Content
Activity
04/14/2025
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 04/14/2025 08:47 PM -
Comment added
Hi Christophe Bliard,
As we discussed last week, I think we might need to allow users to be able to choose whether lag s...
-
Comment added
-
Feature SPAR-257: Make it possible to include or exclude working days when defining lag per relationcreated by
Parimal Satyal on 04/14/2025 08:44 PM -
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 04/14/2025 08:35 PM -
Comment added
Hi Christophe Bliard,
Interesting, thanks for the gif of the behaviour from 15.0.
I think this is a larger topic of ho...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 04/14/2025 06:12 PM - Status changed from needs review to in review
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 04/14/2025 05:22 PM -
Comment added
Fixed ✅
Tested on:
Core build
9ae744e052af4cbee699694039fb433028587380
Product version
4a9d35446618862b4c4f412829f9e9836...
- Status changed from in test to tested
- Assignee deleted (
Cécile Guiot) - % Complete set to 100%
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 04/14/2025 05:10 PM -
Comment added
Fixed ✅
Tested on:
Core build
9ae744e052af4cbee699694039fb433028587380
Product version
4a9d35446618862b4c4f412829f9e9836...
- Status changed from in test to tested
- Assignee deleted (
Cécile Guiot) - % Complete set to 100%
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 04/14/2025 04:54 PM -
Comment added
Hi Cécile Guiot,
Discussed this with Henriette Darge. Yes, we'll extract the discussion about how to distinguish between...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 04/14/2025 04:52 PM -
Comment added
We talked about this today in our UX/UI open door and decided to:
Enfore symmetry.
Relations with read-only permissi...
- Description changed (Details)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 04/14/2025 04:25 PM -
Comment added
I consider this bug fixed, but i'll wait for a resolution on the milestone visual to approve.
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 04/14/2025 04:21 PM -
Comment added
Fixed ✅
Tested on:
iPhone 14
iOS 18.3.1
Core build
9ae744e052af4cbee699694039fb433028587380
Product version
4a9d35446618...
- Status changed from in test to tested
- Assignee deleted (
Cécile Guiot)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 04/14/2025 04:19 PM -
Comment added
Fixed ✅
Tested on:
Core build
9ae744e052af4cbee699694039fb433028587380
Product version
4a9d35446618862b4c4f412829f9e9836...
- Status changed from merged to tested
- % Complete set to 100%
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 04/14/2025 04:18 PM - Status changed from merged to in test
- Assignee set to Cécile Guiot
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 04/14/2025 04:18 PM -
Comment added
Fixed ✅
Tested on:
Core build
9ae744e052af4cbee699694039fb433028587380
Product version
4a9d35446618862b4c4f412829f9e9836...
- Status changed from merged to tested
- % Complete set to 100%
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 04/14/2025 04:18 PM -
Comment added
Parimal Satyal i also do not see any visual difference between a milestone and WP that has a singe date.
On the below sc...
- Status changed from merged to in test
- Assignee set to Cécile Guiot
- File image.png added as attachment
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 04/14/2025 04:17 PM -
Comment added
Fixed ✅
Tested on:
Core build
9ae744e052af4cbee699694039fb433028587380
Product version
4a9d35446618862b4c4f412829f9e9836...
- Status changed from in test to tested
- Assignee deleted (
Cécile Guiot) - % Complete set to 100%
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/14/2025 04:13 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 04/14/2025 03:00 PM -
Comment added
I am confused.. What is this "visual pattern" of Milestones you are refering to? Look at this example:
These three loo...
- File Bildschirmfoto_2025-04-14_um_15.00.51.png added as attachment
- File Bildschirmfoto_2025-04-14_um_15.02.51.png added as attachment
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 04/14/2025 02:52 PM -
Comment added
Henriette Darge Indeed.
The Milestone is different; I just mean we can use the same visual pattern to display it.
