Content
Activity
04/28/2025
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/28/2025 10:15 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18318 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/28/2025 10:15 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18318 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/28/2025 10:15 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18318 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/28/2025 10:15 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18318 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/28/2025 10:15 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18318 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/28/2025 10:15 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18318 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 04/28/2025 09:33 PM - Status changed from review approved to merged
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/28/2025 09:32 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/28/2025 09:32 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/28/2025 09:32 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/28/2025 09:32 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/28/2025 09:32 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 04/28/2025 09:28 PM - Parent deleted (
Meeting backlogs)
- Parent deleted (
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 04/28/2025 08:45 PM - Description changed (Details)
- Status changed from needs review to review approved
- Assignee deleted (
Oliver Günther)
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 04/28/2025 08:45 PM - Description deleted (Details)
- Status changed from in development to merged
- Assignee deleted (
Parimal Satyal)
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/28/2025 08:45 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18752 deployed to qa.openproject-edge.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 04/28/2025 08:43 PM -
Comment added
I feel like the behavior of the add modal is weird with backlog. I select an upcoming meeting occurrence, it gets added ...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 04/28/2025 08:24 PM - Status changed from review approved to merged
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/28/2025 08:24 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 04/28/2025 07:50 PM - Status changed from in development to closed
- Assignee deleted (
Mir Bhatia) - % Complete set to 100%
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 04/28/2025 07:50 PM - Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee changed from Mir Bhatia to Oliver Günther
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/28/2025 07:48 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/28/2025 07:47 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/28/2025 07:47 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/28/2025 07:47 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/28/2025 07:47 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/28/2025 07:47 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 04/28/2025 07:24 PM -
Comment added
Hi Andrej Sandorf,
I've updated the Figma mockups and the specifications as we discussed.
I've tried to simplify the des...
- Description changed (Details)
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 04/28/2025 06:40 PM -
Comment added
Hi Parimal Satyal Oliver Günther,
I noticed while adding in the backlogs that the initial blankslate is not a drop locat...
- Description changed (Details)
- Status changed from new to needs clarification
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 04/28/2025 06:39 PM - Status changed from new to specified
- Assignee set to Mir Bhatia
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 04/28/2025 06:33 PM -
Comment added
Hi Parimal Satyal Oliver Günther,
What should the expected behaviour be here? I suppose it's possible to hide all occurr...
- Subject changed from Work package meetings tab autocompleter doesn't work corectly with backlogs to Work package meetings tab autocompleter doesn't work correctly with backlogs
- Description changed (Details)
- Status changed from new to needs clarification
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 04/28/2025 06:27 PM -
Comment added
Hi Parimal Satyal Oliver Günther,
When exactly should and shouldn't the meeting updated flash be triggered for actions r...
- Description changed (Details)
- Status changed from new to needs clarification
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/28/2025 06:26 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/28/2025 06:26 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/28/2025 06:26 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/28/2025 06:26 PM - Comment added
-
created by
Mir Bhatia on 04/28/2025 06:23 PM -
created by
Mir Bhatia on 04/28/2025 06:22 PM -
created by
Mir Bhatia on 04/28/2025 06:21 PM -
created by
Mir Bhatia on 04/28/2025 06:20 PM -
updated by
Klaus Zanders on 04/28/2025 04:40 PM - Status changed from needs review to review approved
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 04/28/2025 02:43 PM - Priority changed from Medium to High
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 04/28/2025 02:42 PM - Version changed from Product Backlog to 16.0.0
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 04/28/2025 02:42 PM - Version changed from Product Backlog to 16.0.0
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 04/28/2025 02:41 PM - Priority changed from Medium to High
- Version changed from 16.1.0 to Product Backlog
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 04/28/2025 02:39 PM - Version changed from 16.1.0 to Wish List
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 04/28/2025 02:38 PM - Priority changed from Medium to High
- Version set to 16.1.0
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 04/28/2025 02:29 PM - Subject changed from Permissions to change meeting status not consistent to Consistent permissions for meetings modules
- Status changed from in development to needs review
- Assignee deleted (
Oliver Günther)
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/28/2025 02:29 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/28/2025 01:56 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 04/28/2025 01:46 PM - Description changed (Details)
- Status changed from specified to in development
- Assignee set to Oliver Günther
- Developers changed from OP Dev Sirius Team to Oliver Günther
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 04/28/2025 01:23 PM - Version changed from 16.0.0 to Product Backlog
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 04/28/2025 10:45 AM - Votes changed from 3 to 5
-
updated by
Gábor Alexovics on 04/28/2025 10:35 AM -
Comment added
+1
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 04/28/2025 09:01 AM -
Comment added
I would have expected that we only need a rule for future executions, not for past executions
This is correct, we neve...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 04/28/2025 08:53 AM - Subject changed from Meetings: addign non-user participants (no need for placeholders) to Meetings: Adding non-user participants (no need for placeholders)
-
updated by
Gábor Alexovics on 04/28/2025 08:20 AM -
Comment added
Hi, Oliver!
