Content
Activity
02/25/2025
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 02/25/2025 02:51 PM -
Comment added
Hi Alexander Coles,
A few comments on just those things to which I can speak:
Great question. A predecessor can indeed...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 02/25/2025 11:37 AM -
Comment added
Hi Christophe Bliard,
Oh that is rather odd. I agree that there should only be one journal entry (the proper one rather ...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 02/25/2025 11:30 AM -
Comment added
Hi Christophe Bliard,
You're right. Not intended at all; they must've slipped under the radar. They're related to single...
- Description changed (Details)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Alexander Coles on 02/25/2025 11:08 AM -
Comment added
While not finished, the code is ready for some initial feedback -
a few questions - Christophe Bliard and possibly Pari...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 02/25/2025 11:02 AM -
Comment added
Hi Parimal Satyal,
I'm not sure why the 2 first scenarios, 24a and 24b, are there. They're not related to automatic sche...
-
Comment added
-
created by
Christophe Bliard on 02/25/2025 08:46 AM -
Comment added
Hi Parimal Satyal,
I just noticed this bug about 2 journal entries created for a change to a related work package.
Only ...
-
Comment added
02/24/2025
-
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 02/24/2025 02:18 PM -
Comment added
Christophe Bliard , manipulating projects or rather associated properties like lifecycle steps or storages faced the sam...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 02/24/2025 10:48 AM - The changes were retracted.
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 02/24/2025 10:13 AM -
Comment added
Hi Jens Ulferts,
or we can leverage the work done on projects.
Thanks for the feedback. Could you give more details ab...
- Version changed from 15.3.1 to 15.4.0
-
Comment added
02/20/2025
-
updated by
Ivana Šugić on 02/20/2025 09:22 AM -
Comment added
Tested on QA Stage 15.3.1: the issue has been fixed ✅
The inline error message now appears and says: Cannot add child b...
- Status changed from merged to closed
-
Comment added
02/19/2025
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/19/2025 04:15 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#17973 deployed to qa.openproject-stage.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 02/19/2025 03:40 PM - Status changed from in review to merged
- Assignee deleted (
Christophe Bliard)
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/19/2025 03:40 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 02/19/2025 03:32 PM - Status changed from needs review to in review
-
updated by
Behrokh Satarnejad on 02/19/2025 12:25 PM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee changed from Behrokh Satarnejad to Christophe Bliard
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 02/19/2025 12:02 PM -
Comment added
This is merged into the branch of the single-date mode. So this can be set to merged together with
- Status changed from in development to on hold
- Assignee deleted (
Behrokh Satarnejad)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/19/2025 12:01 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 02/19/2025 10:56 AM -
Comment added
Hi Marc Alcobé,
These are the specs for the pPrimerised date picker, including behaviour for mobile (notably banners).
P...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Behrokh Satarnejad on 02/19/2025 09:56 AM - Status changed from review failed to in development
- Assignee set to Behrokh Satarnejad
-
updated by
Behrokh Satarnejad on 02/19/2025 09:54 AM - Status changed from review failed to in development
Also available in: Atom