Content
Activity
02/05/2025
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 02/05/2025 09:19 PM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Oliver Günther)
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/05/2025 09:19 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 02/05/2025 09:19 PM - Status changed from confirmed to in development
- Assignee set to Oliver Günther
- Version set to 15.3.0
- Accountable set to Oliver Günther
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 02/05/2025 09:16 PM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Oliver Günther) - Version set to 15.3.0
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/05/2025 09:16 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 02/05/2025 09:01 PM - Status changed from confirmed to in development
- Assignee set to Oliver Günther
- Accountable set to Oliver Günther
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 02/05/2025 08:59 PM -
Comment added
No longer occurs
- Status changed from confirmed to rejected
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 02/05/2025 08:58 PM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Oliver Günther) - Version set to 15.3.0
- Bug found in version set to 15.3.x
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/05/2025 08:57 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 02/05/2025 08:46 PM - Status changed from confirmed to in development
- Assignee set to Oliver Günther
- Accountable set to Oliver Günther
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 02/05/2025 08:20 PM -
Comment added
Cécile Guiot Mir Bhatia Parimal Satyal While implementing the change, I had the idea to add some minor offset to the las...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/05/2025 08:19 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 02/05/2025 08:06 PM - Status changed from test failed to in development
- Assignee changed from Cécile Guiot to Oliver Günther
- Accountable set to Oliver Günther
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 02/05/2025 08:06 PM -
Comment added
I think it makes sense to model it like this from the start. Why not connect two tickets, or one decision, and a follow-...
-
Comment added
-
created by
Parimal Satyal on 02/05/2025 07:24 PM -
created by
Parimal Satyal on 02/05/2025 07:12 PM -
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 02/05/2025 07:11 PM - Description changed (Details)
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 02/05/2025 06:44 PM - Description changed (Details)
- Version set to 15.3.0
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/05/2025 06:44 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 02/05/2025 05:28 PM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Oliver Günther) - Version set to 15.3.0
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/05/2025 05:28 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 02/05/2025 05:26 PM - Status changed from merged to in test
- Assignee set to Cécile Guiot
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 02/05/2025 05:25 PM -
Comment added
Hi Cécile Guiot , no we can amend the acceptance criteria and simply set it to test failed. It was not added so I forgot...
- Description changed (Details)
- Status changed from in test to test failed
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 02/05/2025 05:11 PM -
Comment added
Fixed ✅
Tested on:
Core build
2e92b26ff645f7f279966cc9a7715c9bff4caa80
Product version
8950dfe92bf34bd6dfcab51a36e211e8a...
- Status changed from merged to tested
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 02/05/2025 05:11 PM -
Comment added
Hi Oliver Günther the same issue as this one is also happening when i click on 'Show more' in this context.
You can rep...
- Status changed from merged to in test
- Assignee set to Cécile Guiot
- File meeting_show_more_again.gif added as attachment
-
Comment added
-
created by
Mir Bhatia on 02/05/2025 04:27 PM -
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 02/05/2025 04:25 PM -
Comment added
Fixed ✅
Tested on:
Core build
2e92b26ff645f7f279966cc9a7715c9bff4caa80
Product version
8950dfe92bf34bd6dfcab51a36e211e8a...
- Status changed from in test to tested
- Assignee deleted (
Cécile Guiot)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 02/05/2025 04:14 PM -
Comment added
Rejecting as MEET-192 seems to have fixed this too.
- Status changed from in development to rejected
- Assignee deleted (
Mir Bhatia)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 02/05/2025 04:00 PM - Status changed from confirmed to in development
- Assignee set to Mir Bhatia
- Accountable set to Mir Bhatia
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 02/05/2025 01:57 PM - Description changed (Details)
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 02/05/2025 01:54 PM -
Comment added
Thank you!