Sing...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/14/2025 02:45 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18613 deployed to qa.openproject-stage.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/14/2025 02:45 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18612 deployed to qa.openproject-stage.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/14/2025 02:45 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18594 deployed to qa.openproject-stage.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/14/2025 02:45 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18594 deployed to qa.openproject-stage.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 04/14/2025 02:31 PM -
Comment added
As such, I don't think we need a gradient on them. I would display them the same as a milestone.
But a milestone does ...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/14/2025 02:15 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18631 deployed to qa.openproject-stage.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 04/14/2025 01:57 PM -
Comment added
Henriette Darge wrote:
Yes, that would be interesting! But do we have a visual code like this for the calendar yet? If...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 04/14/2025 01:51 PM - Status changed from review approved to merged
- Assignee deleted (
Christophe Bliard)
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/14/2025 01:51 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 04/14/2025 01:51 PM - Status changed from review approved to merged
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/14/2025 01:51 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 04/14/2025 01:49 PM - Status changed from review approved to merged
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 04/14/2025 01:49 PM - Status changed from review approved to merged
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/14/2025 01:49 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/14/2025 01:49 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 04/14/2025 01:46 PM -
Comment added
Not sure that's testable by QA. I'll mark it as closed.
- Status changed from in review to closed
- Assignee deleted (
Christophe Bliard) - % Complete set to 100%
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/14/2025 01:46 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 04/14/2025 01:41 PM - Status changed from needs review to in review
-
updated by
Behrokh Satarnejad on 04/14/2025 01:02 PM - Status changed from in review to review approved
- Assignee deleted (
Behrokh Satarnejad)
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 04/14/2025 12:43 PM -
Comment added
Yes, that would be interesting! But do we have a visual code like this for the calendar yet? If not, I imagine you're s...
- Status changed from review failed to review approved
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 04/14/2025 12:26 PM -
Comment added
Hi Henriette Darge,
Yes, that would be interesting! But do we have a visual code like this for the calendar yet? If not,...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 04/14/2025 12:24 PM -
Comment added
Hi Christophe Bliard,
Yes for all three cases in your previous message.
Cheers
Parimal
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/14/2025 12:15 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18629 deployed to qa.openproject-stage.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 04/14/2025 12:10 PM - Status changed from merged to in test
- Assignee changed from Parimal Satyal to Cécile Guiot
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 04/14/2025 12:04 PM -
Comment added
Setting this back to "merged" in case Cécile Guiot wants to have a look again.
- Status changed from needs clarification to merged
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 04/14/2025 12:03 PM -
Comment added
Hi Henriette Darge,
I checked again on iOS 18.2.1. The problem with the bottom-margin has been fixed and the field comes...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 04/14/2025 12:02 PM -
Comment added
Christophe Bliard I created a quick fix PR to get at least rid of that error in 15.5
- Status changed from needs clarification to needs review
- Developers set to Henriette Darge
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/14/2025 12:01 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/14/2025 11:51 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 04/14/2025 11:50 AM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee changed from Henriette Darge to Christophe Bliard
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/14/2025 11:50 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
Behrokh Satarnejad on 04/14/2025 11:45 AM - Status changed from needs review to in review
-
updated by
Behrokh Satarnejad on 04/14/2025 11:44 AM - Status changed from in review to review approved
- Assignee deleted (
Behrokh Satarnejad)
-
updated by
Behrokh Satarnejad on 04/14/2025 11:44 AM - Status changed from in review to review approved
- Assignee deleted (
Behrokh Satarnejad)
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 04/14/2025 11:36 AM -
Comment added
yes, I couldn't set the status to "tested" myself.
Sorry I should have left a comment about it.
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/14/2025 11:28 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 04/14/2025 11:17 AM -
Comment added
Decision based on our call:
We use a simple unweighted average of all lines for the total of % Complete.
A value of u...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/14/2025 11:15 AM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18599 deployed to qa.openproject-stage.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/14/2025 11:15 AM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18599 deployed to qa.openproject-stage.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 04/14/2025 11:12 AM - Status changed from merged to in test
- Assignee set to Cécile Guiot
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 04/14/2025 11:10 AM -
Comment added
The AC as they are written down here are met, I'd like to see a visual difference between WP that have both start and du...
