Content
Activity
04/03/2025
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/03/2025 05:32 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 04/03/2025 03:07 PM - Status changed from in test to tested
- Assignee deleted (
Ivana Šugić) - % Complete set to 100%
-
updated by
Ivana Šugić on 04/03/2025 02:39 PM -
Comment added
This issue has been fixed ✅
Tested on:
Core build
5d7ed9559acf7c7b3514c2e74a87e5695f4bc956
Product version
606300f740b0...
- Status changed from merged to in test
- Assignee set to Ivana Šugić
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 04/03/2025 02:05 PM - Description changed (Details)
- Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Henriette Darge)
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/03/2025 02:05 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Behrokh Satarnejad on 04/03/2025 02:04 PM - Status changed from needs review to in review
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 04/03/2025 02:04 PM - Description changed (Details)
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 04/03/2025 01:59 PM - Status changed from confirmed to in development
- Assignee set to Henriette Darge
- Developers set to Henriette Darge
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 04/03/2025 12:44 PM - Description changed (Details)
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 04/03/2025 12:05 PM - Version set to 15.5.0
-
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 04/03/2025 10:06 AM - Project changed from OpenProject GmbH to Stream Planning and Reporting
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/03/2025 09:42 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 04/03/2025 09:36 AM - Assignee changed from Henriette Darge to Behrokh Satarnejad
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 04/03/2025 09:36 AM - Status changed from in development to needs review
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 04/03/2025 08:40 AM - Scheduling mode set to Manual
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 04/03/2025 08:40 AM - Parent changed from Advanced accessibility for the datepicker to Implementing ARIA live regions to communicate contextual changes
04/02/2025
-
updated by
Behrokh Satarnejad on 04/02/2025 11:30 PM - Description changed (Details)
-
updated by
Ivana Šugić on 04/02/2025 03:30 PM -
Comment added
This bug cannot be tested as long as Save does not work: reported in SSI-277
Can be tested now.
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 04/02/2025 03:05 PM -
Comment added
Hi Jens Ulferts, Christophe Bliard:
I agree that we should work on this rather quickly. I think the best next step would...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 04/02/2025 12:10 PM -
Comment added
Hi Christophe Bliard , Parimal Satyal ,
I am all for fixing it quickly. And from what I read so far, I also wouldn't wan...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 04/02/2025 11:21 AM - Status changed from confirmed to in development
- Assignee set to Henriette Darge
- Developers set to Henriette Darge
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/02/2025 10:45 AM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18484 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/02/2025 10:45 AM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18484 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 04/02/2025 10:36 AM -
Comment added
Hi Max Mutzge,
Thanks for your bug report. I can confirm this has been fixed in 15.4.0 as part of the work done when the...
- Status changed from confirmed to closed
- Version set to 15.4.0
- % Complete set to 100%
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 04/02/2025 10:28 AM -
Comment added
Hi Parimal Satyal and Jens Ulferts,
Shouldn't we fix this bug for 15.5.0?
I'm not sure to acurately remember our past co...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 04/02/2025 10:26 AM - Subject changed from Duplicate journal entries when updating attributes of related work package to Duplicated journal entries when updating attributes of related work package
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 04/02/2025 10:22 AM - Status changed from confirmed to in development
- Assignee set to Christophe Bliard
- Developers set to Christophe Bliard
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 04/02/2025 10:19 AM -
Comment added
Removing version. This issue also exists for other computed fields (total work for instance) and we did not get any bug ...
- Priority changed from Medium to Low
- Version deleted (
15.5.0)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 04/02/2025 10:18 AM - Version set to 15.5.0
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 04/02/2025 10:15 AM - Status changed from in review to merged
- Assignee deleted (
Alexander Coles)
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 04/02/2025 10:15 AM - Status changed from in review to merged
- Assignee deleted (
Alexander Coles)
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/02/2025 10:14 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/02/2025 10:14 AM - Comment added
-
created by
Ivana Šugić on 04/02/2025 10:05 AM -
updated by
GitHub on 04/02/2025 09:15 AM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18506 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 04/02/2025 08:38 AM -
Comment added
Hi Behrokh Satarnejad
I assume the status is wrong, it is probably merged, right? Could you please sepcify clear accept...
- Status changed from needs review to merged
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 04/02/2025 08:36 AM -
Comment added
Hi Behrokh Satarnejad
could you please fill the results of what you found out, so that we have that documented?