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 02/05/2025 01:48 PM -
Comment added
Mir Bhatia FYI
-
Comment added
-
created by
Cécile Guiot on 02/05/2025 01:48 PM -
updated by
GitHub on 02/05/2025 01:46 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 02/05/2025 01:44 PM -
Comment added
Mir Bhatia also, it doesn't happen if i select 'Never' or a specific date as an end to the series
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 02/05/2025 01:29 PM -
Comment added
Mir Bhatia i can repro the issue you mentioned
i will file a bug for it
- File grafik.png added as attachment
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/05/2025 01:15 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#17820 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 02/05/2025 12:48 PM - Status changed from review approved to merged
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/05/2025 12:48 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 02/05/2025 11:53 AM - Version deleted (
15.3.0)
- Version deleted (
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 02/05/2025 11:21 AM - Status changed from needs review to in review
- Assignee set to Mir Bhatia
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 02/05/2025 11:18 AM - Status changed from needs review to review approved
- Assignee deleted (
Alexander Coles)
-
updated by
Alexander Coles on 02/05/2025 11:17 AM - Status changed from in development to needs review
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/05/2025 11:17 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 02/05/2025 10:20 AM - Status changed from confirmed to in development
- Assignee set to Oliver Günther
- Accountable set to Oliver Günther
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 02/05/2025 10:16 AM -
Comment added
Discussed in front-end daily. Rejecting to not override Primer default behaviour.
- Status changed from confirmed to rejected
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/05/2025 10:15 AM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#17827 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/05/2025 10:15 AM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#17825 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 02/05/2025 10:02 AM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Oliver Günther) - Version set to 15.3.0
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/05/2025 10:02 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 02/05/2025 09:42 AM -
Comment added
All tickets are closed for 15.3. We can close this epic
- Status changed from in development to closed
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 02/05/2025 09:40 AM -
Comment added
Already done
- Status changed from new to closed
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 02/05/2025 09:40 AM - Status changed from review approved to merged
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/05/2025 09:40 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 02/05/2025 09:39 AM - Status changed from needs review to merged
- Assignee deleted (
Oliver Günther)
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/05/2025 09:39 AM - Comment added
-
created by
Oliver Günther on 02/05/2025 09:28 AM -
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 02/05/2025 09:24 AM - Status changed from confirmed to in development
- Assignee set to Mir Bhatia
- Accountable set to Mir Bhatia
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 02/05/2025 09:19 AM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee changed from Mir Bhatia to Oliver Günther
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 02/05/2025 09:15 AM -
Comment added
Hi Cécile Guiot,
I think I found some weird behaviour related to this.
For the duration that a meeting is shown in the "...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 02/05/2025 08:57 AM - Status changed from needs review to review approved
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 02/05/2025 08:26 AM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Oliver Günther) - Version set to 15.3.0
02/04/2025
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/04/2025 08:56 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 02/04/2025 08:47 PM - Description changed (Details)
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 02/04/2025 06:12 PM - Version set to 15.3.0
-
updated by
Colin Puskaritz on 02/04/2025 05:42 PM -
Comment added
upvote enterprise customer - also export to Word
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/04/2025 05:16 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/04/2025 04:45 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#17812 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 02/04/2025 04:40 PM - Status changed from merged to in test
- Assignee set to Cécile Guiot
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 02/04/2025 04:38 PM -
Comment added
Fixed ✅
Tested on:
Core build
daf1a355c8fc2880adbf27a107b0ca7f5a07376f
Product version
8950dfe92bf34bd6dfcab51a36e211e8a...
- Status changed from in test to tested
- Assignee deleted (
Cécile Guiot)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 02/04/2025 04:09 PM - Status changed from needs review to merged
- Assignee deleted (
Oliver Günther)
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/04/2025 04:09 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 02/04/2025 03:35 PM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee changed from Mir Bhatia to Oliver Günther
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/04/2025 03:09 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 02/04/2025 03:09 PM -
Comment added
I will reopen this, as the AC state clearly that the simple variatnt should be part of it. This is already being worked ...
- Status changed from merged to in development
- Assignee set to Alexander Coles
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 02/04/2025 02:47 PM - Status changed from merged to in test
- Assignee set to Cécile Guiot
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 02/04/2025 01:56 PM -
Comment added
All AC have been verified, issues have been filed separately and added as relations
Marking as tested ✅
Tested on:
Core ...
