Content
View differences
Updated by Christophe Bliard about 2 years ago
**As a** project manager that implements quality gates with status transitions
**I want to** derive the remaining work from the status I set for my projects
**So that** I can aggregate those values across a hierarchy.
The % Complete calculation mode is defined globally in instance settings. It can be either derived from work and remaining work, or from status as described in #40749.
This setting should be configurable at the project level instead.
#### Acceptance criteria
* There is a setting on project-level to change the mode.
* The global setting defines a default for each new project.
* When copying a project the setting is copied.
#### Migration
* The global setting is applied to all projects.
* NL: Open - why is that?
* CBL: as I see it, each project will have its own progress mode setting. None of them inherit from the global setting. In fact there will be no global setting anymore, there will be a default value for new projects.
* The global setting becomes the default setting for new projects.
**I want to** derive the remaining work from the status I set for my projects
**So that** I can aggregate those values across a hierarchy.
The % Complete calculation mode is defined globally in instance settings. It can be either derived from work and remaining work, or from status as described in #40749.
This setting should be configurable at the project level instead.
#### Acceptance criteria
* There is a setting on project-level to change the mode.
* The global setting defines a default for each new project.
* When copying a project the setting is copied.
#### Migration
* The global setting is applied to all projects.
* NL: Open - why is that?
* CBL: as I see it, each project will have its own progress mode setting. None of them inherit from the global setting. In fact there will be no global setting anymore, there will be a default value for new projects.
* The global setting becomes the default setting for new projects.