Content
Activity
03/04/2025
-
updated by
Oleksii Borysenko on 03/04/2025 04:12 PM - Status changed from in development to confirmed
-
updated by
Oleksii Borysenko on 03/04/2025 04:12 PM - Status changed from specified to in development
-
updated by
Eric Schubert on 03/04/2025 03:25 PM -
Comment added
do you normally allow user to get the information even though it is locked?
I can answer that pretty directly. We are ...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 03/04/2025 02:52 PM - Assignee deleted (
Cécile Guiot)
- Assignee deleted (
-
updated by
Oleksii Borysenko on 03/04/2025 01:41 PM -
Comment added
Thanks Eric Schubert
Indeed, it seems that you and Cecile were right and the problem is with read-only packages (reject...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Eric Schubert on 03/04/2025 12:13 PM -
Comment added
Ah, Oleksii Borysenko I got it.
it happens, if the wp is set read-only - the mentioned wp is rejected. In this case, the...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Eric Schubert on 03/04/2025 11:55 AM -
Comment added
Yep, I reproduced it on community. This seems to be a bug, as the _links must not be empty if there are any allowed valu...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Oleksii Borysenko on 03/04/2025 08:57 AM -
Comment added
Ready to test from build 228
- Status changed from in development to review approved
-
Comment added
03/03/2025
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/03/2025 04:04 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/03/2025 04:03 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Oleksii Borysenko on 03/03/2025 01:34 PM -
Comment added
Hello Eric Schubert
as Cécile Guiot mentioned you are the person who knows a lot about the API so maybe you can help wit...
- Status changed from confirmed to needs clarification
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 03/03/2025 12:39 PM -
Comment added
Oleksii Borysenko indeed! hahaha sorry 🙈
i'll reject the bug
- Status changed from needs clarification to rejected
- Assignee deleted (
Oleksii Borysenko)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Oleksii Borysenko on 03/03/2025 12:09 PM -
Comment added
not sure that I found a correct relation, but I see similar case with description:
- Status changed from confirmed to needs clarification
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Oleksii Borysenko on 03/03/2025 12:07 PM -
Comment added
Cécile Guiot just to clarify: in this particular screenshot '2 lag days' seems to be a description.
- File Screenshot_2025-03-03_at_13.08.01.png added as attachment
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Eric Schubert on 03/03/2025 10:58 AM -
Comment added
The other endpoint should react properly to offset and pageSize. But alas, it does not return children, too.
To get the ...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Oleksii Borysenko on 03/03/2025 10:57 AM -
Comment added
Thank you. I guess this should help.
- Status changed from needs clarification to confirmed
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Eric Schubert on 03/03/2025 10:56 AM -
Comment added
Also, important hint, the endpoint /api/v3/work_packages/:id/relations is considered deprecated. The redirection should ...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Oleksii Borysenko on 03/03/2025 10:56 AM -
Comment added
Thank you Eric Schubert.
Two questions regarding it:
1. Which endpoint do you suggest to use instead of /api/v3/work_p...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Eric Schubert on 03/03/2025 10:53 AM -
Comment added
Pretty sure, that is about the relations tab containing children, while the API endpoint /api/v3/work_packages/:id/relat...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Oleksii Borysenko on 03/03/2025 10:52 AM - Status changed from confirmed to needs clarification
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 03/03/2025 08:29 AM -
Comment added
Oleksii Borysenko the stream that is in charge of relations in general (not specifically of the API) is Planning & R...
-
Comment added
02/28/2025
-
updated by
Oleksii Borysenko on 02/28/2025 07:10 PM -
Comment added
I see two issues here.
