Content
Activity
04/10/2025
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 04/10/2025 06:01 PM -
Comment added
I see. Then yes, I agree (even more) that we don't need an additional note or indication.
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 04/10/2025 05:55 PM -
Comment added
Hi Parimal Satyal , once the migration is through, we cannot differentiate classic meetings from dynamic ones, so showin...
-
Comment added
-
created by
Parimal Satyal on 04/10/2025 05:45 PM -
Comment added
Originally discovered by Henriette Darge.
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 04/10/2025 04:45 PM - Module set to Modules and project features / Meetings
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 04/10/2025 04:08 PM - Status changed from needs review to in review
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 04/10/2025 04:08 PM - Status changed from needs review to in review
- Assignee set to Mir Bhatia
-
updated by
Niels Lindenthal on 04/10/2025 03:36 PM - Description changed (Details)
- Version changed from Wish List to 16.1.0
-
updated by
Andrej Sandorf on 04/10/2025 03:32 PM - The changes were retracted.
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 04/10/2025 03:15 PM -
Comment added
Hi Rince wind,
Thanks for the feature. We do indeed need to update the Meetings module and have a look at the alignments...
- Status changed from new to needs clarification
- Assignee set to Parimal Satyal
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 04/10/2025 03:07 PM -
Comment added
Hi Samantha Machon, Otto Höbel:
Thank you for the feedback. We're taking this seriously and intend on addressing this so...
- Assignee set to Parimal Satyal
- Priority changed from Medium to High
- Designer set to Parimal Satyal
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 04/10/2025 02:32 PM - Status changed from needs review to review approved
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 04/10/2025 02:23 PM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Henriette Darge)
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/10/2025 02:23 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 04/10/2025 02:12 PM - Status changed from review failed to needs review
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 04/10/2025 02:01 PM -
Comment added
Hi Lea, thanks for your feedback. A word export is difficult to get right, but we have a PDF export of the agenda planne...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Samantha Machon on 04/10/2025 01:52 PM -
Comment added
Customer feedback from support ticket 25963: Since the last update, there no longer seems to be an option in the meeting...
-
Comment added
-
created by
Lea Fuchs on 04/10/2025 12:56 PM -
updated by
Oliver Günther on 04/10/2025 12:10 PM - Description changed (Details)
- Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee changed from Oliver Günther to Mir Bhatia
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 04/10/2025 10:24 AM - Status changed from needs review to review failed
- Assignee deleted (
Mir Bhatia)
-
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 04/10/2025 09:18 AM - Version set to 15.5.0
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 04/10/2025 09:15 AM -
Comment added
Hi Oliver Günther,
I don't think this is a duplicate for MEET-296, since that seems to be about a missing 'Show more' a...
- Type changed from Bug to Feature
- Description changed (Details)
- Status changed from rejected to specified
- Version deleted (
15.5.0) - Bug found in version deleted (
15.5.x)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 04/10/2025 09:12 AM -
Comment added
Hi Oliver Günther. We could in theory create an info banner here specifically for this case and have use a translation s...
-
Comment added
04/09/2025
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 04/09/2025 07:47 PM -
Comment added
Since we can't properly translate the content in these agendas, I wouldn't want to add additional information (e.g., on ...
- Status changed from new to decided
- Assignee deleted (
Parimal Satyal) - % Complete set to 100%
- Decision set to We close past classic meetings
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 04/09/2025 07:42 PM -
Comment added
BTW currently 5 items is the expected count, as we implemented it consistently with upcoming (it shares the same behavio...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 04/09/2025 07:38 PM -
Comment added
Duplicate of
- Status changed from confirmed to rejected
- % Complete set to 100%
-
Comment added
-
created by
Parimal Satyal on 04/09/2025 05:30 PM -
Comment added
Hi team,
I set this for 15.5 because I imagine it's a fairly small fix. Feel free to move it to the next release if nec...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 04/09/2025 05:06 PM - The changes were retracted.
-
created by
Parimal Satyal on 04/09/2025 11:23 AM -
Comment added
Initially reported by Christophe Bliard.
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Henriette Darge on 04/09/2025 09:35 AM - Status changed from confirmed to in development
- Assignee set to Henriette Darge
- Developers set to Henriette Darge
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 04/09/2025 08:53 AM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee changed from Oliver Günther to Mir Bhatia
- Version set to 15.5.0
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/09/2025 08:52 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 04/09/2025 08:52 AM - Status changed from confirmed to in development
- Assignee set to Oliver Günther
- Developers changed from OP Dev Sirius Team to Oliver Günther
04/08/2025
-
created by
Parimal Satyal on 04/08/2025 05:18 PM -
created by
Mir Bhatia on 04/08/2025 04:44 PM -
updated by
Oliver Günther on 04/08/2025 04:23 PM - Status changed from review failed to in development
- Assignee set to Oliver Günther
- Developers changed from OP Dev Sirius Team to Oliver Günther
-
updated by
Samantha Machon on 04/08/2025 01:50 PM -
Comment added
+1 from on-premises customer
- Votes changed from 8 to 9
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 04/08/2025 12:55 PM - Status changed from in review to review failed
- Assignee deleted (
Mir Bhatia)
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 04/08/2025 11:24 AM - Status changed from needs review to in review
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 04/08/2025 09:36 AM - Assignee set to Mir Bhatia
04/07/2025
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 04/07/2025 06:33 PM - Subject changed from Missing label/translatiosn for label_meeting_state_in_progress_html to Missing label/translations for label_meeting_state_in_progress_html
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 04/07/2025 06:01 PM - Module set to Modules and project features / Meetings
-
updated by
Markus K. on 04/07/2025 05:11 PM -
Comment added
In the German localization there are some more untranslated strings in the new modified meeting module...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 04/07/2025 04:18 PM -
Comment added
Note/Update: Still happening for some meetings, although the next iteration of the Sirius weekly got created automatical...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 04/07/2025 02:36 PM - Assignee set to Parimal Satyal
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 04/07/2025 12:26 PM - Description changed (Details)
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 04/07/2025 11:01 AM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Oliver Günther)
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/07/2025 11:00 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 04/07/2025 07:31 AM -
Comment added
If we close them, would it make sense to also add an agenda item explaining the migration to all of these meetings?
-
Comment added
04/06/2025
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/06/2025 08:50 PM - Comment added
04/04/2025
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 04/04/2025 03:51 PM -
Comment added
Hi team,
Yes, I think we can close migrated meetings.
It makes sense that they are not editable by default. (And the st...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Samantha Machon on 04/04/2025 01:30 PM -
Comment added
+1 from on-premises customer
- Votes changed from 65 to 67
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 04/04/2025 09:15 AM -
Comment added
The status of a classic meeting could be "agenda closed" which would mean note taking is in progress. There is no third ...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 04/04/2025 09:14 AM -
Comment added
Can we not match the current status? Classic meetings also have an agenda closed/agenda open state, yeah?
-
Comment added
-
created by
Oliver Günther on 04/04/2025 08:36 AM -
Comment added
Do we want to set the status of migrated classic meetings to closed, if they are in the past? Or do we postpone this unt...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 04/04/2025 08:08 AM - Status changed from in specification to in development
- Assignee changed from Parimal Satyal to Oliver Günther
Also available in: Atom