Content
Activity
11/28/2024
-
updated by
GitHub on 11/28/2024 09:45 AM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#17272 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 11/28/2024 09:10 AM - Comment added
11/26/2024
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 11/26/2024 11:41 AM - Description set (Details)
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 11/26/2024 11:40 AM - Description changed (Details)
- Status changed from specified to in development
- Assignee set to Klaus Zanders
-
updated by
Niels Lindenthal on 11/26/2024 10:17 AM -
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 11/26/2024 10:08 AM -
Comment added
Hey Niels Lindenthal I have just read the description of this work package and checked the wire frames. I like that we w...
-
Comment added
11/25/2024
-
created by
Klaus Zanders on 11/25/2024 06:00 PM -
updated by
GitHub on 11/25/2024 02:50 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Klaus Zanders on 11/25/2024 02:30 PM -
Comment added
iCal does support calendar events spanning multiple days, so both of our approaches fit with iCal
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Niels Lindenthal on 11/25/2024 02:28 PM -
Comment added
Hi Klaus Zanders,
Thanks for the info.
One more consideration from my side. My goal is to have one calendar that can sho...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Klaus Zanders on 11/25/2024 01:55 PM -
Comment added
Niels Lindenthal just fyi, this is how it's done in Jira. They have a starting timestamp and then a time spent field. Th...
- File Monosnap_The_Jira_Cloud_platform_REST_API_2024-11-25_13-51-54_1_.png added as attachment
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 11/25/2024 11:01 AM -
Comment added
Fixed ✅
Tested on:
Core build
8aaadc41298d1a4e2b7a85685373c49a0579a5c8
Product version
6ee52f8d913288b68307307b5594773c8...
- Status changed from in test to closed
- Assignee deleted (
Cécile Guiot) - Version set to 15.1.0
-
Comment added
-
created by
Cécile Guiot on 11/25/2024 11:01 AM -
updated by
GitHub on 11/25/2024 10:22 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 11/25/2024 10:21 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 11/25/2024 10:15 AM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#17249 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Andrej Sandorf on 11/25/2024 10:13 AM -
Comment added
I changed my mind, not splitting this work package, as I don't want code review/QA having to assess interim results.
- Status changed from specified to in development
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 11/25/2024 09:44 AM - Status changed from in review to closed
- Assignee deleted (
Oliver Günther) - Version set to 15.1.0
-
updated by
GitHub on 11/25/2024 09:44 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 11/25/2024 09:37 AM - Status changed from needs review to in review
- Assignee set to Oliver Günther
11/22/2024
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 11/22/2024 01:57 PM - Status changed from merged to in test
- Assignee set to Cécile Guiot
-
updated by
GitHub on 11/22/2024 01:45 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#17156 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 11/22/2024 01:22 PM - Status changed from review approved to merged
-
updated by
GitHub on 11/22/2024 01:21 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 11/22/2024 01:21 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 11/22/2024 12:10 PM - Status changed from needs clarification to resolved
- Decision set to Not handled at the moment
-
updated by
Niels Lindenthal on 11/22/2024 06:56 AM -
Comment added
OK Klaus Zanders and Oliver Günther I have no better idea. I can not anticipate the planning aspect that comes from the...
-
Comment added
Also available in: Atom