Content
Activity
01/16/2019
-
updated by
Giancarlo Bassanini on 01/16/2019 11:55 PM -
Comment added
Hi, do you guys have any news on this one? I cannot use the container because of this fatal error
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/16/2019 01:18 PM -
Comment added
Referenced in PR: oliverguenther referenced this work package in Pull request 6993 Manual sorting on flat lists on opf/o...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Robin Wagner on 01/16/2019 11:05 AM - Status changed from needs review to new
-
updated by
Robin Wagner on 01/16/2019 11:04 AM - Status changed from needs review to new
-
updated by
Robin Wagner on 01/16/2019 11:04 AM -
Comment added
Hi Niels Lindenthal,
quite often we receive the request to sort within the work package list with activated hierarchy mo...
- Type set to Feature
- Project set to OpenProject
- Subject set to Allow sorting with activated hierarchy mode
- Description set (Details)
- Status set to new
- Assignee set to Niels Lindenthal
- Priority set to Medium
- Version set to Product Backlog
- Author set to Robin Wagner
- % Complete set to 0%
- Scheduling mode set to Automatic
- Working days set to include non-working days
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 01/16/2019 10:58 AM -
Comment added
Hi Ali,
can you please elaborate on what steps you take to run into this bug?
Best,
Oliver
- Status changed from new to needs clarification
- Assignee deleted (
OP Devops Team)
-
Comment added
01/15/2019
-
created by
Ole Odendahl on 01/15/2019 04:15 PM -
updated by
GitHub on 01/15/2019 02:54 PM -
Comment added
Referenced in PR: ingamai referenced this work package in Pull request 6984 [29275] LSG cleanup and update on opf/openpr...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/15/2019 02:53 PM -
Comment added
Referenced in PR: ingamai referenced this work package in Pull request 6984 [29275] LSG cleanup and update on opf/openpr...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/15/2019 01:56 PM -
Comment added
Referenced in PR: ingamai referenced this work package in Pull request 6984 [29275] LSG cleanup and update on opf/openpr...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Marc Burk on 01/15/2019 10:53 AM -
Comment added
Hey Markus Kahl, thank you for the fix, this looks very promising. I give this patch to the IT and will reply, when they...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/15/2019 10:43 AM -
Comment added
Referenced in PR: ingamai referenced this work package in Pull request 6984 [29275] LSG cleanup and update on opf/openpr...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/15/2019 10:41 AM -
Comment added
Referenced in PR: ingamai referenced this work package in Pull request 6984 [29275] LSG cleanup and update on opf/openpr...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/15/2019 10:30 AM -
Comment added
Referenced in PR: ingamai referenced this work package in Pull request 6984 [29275] LSG cleanup and update on opf/openpr...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/15/2019 10:29 AM -
Comment added
Referenced in PR: ingamai referenced this work package in Pull request 6984 [29275] LSG cleanup and update on opf/openpr...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/15/2019 10:04 AM -
Comment added
PR Opened: Pull request 6992 Corrections for: for opf/openproject has been opened by nsalguero.
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/15/2019 10:04 AM -
Comment added
PR Opened: Pull request 6992 Corrections for: for opf/openproject has been opened by nsalguero.
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/15/2019 10:04 AM -
Comment added
PR Opened: Pull request 6992 Corrections for: for opf/openproject has been opened by nsalguero.
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/15/2019 10:00 AM -
Comment added
Referenced in PR: ingamai referenced this work package in Pull request 6984 [29275] LSG cleanup and update on opf/openpr...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Markus Kahl on 01/15/2019 09:55 AM -
Comment added
Hey Marc Burk, this does look quite similar. Could you perhaps try to see if that PR fixes your problem, please?
You wou...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 01/15/2019 08:14 AM - Status changed from in specification to in development
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 01/15/2019 07:45 AM -
Comment added
Hi Marc,
sorry, I must have somehow deleted the notification of your comment by mistake and have never replied.
You alre...
-
Comment added
01/14/2019
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/14/2019 05:02 PM -
Comment added
Referenced in PR: ingamai referenced this work package in Pull request 6984 [29275] LSG cleanup and update on opf/openpr...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Markus Kahl on 01/14/2019 04:44 PM - Status changed from confirmed to needs review
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/14/2019 04:44 PM -
Comment added
PR Opened: Pull request 6991 determine start revision when fetching changeset to support subfolders for opf/openproject ...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 01/14/2019 04:08 PM - Type set to Bug
- Project set to OpenProject
- Subject set to Date picker allows selection a year for only the next 10 years. Needs to increase.
- Description set (Details)
- Status set to new
- Priority set to Medium
- Author set to Wieland Lindenthal
- % Complete set to 0%
- Scheduling mode set to Automatic
- Working days set to include non-working days
- File image.png added as attachment
- Bug found in version set to 8.2.x
-
updated by
Laura Villa on 01/14/2019 03:25 PM -
Comment added
I have the same issue, I try to assign to somebody a work package or if I try to put a parent work package to another. P...
