Content
Activity
09/09/2025
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 09/09/2025 03:19 PM -
Comment added
Hi Christophe Bliard,
Thanks for creating this. It's a very interesting proposition indeed.
What do you think, Oliver G...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 09/09/2025 03:15 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#20242 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 09/09/2025 02:51 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 09/09/2025 02:51 PM - Status changed from review approved to merged
-
updated by
Klaus Zanders on 09/09/2025 02:42 PM - Status changed from needs review to review approved
-
created by
Klaus Zanders on 09/09/2025 02:10 PM -
updated by
Oliver Günther on 09/09/2025 02:06 PM - Version changed from 16.4.0 to 16.5.0
-
updated by
GitHub on 09/09/2025 01:45 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#20240 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 09/09/2025 01:38 PM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Oliver Günther) - Version set to 16.5.0
-
updated by
GitHub on 09/09/2025 01:38 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Klaus Zanders on 09/09/2025 01:09 PM - Status changed from review approved to closed
- % Complete set to 100%
-
updated by
GitHub on 09/09/2025 01:08 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 09/09/2025 01:08 PM - Status changed from confirmed to in development
- Assignee set to Oliver Günther
- Developers changed from Mir Bhatia, Oliver Günther to Oliver Günther
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 09/09/2025 12:58 PM - Status changed from needs review to review approved
-
updated by
Klaus Zanders on 09/09/2025 12:48 PM - Status changed from new to needs review
- Developers set to Klaus Zanders
-
updated by
GitHub on 09/09/2025 12:48 PM - Comment added
-
created by
Klaus Zanders on 09/09/2025 12:27 PM -
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 09/09/2025 11:28 AM -
Comment added
Fixed ✅ (and btw i forgot to add this to the bug report but this issue was a nice catch from Mir Bhatia 🚀 )
Tested on:
C...
- Status changed from merged to closed
- % Complete set to 100%
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Klaus Zanders on 09/09/2025 11:25 AM - Status changed from review approved to merged
-
created by
Cécile Guiot on 09/09/2025 10:40 AM
09/08/2025
-
created by
Christophe Bliard on 09/08/2025 06:16 PM -
Comment added
Hi Parimal Satyal,
Here is a rough idea about how I see the "draft mode". Actually it's not a draft mode but rather a "e...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Kristin Lüdecke on 09/08/2025 04:55 PM -
Comment added
+1 from customer
- Votes changed from 3 to 4
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 09/08/2025 03:36 PM - Description changed (Details)
-
updated by
GitHub on 09/08/2025 01:45 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#20075 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Wieland Lindenthal on 09/08/2025 01:13 PM -
Comment added
Yes, agree. I simply flat faced here already 5 times. I thought I'd file a FEEDBACK ;-)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 09/08/2025 01:05 PM -
Comment added
We had this discussion when we first introduced this page. The schedule is actually the link that brings you to the seri...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 09/08/2025 01:02 PM - Status changed from review approved to merged
-
updated by
GitHub on 09/08/2025 01:02 PM - Comment added
-
created by
Wieland Lindenthal on 09/08/2025 01:02 PM -
Comment added
Parimal Satyal FYI
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 09/08/2025 11:12 AM -
Comment added
All statuses except draft mode have been implemented:
- Status changed from new to rejected
- % Complete set to 100%
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 09/08/2025 11:11 AM - Version set to Product Backlog
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 09/08/2025 11:09 AM - Status changed from in review to review approved
- Assignee deleted (
Oliver Günther)
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 09/08/2025 10:43 AM - Status changed from tested to closed
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 09/08/2025 10:42 AM - Status changed from tested to closed
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 09/08/2025 10:41 AM - Status changed from tested to closed
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 09/08/2025 10:41 AM - Status changed from tested to closed
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 09/08/2025 10:41 AM - Status changed from tested to closed
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 09/08/2025 10:34 AM - Status changed from tested to closed
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 09/08/2025 10:33 AM - Status changed from tested to closed
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 09/08/2025 10:33 AM - Status changed from tested to closed
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 09/08/2025 10:33 AM - Status changed from tested to closed
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 09/08/2025 10:32 AM - Status changed from tested to closed
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 09/08/2025 10:32 AM - Status changed from tested to closed
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 09/08/2025 10:32 AM - Status changed from tested to closed
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 09/08/2025 09:37 AM - Status changed from needs review to in review
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 09/08/2025 08:49 AM - Status changed from review failed to needs review
- Assignee set to Oliver Günther
-
created by
Oliver Günther on 09/08/2025 08:42 AM -
updated by
Oliver Günther on 09/08/2025 08:40 AM -
Comment added
Wieland Lindenthal We actively decided against a big creation form to present the user with the blank meeting itself, wh...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 09/08/2025 08:36 AM - Status changed from in review to review failed
- Assignee deleted (
Oliver Günther)
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 09/08/2025 07:34 AM - Status changed from needs review to in review
- Assignee set to Oliver Günther
09/05/2025
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 09/05/2025 04:12 PM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Mir Bhatia)
-
updated by
GitHub on 09/05/2025 04:11 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 09/05/2025 01:17 PM - Description changed (Details)
09/04/2025
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 09/04/2025 02:54 PM -
Comment added
Fixed ✅
Tested on:
Mailbox.org as email client
Core build
2576bb0f2806efbfbdd476649f4e3ddf1c19dc36
Product version
a0868...
