Content
Activity
04/01/2025
-
updated by
Ivan Kuchin on 04/01/2025 08:45 PM -
Comment added
I assume at least first implementation should be on backend.
Why «to be on the non working day»? Shouldn't it be on ...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/01/2025 08:15 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Ivan Kuchin on 04/01/2025 07:26 PM - Description changed (Details)
-
created by
Jens Ulferts on 04/01/2025 05:28 PM -
updated by
GitHub on 04/01/2025 05:06 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/01/2025 05:06 PM - Comment added
-
created by
Jens Ulferts on 04/01/2025 04:57 PM -
created by
Jens Ulferts on 04/01/2025 04:55 PM -
created by
Jens Ulferts on 04/01/2025 04:49 PM -
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 04/01/2025 04:49 PM - Status changed from specified to in development
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/01/2025 04:33 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/01/2025 04:33 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/01/2025 04:33 PM - Comment added
03/31/2025
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/31/2025 05:47 PM - Comment added
-
Bug SPPM-159: Version from the shared work package not available in Version filter on global wp pageupdated by
Jens Ulferts on 03/31/2025 10:03 AM - Developers set to OP Dev Polaris Team
-
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 03/31/2025 09:56 AM - Description changed (Details)
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/31/2025 09:52 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 03/31/2025 09:51 AM -
Comment added
Setting to "in development" again as the AC changed slightly (name changes) and the code for meeting the specification i...
- Status changed from merged to in development
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 03/31/2025 09:49 AM -
Comment added
Setting to "in development" again as the AC changed and the code for meeting them is currently being developed.
- Status changed from merged to in development
-
Comment added
03/28/2025
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/28/2025 08:20 PM - Comment added
-
Bug SPPM-159: Version from the shared work package not available in Version filter on global wp pagecreated by
Ivana Šugić on 03/28/2025 04:08 PM -
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 03/28/2025 04:05 PM -
Comment added
Hi Marc Alcobé , Ivan Kuchin ,
I would exclude journaling the phase definitions for now which would be required to disp...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Ivana Šugić on 03/28/2025 04:01 PM -
Comment added
This issue has been fixed ✅
Tested on:
Core build
94fba092629a0281e3564a075b3aac78ead16666
Product version
4b55c8485559...
- Status changed from merged to closed
- % Complete set to 100%
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Ivan Kuchin on 03/28/2025 03:51 PM -
Comment added
With current structure it will be a bit more involved, so while I think it will be less confusing, but will require more...
-
Comment added
-
created by
Jens Ulferts on 03/28/2025 03:45 PM -
updated by
GitHub on 03/28/2025 03:45 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18440 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 03/28/2025 03:41 PM -
Comment added
Updated automatically by changing values within child work package SPPM-157
- Description changed (Details)
- Scheduling mode set to Automatic
-
Comment added
-
created by
Jens Ulferts on 03/28/2025 03:41 PM -
updated by
Marc Alcobé on 03/28/2025 03:40 PM -
Comment added
Hi Ivan Kuchin,
I see. Then we would need to journalise also somehow name changes and gate activations:
Phase name cha...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Ivan Kuchin on 03/28/2025 03:26 PM -
Comment added
Marc Alcobé wrote:
* Don't really understand this question what do you mean with “if definition changes”?
I create ...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 03/28/2025 03:16 PM - Status changed from needs review to merged
- Assignee deleted (
Jens Ulferts)
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/28/2025 03:16 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 03/28/2025 03:16 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Marc Alcobé on 03/28/2025 12:30 PM -
Comment added
Hi Ivan Kuchin,
I try to respond to each point:
Activity will change if definition changes, may it be too confusing?
...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Ivan Kuchin on 03/28/2025 12:20 PM -
Comment added
Marc Alcobé Few questions/notes:
Activity will change if definition changes, may it be too confusing?
Is it fine tha...
-
Comment added
03/27/2025
-
updated by
Ivan Kuchin on 03/27/2025 07:33 PM - Description changed (Details)
-
updated by
Ivan Kuchin on 03/27/2025 04:36 PM - Description changed (Details)
-
updated by
Marc Alcobé on 03/27/2025 04:03 PM - Description changed (Details)
-
updated by
Marc Alcobé on 03/27/2025 03:56 PM - Description changed (Details)
-
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 03/27/2025 01:56 PM - Assignee set to Jens Ulferts
03/26/2025
-
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 03/26/2025 05:14 PM - Status changed from in specification to specified
-
updated by
Marc Alcobé on 03/26/2025 05:14 PM -
Comment added
Hi Jens Ulferts,
I've created this mockups that should specify a bit better the way how deal with phase gates: https://w...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Marc Alcobé on 03/26/2025 05:13 PM -
Comment added
Hi Jens Ulferts,
Agree. It is specified for me also.
Best,
Marc
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 03/26/2025 10:31 AM -
Comment added
Hi Marc Alcobé ,
this one also has open questions. It mostly circles around the question of how to display gates (with t...
- Description changed (Details)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 03/26/2025 09:57 AM -
Comment added
Hi Marc Alcobé , Niels Lindenthal ,
from what I have seen, you Marc now used the term "Project phase" throughout your re...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 03/26/2025 09:26 AM -
Comment added
Hi Marc Alcobé,
What about the decision of having phase gates as part of the phase definition itself?
since I haven't ...
- Description changed (Details)
-
Comment added
Also available in: Atom