Content
Activity
03/03/2025
-
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 03/03/2025 05:58 PM - Description changed (Details)
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 03/03/2025 04:46 PM -
Comment added
Hi Henriette Darge,
All three added scenarios conform to expectations. I've set them to green on my end.
(Although 1b le...
- Description changed (Details)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 03/03/2025 03:06 PM -
Comment added
Hi Parimal Satyal
I added three examples. Could you please have a look?
Best,
Henriette
- Description changed (Details)
-
Comment added
-
created by
Ivana Šugić on 03/03/2025 03:00 PM -
updated by
Ivana Šugić on 03/03/2025 02:06 PM -
Comment added
This issue has been fixed ✅
Tested on:
Core build
eebdf38491364c9c8629a60fab561e5e2c010305
Product version
79e94fc8ce0c...
- Status changed from merged to closed
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/03/2025 01:15 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18118 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/03/2025 12:56 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 03/03/2025 12:34 PM - Status changed from needs review to merged
- Assignee deleted (
Henriette Darge)
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/03/2025 12:34 PM - Comment added
-
created by
Ivana Šugić on 03/03/2025 12:01 PM -
updated by
Ivana Šugić on 03/03/2025 11:40 AM -
Comment added
Hi Henriette Darge, I also noticed this scenario: if I open a work package page with Gantt (like this one: https://qa.op...
- File image.png added as attachment
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 03/03/2025 11:20 AM - Assignee set to Henriette Darge
-
created by
Cécile Guiot on 03/03/2025 10:37 AM -
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 03/03/2025 10:02 AM -
Comment added
Fixing typos
- Description changed (Details)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Niels Lindenthal on 03/03/2025 09:50 AM - Enterprise plan set to Community
-
updated by
Niels Lindenthal on 03/03/2025 09:48 AM - Enterprise plan set to Community
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 03/03/2025 09:46 AM - Status changed from merged to in test
- Assignee set to Cécile Guiot
-
updated by
Niels Lindenthal on 03/03/2025 09:29 AM - Enterprise plan set to Enterprise / Basic
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 03/03/2025 08:24 AM - Description changed (Details)
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 03/03/2025 08:20 AM -
Comment added
Hi,
As Tobias wrote, the negative lag will come (see SPAR-97). We planned it for 15.4 but won't be able to make that hap...
-
Comment added
03/01/2025
-
updated by
Tobias Nowakow on 03/01/2025 10:29 AM -
Comment added
2. There is work package SPAR-97. It was planned for 15.4.0 but was unfortunately moved back to the backlog.
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Andrey Dermeyko on 03/01/2025 05:36 AM -
Comment added
Thanks a lot for the feature!
There are some questions:
I can't find an option or feature to relate WP's somehow apart o...
-
Comment added
02/28/2025
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 02/28/2025 05:01 PM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Christophe Bliard)
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/28/2025 05:01 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Tobias Dillmann on 02/28/2025 04:10 PM -
Comment added
Parent PR has been merged, so approving the PR is no longer necessary. The changes look great 👏 review approved ✅
- Status changed from in review to merged
- Assignee deleted (
Tobias Dillmann)
-
Comment added
-
created by
Christophe Bliard on 02/28/2025 04:09 PM -
updated by
GitHub on 02/28/2025 03:45 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#17235 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/28/2025 03:45 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#17235 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Alexander Coles on 02/28/2025 02:39 PM -
Comment added
I've added SDS-235 for Danger Dialog advanced accessibility. Hopefully we can apply learnings from this WP to dialogs!
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Ivana Šugić on 02/28/2025 02:38 PM - Status changed from merged to in test
- Assignee set to Ivana Šugić
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 02/28/2025 01:59 PM - Status changed from confirmed to in development
- Accountable set to Henriette Darge
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 02/28/2025 01:43 PM - Status changed from merged to in test
- Assignee set to Cécile Guiot
-
updated by
Niels Lindenthal on 02/28/2025 01:32 PM -
Comment added
Hi Christophe Bliard,
Do you have time to work on this in March so we can release it in April?
- Version changed from Product Backlog to 15.5.0
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 02/28/2025 01:28 PM -
Comment added
Parimal Satyal Could you please review the texts?
- Description changed (Details)
- Status changed from specified to in specification
- Assignee set to Parimal Satyal
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 02/28/2025 01:24 PM - Status changed from on hold to merged
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 02/28/2025 01:23 PM - Status changed from in development to merged
- Assignee deleted (
Christophe Bliard)
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/28/2025 01:23 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/28/2025 01:23 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/28/2025 01:21 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/28/2025 01:21 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/28/2025 11:36 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/28/2025 11:26 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
Tobias Dillmann on 02/28/2025 11:21 AM - Status changed from needs review to in review
- Assignee set to Tobias Dillmann
-
updated by
Alexander Coles on 02/28/2025 11:08 AM -
Comment added
Parimal Satyal I've added a separate WP - SPAR-165 - to track the work to change grouping/sorting of visible/ghost relat...
