Content
Activity
02/06/2025
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 02/06/2025 08:57 PM -
Comment added
Hi Oliver Günther,
Yes, this looks good to me. I wonder if we should phrase it different for recurring meetings.
For ex...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 02/06/2025 06:25 PM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee changed from Mir Bhatia to Oliver Günther
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/06/2025 06:24 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/06/2025 05:45 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#17847 deployed to qa.openproject-stage.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/06/2025 05:45 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#17844 deployed to qa.openproject-stage.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 02/06/2025 05:10 PM - Status changed from merged to in test
- Assignee set to Cécile Guiot
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 02/06/2025 05:10 PM - Status changed from merged to in test
- Assignee changed from Alexander Coles to Cécile Guiot
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 02/06/2025 04:56 PM - Status changed from needs review to merged
- Assignee deleted (
Mir Bhatia)
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/06/2025 04:56 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 02/06/2025 04:31 PM - Description changed (Details)
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 02/06/2025 04:29 PM - Description changed (Details)
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 02/06/2025 04:15 PM - Status changed from in development to confirmed
- Assignee deleted (
Oliver Günther) - Accountable deleted (
Oliver Günther)
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 02/06/2025 04:12 PM - Status changed from in review to review failed
- Assignee deleted (
Mir Bhatia)
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 02/06/2025 04:12 PM - Status changed from in review to review failed
- Assignee deleted (
Mir Bhatia)
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 02/06/2025 03:40 PM - Description changed (Details)
-
created by
Oliver Günther on 02/06/2025 03:37 PM -
created by
Oliver Günther on 02/06/2025 03:37 PM -
Comment added
Parimal Satyal here's my suggestion on how that cancellation email would look like. I'd like to keep it basic to at leas...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 02/06/2025 03:27 PM - Assignee deleted (
Mir Bhatia)
- Assignee deleted (
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 02/06/2025 03:19 PM -
Comment added
Working as expected ✅
Tested on:
Core build
fe73c08123ffb0052b48e6d4048f06e232af59ae
Product version
8950dfe92bf34bd6dfc...
- Status changed from in test to tested
- Assignee deleted (
Cécile Guiot)
-
Comment added
-
created by
Cécile Guiot on 02/06/2025 02:52 PM -
updated by
Oliver Günther on 02/06/2025 02:06 PM - Status changed from new to decided
- Decision set to Multiple outcomes will be possible
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 02/06/2025 02:06 PM - Status changed from confirmed to in development
- Assignee set to Oliver Günther
- Accountable set to Oliver Günther
-
created by
Cécile Guiot on 02/06/2025 02:00 PM -
Comment added
Mir Bhatia whack-a-mole part 1235425425 :D
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 02/06/2025 01:29 PM -
Comment added
Hi Alexander Coles,
Could you possibly update the description of the work package with the updated phrasing for the dial...
- Assignee set to Alexander Coles
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 02/06/2025 12:44 PM - Subject changed from Last planned meeting is not showing when current meeting is in both in 'Upcoming' and 'Past' tab
to Last planned meeting is not showing when current meeting is in both 'Upcoming' and 'Past' tab
- Subject changed from Last planned meeting is not showing when current meeting is in both in 'Upcoming' and 'Past' tab
-
updated by
Gábor Alexovics on 02/06/2025 12:11 PM -
Comment added
Hi!
In my experience, agenda outcomes easily can be multiple work packages created on the spot when closing the agenda. ...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 02/06/2025 11:54 AM -
Comment added
Fixed ✅
Tested on:
Core build
fe73c08123ffb0052b48e6d4048f06e232af59ae
Product version
8950dfe92bf34bd6dfcab51a36e211e8a...
- Status changed from in test to tested
- Assignee deleted (
Cécile Guiot)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 02/06/2025 11:44 AM -
Comment added
Fixed ✅
Tested on:
Core build
fe73c08123ffb0052b48e6d4048f06e232af59ae
Product version
8950dfe92bf34bd6dfcab51a36e211e8a...
