Content
View differences
Updated by Parimal Satyal almost 2 years ago
**As a** project manager
**I want to** enter lag to follow/precedes relations
**so that** this is included in the scheduling of work packages.
**Acceptance criteria**
* The lag is shown in the relations tab for follow-preceds relations.
* The default is 0 days (unset).
* Users with the permissions "manage relations" can edit the lag.
* The lag can also be negative.
<figure class="image op-uc-figure"><div class="op-uc-figure--content"><img class="op-uc-image" src="/api/v3/attachments/95368/content"></div><figcaption class="op-uc-figure--description">Example (MS Project):</figcaption></figure>
**Figma mockups**
[https://www.figma.com/design/HrWVktq0SsGI2dqqIKQ11M/Relations-tab?node-id=0-1](https://www.figma.com/design/HrWVktq0SsGI2dqqIKQ11M/Relations-tab?node-id=0-1)
**Anticipated UX issues**
* A user, especially one who is not familiar with the concept of lag, might not understand the concept. We might have to explain this better.
* In a Gantt view, when a user moves a work package into the future, certain other work packages might be pushed. Based on the lag set for those relations, some might move by keeping a certain distance (3 days in between), some might move with no distance (the next day) and some might move with negative distance (-2 days). How should the user understand this inconsistent behaviour, especially if she cannot see that lag has been set inside the work packages?
* How can we make lag more visible in the Gantt view itself? It would have to be in the lines connected the work packages, but we know that there are technical limitations to how much we can do here. https://www.figma.com/design/HrWVktq0SsGI2dqqIKQ11M/Relations-tab?node-id=0-1
**I want to** enter lag to follow/precedes relations
**so that** this is included in the scheduling of work packages.
**Acceptance criteria**
* The lag is shown in the relations tab for follow-preceds relations.
* The default is 0 days (unset).
* Users with the permissions "manage relations" can edit the lag.
* The lag can also be negative.
<figure class="image op-uc-figure"><div class="op-uc-figure--content"><img class="op-uc-image" src="/api/v3/attachments/95368/content"></div><figcaption class="op-uc-figure--description">Example (MS Project):</figcaption></figure>
**Figma mockups**
[https://www.figma.com/design/HrWVktq0SsGI2dqqIKQ11M/Relations-tab?node-id=0-1](https://www.figma.com/design/HrWVktq0SsGI2dqqIKQ11M/Relations-tab?node-id=0-1)
**Anticipated UX issues**
* A user, especially one who is not familiar with the concept of lag, might not understand the concept. We might have to explain this better.
* In a Gantt view, when a user moves a work package into the future, certain other work packages might be pushed. Based on the lag set for those relations, some might move by keeping a certain distance (3 days in between), some might move with no distance (the next day) and some might move with negative distance (-2 days). How should the user understand this inconsistent behaviour, especially if she cannot see that lag has been set inside the work packages?
* How can we make lag more visible in the Gantt view itself? It would have to be in the lines connected the work packages, but we know that there are technical limitations to how much we can do here.