-
Comment added
-
created by
Ali Al-Ali on 01/14/2019 03:17 PM -
Bug ES-5: Typo in error message (Subproject: Excel Sync)updated by
Robin Wagner on 01/14/2019 02:38 PM -
Comment added
Thanks for developing the Excel sync. It is really helpful - especially for new users.
I just noticed a small typo (see ...
- Type set to Bug
- Project set to Excel Sync
- Subject set to Typo in error message
- Description set (Details)
- Status set to confirmed
- Priority set to Medium
- Author set to Robin Wagner
- % Complete set to 0%
- Scheduling mode set to Automatic
- Working days set to include non-working days
- File image.png added as attachment
-
Comment added
-
created by
Frank Schmid on 01/14/2019 02:21 PM -
updated by
Oliver Günther on 01/14/2019 02:09 PM - Project changed from ScaleUp Expedition to OpenProject
-
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 01/14/2019 01:16 PM - Status changed from needs review to merged
-
updated by
Nicolas Salguero on 01/14/2019 09:41 AM -
Comment added
Since version 8, "path" parameter was replaced by "repo_path" so here is a new version of the patch regarding app/views/...
- Bug found in version deleted (
(deleted option))
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Frank Schmid on 01/14/2019 08:59 AM -
Comment added
Unfortunately, deactivating the backup is also not so good. I may be able to disable it over the weekend.
-
Comment added
-
created by
Oliver Günther on 01/14/2019 08:26 AM -
updated by
Marc Burk on 01/14/2019 07:27 AM -
Comment added
hi Markus Kahl, "rvr/200" reminds me to this problem OP-3028
the error message is the same.
with kind regards,
Marc
-
Comment added
01/12/2019
-
created by
mohammadsaleh sayari on 01/12/2019 03:56 PM -
updated by
Markus Kahl on 01/12/2019 03:41 PM - Type set to Bug
- Project set to OpenProject
- Subject set to SVN fails to get changesets in subfolders which start at a revision greater than 1
- Description set (Details)
- Status set to confirmed
- Assignee set to Markus Kahl
- Priority set to Medium
- Author set to Markus Kahl
- % Complete set to 0%
- Scheduling mode set to Automatic
- Working days set to include non-working days
- Bug found in version set to 8.2.x
01/11/2019
-
created by
Felipe A. Braga on 01/11/2019 08:21 PM -
updated by
Nicolas Salguero on 01/11/2019 04:28 PM -
Comment added
Yet other issues with HTML entities corrected in the 4th version of the patch:
diff --git a/lib/redmine/unified_diff.rb ...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/11/2019 02:24 PM -
Comment added
Referenced in PR: HDinger referenced this work package in Pull request 6988 [29257] Auto completion for work package att...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/11/2019 01:50 PM -
Comment added
PR Opened: Pull request 6988 [29257] Auto completion for work package attributes for opf/openproject has been opened by ...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 01/11/2019 01:21 PM -
Comment added
I don't think you need to stop MySQL to dump the database. It might be locked during that time however.
Could you tempor...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 01/11/2019 01:18 PM -
Comment added
You are likely having mismatching permission in the attachments folder of OpenProject. Please refer this to the Bitnami ...
- Status changed from new to rejected
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Nicolas Salguero on 01/11/2019 12:07 PM -
Comment added
Using "escapeHTML" in the patch caused problems with single and double quotes in some diff so here is the third version ...
- Bug found in version deleted (
(deleted option))
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 01/11/2019 11:28 AM - Status changed from needs review to merged
- Assignee deleted (
Cyril Rohr)
-
updated by
GitHub on 01/11/2019 11:28 AM -
Comment added
PR Merged: Pull request 6962 [29288] Wait for postgres to start up in public image for opf/openproject has been merged b...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 01/11/2019 10:44 AM - Accountable changed from Wieland Lindenthal to Henriette Darge
-
Bug DOC-42: Gem::LoadError: You have already activated rake 12.3.0, but your Gemfile requires rake 12.3.1. (Subproject: Docker)updated by
Rob BreakEats on 01/11/2019 09:08 AM -
Comment added
Pulled the latest image and everything appears to work now. Thanks for the rapid response!!
-
Comment added
-
Bug DOC-42: Gem::LoadError: You have already activated rake 12.3.0, but your Gemfile requires rake 12.3.1. (Subproject: Docker)updated by
Oliver Günther on 01/11/2019 08:35 AM -
Comment added
Indeed our CI pushed a version was pushed that did not include the backport due to me not publishing it on the CE reposi...
- Status changed from in development to merged
-
Comment added
-
Bug DOC-42: Gem::LoadError: You have already activated rake 12.3.0, but your Gemfile requires rake 12.3.1. (Subproject: Docker)updated by
Rob BreakEats on 01/11/2019 08:23 AM -
Comment added
+1. Spent several hours trying to fix since the error coincided with an update I was performing. Glad to know I am not...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 01/11/2019 08:15 AM -
Comment added
Hi Catherine,
thanks for clarification, I can reproduce this error. The colors for statuses, types and priorities are lo...