- Status changed from in test to tested
- Assignee deleted (
Cécile Guiot)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 02/06/2025 11:09 AM - Assignee set to Mir Bhatia
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 02/06/2025 11:09 AM - Status changed from needs review to in review
- Assignee set to Mir Bhatia
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 02/06/2025 10:41 AM - Status changed from in review to merged
- Assignee deleted (
Mir Bhatia)
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/06/2025 10:41 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 02/06/2025 09:20 AM - Status changed from merged to in test
- Assignee set to Cécile Guiot
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 02/06/2025 09:20 AM - Status changed from merged to in test
- Assignee set to Cécile Guiot
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/06/2025 09:15 AM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#17849 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 02/06/2025 09:14 AM -
Comment added
I added the pullpreview label on the PR so Cécile Guiot and Parimal Satyal can test it out easily as well.
- Status changed from needs review to in review
- Assignee set to Mir Bhatia
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 02/06/2025 08:52 AM - Status changed from needs review to merged
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/06/2025 08:52 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/06/2025 08:45 AM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#17850 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 02/06/2025 08:17 AM - Status changed from needs review to merged
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/06/2025 08:17 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 02/06/2025 06:34 AM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Oliver Günther)
02/05/2025
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 02/05/2025 09:19 PM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Oliver Günther)
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/05/2025 09:19 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 02/05/2025 09:19 PM - Status changed from confirmed to in development
- Assignee set to Oliver Günther
- Version set to 15.3.0
- Accountable set to Oliver Günther
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 02/05/2025 09:16 PM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Oliver Günther) - Version set to 15.3.0
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/05/2025 09:16 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 02/05/2025 09:01 PM - Status changed from confirmed to in development
- Assignee set to Oliver Günther
- Accountable set to Oliver Günther
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 02/05/2025 08:59 PM -
Comment added
No longer occurs
- Status changed from confirmed to rejected
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 02/05/2025 08:58 PM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Oliver Günther) - Version set to 15.3.0
- Bug found in version set to 15.3.x
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/05/2025 08:57 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 02/05/2025 08:46 PM - Status changed from confirmed to in development
- Assignee set to Oliver Günther
- Accountable set to Oliver Günther
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 02/05/2025 08:20 PM -
Comment added
Cécile Guiot Mir Bhatia Parimal Satyal While implementing the change, I had the idea to add some minor offset to the las...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/05/2025 08:19 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 02/05/2025 08:06 PM - Status changed from test failed to in development
- Assignee changed from Cécile Guiot to Oliver Günther
- Accountable set to Oliver Günther
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 02/05/2025 08:06 PM -
Comment added
I think it makes sense to model it like this from the start. Why not connect two tickets, or one decision, and a follow-...
-
Comment added
-
created by
Parimal Satyal on 02/05/2025 07:24 PM -
created by
Parimal Satyal on 02/05/2025 07:12 PM -
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 02/05/2025 07:11 PM - Description changed (Details)
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 02/05/2025 06:44 PM - Description changed (Details)
- Version set to 15.3.0
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/05/2025 06:44 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 02/05/2025 05:28 PM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Oliver Günther) - Version set to 15.3.0
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/05/2025 05:28 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 02/05/2025 05:26 PM - Status changed from merged to in test
- Assignee set to Cécile Guiot
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 02/05/2025 05:25 PM -
Comment added
Hi Cécile Guiot , no we can amend the acceptance criteria and simply set it to test failed. It was not added so I forgot...
- Description changed (Details)
- Status changed from in test to test failed
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 02/05/2025 05:11 PM -
Comment added
Fixed ✅
Tested on:
Core build
2e92b26ff645f7f279966cc9a7715c9bff4caa80
Product version
8950dfe92bf34bd6dfcab51a36e211e8a...
- Status changed from merged to tested
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 02/05/2025 05:11 PM -
Comment added
Hi Oliver Günther the same issue as this one is also happening when i click on 'Show more' in this context.
You can rep...
