Content
View differences
Updated by Niels Lindenthal 2 days ago
Currently project managers create a work package of type \("Risk"\) ("Risk") with custom fields\. fields. This allows flexible configuration, but prevents us from doing better analysis and aggregation of risks\. risks.
Effective risk management is a core component of both the PM² methodology \(developed (developed by the European Commission\) Commission) and the PMflex PMFlex framework \(a (a customizable, flexible project management approach\)\. approach). Both emphasize the need to:
- * Identify, assess, and document project risks
-
* Evaluate likelihood and impact
-
* Define and apply risk controls and treatment strategies
-
* Track the residual risk after mitigation efforts
-
* Maintain transparency and accountability through a structured workflow and status lifecycle
The purpose of this Epic is to design and implement a Risk Management module that aligns with these principles, enabling project teams to effectively manage risks throughout the project lifecycle\. lifecycle.
Key objectives:
- * Support for risk assessment via impact and likelihood
-
* Modeling of initial and residual risk levels
-
* A notion of ongoing treatments and actions of a risk that impacts its residual risk value
-
* Visualization support \(e\.g\. (e.g. risk matrix, heat map, stacked graphs\)
- graphs)
* A basic workflow of risks
-
* Auditing and reporting
This will allow organizations to standardize risk management across projects and ensure compliance with internal or external frameworks\.
frameworks.
Effective risk management is a core component of both the PM² methodology \(developed
-
-
*
-
*
-
*
-
*
Key objectives:
-
-
*
-
*
-
*
-
*
-
*