Content
View differences
Updated by Parimal Satyal over 1 year ago
**As** a project member
**I want to** know when a time-sensitive relation is an indirect one (via a parent)
**so that** I can better understand how these indirect relations might affect the scheduling of my work package
**Acceptance criteria**
* In the Relations tab in the work package split screen and on the 'Predecessor' and 'Sucessor' tabs in the date picker:
* When a work package has a predecessor or successor relationship via its parent (and thus not a direct relationship),
* Mark these relations with an "Indirect" label similar to "Closest"
* It's possible for a relationship to be both closest and indirect
* Because this can add additional length to the line with dates and lag:
* Reduce font size from `Body/Medium` to `Body/Small`
* These relations also do not have a More icon, since editing or removing them is not possible (these have to be done via the parent)
**Technical notes**
* _\[open\] Are there other ways a relationship can be indirect apart from through a parent?_
**Permissions and visibility considerations**
* We follow existing rules on visiblity; if a user does not have the necessary permissions to view details of a related work package, we will display a 'ghost' relation as described in ##58427
**Out of scope**
* Indirect relations shown in a separate block; this would add additional visual complexity and we do not see the need for this at the moment
**I want to** know when a time-sensitive relation is an indirect one (via a parent)
**so that** I can better understand how these indirect relations might affect the scheduling of my work package
**Acceptance criteria**
* In the Relations tab in the work package split screen and on the 'Predecessor' and 'Sucessor' tabs in the date picker:
* When a work package has a predecessor or successor relationship via its parent (and thus not a direct relationship),
* Mark these relations with an "Indirect" label similar to "Closest"
* It's possible for a relationship to be both closest and indirect
* Because this can add additional length to the line with dates and lag:
* Reduce font size from `Body/Medium` to `Body/Small`
* These relations also do not have a More icon, since editing or removing them is not possible (these have to be done via the parent)
* _\[open\] Are there other ways a relationship can be indirect apart from through a parent?_
**Permissions and visibility considerations**
* We follow existing rules on visiblity; if a user does not have the necessary permissions to view details of a related work package, we will display a 'ghost' relation as described in ##58427
**Out of scope**
* Indirect relations shown in a separate block; this would add additional visual complexity and we do not see the need for this at the moment