- Status changed from merged to in test
- Assignee set to Cécile Guiot
- File meeting_show_more_again.gif added as attachment
-
Comment added
-
created by
Mir Bhatia on 02/05/2025 04:27 PM -
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 02/05/2025 04:25 PM -
Comment added
Fixed ✅
Tested on:
Core build
2e92b26ff645f7f279966cc9a7715c9bff4caa80
Product version
8950dfe92bf34bd6dfcab51a36e211e8a...
- Status changed from in test to tested
- Assignee deleted (
Cécile Guiot)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 02/05/2025 04:14 PM -
Comment added
Rejecting as MEET-192 seems to have fixed this too.
- Status changed from in development to rejected
- Assignee deleted (
Mir Bhatia)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 02/05/2025 04:00 PM - Status changed from confirmed to in development
- Assignee set to Mir Bhatia
- Accountable set to Mir Bhatia
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 02/05/2025 01:57 PM - Description changed (Details)
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 02/05/2025 01:54 PM -
Comment added
Thank you!
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 02/05/2025 01:48 PM -
Comment added
Mir Bhatia FYI
-
Comment added
-
created by
Cécile Guiot on 02/05/2025 01:48 PM -
updated by
GitHub on 02/05/2025 01:46 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 02/05/2025 01:44 PM -
Comment added
Mir Bhatia also, it doesn't happen if i select 'Never' or a specific date as an end to the series
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 02/05/2025 01:29 PM -
Comment added
Mir Bhatia i can repro the issue you mentioned
i will file a bug for it
- File grafik.png added as attachment
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/05/2025 01:15 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#17820 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 02/05/2025 12:48 PM - Status changed from review approved to merged
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/05/2025 12:48 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 02/05/2025 11:53 AM - Version deleted (
15.3.0)
- Version deleted (
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 02/05/2025 11:21 AM - Status changed from needs review to in review
- Assignee set to Mir Bhatia
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 02/05/2025 11:18 AM - Status changed from needs review to review approved
- Assignee deleted (
Alexander Coles)
-
updated by
Alexander Coles on 02/05/2025 11:17 AM - Status changed from in development to needs review
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/05/2025 11:17 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 02/05/2025 10:20 AM - Status changed from confirmed to in development
- Assignee set to Oliver Günther
- Accountable set to Oliver Günther
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 02/05/2025 10:16 AM -
Comment added
Discussed in front-end daily. Rejecting to not override Primer default behaviour.
- Status changed from confirmed to rejected
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/05/2025 10:15 AM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#17827 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/05/2025 10:15 AM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#17825 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 02/05/2025 10:02 AM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Oliver Günther) - Version set to 15.3.0
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/05/2025 10:02 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 02/05/2025 09:42 AM -
Comment added
All tickets are closed for 15.3. We can close this epic
- Status changed from in development to closed
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 02/05/2025 09:40 AM -
Comment added
Already done
- Status changed from new to closed
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 02/05/2025 09:40 AM - Status changed from review approved to merged
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/05/2025 09:40 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 02/05/2025 09:39 AM - Status changed from needs review to merged
- Assignee deleted (
Oliver Günther)
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/05/2025 09:39 AM - Comment added
-
created by
Oliver Günther on 02/05/2025 09:28 AM -
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 02/05/2025 09:24 AM - Status changed from confirmed to in development
- Assignee set to Mir Bhatia
- Accountable set to Mir Bhatia
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 02/05/2025 09:19 AM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee changed from Mir Bhatia to Oliver Günther
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 02/05/2025 09:15 AM -
Comment added
Hi Cécile Guiot,
I think I found some weird behaviour related to this.
For the duration that a meeting is shown in the "...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 02/05/2025 08:57 AM - Status changed from needs review to review approved
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 02/05/2025 08:26 AM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Oliver Günther) - Version set to 15.3.0
02/04/2025
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/04/2025 08:56 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 02/04/2025 08:47 PM - Description changed (Details)
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 02/04/2025 06:12 PM - Version set to 15.3.0
-
updated by
Colin Puskaritz on 02/04/2025 05:42 PM -
Comment added
upvote enterprise customer - also export to Word
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/04/2025 05:16 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/04/2025 04:45 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#17812 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 02/04/2025 04:40 PM - Status changed from merged to in test
- Assignee set to Cécile Guiot
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 02/04/2025 04:38 PM -
Comment added
Fixed ✅
Tested on:
Core build
daf1a355c8fc2880adbf27a107b0ca7f5a07376f
Product version
8950dfe92bf34bd6dfcab51a36e211e8a...
