# Feature AA-82 - Expose work package relations via MCP

Project: Stream Agents & Assistants
Status: closed
URL: https://community.openproject.org/work_packages/AA-82

## Planning

| Attribute | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Date |  |
| Priority | Medium |
| Target versions | 17.8.0 |
| List |  |
| Roadmap |  |
| Relevance |  |

## OPEN POINTS / FEEDBACK

_No work packages_

## Features and Chunks

_No work packages_

## Bugs and other work packages

_No work packages_

## Technical Details

| Attribute | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Module | Artificial Intelligence / MCP Server (MCP) |
| Feature Flag |  |
| Requires doc change | No |
| Enterprise plan | Enterprise / Professional (PRO) |

## Details

| Attribute | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Pull preview |  |
| Mockups |  |

## People

| Attribute | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Assignee |  |
| Accountable |  |
| Product manager |  |
| Developers | Jan Sandbrink |
| Designer |  |
| Ordered by |  |
| Signed off by |  |
| Interest by |  |

## Estimates and progress

| Attribute | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Work |  |
| Labor costs |  |

## Description

**As** a user of LLMs,  
**I want to** expose information about work package relations via MCP,  
**so that** those relations can be taken into account, for example during scheduling via MCP.

**Acceptance criteria**

*   Expose work package relations via MCP tools or resources
    
*   The information exposed is enough to understand how the rescheduling of one work package could affect the scheduling of another work package (e.g. in precedes/follows relations)
    

**Background**

During some practical tests, it was noticed that updating a work package&#x27;s start or due date is easily possible, but it can have unintended consequences other work package&#x27;s dates. Exposing relations should either prevent this or at least ease the trouble shooting that follows.