- Description changed (Details)
- Status changed from needs review to review failed
- Assignee changed from Henriette Darge to Christophe Bliard
- File Bildschirmfoto_2025-04-14_um_11.12.20.png added as attachment
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 04/14/2025 11:01 AM -
Comment added
Fixed ✅
Tested on:
Core build
92ebcb01c679fa60fcf9aaa3cba8eb31d9803690
Product version
4a9d35446618862b4c4f412829f9e9836...
- Status changed from in test to tested
- Assignee deleted (
Cécile Guiot) - % Complete set to 100%
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/14/2025 10:58 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 04/14/2025 10:58 AM -
Comment added
Created as a follow-up.
-
Comment added
-
created by
Christophe Bliard on 04/14/2025 10:57 AM -
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 04/14/2025 10:46 AM -
Comment added
I still see an issue when a predecessor / successor relation is added from the relations tab: the Gantt chart is not alw...
- Status changed from in review to merged
- Assignee deleted (
Christophe Bliard)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/14/2025 10:44 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 04/14/2025 10:36 AM - Status changed from needs review to in review
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 04/14/2025 10:27 AM - Status changed from in test to tested
-
updated by
Ivana Šugić on 04/14/2025 10:17 AM -
Comment added
Hi Cécile Guiot, I suppose we should set it back to Tested. If I understood Christophe Bliard correctly, no extra work w...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 04/14/2025 09:39 AM - Assignee set to Behrokh Satarnejad
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 04/14/2025 09:39 AM - Assignee set to Henriette Darge
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 04/14/2025 09:36 AM - Status changed from in test to in development
- Assignee changed from Cécile Guiot to Behrokh Satarnejad
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 04/14/2025 09:36 AM - Status changed from merged to in test
- Assignee set to Cécile Guiot
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 04/14/2025 09:35 AM -
Comment added
Christophe Bliard Ivana Šugić so is this in test or in development? Asking because this is from my stream so i would tak...
-
Comment added
-
created by
Christophe Bliard on 04/14/2025 09:29 AM -
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 04/14/2025 09:24 AM -
Comment added
Hi Ivana Šugić,
My bad. This issue is correctly fixed for 15.5. It's just that I had the exact same issue but for the da...
- Status changed from in development to in test
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 04/14/2025 09:18 AM -
Comment added
Hi Ivana Šugić,
I reopen this issue. It was fixed on edge, but it should have been fixed on 15.5. I just saw the issue i...
- Status changed from tested to in development
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 04/14/2025 08:29 AM - Status changed from review failed to needs review
- Assignee set to Christophe Bliard
04/11/2025
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/11/2025 05:45 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18606 deployed to qa.openproject-stage.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Behrokh Satarnejad on 04/11/2025 05:26 PM - Status changed from needs review to in review
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 04/11/2025 05:13 PM - Status changed from in review to merged
- Assignee deleted (
Christophe Bliard)
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/11/2025 05:13 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 04/11/2025 05:10 PM - Status changed from needs review to in review
- Assignee set to Christophe Bliard
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 04/11/2025 05:05 PM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Christophe Bliard)
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/11/2025 05:05 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 04/11/2025 05:02 PM - Status changed from confirmed to in development
- Assignee set to Christophe Bliard
- Version changed from 16.0.0 to 15.5.0
- Developers set to Christophe Bliard
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 04/11/2025 05:01 PM - The changes were retracted.
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 04/11/2025 04:12 PM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Christophe Bliard)
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/11/2025 04:08 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Behrokh Satarnejad on 04/11/2025 03:56 PM - Status changed from needs review to in review
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 04/11/2025 02:48 PM - Status changed from confirmed to in development
- Assignee set to Christophe Bliard
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/11/2025 02:35 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 04/11/2025 02:20 PM -
Comment added
It's much better, yet there are somes cases where it still happens. I added a video in the PR.