Thanks!...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 04/02/2025 08:16 AM - Status changed from needs review to in review
- Assignee set to Alexander Coles
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 04/02/2025 08:15 AM - Status changed from needs review to in review
- Assignee set to Alexander Coles
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 04/02/2025 08:13 AM - Status changed from needs review to merged
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/02/2025 08:13 AM - Comment added
04/01/2025
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/01/2025 08:15 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18492 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Behrokh Satarnejad on 04/01/2025 07:28 PM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Behrokh Satarnejad)
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/01/2025 07:28 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 04/01/2025 05:41 PM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Christophe Bliard)
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 04/01/2025 05:41 PM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Christophe Bliard) - Version set to 15.5.0
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/01/2025 05:41 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/01/2025 05:41 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 04/01/2025 04:40 PM -
Comment added
Hi Henriette Darge. Very interesting! Yes this is a rather elegant solution to an odd problem. Thanks.
Cheers
Parimal
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Behrokh Satarnejad on 04/01/2025 03:49 PM - Subject changed from Advanced accessibility for the datepicker (with ARIA live regions to communicate contextual changes)
to Advanced accessibility for the datepicker - Description changed (Details)
- Subject changed from Advanced accessibility for the datepicker (with ARIA live regions to communicate contextual changes)
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 04/01/2025 02:42 PM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Henriette Darge)
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/01/2025 02:37 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 04/01/2025 02:19 PM -
Comment added
Hi team.
Okay, yes, I can see that how we need rules for when "Working days only" is toggled after a field is 'touched'....
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 04/01/2025 02:14 PM -
Comment added
Hi Parimal Satyal
Cécile discovered that on iOS, when pressing the "x" button in the datepicker date field input, the n...
- Description changed (Details)
- Status changed from confirmed to in development
- Assignee set to Henriette Darge
- Developers set to Henriette Darge
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/01/2025 01:55 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Ivana Šugić on 04/01/2025 12:45 PM -
Comment added
This issue has been fixed ✅
Tested on:
Core build
5dfee77e47f4b14884da8ee7679bf5cd0f78a629
Product version
4b55c8485559...
- Status changed from merged to closed
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 04/01/2025 12:06 PM - Status changed from specified to in development
- Version set to 15.5.0
- Developers set to Christophe Bliard
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 04/01/2025 10:25 AM -
Comment added
Taken from the meeting today:
It doesn't need to be full screen, but it does need to behave such that putting Duration ...
- Status changed from test failed to tested
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 04/01/2025 10:24 AM - Status changed from confirmed to rejected
- % Complete set to 100%
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/01/2025 09:15 AM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18425 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 04/01/2025 09:06 AM - Project changed from OpenProject to Stream Planning and Reporting
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 04/01/2025 09:05 AM - Project changed from OpenProject GmbH to Stream Planning and Reporting
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 04/01/2025 09:04 AM - Project changed from OpenProject to Stream Planning and Reporting
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 04/01/2025 09:03 AM - Project changed from OpenProject to Stream Planning and Reporting
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 04/01/2025 09:01 AM -
Comment added
Hi there,
Henriette analysis is correct. The issue happens when only one field is changed and "working days only" is tog...
- Project changed from OpenProject to Stream Planning and Reporting
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 04/01/2025 08:45 AM - Status changed from in development to merged
- Assignee deleted (
Parimal Satyal)
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/01/2025 08:45 AM - Comment added
03/31/2025
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 03/31/2025 06:48 PM -
Comment added
The first criterion does not seem to be fulfilled:
Display the date picker in a full screen modal
The date picker is s...
- Status changed from tested to test failed
-
Comment added
-
created by
Parimal Satyal on 03/31/2025 06:38 PM -
Comment added
To the developer who will be working on this: we might have to adjust the expected behaviour based on what is possible. ...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/31/2025 05:45 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18475 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/31/2025 04:58 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 03/31/2025 04:58 PM - Status changed from review approved to merged
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/31/2025 03:15 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18477 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/31/2025 03:15 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18466 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Behrokh Satarnejad on 03/31/2025 03:08 PM - Status changed from needs review to review approved
- Assignee deleted (
Behrokh Satarnejad)
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/31/2025 03:02 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 03/31/2025 02:59 PM -
Comment added
Hi team,
Would we be able to work on this for 16.0?
Cheers
Parimal
cc Henriette Darge
- Version changed from Product Backlog to 16.0.0
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 03/31/2025 02:58 PM - Version changed from Product Backlog to 16.0.0
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 03/31/2025 02:57 PM -
Comment added
Specs updated based on our discussion from today's S-team weekly:
This feature will only show direct parent in this it...
