Content
Activity
12/19/2025
-
updated by
Jan Sandbrink on 12/19/2025 02:35 PM -
Comment added
As written in a DM today,
right now I'd suggest that we do two things:
List no resources under resources/list, because...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Jan Sandbrink on 12/19/2025 02:27 PM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Jan Sandbrink)
-
updated by
GitHub on 12/19/2025 10:28 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 12/19/2025 09:15 AM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#21451 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Jan Sandbrink on 12/19/2025 08:46 AM -
Comment added
Skipping QA, because there is no change that's testable by QA.
Most of the changes performed for this maintenance improv...
- Status changed from needs review to closed
- % Complete set to 100%
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 12/19/2025 08:46 AM - Comment added
12/18/2025
-
updated by
GitHub on 12/18/2025 04:07 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 12/18/2025 08:32 AM - Comment added
12/17/2025
-
updated by
GitHub on 12/17/2025 04:15 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#21404 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 12/17/2025 03:31 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 12/17/2025 12:45 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#21381 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 12/17/2025 12:45 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#21381 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 12/17/2025 12:25 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 12/17/2025 12:25 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Jan Sandbrink on 12/17/2025 10:42 AM - Status changed from needs review to closed
- % Complete set to 100%
-
updated by
Jan Sandbrink on 12/17/2025 10:42 AM - Status changed from needs review to closed
- % Complete set to 100%
-
updated by
Jan Sandbrink on 12/17/2025 08:34 AM -
Comment added
New learning: The description was only added to the MCP specification with version 2025-11-25, previous versions didn't ...
- Description changed (Details)
- Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Jan Sandbrink)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Jan Sandbrink on 12/17/2025 08:13 AM -
Comment added
Dominic Bräunlein I adapted this according to the current implementation and also identified that the Ruby SDK does not ...
- Description changed (Details)
- Status changed from specified to in development
- Assignee set to Jan Sandbrink
- Developers set to Jan Sandbrink
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Dominic Bräunlein on 12/17/2025 08:13 AM - Developers set to Jan Sandbrink
- Designer set to Parimal Satyal
-
updated by
Jan Sandbrink on 12/17/2025 08:12 AM -
Comment added
That's good. Then let's have a look with the team, I believe we might be done.
Though this will not be verifyable by QA,...
- Status changed from specified to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Dominic Bräunlein) - Developers set to Jan Sandbrink
-
Comment added
-
created by
Dominic Bräunlein on 12/17/2025 08:04 AM -
Comment added
Hi Marc Alcobé we would like to have an enterprise banner for MCP.
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Dominic Bräunlein on 12/17/2025 08:02 AM - Status changed from in specification to specified
-
updated by
Dominic Bräunlein on 12/17/2025 08:02 AM -
Comment added
Jan Sandbrink Can you update the Acceptance criteria in case something changed during implementation.
- Status changed from in specification to specified
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Dominic Bräunlein on 12/17/2025 07:58 AM -
Comment added
Jan Sandbrink Here is one clarification missing:
> Resources can also be accessed by name (needs clarification)
Can w...
- Status changed from in specification to specified
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Dominic Bräunlein on 12/17/2025 07:55 AM -
Comment added
Jan Sandbrink from product perspective, the feature is specified.
- Status changed from in specification to specified
-
Comment added
-
created by
Jan Sandbrink on 12/17/2025 07:51 AM -
updated by
Jan Sandbrink on 12/17/2025 07:50 AM -
Comment added
Dominic Bräunlein since this feature is still in specification: I am not yet quite sure whether it's done or not. There ...
- Assignee set to Dominic Bräunlein
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 12/17/2025 07:38 AM - Comment added
12/16/2025
-
updated by
GitHub on 12/16/2025 12:14 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 12/16/2025 12:06 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 12/16/2025 09:37 AM - Comment added
-
created by
Jan Sandbrink on 12/16/2025 09:36 AM -
updated by
Jan Sandbrink on 12/16/2025 09:20 AM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Jan Sandbrink)
-
updated by
GitHub on 12/16/2025 07:45 AM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#21359 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 12/16/2025 07:45 AM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#21322 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 12/16/2025 07:45 AM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#21310 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
12/15/2025
-
updated by
GitHub on 12/15/2025 03:25 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 12/15/2025 01:18 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Jan Sandbrink on 12/15/2025 09:50 AM -
Comment added
Skipping QA, as this would not add additional value over dev review (only implementing technical requirements).
- Status changed from merged to closed
- % Complete set to 100%
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Jan Sandbrink on 12/15/2025 09:49 AM -
Comment added
Skipping QA, as this would not add additional value over dev review (only implementing technical requirements).
FYI Céci...
- Status changed from needs review to closed
- % Complete set to 100%
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 12/15/2025 09:43 AM - Comment added
Also available in: Atom