Content
Activity
07/07/2025
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 07/07/2025 06:34 PM -
Comment added
Hi Jan Sandbrink,
We could go with:
Created on
Expires on
This works as long as we're not every using relative tim...
- Description changed (Details)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Jan Sandbrink on 07/07/2025 04:52 PM -
Comment added
Parimal Satyal We should probably align here. It's weird to me that both columns show a date, but one of them is ending ...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Marc Alcobé on 07/07/2025 03:50 PM -
Comment added
Hi Christoph Zierz,
Yes, thanks a lot for the quick support on this one. Jan Sandbrink, I've updated the mockups regardi...
-
Comment added
-
created by
Cécile Guiot on 07/07/2025 03:23 PM -
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 07/07/2025 03:19 PM -
Comment added
Setting this to test failed because most of the ACs are buggy, bugs are filed separately and added as relations to this ...
- Status changed from merged to test failed
- Assignee set to Jan Sandbrink
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 07/07/2025 03:17 PM -
Comment added
All AC have been verified, issues found were filed separately and added as relations to this ticket.
Marking as tested ✅...
- Status changed from in test to tested
- Assignee deleted (
Cécile Guiot) - % Complete set to 100%
-
Comment added
-
created by
Cécile Guiot on 07/07/2025 02:51 PM -
updated by
Christoph Zierz on 07/07/2025 02:48 PM -
Comment added
Alexander Hermann is back from holiday and can start with the video tomorrow.
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Christoph Zierz on 07/07/2025 02:47 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Christoph Zierz on 07/07/2025 02:45 PM -
Comment added
Hey Marc Alcobé is this a placeholder you can work with?
-
Comment added
-
created by
Cécile Guiot on 07/07/2025 02:31 PM -
updated by
Jan Sandbrink on 07/07/2025 12:01 PM -
Comment added
4th of July, but you are right. I forgot to update the WP properly.
Thanks for fixing it.
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 07/07/2025 11:49 AM -
Comment added
This has already been merged on the 4th of June leading me to expect the status of the ticket to also be merged. Correct...
- Status changed from needs review to merged
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 07/07/2025 10:45 AM - Status changed from merged to in test
- Assignee set to Cécile Guiot
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 07/07/2025 10:45 AM - Status changed from merged to in test
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 07/07/2025 10:45 AM - Status changed from merged to in test
- Assignee set to Cécile Guiot
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 07/07/2025 10:45 AM - Status changed from merged to in test
- Assignee set to Cécile Guiot
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 07/07/2025 10:45 AM - Status changed from merged to in test
- Assignee changed from Pavel Balashou to Cécile Guiot
-
updated by
Jan Sandbrink on 07/07/2025 10:11 AM - Status changed from in development to closed
- Assignee deleted (
Jan Sandbrink) - % Complete set to 100%
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 07/07/2025 09:22 AM - Status changed from on hold to merged
-
created by
Jan Sandbrink on 07/07/2025 08:13 AM
07/04/2025
-
updated by
GitHub on 07/04/2025 05:15 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#19413 deployed to qa.openproject-stage.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Pavel Balashou on 07/04/2025 04:49 PM - Status changed from needs review to merged
- Assignee deleted (
Pavel Balashou)
-
updated by
GitHub on 07/04/2025 04:49 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 07/04/2025 01:45 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#19395 deployed to qa.openproject-stage.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 07/04/2025 01:15 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#19009 deployed to qa.openproject-stage.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 07/04/2025 01:15 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18447 deployed to qa.openproject-stage.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 07/04/2025 01:05 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Pavel Balashou on 07/04/2025 11:20 AM - Status changed from confirmed to needs review
- Developers set to Pavel Balashou
-
updated by
Jan Sandbrink on 07/04/2025 11:01 AM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Jan Sandbrink)
-
updated by
GitHub on 07/04/2025 10:56 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
Pavel Balashou on 07/04/2025 10:48 AM - Subject changed from ScimClient access token dialog renders wrong value to ScimClient access token and client credentials dialogs render wrong value
- Description changed (Details)
-
updated by
Pavel Balashou on 07/04/2025 10:47 AM - Status changed from specified to closed
- Version changed from 16.3.0 to 16.2.0
- % Complete set to 100%
-
updated by
Pavel Balashou on 07/04/2025 10:46 AM -
Comment added
Jens Ulferts this one has been already implemented.
- Status changed from specified to closed
- Version changed from 16.3.0 to 16.2.0
- % Complete set to 100%
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 07/04/2025 09:52 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
Jan Sandbrink on 07/04/2025 09:36 AM -
Comment added
Automatisch durch die Änderungen in Unteraufgabe SI-185 aktualisiert
- Scheduling mode set to Automatic
-
Comment added
-
created by
Jan Sandbrink on 07/04/2025 09:36 AM -
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 07/04/2025 09:36 AM - Version changed from 16.2.0 to 16.3.0
-
updated by
Jens Ulferts on 07/04/2025 09:36 AM - Version changed from 16.2.0 to 16.3.0
-
created by
Pavel Balashou on 07/04/2025 09:14 AM -
updated by
Pavel Balashou on 07/04/2025 09:12 AM - Status changed from specified to closed
- % Complete set to 100%
-
updated by
Pavel Balashou on 07/04/2025 09:12 AM - Status changed from specified to closed
- % Complete set to 100%
-
updated by
Pavel Balashou on 07/04/2025 09:12 AM - Status changed from specified to closed
- % Complete set to 100%
-
updated by
Pavel Balashou on 07/04/2025 09:12 AM - Status changed from needs review to merged
-
updated by
GitHub on 07/04/2025 09:11 AM - Comment added
07/03/2025
-
updated by
Pavel Balashou on 07/03/2025 01:55 PM - Status changed from in development to merged
-
updated by
Dominic Bräunlein on 07/03/2025 08:21 AM - Priority changed from Medium to Low
07/02/2025
-
updated by
Marc Alcobé on 07/02/2025 04:05 PM -
Comment added
Hi Jan Sandbrink,
I think you meant that the large one can't handle images. Okay, let's use the medium one until we have...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Jan Sandbrink on 07/02/2025 03:56 PM -
Comment added
Marc Alcobé FYI: The large component is not able to handle videos images, it was not built to do that and I checked the ...