- Status changed from in review to review failed
- Assignee deleted (
Christophe Bliard)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 04/11/2025 02:14 PM - Status changed from confirmed to in development
- Assignee set to Henriette Darge
- Developers changed from OP Dev Sirius Team to Henriette Darge
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 04/11/2025 12:22 PM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Henriette Darge)
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/11/2025 12:21 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 04/11/2025 12:05 PM - Status changed from confirmed to in development
- Assignee set to Henriette Darge
- Developers changed from OP Dev Sirius Team to Henriette Darge
-
updated by
Maya Berdygylyjova on 04/11/2025 11:54 AM - Votes changed from 2 to 3
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 04/11/2025 11:44 AM -
Comment added
I understand. Maybe it's the same relation being displayed twice, and she tried to delete the same relation twice and th...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 04/11/2025 11:42 AM -
Comment added
Christophe Bliard because it happened to Corinna Günther who yesterday reported the problem with duplicate relations als...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 04/11/2025 11:39 AM -
Comment added
Thanks Jens Ulferts, why do you think it may be related?
Edit: looking at the appsignal error, it looks like it happens ...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 04/11/2025 11:31 AM -
Comment added
Christophe Bliard , this App-Signal error might be related. Can you please double check and if not, file a new bug for i...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 04/11/2025 09:47 AM - Assignee set to Behrokh Satarnejad
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 04/11/2025 09:46 AM - Assignee set to Behrokh Satarnejad
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 04/11/2025 09:19 AM -
Comment added
For information, I tried in 15.0 to see the behavior. It lets the user enter dates, and then displays an message but it ...
- File saving_dates_with_required_cf_in_15-0.gif added as attachment
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 04/11/2025 09:02 AM - Status changed from needs review to in review
- Assignee set to Christophe Bliard
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 04/11/2025 08:59 AM - Version set to 15.5.0
- Developers set to OP Dev Sirius Team
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 04/11/2025 08:57 AM -
Comment added
Thanks Parimal Satyal,
I'm not sure wether the translation is already done or not so I prefer planning it for 16.0.0 to ...
- Version set to 16.0.0
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 04/11/2025 08:52 AM - Version set to 15.5.0
04/10/2025
-
created by
Parimal Satyal on 04/10/2025 05:41 PM -
created by
Parimal Satyal on 04/10/2025 05:31 PM -
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 04/10/2025 04:36 PM -
Comment added
Hi Parimal Satyal,
So just to be extra sure, these 3 behaviors are correct:
switching "Working days only" on
.
switchin...
- File wdo_switched_on.gif added as attachment
- File wdo_switched_off.gif added as attachment
- File wdo_switched_on.gif added as attachment
- File wdo_switched_on_2_dates_nwd.gif added as attachment
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 04/10/2025 04:05 PM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Oliver Günther)
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/10/2025 04:05 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 04/10/2025 03:44 PM -
Comment added
After a call with Christophe Bliard, we agree on the behaviour:
Do we agree that given a work package has "Working day...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 04/10/2025 03:41 PM -
Comment added
Hi Parimal Satyal,
we defined positive lag as the number of working days between two work packages following each other....
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 04/10/2025 03:19 PM -
Comment added
Hi Christophe Bliard,
There was indeed a small mistake in my previous message; that off should've been on, like this:
...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 04/10/2025 02:59 PM -
Comment added
Hi Christophe Bliard,
I don't know, actually.
I think this requires team discussion and brainstorming to figure this ou...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 04/10/2025 02:47 PM - Status changed from confirmed to in development
- Developers set to Oliver Günther
-
updated by
Ivana Šugić on 04/10/2025 01:51 PM -
Comment added
Hi Christophe Bliard, yeah, it is a duplicate so I will close it in favor of the original one.
Thank you for pointing t...
