**As** a project member
**I want to** know when a work package has been added to or discussed in a meeting
**so that** I have all the context about that work package

**Context**

Currently, when a work package is discussed in a meeting, the relevant meeting notes are visible under the Meetings tab. However, users will not know to look there since there is no indication of it in the Activity stream. The only indication is a number next to the Meetings tab, which is often not visible because it's hidden behind a horizontal scroll. 

This feature aims to make meeting activity around a work package more transparent and visible.

**Acceptance criteria**

Add journal entries to the work package tab when the current work package

* is added, removed, moved to discussed in a meeting:

* When a work package is added to a meeting

* _"Added Begin of the deletion thisEnd of the deletion to meeting {Meeting name} - {date}"_

* When a work package is removed from a meeting

* _"Removed Begin of the deletion thisEnd of the deletion from meeting {Meeting name} - {date}"_

* When a work package is moved to another occurrence

* _"Moved Begin of the deletion thisEnd of the deletion to meeting {Meeting name} - {date}"_

* When Begin of the deletion a note or an outcome toEnd of the deletion the work package Begin of the deletion agenda itemEnd of the deletion is Begin of the insertioncreated or linked to a meeting outcome:End of the insertion Begin of the deletion added/modified:End of the deletion

* Begin of the insertion_"Added as outcomeEnd of the insertion Begin of the deletion _"This was discussedEnd of the deletion in {Meeting name} - {date}"._

* is added to a meeting template:

* same as the first three cases above, but replace "_{Meeting name} - {date}_" with "template for meeting {Meeting name}"


**Technical notes**

* Can we render this is a cause, not an actual journal diff?


**Permissions and Visibility considerations**

* These changes will only appear to users who have both access to the work package _and_ the meeting

* \[open\] What should we do when the user _does_ have access to the work package but _not_ the meeting? Do we simply not show any updates, or do we show ghost meetings as we do with ghost relations? (See ##58427)


**Out of scope**

* \[note\] Showing a diff of the notes/text

* _Perhaps this can also be included?_

* Adding more specific journal entries for these cases:

* "{User} added the following {note} in meeting {Meeting name} {Meeting date}: {agenda item note}"

* "{User} modified the following {note} in meeting {Meeting name} {Meeting date}: {modified agenda item note}"

* "{User} added the following {outcome type} in meeting {Meeting name} {Meeting date}: {outcome note}"

* "{User} modified the following {outcome type} in meeting {Meeting name} {Meeting date}: {outcome note}"

* _\[Open\] Perhaps we don't need to show a preview of the note or decision in the Activity stream, but instead point to an anchor that directs users to the relevant item in the Meetings tab of the split screen?_