- Status changed from in specification to in development
- Assignee changed from Christoph Zierz to Jan Sandbrink
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 07/02/2025 03:53 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Marc Alcobé on 07/02/2025 03:49 PM -
Comment added
Hi Christoph Zierz,
Perfect! Thanks a lot for the flexibility.
Jan Sandbrink, we will use an illustration on the first ...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 07/02/2025 03:41 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Christoph Zierz on 07/02/2025 03:40 PM -
Comment added
Hey Marc Alcobé,
Alex is on holiday this week so a video is not possible. But I can deliver placeholder illustration for...
- Assignee changed from Alexander Hermann to Christoph Zierz
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 07/02/2025 03:38 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Pavel Balashou on 07/02/2025 03:34 PM -
Comment added
Dominic Bräunlein it was merged to the other dev branch. I will set it to merge as soon as the other one is merged.
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Marc Alcobé on 07/02/2025 03:28 PM -
Comment added
Hi Alexander Hermann and Christoph Zierz,
Unfortunately, on a very last minute we realised that this feature is Enterpri...
- Description changed (Details)
- Assignee set to Alexander Hermann
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Jan Sandbrink on 07/02/2025 03:14 PM -
Comment added
Thank you Marc Alcobé for prefilling the description. I added one more question to the wireframe that will also affect t...
- Description changed (Details)
- Status changed from new to in specification
- Version set to 16.2.0
- Accountable set to Jan Sandbrink
- Module set to API / SCIM
- Designer set to Marc Alcobé
- Enterprise plan set to Enterprise / Corporate
- Mockups set to https://www.figma.com/design/0QQJXMwi6bZPu9T1XVfHci/Enterprise?node-id=2991-20029&t=zMLuwQGhYMBowv1K-4
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Dominic Bräunlein on 07/02/2025 03:11 PM -
Comment added
Pavel Balashou I see this merged, is the status up to date?
- Developers set to Pavel Balashou
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Marc Alcobé on 07/02/2025 03:01 PM - Description changed (Details)
-
updated by
Dominic Bräunlein on 07/02/2025 02:55 PM - Developers set to Pavel Balashou
-
updated by
Dominic Bräunlein on 07/02/2025 02:54 PM - Developers set to Jan Sandbrink
-
updated by
Jan Sandbrink on 07/02/2025 01:34 PM -
Comment added
Let me quickly redirect discussions regarding enterprise banners here: https://community.openproject.org/wp/65339
-
Comment added
-
created by
Jan Sandbrink on 07/02/2025 01:33 PM -
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 07/02/2025 11:23 AM -
Comment added
Hey Dominic Bräunlein,
Added an idea for an animation in the Figma (as a comment). Could you review that and the text fo...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 07/02/2025 08:45 AM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#19206 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Jan Sandbrink on 07/02/2025 08:17 AM -
Comment added
Dominic Bräunlein I'd even remove the AC about the expiration time that mentions one year, and btw. I think this story s...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Jan Sandbrink on 07/02/2025 08:03 AM - Status changed from review approved to merged
-
updated by
GitHub on 07/02/2025 08:03 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
Dominic Bräunlein on 07/02/2025 07:44 AM -
Comment added
Jan Sandbrink Originally I saw a need for admins to specify the expiration time for the token - in the UI and the theref...
- Description changed (Details)
-
Comment added
07/01/2025
-
updated by
Pavel Balashou on 07/01/2025 10:44 PM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Pavel Balashou)
-
updated by
GitHub on 07/01/2025 10:44 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Dominic Bräunlein on 07/01/2025 05:20 PM -
Comment added
Hi Parimal Satyal, we need an Enterprise banner for the SCIM feature, or does Marc Alcobé organise these?
//cc Jan Sand...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Jan Sandbrink on 07/01/2025 01:45 PM - Description changed (Details)
-
updated by
Pavel Balashou on 07/01/2025 01:43 PM - Type changed from Feature to Documentation
- Subject changed from Allow admin ServiceAccount to delete users. to Setting.users_deletable_by_admins is required for user deletion through SCIM Server API
- Description changed (Details)
- Status changed from in specification to specified
- Parent set to Add SCIM server functionality to OpenProject via SCIM API
- Requires doc change deleted (
No)
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 07/01/2025 01:43 PM -
Comment added
Working as expected ✅
Tested on:
Core build
fc26246e8a6e0e6154d27859947e60a32ad3d86b
Product version
5e530faf89dffc9de76...
- Status changed from in test to tested
- Assignee deleted (
Cécile Guiot) - % Complete set to 100%
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Pavel Balashou on 07/01/2025 01:28 PM - Status changed from in review to review approved
- Assignee deleted (
Pavel Balashou)
-
created by
Pavel Balashou on 07/01/2025 11:36 AM -
updated by
GitHub on 07/01/2025 10:44 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 07/01/2025 10:44 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
Pavel Balashou on 07/01/2025 10:05 AM - Status changed from needs review to in review
- Assignee changed from Jan Sandbrink to Pavel Balashou
-
updated by
Dominic Bräunlein on 07/01/2025 08:46 AM - Subject changed from Add proper authentication to SCIM server API to Add authentication to SCIM server API
Also available in: Atom