Content
Activity
05/17/2016
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 05/17/2016 09:09 PM - Status changed from on hold to merged
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 05/17/2016 09:09 PM - Status changed from on hold to merged
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 05/17/2016 09:09 PM -
Comment added
For required fields, this is tracked in another ticket. For non-required fields, this should now be resolved with wp-edi...
- Status changed from on hold to merged
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 05/17/2016 04:28 PM - Status changed from in development to merged
- Assignee deleted (
Alex Dik)
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 05/17/2016 03:36 PM -
Comment added
https://github.com/opf/openproject/pull/4420
- Status changed from specified to needs review
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Roman Roelofsen on 05/17/2016 12:04 PM - Status changed from confirmed to in development
-
created by
Jens Ulferts on 05/17/2016 11:07 AM -
created by
Jens Ulferts on 05/17/2016 10:48 AM -
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 05/17/2016 10:44 AM -
Comment added
Roman will take a look to identify the performance bottlenecks.
- Status changed from confirmed to in development
- Assignee set to Roman Roelofsen
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 05/17/2016 10:43 AM -
Comment added
PR: https://github.com/opf/openproject/pull/4415
- Type set to Feature
- Project set to OpenProject
- Subject set to Open split view with information already present in the table
- Description set (Details)
- Status set to specified
- Assignee set to Roman Roelofsen
- Priority set to Medium
- Version set to 6.0.0
- Author set to Jens Ulferts
- % Complete set to 0%
- Work set to 0h
- Parent set to Work package edit sync
- Scheduling mode set to Automatic
- Working days set to include non-working days
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 05/17/2016 09:27 AM - Status changed from in development to merged
-
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 05/17/2016 09:26 AM -
Comment added
The date picker is shown again. While the behaviour of optimizing the positioning to avoid the date picker being hidden ...
- Status changed from on hold to merged
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 05/17/2016 09:23 AM -
Comment added
The table is no longer reloaded which fixes the immediate problem. The responsiveness problem is mitigated but it is sti...
- Status changed from on hold to merged
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 05/17/2016 08:03 AM -
Comment added
Hey Roman, the event that focuses the element is now blocked due to the focus delay. Do you have an idea how we can move...
- Status changed from new to confirmed
- Assignee changed from Oliver Günther to Roman Roelofsen
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 05/17/2016 07:59 AM - Status changed from needs review to merged
- Assignee deleted (
Manuel Schiller)
05/15/2016
-
updated by
Niels Lindenthal on 05/15/2016 03:21 PM -
Comment added
Hi Henriette,
is it possible that long subject start in the first row but then take a second row?
Best
Niels
- Type set to Bug
- Project set to OpenProject
- Subject set to Subject in wrong column
- Description set (Details)
- Status set to new
- Assignee set to Henriette Darge
- Priority set to Medium
- Version set to 5.0.18
- Author set to Niels Lindenthal
- % Complete set to 0%
- Work set to 0h
- Scheduling mode set to Automatic
- Working days set to include non-working days
- File WP_Subject_FF.GIF added as attachment
-
Comment added
-
created by
Niels Lindenthal on 05/15/2016 02:57 PM -
updated by
Niels Lindenthal on 05/15/2016 02:49 PM - Type set to Bug
- Project set to OpenProject
- Subject set to Inline create: subject doesn't get focus after second wp creation
- Description set (Details)
- Status set to new
- Assignee set to Oliver Günther
- Priority set to Medium
- Version set to 6.0.0
- Author set to Niels Lindenthal
- % Complete set to 0%
- Work set to 0h
- Scheduling mode set to Automatic
- Working days set to include non-working days
05/13/2016
-
updated by
Niels Lindenthal on 05/13/2016 03:53 PM -
Comment added
Just talked to Phlipp, he found the setting in Administration -> System settings -> Projects
- Status changed from new to rejected
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 05/13/2016 03:22 PM -
Comment added
It seem to crash in Firefox only. I opened a PR: https://github.com/opf/openproject/pull/4416
- Status changed from new to needs review
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Niels Lindenthal on 05/13/2016 10:06 AM - Type set to Bug
- Project set to OpenProject
- Subject set to Query select too short
- Description set (Details)
- Status set to new
- Assignee set to Henriette Darge
- Priority set to Medium
- Version set to 5.0.18
- Author set to Niels Lindenthal
- % Complete set to 0%
- Work set to 0h
- Scheduling mode set to Automatic
- Working days set to include non-working days
- File Query_title.GIF added as attachment
05/12/2016
-
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 05/12/2016 03:46 PM -
Comment added
Styling should be good enough now. With the removal of the long text fields as an available column (https://github.com/o...
- Status changed from in development to needs review
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 05/12/2016 01:43 PM -
Comment added
Putting on hold until OP-2773 is fixed as I can not spot another problem right now.
- Status changed from confirmed to on hold
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 05/12/2016 08:39 AM -
Comment added
In the PR:
https://github.com/opf/openproject/pull/4338
the fields are now displayed and are editable. Their styling how...
- Status changed from confirmed to in development
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 05/12/2016 08:29 AM -
Comment added
PR: https://github.com/opf/openproject/pull/4389
Putting on hold until two-way-sync is merged as the PR depends on it.
- Status changed from needs review to on hold
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 05/12/2016 08:27 AM -
Comment added
Putting on hold until the two-way-sync is merged as it changes the implementation of the select fields.
- Status changed from confirmed to on hold
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 05/12/2016 08:25 AM -
Comment added
PR: https://github.com/opf/openproject/pull/4389
Put on hold as it depends on the two-way-sync to be merged.
- Status changed from needs review to on hold
-
Comment added
05/11/2016
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 05/11/2016 09:02 AM - Status changed from needs review to merged
- Assignee deleted (
Markus Kahl)
-
created by
Samuel Talleux on 05/11/2016 08:55 AM
Also available in: Atom