- Status changed from rejected to confirmed
-
Comment added
-
Bug DOC-42: Gem::LoadError: You have already activated rake 12.3.0, but your Gemfile requires rake 12.3.1. (Subproject: Docker)updated by
Oliver Günther on 01/11/2019 08:08 AM -
Comment added
I built a openproject-ce with the fix manually basing on stable/8, I'm looking into it.
- Status changed from merged to in development
-
Comment added
01/10/2019
-
Bug DOC-42: Gem::LoadError: You have already activated rake 12.3.0, but your Gemfile requires rake 12.3.1. (Subproject: Docker)updated by
Mouadh Hsoumi on 01/10/2019 10:22 PM -
Comment added
+1 , I did test the Docker image yesterday and it was working, with the last update you made today, it does no longer wo...
-
Comment added
-
Bug DOC-42: Gem::LoadError: You have already activated rake 12.3.0, but your Gemfile requires rake 12.3.1. (Subproject: Docker)updated by
Andrew Jenks on 01/10/2019 08:55 PM -
Comment added
My apologies, I see the fixes are in your development fork, but they are not yet in 8.2. When might they be pulled into ...
-
Comment added
-
Bug DOC-42: Gem::LoadError: You have already activated rake 12.3.0, but your Gemfile requires rake 12.3.1. (Subproject: Docker)updated by
Andrew Jenks on 01/10/2019 08:41 PM -
Comment added
Oliver Günther I also encounter the same problem with the latest docker image as of today.
-
Comment added
-
Bug DOC-42: Gem::LoadError: You have already activated rake 12.3.0, but your Gemfile requires rake 12.3.1. (Subproject: Docker)updated by
Mark Stopka on 01/10/2019 06:14 PM -
Comment added
Oliver Günther, I still suffer the same issue, please see:
[mark_stopka@docker-host-01 op.perlur.cloud]$ docker pull ope...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Cyril Rohr on 01/10/2019 05:54 PM - Status changed from confirmed to closed
-
updated by
Catherine G on 01/10/2019 04:39 PM -
Comment added
Hello, it's me again. We now found the cause for this problem. If you create a new project and you don't open the Gantt-...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Marc Burk on 01/10/2019 04:15 PM -
Comment added
Oliver Günther is the "star icon" thing still existing in the new project overview?
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Marc Burk on 01/10/2019 04:12 PM -
Comment added
Hi Oliver,
this is really nice, too. But still different as you already mentioned :) Thanks for reopening.
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 01/10/2019 03:29 PM - Version deleted (
8.3.0)
- Version deleted (
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 01/10/2019 03:12 PM -
Comment added
Hi Marc,
I understand you better now. This is different from the search filter of course. Let's reopen it then.
However ...
- Status changed from rejected to new
- File Screenshot_from_2019-01-10_15-09-20.png added as attachment
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Robin Wagner on 01/10/2019 03:06 PM -
Comment added
Reported by Cloud Edition user.
- Type set to Bug
- Project set to OpenProject
- Subject set to Markdown error for indented empty unordered lists
- Description set (Details)
- Status set to confirmed
- Priority set to Medium
- Version set to 8.2.1
- Author set to Robin Wagner
- % Complete set to 0%
- Scheduling mode set to Automatic
- Working days set to include non-working days
- File Bug_WYSIWYG-editor-unordered-list.gif added as attachment
- Bug found in version set to 8.1.x
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Quentin Goulard on 01/10/2019 01:37 PM -
Comment added
Same problem :-( No solution ?
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Marc Burk on 01/10/2019 12:21 PM -
Comment added
the best example how i would like this feature to be is the project quick filter, just for work packages
- File grafik.png added as attachment
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Marc Burk on 01/10/2019 12:13 PM -
Comment added
Hi Oliver,
thats nice. I have a question about this new feature. Does the use of this filter feels like a quick search o...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Catherine G on 01/10/2019 12:03 PM -
Comment added
Hello, I have the same problem. Yesterday I could see all the chosen colors next to the work package type when I clicked...
-
Comment added
-
created by
Aldo D. AIM on 01/10/2019 11:06 AM -
created by
mohammadsaleh sayari on 01/10/2019 10:47 AM -
updated by
Manuel Ott on 01/10/2019 10:21 AM -
Comment added
Hi,
is there any progress on this Feature? Since the last update was almost 3 years ago, I'm currious how things are pro...
-
Comment added
-
created by
aihua peng on 01/10/2019 10:08 AM -
updated by
Oliver Günther on 01/10/2019 09:30 AM -
Comment added
This has been implemented for 8.3. in DEB-212 . It searches for more than just the subject.
- Status changed from new to rejected
- Assignee deleted (
OP Dev All) - File Screenshot_from_2019-01-10_09-27-12.png added as attachment
-
Comment added
Also available in: Atom