Content
Activity
08/20/2025
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 08/20/2025 07:46 PM -
Comment added
Hi Mir Bhatia,
The ones for changes look good to me! I like the 'Old' label and the strikethrough on the old and the new...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 08/20/2025 05:37 PM -
Comment added
Do these work Parimal Satyal Oliver Günther?
No location -> location added:
Location changed to link:
Location remo...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 08/20/2025 04:41 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 08/20/2025 03:45 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#19891 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 08/20/2025 03:17 PM - Status changed from review approved to merged
-
updated by
GitHub on 08/20/2025 03:17 PM - Comment added
-
created by
Klaus Zanders on 08/20/2025 01:53 PM -
updated by
Lucas Knechtel on 08/20/2025 01:47 PM -
Comment added
+1 from interested user
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Gábor Alexovics on 08/20/2025 10:05 AM -
Comment added
Thanks for the response. MEET-255 looks like what I was thinking about as long as multiple WPs can be created.
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Klaus Zanders on 08/20/2025 08:39 AM - Status changed from needs review to review approved
- Assignee deleted (
Klaus Zanders)
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 08/20/2025 08:34 AM -
Comment added
There are two feature requests. This one is about converting an agenda item into a work package. As a result , the agend...
- Votes changed from 6 to 8
-
Comment added
08/19/2025
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 08/19/2025 08:58 PM - Description changed (Details)
- Status changed from in specification to specified
- Version set to Product Backlog
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 08/19/2025 05:48 PM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee changed from Mir Bhatia to Klaus Zanders
-
updated by
GitHub on 08/19/2025 02:15 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#19936 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Klaus Zanders on 08/19/2025 01:40 PM - Description changed (Details)
- Status changed from review approved to merged
-
updated by
GitHub on 08/19/2025 01:40 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 08/19/2025 01:35 PM - Status changed from in review to review approved
- Assignee deleted (
Oliver Günther)
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 08/19/2025 12:17 PM - Status changed from review failed to in development
- Assignee set to Mir Bhatia
-
updated by
Klaus Zanders on 08/19/2025 12:03 PM - Status changed from in review to review failed
- Assignee deleted (
Klaus Zanders)
-
updated by
GitHub on 08/19/2025 10:15 AM - Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 08/19/2025 09:34 AM - Status changed from needs review to in review
- Assignee set to Oliver Günther
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 08/19/2025 09:32 AM - Status changed from specified to in development
- Developers changed from OP Dev Sirius Team to Mir Bhatia
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 08/19/2025 09:30 AM - Status changed from needs review to in review
- Assignee changed from Oliver Günther to Klaus Zanders
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 08/19/2025 09:29 AM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee changed from Mir Bhatia to Oliver Günther
-
updated by
Klaus Zanders on 08/19/2025 09:26 AM -
Comment added
I think that could be done by spawaning the job with meeting id & journal version and then when the mail gets send o...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 08/19/2025 06:40 AM -
Comment added
If we generate the mail at the time when it is sent and not when it is generated, wouldn't that solve everything in her...
-
Comment added
08/18/2025
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 08/18/2025 05:59 PM -
Comment added
Yeah, what Klaus said will solve the problem of incorrect updates being sent, but we will need to pull from the meeting ...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Klaus Zanders on 08/18/2025 04:55 PM -
Comment added
If we generate the mail at the time when it is sent and not when it is generated, wouldn't that solve everything in here...
-
Comment added
-
created by
Oliver Günther on 08/18/2025 04:15 PM -
Comment added
Mir Bhatia Parimal Satyal Klaus Zanders What we didn't consider when talking about debouncing is that right now we're pa...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 08/18/2025 02:45 PM - Assignee changed from Parimal Satyal to Mir Bhatia
- Developers set to OP Dev Sirius Team
-
updated by
Klaus Zanders on 08/18/2025 02:27 PM - Status changed from review failed to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Klaus Zanders)
-
updated by
GitHub on 08/18/2025 02:15 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#19935 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 08/18/2025 01:39 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 08/18/2025 09:33 AM - Status changed from in review to review failed
- Assignee changed from Oliver Günther to Klaus Zanders
- Developers set to Klaus Zanders
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 08/18/2025 09:12 AM - Votes changed from 4 to 6
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 08/18/2025 07:55 AM - Status changed from needs review to in review
- Assignee set to Oliver Günther
08/17/2025
-
updated by
Niels Lindenthal on 08/17/2025 09:15 AM - Description changed (Details)
- Enterprise plan set to Community
08/16/2025
-
updated by
Tobias Nowakow on 08/16/2025 11:21 PM -
Comment added
+1
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Tobias Nowakow on 08/16/2025 11:21 PM -
Comment added
+1
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Tobias Nowakow on 08/16/2025 11:18 PM -
Comment added
+1
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Gábor Alexovics on 08/16/2025 04:05 PM -
Comment added
Based on the description, I think this not what they had in mind (after WP creation the agenda item is closed and conver...
-
Comment added
08/15/2025
-
updated by
Luka Bradesko on 08/15/2025 10:25 PM -
Comment added
+1 ( I think Oliver added my vote already). We often create multiple WPs from one agenda item. For example Employee 1 ne...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Klaus Zanders on 08/15/2025 02:06 PM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Klaus Zanders) - Version changed from Product Backlog to 16.4.0
-
updated by
GitHub on 08/15/2025 02:05 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 08/15/2025 02:00 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 08/15/2025 01:44 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 08/15/2025 01:42 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Klaus Zanders on 08/15/2025 01:39 PM - Comment added
08/14/2025
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 08/14/2025 03:38 PM -
Comment added
Hi Klaus Zanders,
Your current implementation looks very good! The design is consistent with token creation elsewhere. I...
- Description changed (Details)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 08/14/2025 11:39 AM - Description changed (Details)
- Votes changed from 2 to 4
Also available in: Atom