-
Comment added
-
created by
Alexander Coles on 02/28/2025 11:03 AM -
updated by
Henriette Darge on 02/28/2025 10:50 AM - Status changed from on hold to review approved
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 02/28/2025 10:50 AM - Status changed from on hold to review approved
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 02/28/2025 10:49 AM - Version changed from 15.4.0 to 15.5.0
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 02/28/2025 10:49 AM - Assignee set to Henriette Darge
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 02/28/2025 09:28 AM - Description changed (Details)
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 02/28/2025 09:03 AM -
Comment added
merged onto Pull Request #17806 (single-date mode for work package date picker). Once PR #17806 is merged, it can be QAe...
- Status changed from needs review to on hold
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/28/2025 09:03 AM - Comment added
02/27/2025
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 02/27/2025 07:04 PM -
Comment added
This has been fixed directly in PR https://github.com/opf/openproject/pull/17235 as part of the work package .
Commit me...
- Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Christophe Bliard)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 02/27/2025 04:10 PM - Subject changed from Accessibility for new datepicker
to Advanced accessibility for the datepicker (with ARIA live regions to communicate contextual changes)
- Subject changed from Accessibility for new datepicker
-
updated by
Alexander Coles on 02/27/2025 02:05 PM -
Comment added
Parimal Satyal
Shall we do that, then? (Unless I've missed something)
Sure. (just cross-posted to Element), but I thi...
- Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Alexander Coles)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 02/27/2025 01:43 PM - Project changed from OpenProject to Stream Planning and Reporting
- Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee changed from Henriette Darge to Parimal Satyal
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 02/27/2025 11:45 AM - Description changed (Details)
- Assignee deleted (
Parimal Satyal)
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 02/27/2025 11:42 AM - Description changed (Details)
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 02/27/2025 11:39 AM -
Comment added
I added two examples based on the discussion we had in the weekly yesterday.
- Description changed (Details)
- Assignee set to Parimal Satyal
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 02/27/2025 09:20 AM - Status changed from confirmed to in development
- Assignee set to Christophe Bliard
- Accountable set to Christophe Bliard
02/26/2025
-
created by
Christophe Bliard on 02/26/2025 04:24 PM -
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 02/26/2025 04:23 PM -
Comment added
Ah, okay, didn't realise they were, thanks for the info, Alexander Coles.
Hmm, to me it would seem like we could have th...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Alexander Coles on 02/26/2025 04:16 PM -
Comment added
Christophe Bliard thanks for your detailed comments (both here and on the PR itself). With regards to the above comment,...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Alexander Coles on 02/26/2025 04:10 PM -
Comment added
Parimal Satyal
In my opinion, the "closest" label should not be displayed on any predecessors relations if none of the...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/26/2025 04:09 PM - Comment added
-
created by
Christophe Bliard on 02/26/2025 03:56 PM -
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 02/26/2025 03:17 PM - Version set to 15.4.0
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 02/26/2025 12:14 PM - Version changed from 15.4.0 to Product Backlog
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 02/26/2025 12:14 PM - Version changed from 15.4.0 to Product Backlog
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 02/26/2025 12:13 PM - Version changed from 15.4.0 to Product Backlog
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 02/26/2025 12:13 PM - Version changed from 15.4.0 to Product Backlog
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 02/26/2025 12:13 PM - Version changed from 15.4.0 to Product Backlog
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 02/26/2025 11:55 AM - Description changed (Details)
-
created by
Karen Arzumanyan on 02/26/2025 11:54 AM -
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 02/26/2025 10:49 AM -
Comment added
Decision:
We'll add an icon for automatic.
New icon: Two bars, linked somehow
For now, we'll keep both manual and...
- Status changed from needs clarification to decided
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 02/26/2025 09:23 AM -
Comment added
Decision of the frontend meeting:
Decision:
In this case, do nothing different. Hide the more menu when no actions ar...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 02/26/2025 09:22 AM -
Comment added
Thanks Parimal Satyal,
I think we can fix 2 journals -> 1 journal, but the journal entries with causes explanation ne...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 02/26/2025 08:59 AM -
Comment added
Hi Parimal Satyal,
Could you please update the specs to indicate what happens if none of the predecessors have dates?
In...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 02/26/2025 08:58 AM -
Comment added
Hi Alexander Coles,
Sorry, somehow I missed these questions yesterday. I'll complement Parimal answer.
Alexander Coles w...
-
Comment added
02/25/2025
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 02/25/2025 02:51 PM -
Comment added
Hi Alexander Coles,
A few comments on just those things to which I can speak:
Great question. A predecessor can indeed...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 02/25/2025 11:37 AM -
Comment added
Hi Christophe Bliard,
Oh that is rather odd. I agree that there should only be one journal entry (the proper one rather ...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 02/25/2025 11:30 AM -
Comment added
Hi Christophe Bliard,
You're right. Not intended at all; they must've slipped under the radar. They're related to single...
- Description changed (Details)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Alexander Coles on 02/25/2025 11:08 AM -
Comment added
While not finished, the code is ready for some initial feedback -
a few questions - Christophe Bliard and possibly Pari...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 02/25/2025 11:02 AM -
Comment added
Hi Parimal Satyal,
I'm not sure why the 2 first scenarios, 24a and 24b, are there. They're not related to automatic sche...
-
Comment added
-
created by
Christophe Bliard on 02/25/2025 08:46 AM -
Comment added
Hi Parimal Satyal,
I just noticed this bug about 2 journal entries created for a change to a related work package.
Only ...
-
Comment added
Also available in: Atom