12/08/2025

• Bug BE-64: Work package search input of other user visible
  updated by Judith Roth on 12/08/2025 09:31 PM
  • Comment added

    I've got a working prototype (!) in the branch bug/69706-work-package-search-input-of-other-user-visible. I can continue...

• Bug BE-64: Work package search input of other user visible
  updated by Judith Roth on 12/08/2025 01:53 PM
  • Status changed from confirmed to in development
  • Assignee set to Judith Roth
  • Developers set to Judith Roth
• Bug BE-64: Work package search input of other user visible
  updated by Judith Roth on 12/08/2025 10:16 AM
  • The changes were retracted.
• Bug BE-64: Work package search input of other user visible
  updated by Judith Roth on 12/08/2025 10:05 AM
  • The changes were retracted.
• Bug BE-64: Work package search input of other user visible
  updated by Judith Roth on 12/08/2025 09:55 AM
  • The changes were retracted.
• Bug BE-59: Work package macro in documents: certain statuses are invisible on white background
  updated by Ivana Šugić on 12/08/2025 09:35 AM
  • Comment added

    Fixed. Closing this one.

  • Status changed from confirmed to closed
  • % Complete set to 100%
• Bug BE-25: BlockNote: Work package macro loses its styling upon save and also loses its functionality on edit
  updated by Ivana Šugić on 12/08/2025 09:25 AM
  • Comment added

    Fixed. Closing this one.

  • Status changed from confirmed to closed
  • % Complete set to 100%
• Bug BE-26: BlockNote: On the Work package macro the status is invisible on black background
  updated by Ivana Šugić on 12/08/2025 09:23 AM
  • Comment added

    Fixed. Closing this one.

  • Status changed from confirmed to closed
  • % Complete set to 100%
• Bug BE-64: Work package search input of other user visible
  updated by Wieland Lindenthal on 12/08/2025 08:56 AM
  • Project changed from Stream Communicator to BlockNote Extensions
  • Status changed from new to confirmed

12/03/2025

• Code maintenance BE-63: Improve code quality and avoid memory leaks in op-blocknote-extensions
  updated by GitHub ⁤ on 12/03/2025 03:15 PM
  • Comment added

    opf/openproject#21293 deployed to qa.openproject-stage.com

• Bug BE-54: It should not be possible to type in our custom BlockNote blocks
  updated by GitHub ⁤ on 12/03/2025 02:45 PM
  • Comment added

    opf/openproject#21316 deployed to qa.openproject-stage.com

• Code maintenance BE-63: Improve code quality and avoid memory leaks in op-blocknote-extensions
  updated by GitHub ⁤ on 12/03/2025 02:31 PM
  • Comment added

• Bug BE-54: It should not be possible to type in our custom BlockNote blocks
  updated by Judith Roth on 12/03/2025 02:30 PM
  • Status changed from review approved to merged
• Bug BE-54: It should not be possible to type in our custom BlockNote blocks
  updated by GitHub ⁤ on 12/03/2025 02:25 PM
  • Comment added

• Bug BE-54: It should not be possible to type in our custom BlockNote blocks
  updated by Judith Roth on 12/03/2025 10:25 AM
  • Version set to 17.0.0
• Bug BE-54: It should not be possible to type in our custom BlockNote blocks
  updated by GitHub ⁤ on 12/03/2025 10:24 AM
  • Comment added

• Bug BE-54: It should not be possible to type in our custom BlockNote blocks
  updated by GitHub ⁤ on 12/03/2025 10:01 AM
  • Comment added

• Bug BE-54: It should not be possible to type in our custom BlockNote blocks
  updated by Kabiru Mwenja on 12/03/2025 06:45 AM
  • Status changed from in review to review approved
  • Assignee deleted (Kabiru Mwenja)

12/02/2025

• Bug BE-54: It should not be possible to type in our custom BlockNote blocks
  updated by GitHub ⁤ on 12/02/2025 01:51 PM
  • Comment added

• Bug BE-54: It should not be possible to type in our custom BlockNote blocks
  updated by Kabiru Mwenja on 12/02/2025 11:10 AM
  • Status changed from needs review to in review
  • Assignee set to Kabiru Mwenja
• Code maintenance BE-63: Improve code quality and avoid memory leaks in op-blocknote-extensions
  updated by GitHub ⁤ on 12/02/2025 08:17 AM
  • Comment added