- Status changed from in test to tested
- Assignee deleted (
Cécile Guiot)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 02/04/2025 12:49 PM - Status changed from specified to in development
- Assignee set to Oliver Günther
- Accountable set to Oliver Günther
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 02/04/2025 12:08 PM - Description changed (Details)
- Status changed from new to specified
- File Meetings_-_Series_index_view_-_Series_ended.jpg added as attachment
- Mockups set to https://www.figma.com/design/cJDhzOmYMstUNRS3EmgqZ0/Meetings-Module?node-id=3505-1181
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 02/04/2025 12:05 PM - Subject changed from Better indicate when has ended (or is ended manually) with changes in phrasing and a more helpful blankslate
to Better indicate when a recurring meeting has ended (or is ended manually) with changes in phrasing and a more helpful blankslate
- Subject changed from Better indicate when has ended (or is ended manually) with changes in phrasing and a more helpful blankslate
-
created by
Parimal Satyal on 02/04/2025 11:56 AM -
updated by
GitHub on 02/04/2025 11:15 AM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#17817 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
created by
Cécile Guiot on 02/04/2025 11:04 AM -
updated by
Oliver Günther on 02/04/2025 10:51 AM - Assignee set to Mir Bhatia
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 02/04/2025 10:37 AM - Status changed from needs review to merged
- Assignee deleted (
Oliver Günther)
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/04/2025 10:37 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 02/04/2025 09:44 AM - Status changed from confirmed to in development
- Assignee set to Mir Bhatia
- Accountable set to Mir Bhatia
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 02/04/2025 09:41 AM - Description changed (Details)
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 02/04/2025 09:30 AM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee changed from Mir Bhatia to Oliver Günther
- Version set to 15.3.0
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/04/2025 09:26 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/04/2025 08:45 AM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#17800 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 02/04/2025 08:25 AM - Status changed from review approved to closed
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/04/2025 08:25 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 02/04/2025 08:22 AM - Assignee deleted (
Oliver Günther)
- Assignee deleted (
02/03/2025
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 02/03/2025 06:17 PM - Description changed (Details)
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 02/03/2025 06:16 PM - Status changed from in progress to rejected
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/03/2025 06:16 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/03/2025 06:15 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/03/2025 06:15 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#17569 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 02/03/2025 05:57 PM - Status changed from new to rejected
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/03/2025 05:56 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Alexander Coles on 02/03/2025 05:51 PM - Status changed from in review to merged
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/03/2025 05:50 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/03/2025 05:27 PM - Comment added
-
created by
Mir Bhatia on 02/03/2025 05:19 PM -
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 02/03/2025 04:40 PM - Description changed (Details)
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 02/03/2025 04:12 PM -
Comment added
Working as expected ✅
Tested on:
Core build
99db98b3d352a243f67b0b18c7749fb041b7a29c
Product version
53ab774ec0aa9b1790e...
- Status changed from in test to tested
- Assignee deleted (
Cécile Guiot)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 02/03/2025 03:41 PM -
Comment added
Hi Mir Bhatia:
Added additional text for the blankslate.
Cheers
Parimal
- Description changed (Details)
- Assignee deleted (
Parimal Satyal)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 02/03/2025 03:30 PM - Description changed (Details)
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 02/03/2025 03:27 PM -
Comment added
We discussed this in the meeting stream and currently see the first option "Leave it as is" as the most balanced for now...
- Status changed from needs clarification to decided
- Decision set to Leave it as is
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 02/03/2025 03:20 PM -
Comment added
After verification, this is indeed a bug. The table displayed when there is content is a BoxTable, so the empty message ...
- Description changed (Details)
- Assignee deleted (
Cécile Guiot)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 02/03/2025 03:18 PM - The changes were retracted.
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 02/03/2025 03:17 PM -
Comment added
Can this be rejected?
- Assignee changed from Parimal Satyal to Cécile Guiot
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 02/03/2025 03:14 PM - Description changed (Details)
- Status changed from merged to in development
- Assignee set to Parimal Satyal
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 02/03/2025 02:53 PM - Description changed (Details)
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 02/03/2025 02:38 PM - Status changed from merged to in test
- Assignee set to Cécile Guiot
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 02/03/2025 02:38 PM - Status changed from merged to in test
- Assignee set to Cécile Guiot
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/03/2025 01:45 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#17798 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 02/03/2025 01:09 PM - Status changed from in review to review approved
- Assignee deleted (
Mir Bhatia)
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 02/03/2025 01:02 PM - Status changed from in review to merged
- Assignee deleted (
Mir Bhatia)
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/03/2025 01:02 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 02/03/2025 12:30 PM -
Comment added
I updated the title to 'deviate' instead of 'derive' for clarity.