- Status changed from in test to tested
- Assignee deleted (
Cécile Guiot)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 02/04/2025 04:09 PM - Status changed from needs review to merged
- Assignee deleted (
Oliver Günther)
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/04/2025 04:09 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 02/04/2025 03:35 PM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee changed from Mir Bhatia to Oliver Günther
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/04/2025 03:09 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 02/04/2025 03:09 PM -
Comment added
I will reopen this, as the AC state clearly that the simple variatnt should be part of it. This is already being worked ...
- Status changed from merged to in development
- Assignee set to Alexander Coles
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 02/04/2025 02:47 PM - Status changed from merged to in test
- Assignee set to Cécile Guiot
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 02/04/2025 01:56 PM -
Comment added
All AC have been verified, issues have been filed separately and added as relations
Marking as tested ✅
Tested on:
Core ...
- Status changed from in test to tested
- Assignee deleted (
Cécile Guiot)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 02/04/2025 12:49 PM - Status changed from specified to in development
- Assignee set to Oliver Günther
- Accountable set to Oliver Günther
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 02/04/2025 12:08 PM - Description changed (Details)
- Status changed from new to specified
- File Meetings_-_Series_index_view_-_Series_ended.jpg added as attachment
- Mockups set to https://www.figma.com/design/cJDhzOmYMstUNRS3EmgqZ0/Meetings-Module?node-id=3505-1181
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 02/04/2025 12:05 PM - Subject changed from Better indicate when has ended (or is ended manually) with changes in phrasing and a more helpful blankslate
to Better indicate when a recurring meeting has ended (or is ended manually) with changes in phrasing and a more helpful blankslate
- Subject changed from Better indicate when has ended (or is ended manually) with changes in phrasing and a more helpful blankslate
-
created by
Parimal Satyal on 02/04/2025 11:56 AM -
updated by
GitHub on 02/04/2025 11:15 AM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#17817 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
created by
Cécile Guiot on 02/04/2025 11:04 AM -
updated by
Oliver Günther on 02/04/2025 10:51 AM - Assignee set to Mir Bhatia
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 02/04/2025 10:37 AM - Status changed from needs review to merged
- Assignee deleted (
Oliver Günther)
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/04/2025 10:37 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 02/04/2025 09:44 AM - Status changed from confirmed to in development
- Assignee set to Mir Bhatia
- Accountable set to Mir Bhatia
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 02/04/2025 09:41 AM - Description changed (Details)
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 02/04/2025 09:30 AM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee changed from Mir Bhatia to Oliver Günther
- Version set to 15.3.0
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/04/2025 09:26 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/04/2025 08:45 AM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#17800 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 02/04/2025 08:25 AM - Status changed from review approved to closed
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/04/2025 08:25 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 02/04/2025 08:22 AM - Assignee deleted (
Oliver Günther)
- Assignee deleted (
02/03/2025
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 02/03/2025 06:17 PM - Description changed (Details)
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 02/03/2025 06:16 PM - Status changed from in progress to rejected
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/03/2025 06:16 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/03/2025 06:15 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/03/2025 06:15 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#17569 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 02/03/2025 05:57 PM - Status changed from new to rejected
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/03/2025 05:56 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Alexander Coles on 02/03/2025 05:51 PM - Status changed from in review to merged
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/03/2025 05:50 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/03/2025 05:27 PM - Comment added
-
created by
Mir Bhatia on 02/03/2025 05:19 PM -
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 02/03/2025 04:40 PM - Description changed (Details)
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 02/03/2025 04:12 PM -
Comment added
Working as expected ✅
Tested on:
Core build
99db98b3d352a243f67b0b18c7749fb041b7a29c
Product version
53ab774ec0aa9b1790e...
