PM - Status changed from review approved to merged
- Assignee deleted (
Christophe Bliard)
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/14/2025 01:51 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 04/14/2025 01:51 PM - Status changed from review approved to merged
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/14/2025 01:51 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 04/14/2025 01:49 PM - Status changed from review approved to merged
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 04/14/2025 01:49 PM - Status changed from review approved to merged
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/14/2025 01:49 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/14/2025 01:49 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 04/14/2025 01:46 PM -
Comment added
Not sure that's testable by QA. I'll mark it as closed.
- Status changed from in review to closed
- Assignee deleted (
Christophe Bliard) - % Complete set to 100%
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/14/2025 01:46 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 04/14/2025 01:41 PM - Status changed from needs review to in review
-
updated by
Behrokh Satarnejad on 04/14/2025 01:02 PM - Status changed from in review to review approved
- Assignee deleted (
Behrokh Satarnejad)
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 04/14/2025 12:43 PM -
Comment added
Yes, that would be interesting! But do we have a visual code like this for the calendar yet? If not, I imagine you're s...
- Status changed from review failed to review approved
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 04/14/2025 12:26 PM -
Comment added
Hi Henriette Darge,
Yes, that would be interesting! But do we have a visual code like this for the calendar yet? If not,...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 04/14/2025 12:24 PM -
Comment added
Hi Christophe Bliard,
Yes for all three cases in your previous message.
Cheers
Parimal
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/14/2025 12:15 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18629 deployed to qa.openproject-stage.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 04/14/2025 12:10 PM - Status changed from merged to in test
- Assignee changed from Parimal Satyal to Cécile Guiot
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 04/14/2025 12:04 PM -
Comment added
Setting this back to "merged" in case Cécile Guiot wants to have a look again.
- Status changed from needs clarification to merged
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 04/14/2025 12:03 PM -
Comment added
Hi Henriette Darge,
I checked again on iOS 18.2.1. The problem with the bottom-margin has been fixed and the field comes...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 04/14/2025 12:02 PM -
Comment added
Christophe Bliard I created a quick fix PR to get at least rid of that error in 15.5
- Status changed from needs clarification to needs review
- Developers set to Henriette Darge
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/14/2025 12:01 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/14/2025 11:51 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 04/14/2025 11:50 AM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee changed from Henriette Darge to Christophe Bliard
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/14/2025 11:50 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
Behrokh Satarnejad on 04/14/2025 11:45 AM - Status changed from needs review to in review
-
updated by
Behrokh Satarnejad on 04/14/2025 11:44 AM - Status changed from in review to review approved
- Assignee deleted (
Behrokh Satarnejad)
-
updated by
Behrokh Satarnejad on 04/14/2025 11:44 AM - Status changed from in review to review approved
- Assignee deleted (
Behrokh Satarnejad)
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 04/14/2025 11:36 AM -
Comment added
yes, I couldn't set the status to "tested" myself.
Sorry I should have left a comment about it.
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/14/2025 11:28 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 04/14/2025 11:17 AM -
Comment added
Decision based on our call:
We use a simple unweighted average of all lines for the total of % Complete.
A value of u...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/14/2025 11:15 AM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18599 deployed to qa.openproject-stage.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/14/2025 11:15 AM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18599 deployed to qa.openproject-stage.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 04/14/2025 11:12 AM - Status changed from merged to in test
- Assignee set to Cécile Guiot
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 04/14/2025 11:10 AM -
Comment added
The AC as they are written down here are met, I'd like to see a visual difference between WP that have both start and du...
- Description changed (Details)
- Status changed from needs review to review failed
- Assignee changed from Henriette Darge to Christophe Bliard
- File Bildschirmfoto_2025-04-14_um_11.12.20.png added as attachment
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 04/14/2025 11:01 AM -
Comment added
Fixed ✅
Tested on:
Core build
92ebcb01c679fa60fcf9aaa3cba8eb31d9803690
Product version
4a9d35446618862b4c4f412829f9e9836...
- Status changed from in test to tested
- Assignee deleted (
Cécile Guiot) - % Complete set to 100%
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/14/2025 10:58 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 04/14/2025 10:58 AM -
Comment added
Created as a follow-up.
-
Comment added
-
created by
Christophe Bliard on 04/14/2025 10:57 AM -
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 04/14/2025 10:46 AM -
Comment added
I still see an issue when a predecessor / successor relation is added from the relations tab: the Gantt chart is not alw...
- Status changed from in review to merged
- Assignee deleted (
Christophe Bliard)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/14/2025 10:44 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 04/14/2025 10:36 AM - Status changed from needs review to in review
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 04/14/2025 10:27 AM - Status changed from in test to tested
-
updated by
Ivana Šugić on 04/14/2025 10:17 AM -
Comment added
Hi Cécile Guiot, I suppose we should set it back to Tested. If I understood Christophe Bliard correctly, no extra work w...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 04/14/2025 09:39 AM - Assignee set to Behrokh Satarnejad
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 04/14/2025 09:39 AM - Assignee set to Henriette Darge
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 04/14/2025 09:36 AM - Status changed from in test to in development
- Assignee changed from Cécile Guiot to Behrokh Satarnejad
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 04/14/2025 09:36 AM - Status changed from merged to in test
- Assignee set to Cécile Guiot
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 04/14/2025 09:35 AM -
Comment added
Christophe Bliard Ivana Šugić so is this in test or in development? Asking because this is from my stream so i would tak...
-
Comment added
-
created by
Christophe Bliard on 04/14/2025 09:29 AM -
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 04/14/2025 09:24 AM -
Comment added
Hi Ivana Šugić,
My bad. This issue is correctly fixed for 15.5. It's just that I had the exact same issue but for the da...
- Status changed from in development to in test
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 04/14/2025 09:18 AM -
Comment added
Hi Ivana Šugić,
I reopen this issue. It was fixed on edge, but it should have been fixed on 15.5. I just saw the issue i...
- Status changed from tested to in development
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 04/14/2025 08:29 AM - Status changed from review failed to needs review
- Assignee set to Christophe Bliard
Also available in: Atom