Notification center is a bit particular: we use the "T...
- Subject changed from Meeting series seems to derive from the usual breadcrumb pattern to Meeting series seems to deviate from the usual breadcrumb pattern
- Description changed (Details)
- Status changed from new to rejected
- File Sub-tab_in_Admin_settings.png added as attachment
- File Saved_work_packages.png added as attachment
-
Comment added
-
created by
Parimal Satyal on 02/03/2025 12:17 PM -
Comment added
Extracted from a Primer thread. Any ideas on how to improve this? I've listed possible approaches in a table. There is a...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 02/03/2025 11:20 AM - Status changed from needs review to in review
- Assignee changed from Alexander Coles to Oliver Günther
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 02/03/2025 11:06 AM - Status changed from in development to in review
- Assignee changed from Oliver Günther to Mir Bhatia
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 02/03/2025 11:06 AM - Status changed from needs review to in review
- Assignee set to Mir Bhatia
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 02/03/2025 10:56 AM - The changes were retracted.
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 02/03/2025 10:56 AM - The changes were retracted.
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 02/03/2025 10:56 AM - The changes were retracted.
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 02/03/2025 10:56 AM - The changes were retracted.
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 02/03/2025 10:56 AM - The changes were retracted.
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 02/03/2025 10:56 AM - The changes were retracted.
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 02/03/2025 10:56 AM - The changes were retracted.
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 02/03/2025 10:56 AM - The changes were retracted.
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 02/03/2025 10:56 AM - The changes were retracted.
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 02/03/2025 10:56 AM - The changes were retracted.
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 02/03/2025 10:56 AM - The changes were retracted.
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 02/03/2025 10:56 AM - The changes were retracted.
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 02/03/2025 10:56 AM - The changes were retracted.
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 02/03/2025 10:56 AM - The changes were retracted.
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 02/03/2025 10:56 AM - Subject changed from Placeholder bug, something wrong happens when editing the reccurring day AND the 'end series after' criteria
to Changing the start date of a recurring meeting to a past date loses occurrences - Description changed (Details)
- Status changed from confirmed to in development
- Assignee set to Mir Bhatia
- Accountable set to Mir Bhatia
- Subject changed from Placeholder bug, something wrong happens when editing the reccurring day AND the 'end series after' criteria
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/03/2025 10:53 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 02/03/2025 10:31 AM -
Comment added
Hi Oliver Günther,
This sounds good to me!
Cheers
Parimal
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Alexander Coles on 02/03/2025 09:56 AM - Status changed from in development to needs review
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/03/2025 09:15 AM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#17780 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 02/03/2025 08:48 AM - Description changed (Details)
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 02/03/2025 08:48 AM -
Comment added
Part of https://community.openproject.org/projects/meetings-stream/work_packages/61107/activity
- Status changed from confirmed to rejected
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/03/2025 08:46 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 02/03/2025 08:43 AM - Status changed from specified to in development
- Assignee set to Oliver Günther
- Accountable set to Oliver Günther
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 02/03/2025 08:41 AM - Status changed from in development to closed
- Assignee deleted (
Oliver Günther)
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/03/2025 08:41 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/03/2025 07:15 AM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#17767 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 02/03/2025 07:05 AM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Oliver Günther)
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/03/2025 07:04 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 02/03/2025 06:57 AM - Assignee changed from Mir Bhatia to Oliver Günther
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 02/03/2025 06:38 AM -
Comment added
Parimal Satyal Mir Bhatia to stay consistent with the recurring meeting "show more" pagination, the "Next week and later...
