We need to decide on the markdown representation of the new rich-link work package blocks. 

We want to do better than the previous implementation in CKEditor did. And we also probably should embed some information about the Block itself ([at least the ID](https://www.blocknotejs.org/docs/foundations/document-structure#blocks)) to be able to identify the Block later when (if) we ever try to update the YDoc from Markdown.

The markdown representation should also reflect the visual Begin of the insertionrepresentation, at leastEnd of the insertion Begin of the deletion representation. So far we defined [different visual representations](https://www.figma.com/design/d3zhm0R0pjHJvQd3XTlxuS/New-Documents-module?node-id=1367-40371&t=Iid5MIPMj4Y8qAPa-0) (which needed different space and offer different amounts of information). Based onEnd of the deletion the Begin of the insertionlevelEnd of the insertion Begin of the deletion setting chosen there, the markdown representation should probably also offer the same amountEnd of the deletion of Begin of the insertioninformation that is included (type, status, etc).End of the insertion Begin of the deletion information. (Caveat: for 17.0 we will probably implement only one representation).End of the deletion

With Begin of the insertion**CKEditor**,End of the insertion Begin of the deletion CKEditor,End of the deletion the markdown representation for a work package link looks like this:

`<mention class="mention" data-id="39" data-type="work_package" data-text="#39">#39</mention>`
`<mention class="mention" data-id="39" data-type="work_package" data-text="##39">##39</mention>`
`<mention class="mention" data-id="39" data-type="work_package" data-text="###39">###39</mention>`

The Begin of the insertion**current implementation**End of the insertion Begin of the deletion current implementationEnd of the deletion for the rich-link work package extension produces this markdown:
`[#39 - Work Package Title](/api/v3/work_packages/39)`

Begin of the insertionWhich does neither include the type nor the status (which are included in the **visual representation from the designs** - for inline, only title, id and type, for block we show title, id, type and status):End of the insertion Begin of the deletion <br>End of the deletion

Begin of the insertion<img class="op-uc-image op-uc-image_inline" src="/api/v3/attachments/860562/content">

**Proposal**
End of the insertion I propose something in between - to still stay backwards compatible with external applications but also include the new information and have a nicer looking (rendered) markdown:

`<mention Begin of the insertionclass="mention" data-id="38"End of the insertion Begin of the deletion data-id="39"End of the deletion data-type="work_package" Begin of the insertiondata-block-id="123">[TYPE #38 (Status) WorkEnd of the insertion Begin of the deletion data-block-id="123">[WorkEnd of the deletion Package Begin of the insertionTitle](_/api/v3/work_packages/39_)</mention>`
e.g.
`<mention class="mention" data-id="38" data-type="work_package" data-block-id="123">[FEATURE #38 (In development) Add dark theme support](_/api/v3/work_packages/39_)</mention>`

Which will probably look like this (depending on the markdown viewer):

<img class="op-uc-image op-uc-image_inline" src="/api/v3/attachments/860570/content">

I also attempted a 2-line block notation like in the visual representation, but it turned out to not look good with surrounding text.End of the insertion Begin of the deletion Title (TYPE) #39](/api/v3/work_packages/39)</mention>`End of the deletion