Content
View differences
Updated by Parimal Satyal about 1 year ago
**As** an administrator
**I want to** see multiple results in the storage health status,
**so that** warnings can be displayed, even when other things succeeded.
**Acceptance criteria**
* ~~Group results of the storage health check in a "useful" manner and show aggregated results for each group~~
* ~~"usefulness" is left for the implementor to decide~~
* ~~a balance between~~ _~~too much information~~_ ~~and only showing a single result shall be found~~
* ~~The current check for automatically managed project folders should be shown like one of the many steps~~
* ~~if an immediate re-check on button-press is not possible, instead display a hint that the check is pending and when it will refresh~~
* Every storage can run a health report to validate connections from the sidebar.
* The summary is displayed in the sidebar.
* Format: "{Message}. Last check: {date-time}"
* Example: "All connections and systems are working as expected. Last check: 28.03.2025 6:40 PM."
* The admin must be able to open the report in detail on a new page.
* There is a "Open full report" link at the end of the 'Health status' section.
* The report displays all run checks:
* They are grouped into three sections:
* Base configuration
* Authentication
* Automatically-managed folders
* Each section has its own short summary, one of three options:
* All checked passed (green checkmark, scheme: success)
* {n} checks failed (red warning icon, scheme: danger)
grouped.
* {n} checks returned a warning (orange warning icon, scheme: attention)
* For each sub item in each category:
* There is a text to the right of each item. It can have three options:
* Passed (green: success)
* Warning (orange: attention)
* Failed (red: danger)
* Skipped (orange: attention)
* If there is a warning or an error:
* A label displays either the error code (scheme: danger) or warning code (scheme: attention)
* There is a "More information" link on the right side which opens the relevant documentaiton page with all error codes and warnings
* If there is an error, subsequent sections will be skipped
* If there are failures or warnings in a report, the summary will show only the most severe information.
* if there are failures (errors), failures, do not display any warning details.
* if there are warnings, do not display any failure (skips) details.
* if there are no warnings and no failures, a success message is displayed.
* this summary logic is applied for the summary in storage side bar, for the report summary (at the top of the full health rpoert) and each group summary
**I want to** see multiple results in the storage health status,
**so that** warnings can be displayed, even when other things succeeded.
**Acceptance criteria**
*
* ~~"usefulness" is left for the implementor to decide~~
* ~~a balance between~~ _~~too much information~~_ ~~and only showing a single result shall be found~~
* ~~The current check for automatically managed project folders should be shown like one of the many steps~~
* ~~if an immediate re-check on button-press is not possible, instead display a hint that the check is pending and when it will refresh~~
*
* The summary is displayed in the sidebar.
* Example: "All connections and systems are working as expected. Last check: 28.03.2025 6:40 PM."
* The admin must be able to open the report in detail on a new page.
* The report displays all run checks:
* They are grouped into three sections:
* Base configuration
* Authentication
* Automatically-managed folders
* Each section has its own short summary, one of three options:
* All checked passed (green checkmark, scheme: success)
* {n} checks failed (red warning icon, scheme: danger)
* For each sub item in each category:
* There is a text to the right of each item. It can have three options:
* Passed (green: success)
* Warning (orange: attention)
* Failed (red: danger)
* Skipped (orange: attention)
* If there is a warning or an error:
* A label displays either the error code (scheme: danger) or warning code (scheme: attention)
* There is a "More information" link on the right side which opens the relevant documentaiton page with all error codes and warnings
* If there is an error, subsequent sections will be skipped
* If there are failures or warnings in a report, the summary will show only the most severe information.
* if there are failures (errors),
* if there are warnings, do not display any failure (skips) details.
* if there are no warnings and no failures, a success message is displayed.
* this summary logic is applied for the summary in storage side bar, for the report summary (at the top of the full health rpoert) and each group summary