Content
View differences
Updated by Henriette Darge over 4 years ago
**As** a customer that uses the boards on a beamer for meetings
**I want to** display as much work package information as possible on a card
**so that** we do not have to open the detail view as often
**Acceptance criteria (TBD)**
* Offer an option to display the first 200 characters of the Card description
* Offer an option to preview attached images in card
* Offer an option to preview the time until end date on card
* Offer the possibility to change the date inline
* Offer an option option to preview todo/done subtasks in card
* Offer an option to preview the amount of attachements
* Offer an option to preview the amount of commnts
* Offer an option to get visual feedback on a nearing or crossing deadline
* Option to use coloured labels
Trello solves all of these points in a tight design pretty well IMO:
<figure class="image op-uc-figure" style="width:75%;"><div class="op-uc-figure--content"><img class="op-uc-image" src="/api/v3/attachments/24715/content"></div></figure>
As of right know the boards waste a lot of space on (for us) unnecessary information. For example, the work package type, ID and project name wastes way too much space. The design implies that the most important information is the type of work package or the ID, which is far from the reality in our case.
<figure class="image op-uc-figure" style="width:50%;"><div class="op-uc-figure--content"><img class="op-uc-image" src="/api/v3/attachments/24716/content"></div></figure>
**I want to** display as much work package information as possible on a card
**so that** we do not have to open the detail view as often
**Acceptance criteria (TBD)**
* Offer an option to display the first 200 characters of the Card description
* Offer an option to preview attached images in card
* Offer an option to preview the time until end date on card
* Offer the possibility to change the date inline
* Offer an option option to preview todo/done subtasks in card
* Offer an option to preview the amount of attachements
* Offer an option to preview the amount of commnts
* Offer an option to get visual feedback on a nearing or crossing deadline
* Option to use coloured labels
Trello solves all of these points in a tight design pretty well IMO:
<figure class="image op-uc-figure" style="width:75%;"><div class="op-uc-figure--content"><img class="op-uc-image" src="/api/v3/attachments/24715/content"></div></figure>
As of right know the boards waste a lot of space on (for us) unnecessary information. For example, the work package type, ID and project name wastes way too much space. The design implies that the most important information is the type of work package or the ID, which is far from the reality in our case.
<figure class="image op-uc-figure" style="width:50%;"><div class="op-uc-figure--content"><img class="op-uc-image" src="/api/v3/attachments/24716/content"></div></figure>