Thanks for the info.
Gábor
-
Comment added
04/25/2025
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 04/25/2025 04:25 PM -
Comment added
Hi everyone, I remember mentioning it would be nice to be able to schedule meetings in the past during testing but putti...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Jan Sandbrink on 04/25/2025 04:00 PM -
Comment added
I just realize that this means another use case is currently not supported I guess: One-time rescheduling.
If my meeting...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Jan Sandbrink on 04/25/2025 03:59 PM -
Comment added
After you wrote this I went back and checked my meeting where this happened. And indeed: All past occurences of this mee...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 04/25/2025 03:46 PM -
Comment added
The problem here is, we need a consistent RRULE for all meeting occurrences. So when you change the schedule, we need to...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Jan Sandbrink on 04/25/2025 03:45 PM -
Comment added
Comment from Oliver Günther on a work package where I started the discussion:
It's actually expected behavior, although...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 04/25/2025 03:43 PM - Status changed from new to needs clarification
-
updated by
Jan Sandbrink on 04/25/2025 03:43 PM -
Comment added
Oliver Günther I just extracted this into MEET-320, because I realize that this part of my error description is a separa...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 04/25/2025 03:42 PM -
Comment added
Then I realized that doing this moved the currently running meeting to that date as well (I guess this is a separate bu...
-
Comment added
-
created by
Jan Sandbrink on 04/25/2025 03:41 PM -
updated by
Jan Sandbrink on 04/25/2025 03:35 PM -
Comment added
We had an interesting and very related case today. I'll add it to the comments, but feel free to tell me that this is an...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 04/25/2025 03:21 PM -
Comment added
Hi team,
Good idea! Thanks for writing the feature Jan Sandbrink (and by extension Cécile Guiot).
The risk I could thin...
- Description changed (Details)
- Status changed from in specification to specified
- Module set to Modules and project features / Meetings
- Designer set to Parimal Satyal
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/25/2025 02:15 PM -
Comment added
opf/openproject#18735 deployed to qa.openproject-stage.com
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 04/25/2025 01:36 PM -
Comment added
Setting to closed, as repro steps unclear. The PR improved error handling in case the meeting is not set.
- Status changed from in development to closed
- % Complete set to 100%
-
Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/25/2025 01:35 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/25/2025 01:17 PM - Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 04/25/2025 01:17 PM - Status changed from needs clarification to in development
- Assignee set to Oliver Günther
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 04/25/2025 10:32 AM - Version set to 16.0.0
- Module set to Modules and project features / Meetings
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 04/25/2025 10:30 AM - Requires doc change changed from No to Yes
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 04/25/2025 10:30 AM - Requires doc change changed from No to Yes
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 04/25/2025 10:05 AM -
Comment added
Working as expected ✅
Tested on:
Core build
97a0f6130e46bb70d0c1312ee1a164ffdb16934c
Product version
4c0a4dabe77cbcff4c6...