- Description changed (Details)
- Status changed from new to specified
- Version changed from Wish List to 16.0.0
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 03/31/2025 02:28 PM - Status changed from review approved to merged
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/31/2025 02:28 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 03/31/2025 02:27 PM - Status changed from review approved to merged
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/31/2025 02:27 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 03/31/2025 10:10 AM - Status changed from in review to review approved
- Assignee deleted (
Oliver Günther)
-
updated by
Marc Alcobé on 03/31/2025 10:04 AM -
Comment added
Hi Christophe Bliard,
We can discuss this, but one of the things I'm currently not so convinced is exactly the point you...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/31/2025 09:49 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 03/31/2025 09:37 AM - Assignee set to Behrokh Satarnejad
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 03/31/2025 09:37 AM - Status changed from needs review to review approved
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 03/31/2025 09:06 AM -
Comment added
Hi Parimal Satyal
I wonder if indirect ancestors and descendents should be treated similarly. Thoughts Christophe Blia...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 03/31/2025 08:35 AM -
Comment added
Hi Christophe Bliard
Yes, you are right 👍
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 03/31/2025 08:33 AM - The changes were retracted.
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 03/31/2025 08:33 AM - Description changed (Details)
03/28/2025
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 03/28/2025 06:08 PM -
Comment added
Hi Marc Alcobé,
I meant we only show the direct relations the Relations tab but point taken! (As in, a work package can ...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Marc Alcobé on 03/28/2025 05:59 PM -
Comment added
Hi Parimal Satyal,
Not 100%, we do show in the parent "breadcrumb" of a work package view details more than one level of...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 03/28/2025 05:52 PM - Description changed (Details)
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 03/28/2025 05:50 PM -
Comment added
Hi Marc Alcobé,
Interesting, thanks for bringing it up. So far we only list direct relations (so, no grandparents or gr...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Marc Alcobé on 03/28/2025 03:37 PM -
Comment added
Hi Parimal Satyal,
While having a look into this topic for the mobile app, we stumbled in a case that might be relevant ...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 03/28/2025 03:17 PM - Description changed (Details)
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 03/28/2025 03:12 PM -
Comment added
Parimal Satyal wrote:
Thanks to Christophe Bliard for noticing this and bringing it up.
Actually, Cécile Guiot brought...
-
Comment added
-
created by
Parimal Satyal on 03/28/2025 03:09 PM -
Comment added
Thanks to Christophe Bliard for noticing this and bringing it up.
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 03/28/2025 02:35 PM - Status changed from on hold to in development
- Assignee set to Christophe Bliard
- Developers changed from Alexander Coles to Christophe Bliard
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 03/28/2025 12:38 PM -
Comment added
All AC have been verified, issues found have been filed separately and added as relations.
Marking as tested ✅
Tested on...
- Status changed from in test to tested
- Assignee deleted (
Cécile Guiot) - % Complete set to 100%
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 03/28/2025 12:18 PM -
Comment added
Hi Henriette Darge,
I disagree with the expected behavior "Changing the type should be possible and the dates should ada...
- Description changed (Details)
- Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Christophe Bliard)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/28/2025 12:18 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 03/28/2025 12:13 PM - Version set to 15.5.0
-
updated by
Marc Alcobé on 03/28/2025 11:30 AM - To be informed/consulted teams set to Apps
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 03/28/2025 11:27 AM - Subject changed from Mobile date picker doesn't respect date format from admin settings to User can't delete a date with mobile date picker
- Description changed (Details)
- Status changed from needs clarification to confirmed
- Version set to 15.5.0
- File safari_cant_delete_date.mp4 added as attachment
- File
grafik.pngremoved as attachment - Bug found in version set to 15.5.x
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 03/28/2025 11:17 AM -
Comment added
Ah nice!
- Status changed from confirmed to in development
- Assignee set to Christophe Bliard
- Developers set to Christophe Bliard
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 03/28/2025 11:10 AM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Christophe Bliard) - Version set to 15.5.0
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/28/2025 11:09 AM - Comment added
-
created by
Cécile Guiot on 03/28/2025 09:53 AM -
created by
Cécile Guiot on 03/28/2025 09:52 AM -
updated by
Alexander Coles on 03/28/2025 09:47 AM - Status changed from in development to on hold
- Assignee deleted (
Alexander Coles)
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 03/28/2025 09:37 AM - Status changed from needs review to in review
- Assignee set to Oliver Günther
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 03/28/2025 08:43 AM - Status changed from confirmed to in development
- Assignee set to Christophe Bliard
- Developers set to Christophe Bliard
-
created by
Kabiru Mwenja on 03/28/2025 08:38 AM -
updated by
Henriette Darge on 03/28/2025 08:12 AM -
Comment added
The PR is basically ready to be merged. However, we agreed that Parimal Satyal will write some Test scenarios for that f...
- Assignee changed from Henriette Darge to Parimal Satyal
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 03/28/2025 08:05 AM -
Comment added
I managed to reproduce this now, so I will re-open it
- Description changed (Details)
- Status changed from closed to confirmed
- Version changed from 15.4.2 to 15.5.0
- File Mar-28-2025_08-07-19.gif added as attachment
- File Bildschirmfoto_2025-03-28_um_08.06.00.png added as attachment
-
Comment added
Also available in: Atom