- Status changed from confirmed to rejected
- % Complete set to 100%
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 04/10/2025 11:57 AM - Version set to 16.0.0
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 04/10/2025 11:54 AM -
Comment added
Hi Ivana Šugić,
Is it a duplicate of ##61438?
Cheers
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 04/10/2025 11:52 AM -
Comment added
Hi Parimal Satyal,
This one is still too imprecise about its expected behavior to be worked on.
How should the user be i...
- Version set to 16.0.0
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 04/10/2025 11:27 AM - Status changed from confirmed to needs review
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 04/10/2025 11:27 AM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Christophe Bliard)
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/10/2025 11:27 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/10/2025 11:27 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
Maya Berdygylyjova on 04/10/2025 10:47 AM - Requires doc change changed from No to Yes
-
created by
Christophe Bliard on 04/10/2025 10:38 AM -
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 04/10/2025 10:19 AM -
Comment added
Thanks Parimal Satyal for creating this feature.
Could you give some examples of the calculation to be used when there a...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 04/10/2025 09:18 AM - Version set to 15.5.0
04/09/2025
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/09/2025 05:52 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/09/2025 05:52 PM - Comment added
-
created by
Parimal Satyal on 04/09/2025 04:34 PM -
Comment added
Based on feedback (see screenshot) shared by Cécile Guiot:
very good question came from {a user} about the %age complet...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 04/09/2025 04:14 PM -
Comment added
Hi Parimal Satyal
Sorry, I do not get the two options you're proposing.
For just this particular case (where both sta...
-
Comment added
-
created by
Christophe Bliard on 04/09/2025 03:55 PM -
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 04/09/2025 03:40 PM -
Comment added
Hi Christophe Bliard,
Very interesting case indeed! Thank you for bringing this up.
Normally, I would say in the case th...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Behrokh Satarnejad on 04/09/2025 02:31 PM - Description changed (Details)
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 04/09/2025 11:47 AM -
Comment added
Hi Parimal Satyal,
Do we agree that given a work package has "Working days only" unchecked and its dates are both on non...
-
Comment added
-
Bug SPAR-246: On mobile, adding a Finish date after adding a start date deletes the Start date inputupdated by
Cécile Guiot on 04/09/2025 09:49 AM -
Comment added
Fixed ✅
Tested on:
iPhone 14
iOS 18.3.1
Safari
Core build
abc11de3b324bedf705d81cefacd7dbaea0ee05a
Product version
0e38...
- Status changed from in test to tested
- Assignee deleted (
Cécile Guiot) - % Complete set to 100%
-
Comment added
-
Bug SPAR-246: On mobile, adding a Finish date after adding a start date deletes the Start date inputupdated by
GitHub on 04/09/2025 09:45 AM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18578 deployed to qa.openproject-stage.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/09/2025 09:45 AM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18578 deployed to qa.openproject-stage.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 04/09/2025 09:40 AM - Assignee set to Oliver Günther
-
Bug SPAR-246: On mobile, adding a Finish date after adding a start date deletes the Start date inputupdated by
Cécile Guiot on 04/09/2025 09:19 AM - Status changed from merged to in test
- Assignee set to Cécile Guiot
-
Bug SPAR-246: On mobile, adding a Finish date after adding a start date deletes the Start date inputupdated by
Henriette Darge on 04/09/2025 09:06 AM - Description changed (Details)
- Status changed from review approved to merged
-
Bug SPAR-246: On mobile, adding a Finish date after adding a start date deletes the Start date inputupdated by
GitHub on 04/09/2025 09:05 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/09/2025 09:05 AM - Comment added
-
Bug SPAR-246: On mobile, adding a Finish date after adding a start date deletes the Start date inputupdated by
Oliver Günther on 04/09/2025 08:55 AM - Status changed from needs review to review approved
-
Bug SPAR-246: On mobile, adding a Finish date after adding a start date deletes the Start date inputupdated by
Henriette Darge on 04/09/2025 08:43 AM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Henriette Darge)
-
Bug SPAR-246: On mobile, adding a Finish date after adding a start date deletes the Start date inputupdated by
GitHub on 04/09/2025 08:43 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/09/2025 08:43 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 04/09/2025 08:35 AM -
Comment added
Hi Parimal Satyal
This should have been fixed. The question is why this is not working for you.. Could you send me the ...