- Status changed from in test to tested
- Assignee deleted (
Cécile Guiot)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 02/03/2025 03:41 PM -
Comment added
Hi Mir Bhatia:
Added additional text for the blankslate.
Cheers
Parimal
- Description changed (Details)
- Assignee deleted (
Parimal Satyal)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 02/03/2025 03:30 PM - Description changed (Details)
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 02/03/2025 03:27 PM -
Comment added
We discussed this in the meeting stream and currently see the first option "Leave it as is" as the most balanced for now...
- Status changed from needs clarification to decided
- Decision set to Leave it as is
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 02/03/2025 03:20 PM -
Comment added
After verification, this is indeed a bug. The table displayed when there is content is a BoxTable, so the empty message ...
- Description changed (Details)
- Assignee deleted (
Cécile Guiot)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 02/03/2025 03:18 PM - The changes were retracted.
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 02/03/2025 03:17 PM -
Comment added
Can this be rejected?
- Assignee changed from Parimal Satyal to Cécile Guiot
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 02/03/2025 03:14 PM - Description changed (Details)
- Status changed from merged to in development
- Assignee set to Parimal Satyal
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 02/03/2025 02:53 PM - Description changed (Details)
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 02/03/2025 02:38 PM - Status changed from merged to in test
- Assignee set to Cécile Guiot
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 02/03/2025 02:38 PM - Status changed from merged to in test
- Assignee set to Cécile Guiot
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/03/2025 01:45 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#17798 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 02/03/2025 01:09 PM - Status changed from in review to review approved
- Assignee deleted (
Mir Bhatia)
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 02/03/2025 01:02 PM - Status changed from in review to merged
- Assignee deleted (
Mir Bhatia)
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/03/2025 01:02 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 02/03/2025 12:30 PM -
Comment added
I updated the title to 'deviate' instead of 'derive' for clarity.
Notification center is a bit particular: we use the "T...
- Subject changed from Meeting series seems to derive from the usual breadcrumb pattern to Meeting series seems to deviate from the usual breadcrumb pattern
- Description changed (Details)
- Status changed from new to rejected
- File Sub-tab_in_Admin_settings.png added as attachment
- File Saved_work_packages.png added as attachment
-
Comment added
-
created by
Parimal Satyal on 02/03/2025 12:17 PM -
Comment added
Extracted from a Primer thread. Any ideas on how to improve this? I've listed possible approaches in a table. There is a...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 02/03/2025 11:20 AM - Status changed from needs review to in review
- Assignee changed from Alexander Coles to Oliver Günther
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 02/03/2025 11:06 AM - Status changed from in development to in review
- Assignee changed from Oliver Günther to Mir Bhatia
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 02/03/2025 11:06 AM - Status changed from needs review to in review
- Assignee set to Mir Bhatia
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 02/03/2025 10:56 AM - The changes were retracted.
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 02/03/2025 10:56 AM - The changes were retracted.
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 02/03/2025 10:56 AM - The changes were retracted.
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 02/03/2025 10:56 AM - The changes were retracted.
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 02/03/2025 10:56 AM - The changes were retracted.
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 02/03/2025 10:56 AM - The changes were retracted.
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 02/03/2025 10:56 AM - The changes were retracted.
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 02/03/2025 10:56 AM - The changes were retracted.
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 02/03/2025 10:56 AM - The changes were retracted.
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 02/03/2025 10:56 AM - The changes were retracted.
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 02/03/2025 10:56 AM - The changes were retracted.
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 02/03/2025 10:56 AM - The changes were retracted.
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 02/03/2025 10:56 AM - The changes were retracted.
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 02/03/2025 10:56 AM - The changes were retracted.
