Content
Updated by Robin Wagner almost 9 years ago
I’m seeing two problems with time tracking.
First, in a work package when you click on Spent time the field does not activate so you can’t actually enter any time spent. As such, it’s unclear if you can keep a running log of time, or just need to update that single field as you work on a task. Either way, tracking right now is impossible as the field does not work.
Second, in the time tracking module (Time sheet) when you click on Log time to enter new activity, the first field is supposed to be linked to a work package. Unlike other places in the software however, when you start typing it does not pop up a list of matching packages to then choose from. As such, you can’t actually link this to the work, which is a problem. Either this field needs to be renamed to something more generic like subject or title because it’s not actually linking to work packages, or it needs to actually require a link to a work package as expected for tracking and consistency of naming. If the case is the former, I would suggest that it still pop up a list of other “titles” previously logged so again naming can be consistent and not just a random pile of additions.
First, in a work package when you click on Spent time the field does not activate so you can’t actually enter any time spent. As such, it’s unclear if you can keep a running log of time, or just need to update that single field as you work on a task. Either way, tracking right now is impossible as the field does not work.
Second, in the time tracking module (Time sheet) when you click on Log time to enter new activity, the first field is supposed to be linked to a work package. Unlike other places in the software however, when you start typing it does not pop up a list of matching packages to then choose from. As such, you can’t actually link this to the work, which is a problem. Either this field needs to be renamed to something more generic like subject or title because it’s not actually linking to work packages, or it needs to actually require a link to a work package as expected for tracking and consistency of naming. If the case is the former, I would suggest that it still pop up a list of other “titles” previously logged so again naming can be consistent and not just a random pile of additions.