1. First question is:
I'm trying to get relations from this endpoint:
https://qa.openproject-edg...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Oleksii Borysenko on 02/28/2025 07:08 PM -
Comment added
Cécile Guiot indeed, it is definitely a bug. But after looking at the API I'm a bit puzzled. It seems that we need an ad...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/28/2025 04:53 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Oleksii Borysenko on 02/28/2025 04:51 PM -
Comment added
Can be tested from build 225
- Status changed from confirmed to review approved
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/28/2025 04:51 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Oleksii Borysenko on 02/28/2025 02:34 PM -
Comment added
Ready to test from version 223
- Status changed from confirmed to review approved
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/28/2025 02:34 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/28/2025 02:34 PM - Comment added
02/27/2025
-
created by
Oleksii Borysenko on 02/27/2025 02:05 PM -
created by
Oleksii Borysenko on 02/27/2025 11:34 AM -
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 02/27/2025 10:20 AM -
Comment added
Fixed ✅
Tested on:
IPhone 14
iOS 18.3.1
1.1.0 (221)
- Status changed from in test to tested
- Assignee deleted (
Cécile Guiot)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Marc Alcobé on 02/27/2025 09:31 AM - Version changed from 1.1.0-alpha to 1.2.0-alpha
-
updated by
Marc Alcobé on 02/27/2025 09:28 AM - Status changed from needs clarification to in development
- Version changed from 1.1.0-alpha to 1.2.0-alpha
-
updated by
Marc Alcobé on 02/27/2025 09:25 AM - Status changed from in development to tested
-
updated by
Marc Alcobé on 02/27/2025 09:20 AM - Status changed from scheduled to released
-
updated by
Marc Alcobé on 02/27/2025 09:20 AM - Status changed from scheduled to closed
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 02/27/2025 08:52 AM -
Comment added
Fixed ✅
Tested on:
iPhone 14
iOS 18.3.1
1.1.0 (221)
- Status changed from merged to tested
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 02/27/2025 08:15 AM - Status changed from merged to in test
- Assignee set to Cécile Guiot
02/26/2025
-
updated by
Oleksii Borysenko on 02/26/2025 08:37 PM - Status changed from review approved to merged
-
updated by
Oleksii Borysenko on 02/26/2025 08:37 PM - Status changed from review approved to merged
-
updated by
Oleksii Borysenko on 02/26/2025 04:19 PM -
Comment added
Can be tested from build 220
- Status changed from in development to review approved
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/26/2025 04:18 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/26/2025 04:17 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Marc Alcobé on 02/26/2025 03:32 PM -
Comment added
Hi Cécile Guiot,
Thanks, I've added the expected behaviour.
Best,
Marc
- Description changed (Details)
- Status changed from needs clarification to confirmed
-
Comment added
-
created by
Cécile Guiot on 02/26/2025 02:45 PM -
Comment added
Marc Alcobé i noticed this bug, but i'm not sure what the expected behaviour should be as we don't have this scenario on...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 02/26/2025 02:26 PM - Status changed from in test to review approved
- Assignee deleted (
Cécile Guiot)
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 02/26/2025 12:41 PM - Status changed from review approved to in test
- Assignee set to Cécile Guiot
-
updated by
Oleksii Borysenko on 02/26/2025 12:10 PM -
Comment added
can be tested from version 219
- Status changed from confirmed to review approved
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/26/2025 12:02 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 02/26/2025 12:00 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Oleksii Borysenko on 02/26/2025 10:24 AM -
Comment added
Oh, thanks Christophe Bliard! That will help.
Cécile Guiot I will hardcode those rules, but we should remember (or write...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 02/26/2025 09:15 AM -
Comment added
Fixed ✅
Tested on:
iPhone 14
iOS 18.3.1
1.1.0 (217)
- Status changed from test failed to tested
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 02/26/2025 08:48 AM -
Comment added
Thanks Christophe Bliard :)
Oleksii Borysenko does that help you?
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 02/26/2025 08:07 AM -
Comment added
Hi Cécile Guiot,
I don't think there's any. There is the documentation but it does not say anything about milestones.
He...
-
Comment added
Also available in: Atom