Content
Activity
12/22/2025
-
created by
Niels Lindenthal on 12/22/2025 12:41 PM -
updated by
Niels Lindenthal on 12/22/2025 08:07 AM -
Comment added
Hi Jens Ulferts,
this has been this way forever.
But we can change it of course.
OK, let's change it.
How about addi...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Niels Lindenthal on 12/22/2025 07:33 AM -
Comment added
Hi Jens Ulferts,
For simplicity sake, I suggest removing the "Project" part from "Project status" throughout the applic...
- Subject changed from „Status“ instead of „Project status“ in Status widget on overview to Inconsistent label for „Status“ and „Project status“
- Description changed (Details)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Niels Lindenthal on 12/22/2025 07:31 AM -
Comment added
I extracted project status from this work package SPPM-281.
- Description changed (Details)
- Requires doc change changed from No to Yes
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 12/22/2025 01:16 AM -
Comment added
Updated automatically by changing values within child work package SPPM-281
- Scheduling mode set to Automatic
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 12/22/2025 01:16 AM -
Comment added
Hi Niels Lindenthal ,
we didn't yet get around to rename within the application because of the unclear requirements rega...
- Parent set to Rename "Projects" throughout the application
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 12/22/2025 01:04 AM -
Comment added
Hi Niels Lindenthal ,
this has been this way forever.
But we can change it of course. How about adding a toggle to the ...
-
Comment added
12/20/2025
-
created by
Niels Lindenthal on 12/20/2025 11:30 AM -
Comment added
Hi Jens Ulferts,
Can you please have a look at this?
Many thanks
Niels
-
Comment added
12/19/2025
-
updated by
Ivan Kuchin on 12/19/2025 10:11 PM - Status changed from needs review to review approved
- Assignee deleted (
Ivan Kuchin)
-
created by
Niels Lindenthal on 12/19/2025 04:57 PM -
Comment added
Hi Jens Ulferts,
Not sure if bug or missing feature. On the „Portfolio overview“ it is called „Project status“. I think ...
-
Comment added
12/17/2025
-
updated by
Ivan Kuchin on 12/17/2025 02:06 PM - Assignee set to Ivan Kuchin
12/16/2025
-
updated by
GitHub on 12/16/2025 07:45 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#21326 deployed to qa.openproject-stage.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 12/16/2025 07:45 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#21326 deployed to qa.openproject-stage.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Ivan Kuchin on 12/16/2025 07:05 PM - Status changed from review failed to merged
-
updated by
GitHub on 12/16/2025 07:05 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 12/16/2025 07:05 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Ivana Šugić on 12/16/2025 01:50 PM -
Comment added
Fixed ✅
Tested on:
Core build
f6e72fc0d767c347d2d559b1e7cd718fe78bf746
Product version
1b47b61c8eee63888e430b92be29a03d...
- Status changed from merged to closed
- % Complete set to 100%
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Ivana Šugić on 12/16/2025 01:20 PM -
Comment added
Fixed ✅
Tested on:
Core build
f6e72fc0d767c347d2d559b1e7cd718fe78bf746
Product version
1b47b61c8eee63888e430b92be29a03d...
- Status changed from merged to closed
- % Complete set to 100%
-
Comment added
-
created by
Ivana Šugić on 12/16/2025 12:08 PM -
updated by
Ivana Šugić on 12/16/2025 12:00 PM -
Comment added
Works as expected ✅
Found issues are linked as relations.
Tested on:
Core build
f6e72fc0d767c347d2d559b1e7cd718fe78bf74...
- Status changed from merged to tested
- % Complete changed from 0% to 100%
- Remaining work changed from 10d 0h to 0h
- Total remaining work changed from 10d 0h to 0h
- Total % complete changed from 0% to 100%
-
Comment added
Also available in: Atom