Content
Activity
From 06/04/2025 to 06/10/2025
06/10/2025
-
updated by
Niels Lindenthal on 06/10/2025 04:23 PM - Module set to Modules and project features / Relations and scheduling
-
updated by
Niels Lindenthal on 06/10/2025 04:23 PM - The changes were retracted.
-
Feature SPAR-257: Make it possible to include or exclude working days when defining lag per relationupdated by
Niels Lindenthal on 06/10/2025 04:23 PM - The changes were retracted.
-
updated by
Niels Lindenthal on 06/10/2025 04:20 PM - Module set to Modules and project features / Relations and scheduling
-
updated by
Corinna Günther on 06/10/2025 01:33 PM -
Comment added
Thank you for this open point, Christophe. Without (active) experience in project management, I find it hard to understa...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 06/10/2025 11:26 AM - Version set to Product Backlog
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 06/10/2025 11:25 AM - Version set to Product Backlog
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 06/10/2025 11:25 AM - Version set to Product Backlog
-
updated by
Christophe Bliard on 06/10/2025 11:25 AM - Version set to Product Backlog
06/06/2025
-
updated by
Jan Keppler on 06/06/2025 05:46 PM -
Comment added
+1
- Votes changed from 80 to 81
-
Comment added
06/05/2025
-
updated by
Frank Weber on 06/05/2025 10:56 PM -
Comment added
+1 from customer
- Votes changed from 79 to 80
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Tobias Nowakow on 06/05/2025 08:56 PM -
Comment added
If we use the negative lag to place work packages in the predecessor-successor relationship starting and ending on the s...
-
Comment added
Also available in: Atom