- Status changed from merged to tested
- % Complete set to 100%
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 09/04/2025 01:45 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#20167 deployed to qa.openproject-stage.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 09/04/2025 01:22 PM - Status changed from review approved to merged
-
updated by
GitHub on 09/04/2025 01:20 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 09/04/2025 12:15 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#20165 deployed to qa.openproject-stage.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 09/04/2025 12:13 PM - Status changed from needs review to review approved
-
updated by
GitHub on 09/04/2025 11:56 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
Klaus Zanders on 09/04/2025 11:56 AM - Status changed from confirmed to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Klaus Zanders)
-
updated by
GitHub on 09/04/2025 11:53 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 09/04/2025 11:43 AM - Status changed from needs review to review approved
-
updated by
Karen Arzumanyan on 09/04/2025 10:47 AM -
Comment added
Please make this feature, it doesn't look complicated or time consuming.
Thank you very much in advance.
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 09/04/2025 10:25 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
Klaus Zanders on 09/04/2025 10:22 AM - Status changed from confirmed to needs review
- Developers set to Klaus Zanders
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 09/04/2025 09:57 AM - Description changed (Details)
-
created by
Cécile Guiot on 09/04/2025 09:38 AM
09/03/2025
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 09/03/2025 04:59 PM - Description changed (Details)
- File grafik.png added as attachment
- File grafik.png added as attachment
-
updated by
Klaus Zanders on 09/03/2025 03:59 PM -
Comment added
Notes: It seems to always be the date on which you import that is not incliuded ... That would be super odd. But we'll i...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 09/03/2025 03:36 PM -
Comment added
Fixed ✅
Tested on:
Core build
6ab2ec27724638cee3a07748af5c85ce5ffb47d7
Product version
a0868f474ce642dc2f7bd982ec42d7caa...
- Status changed from merged to tested
- % Complete set to 100%
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 09/03/2025 03:22 PM -
Comment added
Klaus Zanders wrote:
The benefit of linking an existing work package (compare to just ## mentioning it in an outcome te...
-
Comment added
-
created by
Cécile Guiot on 09/03/2025 03:18 PM -
created by
Wieland Lindenthal on 09/03/2025 03:18 PM -
updated by
Klaus Zanders on 09/03/2025 03:18 PM -
Comment added
Amazingly this is already done. When creating MeetingOutcomes we already had multiple ones in mind, linking work package...
- Status changed from new to closed
- % Complete set to 100%
-
Comment added
-
created by
Cécile Guiot on 09/03/2025 03:00 PM -
updated by
GitHub on 09/03/2025 02:15 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#20155 deployed to qa.openproject-stage.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 09/03/2025 02:04 PM - Description changed (Details)
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 09/03/2025 01:41 PM -
Comment added
Thanks Klaus for the specification. I agree to simply add existing as an option if we no start to extend it. We can sepa...
- Status changed from in specification to specified
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Klaus Zanders on 09/03/2025 01:31 PM - Status changed from review approved to merged
-
updated by
GitHub on 09/03/2025 01:31 PM - Comment added
-
created by
Klaus Zanders on 09/03/2025 01:18 PM -
updated by
Klaus Zanders on 09/03/2025 01:18 PM -
Comment added
Parimal Satyal
I'm not entirely convinced by the 'Existing work package' option since the incline ##-includes exist, b...
-
Comment added
-
created by
Klaus Zanders on 09/03/2025 01:13 PM -
created by
Klaus Zanders on 09/03/2025 01:12 PM -
updated by
Klaus Zanders on 09/03/2025 01:11 PM -
Comment added
Automatisch durch die Änderungen in Unteraufgabe MEET-397 aktualisiert
- Scheduling mode set to Automatic
-
Comment added
-
created by
Klaus Zanders on 09/03/2025 01:11 PM -
updated by
Oliver Günther on 09/03/2025 12:58 PM - Status changed from needs review to review approved
-
updated by
Klaus Zanders on 09/03/2025 11:56 AM - Status changed from confirmed to needs review
- Developers set to Klaus Zanders
-
updated by
GitHub on 09/03/2025 11:44 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 09/03/2025 11:41 AM -
Comment added
Hi Samantha Machon,
Thank you. The status is currently too "loose", in that you can easily switch it back to in progress...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Klaus Zanders on 09/03/2025 11:19 AM - Version changed from 16.5.0 to 16.4.0
-
updated by
Samantha Machon on 09/03/2025 10:51 AM -
Comment added
+1 from customer:
As the author of a meeting, once I have set the
meeting status to ‘closed’, I would like the meeting...
- Votes changed from 3 to 4
-
Comment added
-
created by
Cécile Guiot on 09/03/2025 10:20 AM
Also available in: Atom