- Status changed from test failed to needs clarification
- Assignee set to Parimal Satyal
- File Bildschirmfoto_2025-04-09_um_08.35.30.png added as attachment
-
Comment added
04/08/2025
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 04/08/2025 06:38 PM - Description changed (Details)
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 04/08/2025 05:25 PM -
Comment added
Hi Cécile Guiot,
This is a lot better and is definitely now functional.
However, I wonder how much work it would be to ...
- Status changed from tested to test failed
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 04/08/2025 04:52 PM -
Comment added
I mistakenly tested on edge instead of stage 🤦♀️
On stage the duration field is visible, as well as the Cancel and Sav...
- Status changed from in test to tested
- Assignee deleted (
Cécile Guiot) - % Complete set to 100%
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 04/08/2025 04:47 PM -
Comment added
(Edited)
- File Margin-underneath-dialog.png added as attachment
- File Margin-underneath-dialog-stage.png added as attachment
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 04/08/2025 04:32 PM -
Comment added
Parimal Satyal are you satisfied with the current fix? (video in attachments)
Asking because the Cancel and Save buttons...
- Status changed from merged to in test
- Assignee set to Cécile Guiot
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/08/2025 03:45 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18527 deployed to qa.openproject-stage.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 04/08/2025 03:13 PM - Status changed from review approved to merged
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/08/2025 03:13 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 04/08/2025 01:58 PM - Status changed from confirmed to in development
- Assignee set to Christophe Bliard
- Developers set to Christophe Bliard
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 04/08/2025 01:43 PM -
Comment added
No issues found, marking as tested ✅
Tested on:
Core build
6cd1ce9b258a0f2fcc1e3bcaa4e2b1f18397e15b
Product version
0e38...
- Status changed from in progress to closed
- Assignee deleted (
Cécile Guiot) - % Complete set to 100%
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 04/08/2025 01:43 PM -
Comment added
All acceptance criteria as well as all testing scenarios from have been verified.
Issues found were filed separately an...
- Status changed from in test to tested
- Assignee deleted (
Cécile Guiot) - % Complete set to 100%
-
Comment added
-
Bug SPAR-246: On mobile, adding a Finish date after adding a start date deletes the Start date inputupdated by
GitHub on 04/08/2025 12:02 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/08/2025 12:02 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 04/08/2025 11:41 AM - Description changed (Details)
-
updated by
Behrokh Satarnejad on 04/08/2025 11:31 AM - Description changed (Details)
- File duration_change.gif added as attachment
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 04/08/2025 11:28 AM - Assignee deleted (
Cécile Guiot)
- Assignee deleted (
-
created by
Parimal Satyal on 04/08/2025 11:23 AM -
Comment added
Originally reported by Corinna Günther.
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 04/08/2025 11:13 AM - Assignee changed from Parimal Satyal to Cécile Guiot
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 04/08/2025 11:08 AM -
Comment added
Fixed ✅
Tested on:
Core build
6cd1ce9b258a0f2fcc1e3bcaa4e2b1f18397e15b
Product version
0e381ca55ef56dbc8dc3bd2e904af5ace...
- Status changed from in test to tested
- Assignee deleted (
Cécile Guiot) - % Complete set to 100%
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/08/2025 10:06 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 04/08/2025 09:32 AM - Status changed from merged to in test
- Assignee set to Cécile Guiot
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/08/2025 09:15 AM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18548 deployed to qa.openproject-stage.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 04/08/2025 08:39 AM - Status changed from review approved to merged
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/08/2025 08:39 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
Behrokh Satarnejad on 04/08/2025 07:49 AM - Status changed from in review to review approved
- Assignee deleted (
Behrokh Satarnejad)
Also available in: Atom