- Description changed (Details)
- Status changed from review approved to merged
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/03/2025 06:38 AM - Comment added
01/31/2025
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 01/31/2025 08:29 PM - Type changed from Implementation to Feature
- Status changed from review approved to merged
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/31/2025 06:15 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#17768 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/31/2025 06:15 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#17768 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 01/31/2025 05:45 PM -
Comment added
Oliver Günther How do I mark this as merged/ready for QA?
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/31/2025 05:45 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 01/31/2025 05:34 PM - Status changed from new to in progress
- Assignee set to Mir Bhatia
- Start date set to 01/31/2025
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 01/31/2025 05:33 PM - Status changed from new to specified
- Version set to 15.3.0
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 01/31/2025 04:48 PM - Description changed (Details)
- Status changed from in review to review approved
- Assignee deleted (
Mir Bhatia)
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 01/31/2025 04:03 PM - Status changed from needs review to review approved
- Assignee deleted (
Oliver Günther)
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/31/2025 03:45 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#17762 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/31/2025 03:38 PM - Comment added
-
created by
Mir Bhatia on 01/31/2025 03:36 PM -
created by
Mir Bhatia on 01/31/2025 03:18 PM -
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 01/31/2025 03:09 PM - Description changed (Details)
- Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee changed from Mir Bhatia to Oliver Günther
- Requires doc change changed from No to Yes
-
created by
Mir Bhatia on 01/31/2025 03:08 PM -
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 01/31/2025 03:06 PM - Status changed from in review to merged
- Assignee deleted (
Mir Bhatia)
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/31/2025 03:06 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 01/31/2025 12:01 PM -
Comment added
Hi Mir Bhatia,
Yes, then let's load the next five irrespective of state.
Thanks for adding the bit about mobile.
Cheers
...
- Description changed (Details)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 01/31/2025 10:47 AM -
Comment added
Hi Parimal Satyal,
Showing 5 planned + an arbitrary number of cancelled meetings is not technically feasible for the "Pl...
- Description changed (Details)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 01/31/2025 10:39 AM -
Comment added
Fixed ✅
Tested on:
Core build
90c4e94636683116b60e6d14fddef49b2ece60c9
Product version
53ab774ec0aa9b1790e402c05c7d49902...
- Status changed from merged to tested
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/31/2025 09:15 AM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#17761 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 01/31/2025 08:39 AM - Status changed from review approved to merged
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/31/2025 08:39 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 01/31/2025 08:29 AM - Status changed from needs review to in review
- Assignee set to Mir Bhatia
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/31/2025 12:06 AM - Comment added
01/30/2025
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/30/2025 09:28 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 01/30/2025 09:28 PM - Status changed from new to in development
- Accountable set to Oliver Günther
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 01/30/2025 04:33 PM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Oliver Günther)
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 01/30/2025 04:32 PM -
Comment added
Yes, I think it makes sense for a meeting in progress to be in both the Past and Upcoming tabs for the duration of the m...
- Description changed (Details)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 01/30/2025 04:18 PM -
Comment added
Parimal Satyal currently we show it in both past and upcoming in that special case, and it seems to be a consensus from ...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Attila Dombi on 01/30/2025 03:13 PM - Status changed from in review to review approved
- Assignee deleted (
Attila Dombi)
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 01/30/2025 02:39 PM -
Comment added
I'll reject this in favor of MEET-181
- Status changed from in development to rejected
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/30/2025 12:15 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#17766 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 01/30/2025 11:49 AM - Status changed from needs review to merged
- Assignee deleted (
Mir Bhatia)
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/30/2025 11:48 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 01/30/2025 11:24 AM - Assignee set to Mir Bhatia
-
updated by
Attila Dombi on 01/30/2025 11:23 AM - Status changed from needs review to in review
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 01/30/2025 11:00 AM -
Comment added
Considering this fixed ✅
Verified on:
Community 15.2.1
- Status changed from in test to closed
- Assignee deleted (
Cécile Guiot)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 01/30/2025 10:23 AM - Description changed (Details)
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 01/30/2025 10:18 AM - Description changed (Details)
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 01/30/2025 09:21 AM - Description changed (Details)
- Status changed from needs review to in review
- Assignee set to Mir Bhatia
-
updated by
Сергей Баранов on 01/30/2025 08:50 AM -
Comment added
+1
-
Comment added
Also available in: Atom