Content
View differences
Updated by Eric Schubert about 1 year ago
**As** a user
**I want to** be informed and have clarity about the current implementation and status of the "Automatic subjects"
**so that** I am not surprised why the subjects contain "N/A" "NA" or some attributes are not available
**Acceptance criteria**
* ~~An An information box is placed underneath the "Automatic subjects"~~ subjects"
* ~~Information include~~ Information include
* ~~Some Some attribute types are not yet supported and thus cannot be selected (e.g., multi-select attributes).~~ attributes).
* ~~If If you reference an attribute that’s not activated in a project using subject patterns, the subject will display **NA** (not available) instead of the actual value.~~ value.
* ~~The The when you reference parent attributes but no parent is set on the work package the subject will show **NA** for this attribute~~
attribute
**Technical notes**
* The input caption contains a link to a section of the documentation describing "supported attributes". <br>
**Permissions and visibility considerations**
* _To admins_
* The documentation describes the needed information:
Note: Only admins have access to this page.
**Translation considerations**
* If you reference an attribute (custom field) that’s not activated _Key terms and phrases in a project using subject patterns, the subject will display **N/A** (not available) instead key languages_
**Out of the actual value.
scope**
* The when you reference parent attributes but no parent is set on the work package the subject will show **N/A** for this attribute. <br>
**I want to** be informed and have clarity about the current implementation and status of the "Automatic subjects"
**so that** I am not surprised why the subjects contain "N/A"
**Acceptance criteria**
* ~~An
* ~~Information include~~
* ~~Some
* ~~If
* ~~The
**Technical notes**
**Permissions and visibility considerations**
* _To admins_
* The documentation describes the needed information:
**Translation considerations**
**Out