Content
View differences
Updated by Oleksii Borysenko 3 months ago
<p class="op-uc-p"><a href="#statement" aria-hidden="true" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="op-uc-link_permalink icon-link op-uc-link"></a></p>Statement: ##### Statement:
Current authorisation flow works work on mobile for both platforms\. platforms. No urgent actions required\.
required.
Howewer, we use <p class="op-uc-p"><a href="https://pub.dev/packages/flutter_appauth" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_top" class="op-uc-link">flutter_appauth</a></p> [flutter\_appauth](https://pub.dev/packages/flutter_appauth) library that has limitations\. limitations.
<p class="op-uc-p"><a href="#issues" aria-hidden="true" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="op-uc-link_permalink icon-link op-uc-link"></a></p>Issues: ##### Issues:
There are several issues that need to be fixed:
\- The problem with switching instances <mention class="mention" data-id="61069" data-type="work_package" data-text="###61069">###61069</mention>
\- not able to fine tune the behaviour \(i\.e\. (i.e. delete cookies, handle redirect, OIDC\)
OIDC)
\- This library only supports iOs and Android\. Android. for other platforms we should use a different one
\- For the sake of code maintainability we should exclude auth flow into a separate package \(it (it is not directly related to the library we use, but good to be be done during the refactoring\) refactoring)
<p class="op-uc-p"><a href="#decision" aria-hidden="true" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="op-uc-link_permalink icon-link op-uc-link"></a></p>Decision: ##### Decision:
Not yet made, but my suggestion is to allocate time for that within 0\.3\.x sprints\.
0.3.x sprints.
Current authorisation flow works
<p class="op-uc-p"><a href="#issues" aria-hidden="true" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="op-uc-link_permalink icon-link op-uc-link"></a></p>Issues:
There are several issues that need to be fixed:
<p class="op-uc-p"><a href="#decision" aria-hidden="true" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="op-uc-link_permalink icon-link op-uc-link"></a></p>Decision:
Not yet made, but my suggestion is to allocate time for that within 0\.3\.x sprints\.