- Status changed from in test to tested
- Assignee deleted (
Cécile Guiot) - % Complete set to 100%
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Cécile Guiot on 04/25/2025 10:04 AM -
Comment added
Parimal Satyal makes sense, thanks for explaining your thought process.
I'm now able to approve this AC, thanks to a cer...
-
Comment added
04/24/2025
-
updated by
Andrej Sandorf on 04/24/2025 01:07 PM - Type changed from Implementation to Open Point
- Requires doc change deleted (
No)
-
updated by
Andrej Sandorf on 04/24/2025 01:07 PM - Type changed from Implementation to Open Point
- Requires doc change deleted (
No)
-
updated by
Andrej Sandorf on 04/24/2025 01:07 PM - Type changed from Implementation to Open Point
- Requires doc change deleted (
No)
-
updated by
Andrej Sandorf on 04/24/2025 12:15 PM - File My_Meeting_2025-04-1720250424-95709-3vun3t.pdf added as attachment
04/23/2025
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 04/23/2025 06:34 PM -
Comment added
Hi Cécile Guiot,
The logic is to make those old meetings read-only (since the format they were written in is no longer a...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 04/23/2025 06:31 PM -
Comment added
I wasn't aware you could add work packages to a template, but I see the logic of it. Yes, I agree with the expected beha...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 04/23/2025 06:04 PM -
Comment added
Hi Andrej Sandorf,
Thanks for the update!
I've come up with some mockups for this feature. Not all of it might be render...
- Mockups set to https://www.figma.com/design/cJDhzOmYMstUNRS3EmgqZ0/Meetings-Module?node-id=4313-6931
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Andrej Sandorf on 04/23/2025 04:36 PM - Subject changed from PDF export of meeting agenda and/or meeting minutes to PDF export of meetings
-
updated by
GitHub on 04/23/2025 04:36 PM - Comment added
-
created by
Andrej Sandorf on 04/23/2025 10:27 AM -
created by
Andrej Sandorf on 04/23/2025 10:19 AM -
created by
Andrej Sandorf on 04/23/2025 10:19 AM -
created by
Andrej Sandorf on 04/23/2025 10:18 AM -
created by
Andrej Sandorf on 04/23/2025 10:17 AM -
updated by
Andrej Sandorf on 04/23/2025 10:16 AM -
Comment added
Updated automatically by changing values within child work package MEET-314
- Scheduling mode set to Automatic
-
Comment added
-
created by
Andrej Sandorf on 04/23/2025 10:16 AM
04/22/2025
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 04/22/2025 08:22 PM -
Comment added
Good catch. The counter should indeed not include items from templated meetings 👍
- Description changed (Details)
-
Comment added
-
created by
Mir Bhatia on 04/22/2025 06:00 PM -
Comment added
Hi Parimal Satyal,
I noticed this while working on the backlogs, but it exists for templates currently as well. What do ...
-
Comment added
-
created by
Oliver Günther on 04/22/2025 02:29 PM -
updated by
Parimal Satyal on 04/22/2025 02:21 PM - Description changed (Details)
-
updated by
Andrej Sandorf on 04/22/2025 12:45 PM -
Comment added
Hi Parimal Satyal, I've started working on this last week. I will be busy implementing the basic export functionality fo...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Robert Situm on 04/22/2025 12:12 PM -
Comment added
+1
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Mir Bhatia on 04/22/2025 10:32 AM - Votes changed from 2 to 3
-
created by
Parimal Satyal on 04/22/2025 09:33 AM -
Comment added
Hi Oliver Günther,
This is the bug I briefly mentioned this morning. This might require some further digging to confirm ...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 04/22/2025 07:21 AM -
Comment added
Hi Gábor, thanks for your request. This already exists in , I merged your requirements into the other feature and will c...
-
Comment added
-
updated by
Oliver Günther on 04/22/2025 07:20 AM - Description changed (Details)
Also available in: Atom