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 02/03/2025 10:56 AM - Subject changed from Placeholder bug, something wrong happens when editing the reccurring day AND the 'end series after' criteria
to Changing the start date of a recurring meeting to a past date loses occurrences - Description changed (Details)
- Status changed from confirmed to in development
- Assignee set to Mir Bhatia
- Accountable set to Mir Bhatia
- Subject changed from Placeholder bug, something wrong happens when editing the reccurring day AND the 'end series after' criteria
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/03/2025 10:53 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 02/03/2025 10:31 AM -
Comment added
Hi Oliver Günther,
This sounds good to me!
Cheers
Parimal
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Alexander Coles on 02/03/2025 09:56 AM - Status changed from in development to needs review
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/03/2025 09:15 AM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#17780 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 02/03/2025 08:48 AM - Description changed (Details)
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 02/03/2025 08:48 AM -
Comment added
Part of https://community.openproject.org/projects/meetings-stream/work_packages/61107/activity
- Status changed from confirmed to rejected
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/03/2025 08:46 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 02/03/2025 08:43 AM - Status changed from specified to in development
- Assignee set to Oliver Günther
- Accountable set to Oliver Günther
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 02/03/2025 08:41 AM - Status changed from in development to closed
- Assignee deleted (
Oliver Günther)
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/03/2025 08:41 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/03/2025 07:15 AM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#17767 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 02/03/2025 07:05 AM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Oliver Günther)
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/03/2025 07:04 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 02/03/2025 06:57 AM - Assignee changed from Mir Bhatia to Oliver Günther
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 02/03/2025 06:38 AM -
Comment added
Parimal Satyal Mir Bhatia to stay consistent with the recurring meeting "show more" pagination, the "Next week and later...
- Description changed (Details)
- Status changed from review approved to merged
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/03/2025 06:38 AM - Comment added
01/31/2025
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 01/31/2025 08:29 PM - Type changed from Implementation to Feature
- Status changed from review approved to merged
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/31/2025 06:15 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#17768 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/31/2025 06:15 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#17768 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 01/31/2025 05:45 PM -
Comment added
Oliver Günther How do I mark this as merged/ready for QA?
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/31/2025 05:45 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 01/31/2025 05:34 PM - Status changed from new to in progress
- Assignee set to Mir Bhatia
- Start date set to 01/31/2025
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 01/31/2025 05:33 PM - Status changed from new to specified
- Version set to 15.3.0
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 01/31/2025 04:48 PM - Description changed (Details)
- Status changed from in review to review approved
- Assignee deleted (
Mir Bhatia)
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 01/31/2025 04:03 PM - Status changed from needs review to review approved
- Assignee deleted (
Oliver Günther)
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/31/2025 03:45 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#17762 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/31/2025 03:38 PM - Comment added
-
created by
Mir Bhatia on 01/31/2025 03:36 PM -
created by
Mir Bhatia on 01/31/2025 03:18 PM -
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 01/31/2025 03:09 PM - Description changed (Details)
- Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee changed from Mir Bhatia to Oliver Günther
- Requires doc change changed from No to Yes
-
created by
Mir Bhatia on 01/31/2025 03:08 PM -
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 01/31/2025 03:06 PM - Status changed from in review to merged
- Assignee deleted (
Mir Bhatia)
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/31/2025 03:06 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 01/31/2025 12:01 PM -
Comment added
Hi Mir Bhatia,
Yes, then let's load the next five irrespective of state.
Thanks for adding the bit about mobile.
Cheers
...
- Description changed (Details)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 01/31/2025 10:47 AM -
Comment added
Hi Parimal Satyal,
Showing 5 planned + an arbitrary number of cancelled meetings is not technically feasible for the "Pl...
- Description changed (Details)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 01/31/2025 10:39 AM -
Comment added
Fixed ✅
Tested on:
Core build
90c4e94636683116b60e6d14fddef49b2ece60c9
Product version
53ab774ec0aa9b1790e402c05c7d49902...
- Status changed from merged to tested
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/31/2025 09:15 AM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#17761 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 01/31/2025 08:39 AM - Status changed from review approved to merged
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/31/2025 08:39 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 01/31/2025 08:29 AM - Status changed from needs review to in review
- Assignee set to Mir Bhatia
Also available in: Atom